Pet Canards - Part - 1

In a day or two the entire MSM will analyse the 100 days of Modi-Govt. Some members of the G-37 will tell you what the Modi-Sarkar did not achieve and how they have miserably failed. Political opponents of Modi will coin some phrases to describe the failures. They are masters at coining phrases and labels. Remember Nidhi Razdan and that British MP Barry Gardiner who invited Modi to the UK? She kept calling Modi “controversial” in every sentence she spoke. It’s not an accident and it’s not spontaneous. This comes with scripted hatred. Then there was the “Rambo” episode, the “Puppy” episode which used the words to “monsterize” Modi. Of course, the usual titles of fascist, murderer, Hitler, racist, anti-Muslim have been around long enough. There is something about his plain-talk (like “secularism ka burqa”) that upsets our Commie Congress, their Commie clones and our Commie media. The criminals in the MSM who parade as “liberals” are in fact “Fiberals” who cannot survive without lies and denials of truth. You could call those “pet canards”. Yogi Adityanath, the saffron-robed BJP MP, has been rattling the media and the Commie bunch with some blunt truths. Let’s read a sample response from Firstpost:

“Firebrand BJP leader Yogi Adityanath has attacked the minority community, saying riots happen wherever they are more than 10 percent in numbers while there is no place for non-Muslims where they are more than 35 percent. Defending his provocative speeches, the Gorakhpur MP, who is among three party leaders entrusted with leading BJP campaign for the upcoming bye-elections in Uttar Pradesh, said Hindus will reply "in the same language" if they are subjected to attacks or forcible conversions… "In places where there are 10 to 20 percent minorities, stray communal incidents take place. Where there are 20 to 35 percent of them, serious communal riots take place and where they are more than 35 percent, there is no place for non-Muslims," he said. "I have said, if you (minorities) kill one of us, do not expect that you will remain safe... If the other side does not stay in peace, we will teach them how to stay in peace," Adityanath said… Justifying his rabble-rousing remarks, he said, "Whatever I had then said was conditional. If the other is a danav (devil), not a manav (human), then one has to reply. If I have a mala (rosary) in one hand, I also carry a bhala (javelin) in the other". He alleged 'Love Jihad', a term coined by Hindutva activists to protest alleged organised conversion of Hindu girls, is an "international conspiracy" against India. He cited some court orders to buttress his claim”.

It goes beyond reporting. They call him a “rabble-rouser”. Pet canard! Why? Because he speaks some very blunt truths? Is it not true that as the Muslim population in certain areas increase there is a dramatic increase in riots? Why don’t we have so many riots in Goa with Christians or with Sikhs in Punjab? Others on NDTV, CNN-IBN, Timesnow are arguing about his statement like “If you kill one Hindu, we will kill a hundred” or “If they convert one Hindu girl, we should convert 100 of theirs”. Sure, these are provocative statements but all provocative statements are not necessarily hate speeches. While they want to hang the Yogi for such statements, none of our corrupt media anchors want to ask “Why should the Muslims kill even ONE Hindu or anyone at all”? In recent years all Muslim agitations have invariably been violent. I have rarely heard of a peaceful protest or agitation. From Azad Maidan to Saharanpur or all those movies, cartoons and Gaza protests. Someone had posted this sarcastic pic on Twitter:

Events across the world have completely demolished the nonsense of Commie arguments about terrorism has no religion or Muslims are being victimised. Many MSM “Candlelight sinners” mourned endlessly about Gaza but when the ISIS killings broke they all went into a hiding. The iRudali even did a show “Our rather volatile debate on whether India has abandoned her heart on the Gaza killings”. You won’t find her, or any other media crook, debating ISIS or some horrific incidents that came to light in England. First, let’s watch a small clip from a studio debate with a panel typically filled with “Barkhas of England”. In the audience as a volunteer is (ex) founder of English Defence League (EDL) Tommy Robinson (an alias) and this event was a few months before the horrific rapes of 1400 girls came to light. Let’s watch (5.09 mins):

Nice! The opening shot comes from a Muslim who wants to put Anjem Chaudhary and Tommy Robinson on an island and bomb them with Anthrax. I wonder what this obsession is with wanting to bomb anyone you hate. Anyway! Robinson tries to explain there is nothing racist about his protests against Islamists or their ideology and there isn’t really. There is a woman in a pink top and you can’t mistake the permanent scowl on her face which shows the contempt she has for Robinson. She keeps calling him “racist, racist, racist” but not once does she explain why he is a racist. Nobody does! Yet the MSM-brainwashed audience also cheers each time he is called a racist. The full video of that show is on Youtube and some comments on the page reflect more maturity than the panellists and the host:

The entire bunch of morons in that hall, including the idiotic host proved how an entire country was taken for a ride by “fake secularism” and manufactured fears of racism. Because, as we all know by now, this stupid “political correctness” resulted in the rape, abuse and some murders of 1400 girls in Rotherham. The morons like Saira Khan (the woman in pink) should feel like thorough bumpkins for refusing to see the truth. The facts about the cases that were buried and how victims were turned the accused is shocking to say the least. In one case a girl narrated how 250 men had raped her. Here’s another small bit from the Rotherham story:

The police arrested the victim. Looks like Rahul Kanwal would be pleased with that considering he wants to turn Tara Sahdeo into an offender. Ironically, the one everyone hated in that hall (Tommy Robinson) today stands vindicated. Let’s run through the report once again, this time from Frontpage:

“The abuse of at least 1,400 British girls took place because multiculturalism and denial came before their safety. Just as with terrorism, it was easier to close your eyes and chant, “Islam is a Religion of Peace”.

A culture of Left-wing political correctness led politicians and officials to ignore the plight of young girls who were being sexually abused by Asian men, Labour figures have warned.

Ann Cryer, an MP from 1997 until 2010, told The Sunday Telegraph how she had feared being called “racist” when, in 2002, she exposed a sex-abuse scandal involving Pakistani men in her constituency of Keighley, West Yorkshire. A “politically correct Left just saw it as racism”, she said. