Privacy Policy

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Pet Canards - Part - 2



There are frequent surveys in the news media about the best schools and colleges. They rank the schools and declare some school as the best overall. What does it mean? That the particular school produces the most brilliant students and performers? That all the students from that school are Einsteins? And all the teachers at the school are the greatest in the world? I’m sure nobody takes these surveys to mean that. Or does the country with the biggest economy mean the most happiness? Lately there are surveys to rate the happiness quotient of countries. Some country topping the list surely doesn’t mean everyone is happy out there but it’s a general indicator from the samples taken. Our Fiberals who conduct such surveys do not like applying the same wisdom or theory to other areas. We shall see.

A few days back Yogi Adityanath was under the hammer again; this time in “Aap ki Adalat” by Rajat Sharma on IndiaTV. It’s fascinating how one man has rattled the media and they are unable to come to terms with the blunt truths he is dispensing. The Yogi is now headed to being tarred like Modi once was – Mass murderer, Hate-monger, Communal hater, Fascist, Bigot, Racist... Got any more names? Anyway, let’s watch some excerpts from near the end of the show (4.25 mins. Full video on Youtube):   

Wow! So when these morons have to confront the Yogi they are reminded of MKGandhi, Buddha and Mahavir. I wonder why these idiots never go to terrorists and teach them about turning the other cheek. Imagine, a man points a knife or a gun at you or is about to rape your mother, sister, wife or daughter and our Fiberals ask you to turn the other cheek. MK Gandhi has been put on such a pedestal that some of his serious mistakes are being white-washed by these scumbags. MKG wanted Hindus to suffer the Moplah rapes and murders. He wanted to support the Caliphate movement to appease Muslims (The ISIS is working on those dreams now). He wanted Jews to surrender to death peacefully. Most of all, MKG also wanted India shouldn’t have an Army, Navy or Airforce. Do these idiots want India to listen to MKG and dispense with our Army? When convenient, these criminal media crooks will pick up some quotes from Gandhi and throw at you without the whole truth. Did MKG prevent all the communal riots in his time? Why is it that MKG is not responsible for a faulty partition that has left India with the menace of communal riots when the partition itself was based on religion? The deceivers won’t have any answers.

As if all that wasn’t enough, the judge on the show is none other than Congress pimp Vinod Sharma. This guy is one sick man who shouldn’t be in the media or TV at all. He lectures the Yogi on virtues of peaceful living and how a nation cannot be run on “hate” and so on. One pet canard that Fiberals like to spread is that MKGandhi would have been non-violent no matter what. This is sheer nonsense. Here is what I tweeted in October 2011 to his degenerate great grand-son who scavenges in the name of Gandhi:

Was I wrong? It would cost me nothing to be wrong. But I doubt I am wrong. Here’s a CNN-IBN report reproducing some background on why MKG wasn’t considered for a Nobel:

"But Partition seems to have played a spoiler this time. The Nobel Committee report said: "The following 10 years, from 1937 up to 1947, led to the event which for Gandhi and his movement was at the same time the greatest victory and the worst defeat – India's independence and India's Partition… "Then he added: "...sharp turns in his policies, which can hardly be satisfactorily explained by his followers. (...) He is a freedom fighter and a dictator, an idealist and a nationalist. He is frequently a Christ, but then, suddenly, an ordinary politician."… “No one wanted war, but he could never advise anyone to put up with injustice. If all Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind. If there was war, the Hindus in Pakistan could not be fifth columnists. If their loyalty lay not with Pakistan, they should leave it. Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union."

If all the Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind? Do our Fiberal idiots agree with MK Gandhi on this? Do these morons agree that there can even be a JUST CAUSE for all Hindus to be annihilated? Where do such statements come from? In the same breath MKG said "Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union." Want to implement that quote of Gandhi too? Long before I made my tweet above, here is what a Nobel committee member said:

Gandhi had many critics in the international peace movement. The Nobel Committee adviser referred to these critics in maintaining that he was not consistently pacifist, that he should have known that some of his non-violent campaigns towards the British would degenerate into violence and terror. This was something that had happened during the first Non-Cooperation Campaign in 1920-1921, e.g. when a crowd in Chauri Chaura, the United Provinces, attacked a police station, killed many of the policemen and then set fire to the police station”.

I don’t care if MKG was worth a Nobel. He was a great man anyway with all his faults. But our Fiberals misuse “Gandhi” to make the most nonsensical points to Hindus. If Mahatma Gandhi were alive he would have wanted to shut them up and most of their illegitimate practices. And if Buddhists are largely a peaceful community, are they going to be spared? Here’s what jokers like Rajat Sharma are too blind to see:

How is Indonesia bothered by Burma (or Myanmar). Even if there are problems in Myanmar with the Buddhists and Muslims why should Indonesians want to kill them? Oh wait! All Indonesians aren’t like that, are they? So if I point to Azad Maidan, they’ll say all Muslims aren’t like that. If I point to London and the crowd wanting to kill Salman Rushdie, they’ll say all British Muslims aren’t like that. Who the hell said “all are like that”? But the “sample” you consistently provide on all parameters across the world does get your community that tag. It is not wishful thinking by others. That’s how a college gets voted the best or a country gets voted the happiest. Let’s get back to where we left off in Part-1. Here’s a woman in red, a typical brain-washed Fiberal, who dishes out this same stupid logic. Tommy Robinson of EDL keeps asking how he’s a racist so she explains (0.36 mins):

Okay! So the bimbo says Robinson picked up a “tiny minority” from a whole community of hundreds of thousands (The sidekick interjects and says “billions”) and tarred all of them so that is “racist”. How lovely! This is the same stupid argument you hear all over India and all over the world. Your brother goes around killing people but if I ask you to put a leash on him you get back with “Don’t tar my family else you are racist”. Did Robinson say all Muslims or all British Muslims are thugs? I doubt it but you can see how the bimbos and liars hide behind such spurious logic. And if at all a “tiny minority” of your community is committing crimes then who is responsible for controlling them? Only the police? Not their families, not their community leaders or mosques that these people are members of?

In another event of the Heritage Foundation over the killing of the American Ambassador in Benghazi a similar incident happened. A Muslim argues that all Muslims cannot be tarred with the brush of terrorism. Actually, nobody even tarred any Muslim or talked about Muslims in that meeting. But she got a severe answer from a panellist, Bridget Gabriel. Watch the video (5.49 minutes):

The majority of the community just watch. The silent majority stays silent which is why the nonsense goes on. This is true for Hindus too. Because a majority of Hindus cannot see the nonsense of “Sickular” politicians and media they endure the abuse and atrocities on them. This is starting to change with many people speaking up (people like the Yogi) and that is bothering the criminal media folks immensely. It threatens their corrupt life and discourse. Following that response by Bridget Gabriel, some in the US media predictably called it a rant and hounding of the sole Muslim girl in that event. When the girl claims she’s the only representative there she is actually applauded by the audience and not taunted as some US media reports claimed. But here’s some damaging revelation: That girl, Saba Ahmed, turned out to be connected to a violent Jihadi.

Now what? Now you read the full report and it makes chilling reading. There is no getting away from the truth about all this anymore. These are pet canards media and politicians like to hurl at everyone who speaks the truth. Those who speak up will not be challenged with facts and logic but sentimental claptrap and name-calling. We are not done yet. In the aftermath of the expose of 1400 rapes in Rotherham there are some more chilling facts. Take a look at this:

It is something similar that the Yogi too argues. That the moment Muslim population starts rising in an area there is a disproportionate rise in communal riots. How does one explain 4% of British Muslims committing 91% of child rapes? Even if you provide for abundant discounts I doubt the picture can change dramatically. Will the bimbo in red who ranted against Tommy Robinson explain this? Would that moron called Saira Khan (in purple) explain this? Robinson and his EDL were formed with rival football club fans in Luton. I have been to Luton a long time ago. It is a sleepy town near London where one would have never imagined violent protests or Jihadi activities. Even if some of them were or are “football hooligans” why should that negate the arguments on a different issue? Well, that’s the Fiberal way of life. But wait, the shock is not over yet. Let’s watch this related video on this 4% Muslim population and crimes (4.32 mins):

When an advisory was sent to the Mosques to condemn the rapes 75% of them refused to read out the message or condemn the crimes. Should we interpret this as approval by the Mullahs of those who carried out the 1400 rapes over 16 years? Why not? Would that red bimbo and her types answer why? The bogus argument that a “majority” of a community are innocent is a misleading canard used to cover up crimes. Have we seen Mullahs in India condemning crimes and terrorism by Muslims? Are the idiots seriously suggesting that we should respond or speak only when all 1.2 Billion Muslims become violent? No society will exist if the entire population of a community became criminal. India wouldn’t exist if 800 million Hindus decided to become criminals and pursue a career in crime. This is another pet canard that our Fiberals use to dodge the real issue of consistent crimes from a community. 


50 comments:

  1. Ravinar - all your posts demonstrate honest, justified anger on wrongs around us. Your posts resonate millions (including myself) seething in anger but don't know how to express it. Besides bringing out hard truths my specific salutes for giving a picture for the suppressed anger of millions. Heartfelt Salutes

    ReplyDelete
  2. Those who talk of Gandhi being non violent have never read about the notorious Gandhi - Amanullah pact, which was essentially an invitation to Afghanistan to attack and "free" India from British rule. When asked what made him think the Afghans would then hand over power back to Indians, he had no proper answer. Such was the hypocrisy and moronery of the Mahatma, keeping Hindus disarmed and "non violent" while inviting Islamic invaders to "free" us with violence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have articulated well. But then what are hindus doing about it ??
    i went thru the aap ki adalat of yogi adityanath thru the above link. Whilst the fearless conviction of the yogi is appreciable - why the hell do indian hindu journalists corner/criticise such hindu leaders and not muslims on their duplicity ??
    i think it is because these journalists and media persons are cowards and shaping, promoting a cowardly mindset. Money is the primary incentive but it is also due to very weak intrinsic character . This is what happens when weak, cowards, mediocre beings achieve success and go on to legitimize poor standards - the entire public discourse becomes mediocre and yet celebrated.
    we as a nation and as hindus do not yet know what we are missing and how much we have frittered away ( and continue to fritter even now )

    ReplyDelete
  4. Indian journalists, for decades have been conditioned (Pavlov type) to think like the communist (Nehruvian way). They hate the display of anything related to nationalism/culture/religion. The good thing is that many younger journalists have started to think independently off-late.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Reminded of Buddha part - with my enlightenment atleast a few will understand. Great work , Keep Going , God Bless You Hope a few in MSM & Hindus get it .

    ReplyDelete
  6. All our "Secular" journalists like Rajdeep, Barkha, Sagarika, Ravish Kumar, Vinod Sharma etc. (who always want to spread love and sympathy towards every religion, especially ISLAM) should be sent to Iraq to spread the same. I believe with their sweet tongue they could eventually win the hearts of ISIS Terrorists and murderers of humanity.
    ISIS have brutally killed 2 of their own kind (Journalist Steven Sotloff, yesterday, and released the gruesome video too) just to spread the message of love and sympathy. Anyway they have not yet discussed, is ISLAM really a religion of peace ??? If yes why so much mayhem in the world by same religion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The problem with the "Majority is Peaceful" argument is that while this so called "majority" gets agitated when the crimes of the "minority" become a slur on the whole community, it does precious little to curb the criminal intent or takes to task its lumpen elements while there is still time.
    When you as a part of an identity group commit a crime and you and you alone do it, it is no one's case that your belonging to the identity group was contributive to your behavior. But when you are joined in your activities by others who join only because they too belong to the same identity group, it certainly makes for the argument that the shared identity of the criminals is no longer merely coincidental.
    If one Italian living in the United States decides to go and hold up a grocery store, I am sure no sane minded person will call all Italians hooligans. But if ten Italians decide to gang up with their Italian identity being the primary shared trait and ransack a grocery store, it will invariably be called the handiwork of an "Italian" Gang. Does that mean all Italians are gangsters? No. But does it absolve the Italian community in the US of doing nothing about the increasing lawlessness among its people and legitimises merely taking offense at the very utterance of the word “Italian Gang”? Not really. In fact, it is very much evident that Italians for the most parts in modern American pop culture are still prejudicially associated with criminal intent. But isn’t the vast majority of Italians law abiding in nature?
    Most Hindus in India are disgusted at the increasing atrocities that one community and its political patrons are perpetrating. But this vast majority is silent. In their silence they are passively encouraging the lawless lumpens of the other coreligionists to run amok with their nefarious agenda. And this vast majority will be rendered irrelevant by the rise of a group of aware and vocal elements like the yogi. If the vast majority wishes for a less acerbic solution, they first need to rise from their self-enforced morbid passivity. The likes of Rajat Sharma are forbearers of this passive majority and they are equally if not more so responsible for the menace of various jehad derivatives that is being unleashed on this country.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Till date none of the seculars have come out openly on any specific points that Yogi Adityanath raised in the LS. Everyone goes into the general tone of the speech which is supposed to be hatred. I wonder why the BJP spokesmen fail to ask these morons which point constitues hate speech. At best each of the points he made was on the secular conspiracies to spawn terrorism.Finally to build atleast a weak case against the yogi they had to unearth a 7 yr old video and cut paste some seemingly offensive statements fully out of context.I wonder why an upright journalist like Rajat Sharma should ask highly loaded questions to a Yogi just to appear to be secular. The judge in that show was the worst choice one can think of for a 'secular' debate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian
    Vilar Rodriguez and published in a Spanish newspaper on Jan. 15, 2008.
    It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest
    of Europe - and possibly to the rest of the world.

    I walked down the street in Barcelona , and suddenly discovered a
    terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz ... We killed six million Jews
    and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a
    culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people,
    truly chosen, because they producedgreat and wonderful people who changed
    the world.

    The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science,
    art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world.
    These are the people we burned.

    And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to
    ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our
    gates to 20 million Muslims, some of whom brought us stupidity and
    ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty,
    due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

    They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities
    into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

    Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they
    plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

    And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture forfanatical hatred,
    creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and
    superstition.

    We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their
    talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging
    to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people
    consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our
    children and theirs.

    What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

    The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000. That is
    ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world's population. They
    have received the following Nobel Prizes:

    Literature:
    1988 - Najib Mahfooz

    Peace:
    1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
    1990 - Elias James Corey
    1994 - Yaser Arafat:
    1999 - Ahmed Zewai

    Economics:
    (zero)

    Physics:
    (zero)

    Medicine:
    1960 - Peter Brian Medawar
    1998 - Ferid Mourad

    TOTAL: 7 SEVEN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000. That is
      FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world's population. They have
      received the following Nobel Prizes:

      Literature:
      1910 - Paul Heyse
      1927 - Henri Bergson
      1958 - Boris Pasternak
      1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
      1966 - Nelly Sachs
      1976 - Saul Bellow
      1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
      1981 - Elias Canetti
      1987 - Joseph Brodsky
      1991 - Nadine Gordimer World

      Peace:
      1911 - Alfred Fried
      1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
      1968 - Rene Cassin
      1973 - Henry Kissinger
      1978 - Menachem Begin
      1986 - Elie Wiesel
      1994 - Shimon Peres
      1994 - Yitzhak Rabin

      Physics:
      1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
      1906 - Henri Moissan
      1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
      1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
      1910 - Otto Wallach
      1915 - Richard Willstaetter
      1918 - Fritz Haber
      1921 - Albert Einstein
      1922 - Niels Bohr
      1925 - James Franck
      1925 - Gustav Hertz
      1943 - Gustav Stern
      1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
      1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
      1952 - Felix Bloch
      1954 - Max Born
      1958 - Igor Tamm
      1959 - Emilio Segre
      1960 - Donald A. Glaser
      1961 - Robert Hofstadter
      1961 - Melvin Calvin
      1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
      1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
      1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
      1965 - Julian Schwinger
      1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
      1971 - Dennis Gabor
      1972 - William Howard Stein
      1973 - Brian David Josephson
      1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
      1976 - Burton Richter
      1977 - Ilya Prigogine
      1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
      1978 - Peter L Kapitza
      1979 - Stephen Weinberg
      1979 - Sheldon Glashow
      1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
      1980 - Paul Berg
      1980 - Walter Gilbert
      1981 - Roald Hoffmann
      1982 - Aaron Klug
      1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
      1985 - Jerome Karle
      1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
      1988 - Robert Huber
      1988 - Leon Lederman
      1988 - Melvin Schwartz
      1988 - Jack Steinberger
      1989 - Sidney Altman
      1990 - Jerome Friedman
      1992 - Rudolph Marcus
      1995 - Martin Perl
      2000 - Alan J. Heeger

      Economics:
      1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
      1971 - Simon Kuznets
      1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
      1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
      1976 - Milton Friedman
      1978 - Herbert A. Simon
      1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
      1985 - Franco Modigliani
      1987 - Robert M. Solow
      1990 - Harry Markowitz
      1990 - Merton Miller
      1992 - Gary Becker
      1993 - Robert Fogel

      Medicine:
      1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
      1908 - Paul Erlich
      1914 - Robert Barany
      1922 - Otto Meyerhof
      1930 - Karl Landsteiner
      1931 - Otto Warburg
      1936 - Otto Loewi
      1944 - Joseph Erlanger
      1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
      1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
      1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
      1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
      1952 - Selman Abraham Waksman
      1953 - Hans Krebs
      1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
      1958 - Joshua Lederberg
      1959 - Arthur Kornberg
      1964 - Konrad Bloch
      1965 - Francois Jacob
      1965 - Andre Lwoff
      1967 - George Wal
      1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
      1969 - Salvador Luria
      1970 - Julius Axelrod
      1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
      1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelman
      1975 - Howard Martin Temin
      1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
      1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
      1978 - Daniel Nathans
      1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
      1984 - Cesar Milstein
      1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
      1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
      1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
      1988 - Gertrude Elion
      1989 - Harold Varmus
      1991 - Erwin Neher
      1991 - Bert Sakmann
      1993 - Richard J. Roberts
      1993 - Phillip Sharp
      1994 - Alfred Gilman
      1995 - Edward B. Lewis
      1996- Lu Rose Iacovino

      TOTAL: 129

      Delete
    2. The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in military training
      camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths
      of Jews and other non-Muslims.

      The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow
      themselves up in German restaurants. There is NOT one single Jew who has
      destroyed a church. There is NOT a single Jew who protests by killing
      people.

      The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and
      death to all the Infidels. Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider
      investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for
      all their problems.

      Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before they demand
      that humankind respects them.

      Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the
      Palestinians and Arab neighbours, even if you believe there is more
      culpability on Israel 's part, the following two sentences really say it
      all:

      "If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more
      violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no
      more Israel." Benjamin Netanyahu

      General Eisenhower warned us it is a matter of history that when the
      Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found
      the victims of the death camps he ordered all possible photographs to be
      taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered
      through the camps and even made to bury the dead.

      He did this because he said in words to this effect: 'Get it all on
      record now - get the films - get the witnesses because somewhere down
      the road of history someone will get up and say that this never
      happened'

      Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school
      curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim population which claims it
      never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening
      portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each
      country is giving into it.

      It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended.
      This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the, 6
      million Jews, 20 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900
      Catholic priests who were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten,
      experimented on and humiliated' while the German people looked the
      other way. Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others, claiming the
      Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to make sure the world never
      forgets.

      This e-mail is intended to reach 400 million people. Be a link in the
      memorial chain and help distribute this around the world.

      How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Centre
      'NEVER HAPPENED' because it offends some Muslim in the United States ?

      Delete
    3. To be fair, One Prof.Abdus Salam won a nobel prize for Nuclear Physics. He was a paki and died in exile in Britian. Pakistan disowned him as he was of the Ahmediya sect who the mainstream do not consider as muslim.

      Delete
    4. @bumbledoor,
      much of what you have written ( including awards and achievements) of jews happened also because the jews are a close knit community. The holocaust horrors brought them together. There is also quite a substantive element of nepotism, favouritism involved ( also media hype, racism ) . the bias of US and certain european countries towards israel is very apparent .
      not to undermine the achievements of jews , but then millions of competent indians do not eveb get a fraction of such opportunities and facilities that are available to jews as we as a nation have largely been struggling with infighting, corruption, reservations, petty issues . The british divided us and till date we have not recovered .

      Delete
  10. By showing Yogi Adityanath's seven year old speech clip MSM thought they will tar him in the eyes of Hindus instead the opposite has happened..Now people are enthused that we have at least some people who can express the feelings of Hindus fearlessly and this has energised them in so many ways...thank you for your brilliant article.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Kudos to you. Ravinar you are doing a great service to the nation. India needs you and like-minded ppl very badly. Keep exposing these double-standard ineligible hatred-supporters divisive politicians/ news-traders. YOU ARE THE BEST Sir.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "All Muslims are not terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims", just to paraphrase Mr Prem Bhatia who was Editor of The Tribune (Chandigarh) during 1980s. He was sick of the same term "All Sikhs are not..". With Muslim population of 1 Billion +, even 0.01% is a large number that Mother Earth cannot live with

    ReplyDelete
  13. Err. They are not journalists...Media Mercenaries more likely.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ravinar , People like u shud take part in the discussion engaged by PSP(Pseudo secular pimps) in MSM. They deserve egg on their face with Logical snippets that u write in yur articles to show them how big Morons they are! Yogi like people are bold and speak the truth but they are unable to checkmate the Media Pimps at their game with logical arguments.. Keep writing the Expose of our history that has been hidden for long to expose the Pimps..

    ReplyDelete
  15. One solution that a commoner can do..

    Don't buy from Muslim shops/restaurants.
    Stop using leather products and be a vegan.
    Don't sell to Muslims specially land or property.
    Buy only lands and property from Mslim.

    To let in some fresh air we let our window open, but along with the fresh air many mosquitos will also enter. Getting sick with mosquito bite is worse than fresh air. Similarly, may be not all muzlim are anti-hindi but letting a few moderates will surely attract the extremist. The harm caused outweigh the benefit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Namaste,

      First thing we should do is to unite. Imagine if even half Hindus are down to streets, protesting peacefully and demanding justice for LoveJihad Victims. What if we unite and file a PIL, demand legal action. We cant blame them for our cowardliness.

      400 Britishers managed the whole India. Britishers even say that we need more people (more than 400) to manage cow and sheep herds. How is this possible? Because we kept fighting for ourselves.

      Muslims are clear in approach. They gain sympathy with portraying themselves as victims, just because of their beliefs, then unite, increase population, do violence and then wipe out non-muslims when muslims are in majority.

      So if we do not appease them, become active in protests (mostly but not necessarily peacefully), then things will change very fast. We have a habit of waiting for a yuga puruSa to do things for us and keep waiting for kAlkI bhagavAn. We need RSS.

      Even brahmins are poor, do they get any reservation? any facilities? are there any special schemes, even like offering handsome pay to those who dedicate themselves to the study of veda-s in traditional manner staying in gurukul?

      Only 1 % of veda-s remain, who will make effort to save them, brahmins, political leaders, government?

      If we unite and dedicate energy constructively to secure our future, then things will change very fast.

      Hari OM

      Delete
    2. corrections in reply

      400 Britishers managed the whole India. Britishers even say that we need more people (more than 400) to manage cow and sheep herds. How is this possible? Because we kept fighting among ourselves.

      Delete
    3. @indianspirituality amrut,
      completely agree with you. I intend creating a trust shortly ( before end of this year ) with one of the objectives being purely to file PIL challenging anti hindu policies and practices ; and financially support hindus that pursue and maintain vedic heritage. Let us see how things take shape. Would also strive towards better co ordination between the five sankara mutts.

      But was indeed pleasantly surprised to find someone echoing similar thoughts. Even now PILs happen but are isolated and sporadic , effort would be towards contacting and consolidating efforts.

      Delete
    4. Dear @rightwinger,
      I would like to offer my help in any way possible. Please reply when you are ready. Thanks.

      Delete
    5. Dear @rightwinger,
      I would like to offer my help in any way possible. Please reply when you are ready. Thanks.

      Delete
    6. @newbie_blogger,
      thanks. Yes will let you know when the trust becomes operational

      Delete
  16. Namaste,

    No Hindu God (devatA) except brahmA ji is shown without weapons. Even mA kAlI has weapons. M.K.G. believed in srI rAma, who fought against injustice and even killed bAlI from back side (against principles of war). kruShNa (krishna) also fought against injustice. kruShNa played politics too.

    No one has said that one should not fight against injustice. Infact kruShNa prepared pANDava-s and other allies to fight against injustice, but himself didnt took up arms and fight.

    madhusudan sarasvatI (1400~1500) has created 'warrior monks' called as 'nAgA sAdhu-s'. They were a part of Rajput regime for many hundred years. madhusudan sarasvatI belonged to the lineage of Adi SankarAcArya ji.

    manu smriti chapter 8 talks about offenses and punishments. Here are a few quotes (see 350-351)

    M.S. 8.344. A king who desires to gain the throne of Indra and imperishable eternal fame, shall not, even for a moment, neglect (to punish) the man who commits violence.

    M.S. 8.345. He who commits violence must be considered as the worst offender, (more wicked) than a defamer, than a thief, and than he who injures (another) with a staff.

    M.S. 8.346. But that king who pardons the perpetrator of violence quickly perishes and incurs hatred.

    M.S. 8.347. Neither for friendship's sake, nor for the sake of great lucre, must a king let go perpetrators of violence, who cause terror to all creatures.

    M.S. 8.348. Twice-born men (those who have upnayana-samskAra, thread wearing ceremony) may take up arms when (they are) hindered (in the fulfilment of their duties, when destruction (threatens) the twice-born castes (varna) in (evil) times,

    M.S. 8.349. In their own defence, in a strife for the fees of officiating priests, and in order to protect women and Brahmanas; he who (under such circumstances) kills in the cause of right, commits no sin.

    M.S. 8.350. One may slay without hesitation an assassin who approaches (with murderous intent), whether (he be one's) teacher, a child or an aged man, or a Brahmana deeply versed in the Vedas.

    M.S. 8.351. By killing an assassin the slayer incurs no guilt, whether (he does it) publicly or secretly; in that case fury recoils upon fury.

    So even SAstra-s ask us to fight against injustice.

    ----

    from above verses, Narendra Modi ji's actions related to 2002 riots are justifiable (lets assume he did it)

    ----

    Buddhists have developed Saolin Kung-Fu.

    Baudha and Jain dharma are mostly suited for monks. Their way of living and prime imp to non-violence makes me think so. One way of living cannot be forced on entire society, as not all have equal mental purity. the result is most Buddhists are meat-eaters.
    ---

    Also note the difference between two sanyasins. One walking on GYAna mArg (path of knowledge, as taught by Adi Sankara) do not fight, but take pains. They die natural death e.g. Ramakrishna and Ramana Maharshi died of Cancer. But Yogi-s who practice kundalini Yoga or similar quit their body at will and they do not die of severe ailment e.g. Paramhansa Yogananda, Gorakshanath, macchindranath, Lahiri Mahashaya and deathless saint, Mahavatar Babaji.

    Yogi Adityanath ji is a Nath Yogi, not the one walking on GYAna mArg. Their approaches are different. Yoga asks one to master mind and senses, integrate 5 bodies, while GYana asks on to detach from senses, mind, and dis-integrate 5 bodies.

    One tunes into nature (yogi), while other stays aloof.
    ---

    "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." ~Winston Churchill

    Hari OM

    ReplyDelete
  17. Crying foul for so many years have fallen on deaf ears for they had the patronage of the Gandhi family in POWER. Today Gandhi's are out of power, fiberals are still making the same noise as these fiberals (Media mafia) are now themselves within corridors of power managing Modi and his ministers thru bureaucracy in shadow. 100 days has gone by they continue with the same breadth and tremor as seculars. For 70% of the media mafia are run by Delhi Women who are congress loyalist by anti RAHUL GANDHI. Who will bell the cat? Their attempt to bring Sikh militants to take on congress for 1984 failed miserably. WHO IS COMMUNAL? Polarization of gender has damaged the fabric of society, institutions and the world that will remain for whole of human life cycle. Dec16 was unfortunate but the core issue of women using body to BLACKMAIL influential n people of power was not addressed but the aftermath of unfortunate RAPE was on the forefront which was communalised and divided the society on gender. Today women using BODY TO BLACKMAIL has become order of the day (Tejpal, Justice Ganguly, Karthik Gowda, Army generals, Kerala ministers, Governors and many untold stories of high places) This is how they are in corridors of power today and people of lower masses are effected by this saga n suffer in ignominy. Justice Khatju has pointed misuse of media on several occasions. Defence mechanism on false cases is VERY WEAK. Today we are in the same situation as before as we cannot do anything as they (Media Mafia) are in power. Stalemate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. every time I need to thank Ravinar for putting things in right perspective, where in I learn a lot from not only Ravinar but from the messages.
      I want to just make every one of us happy by putting my points here.
      I was watching 100 days PM Modi govt debate on the presstitute arnab,
      Then I realied the fissuers between ashutosh and vinod mehta, it was so funny vinod mehta ws talking first time atleast sense and he says he swar by congis but ashotosh taking him to task.

      So people there is already seismic shift hapenning in the presstitutes world.
      some going to play safe now and there are still majority still thinking their acche din will come when congress under their heir apparent comes to power.
      stuid people have no clue it is five years down the line, this is just 100days.
      So presstitutes have only two options use the money comming from congress for some time and convert, or loose their identity.
      So I think every day they may be having sleepless nights.
      no more spicy statements comming from unknown sources as no one knows what is hapenning in the Govt.
      Govt is directly talking to the people where thay have to telecast.
      such a catch 22 situation for these presstitutes,
      They think sitting in studios they can decide what Bharat needs and even now trying to spin.
      People know what is hapenning but these presstitutes go to the studios and talk nonsense about communal nonsense.
      They did not even get it, even a kindertener would have known I did a mistake and BJP got 282 meaning communal nonsense is not working anymore.
      like congress even these presstitutes think communalism will work.
      hahaha I want more fissures between the presstitutes come in the open.

      Delete
  18. On 'We the People' on 31/8, the bjp panelist said that in a town in U.P. (I think) there had been a conversion to christianity for admission to a missionary school. Immediately the 'secularists' on the panel and Barkha jumped in to defend this saying that dalits had the freedom to convert for improvement of their lot!!!

    So religious conversion is fine for improvement of socio economic conditions??! Why should anyone need to convert to obtain admission to a school?? Are people so gullible as to convert for some ephemeral benefit in the far off future or for some measureable immediate gain such as tuition waiver/ cash etc.? So how is conversion justified if there is monetary inducement? Is there then free will??

    In law this would be a contract - in other words what has happened is that these people had traded their religious/ cultural identity for economic gain. Seems to me coercion of the economic variety on par with resorting to prostitution for personal gain. And therefore a violation of human rights. For if you say this is fine then all those forced conversions of aborogines by christians in australia and of indigenous tribes in various parts of the world is fine.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wow! These two posts have really hit home, judging by the depth of comments!
    The more I get to know MKG, the more he sounds like a better version of Kejriwal. Propped up by an adulating press, whose words and actions don't match and who believes in his way or the highway. Not to belittle what was good in him, would help us a lot to learn all sides of MKG.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The reason minority of Muslims are violent is because they are thoroughly brain washed by Mullahs and Imams that they (Muslims) are the victims of injustice, that everybody is after them and the only way to fight injustice is with violence. Unfortunately, rest of the Muslims also see themselves as victims. Even if they don't participate in violence, they harbor sympathy for those violent Muslims.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @rightwinger if journalists are honest to their profession and government of the day is working for the interests of STATE/NATION as a whole and its citizens ( each one of them ) then only a positive change will come. as @terryJohn pointed out journalists and so called intellectual class is prisoner of their education ( which is some facts but not whole truth ). Indian education does not encourage a child to think, question and make their own conclusions but rewards who just follow the instructions like zombies or yes men.
    I believe this attitude is changing though slowly but surely.

    ReplyDelete
  22. While the players were walking back to the dressing room in Dambulla, Sri Lanka, Shehzad was caught on camera telling Dilshan "if you are a non-Muslim and you turn Muslim, no matter whatever you do in your life, straight to heaven."

    ReplyDelete
  23. http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/pakistan-probe-shehzad-dilshan-religious-chat

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Or does the country with the biggest economy mean the most happiness? Lately there are surveys to rate the happiness quotient of countries."

    Absolutely, in a global survey a few years ago, BHUTAN came first in happiness quotient than America, Singapore, Japan and entire Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  25. People like Swami Vivekananda and Yogi Adityanath have no fear, because they speak TRUTH and believe in Dharma.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @mediacrooks: "As if all that wasn’t enough, the judge on the show is none other than Congress pimp Vinod Sharma. This guy is one sick man who shouldn’t be in the media or TV at all. "

    I think Yogi Adityanath should have asked Rajat Sharma to change the judge Vinod Sharma who is a Congress sympathiser and Sonia sycophant.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @mediacrooks: "How does one explain 4% of British Muslims committing 91% of child rapes?"

    Yes, this one statement should eye opener for world's leading democratic societies including British, India, America and rest of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Excellent one Ravinar, taking quotes out of context and using them to suppress us (hindus) is a classic ploy of fiberals. The blatant misuse of "Ahimsa Paramo Dharma" is a testimony to this fact. The full quote is "Ahimso Paramo Dharma, Dharma himsa tathaiva cha" meaning non-violence is ultimate dharma, so is violence in defense of dharma. Our fiberals have conveniently left the second line which urges action in the face of adversity to defend dharma.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Feudal societies tend to protect and support their wrong doers against host community. Sanju Baba received full support from north Indian community all through- after the blasts, during investigation, prior to sentencing, after sentencing. Remaining silent, co-opting media, lynching the messenger, pressuring the judicial process etc etc all these tactics were adopted to get him off the hook. Katju even tried to get him a reprieve. Bollywood remained mostly silent, organised support etc etc. Ajay Devgun recently shed a few tears over his five star incarceration it was reported a few days back. It took Nana Patekar to denounce him at a national awards function. But, Sanju will continue to enjoy is exalted status after he is released. Supporting community wrong doers is not an exclusively muslim phenomenon.

    ReplyDelete
  30. A very good one Ravi. Thanks a lot...

    ReplyDelete
  31. The MSM morons should watch this

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/04/world/middleeast/surviving-isis-massacre-iraq-video.html?_r=0

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hindus have always been the most tolerant lot, across ages.

    Hindu community never tried to convert people of other religions.
    It just doesn't exist in their religion and philosophy.

    Some bigots falsely claim that conversion to Hinduism did happen while none in their right mind would term it as such. If at all, it was mere re-conversion.

    And it never went beyond bringing some of those Hindus who were forced to ‘stray’ under duress, back into the fold.

    The Sickular idiots among us should realize that there is nothing "Godly" nor can there be any "Godliness" associated with any religious entity that strives to 'poach' people of other religions to augment its numbers.

    Also, there is nothing noble in this whole sinister exercise, other than cornering political power (which happens to be the mother of all other powers) through sheer numbers.

    Unfortunately, conversions go unabated in spite of being ruled illegal by the SC.

    It is business as usual and ‘poaching’ perhaps is the only industry that continues to thrive as ever, in this country.

    While the Hindu community turns a Nelson's eye to this abuse happening around, those few individuals and groups who venture to object to this criminality are labeled 'non-secular' and ‘Hindu fundamentalists’ by our intellectual pygmies and the media crooks.

    We live in a legally administered society and fortunately for them, these poachers can no longer be hung, the way they were in the yesteryear wild west.

    And God alone knows what prevents the Indian Government from banning foreign funding to those hundreds of NGOs whose business is largely anti-national and specifically anti-Hindu.

    ReplyDelete
  33. What amazes me is that the Presstitutes haven't yet understood that by handing out a landslide victory to Modi the majority of Indians have denounced the message and thus the trust in MSM because if MSM was followed by majority than the fascist dictator and communal BJP should have been wiped out. The contrast outcome is still very hard for these morons to digest however slowly but surely they are becoming irrelevant. I don't remember last I watched a news debate on one of these secular channels. Thanks to MC ie Ravi for waking a lot of people up also with a gifted ability to put words to what a majority feels in a very succinct way.

    ReplyDelete
  34. FROM THE FACEBOOK WALL OF MR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY

    Russia is no longer a tourist destination for terrorists!
    --------------------------------
    Putin has got a law passed that forces relatives of terrorists to pay for damages caused by their attacks. It also boosts penalties for launching, participating, or financing militant or terrorist groups.

    Under the law, all damages – including moral damage – should be compensated “at the expense of the means of the person committing the terrorist act and also at the expense of the means of his [or her] family, relatives and close people.”

    Given how relatives of terrorists are more often than not, complicit in their acts (in varying degrees, of course), it's only fair that they pay for their crimes too.
    This could well act as a good deterrence for some 'young budding talents' who plan to be terrorists in near future.
    What do you think ?

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome and are now being moderated due to excessive spam on older posts. Genuine comments by readers will not be blocked. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.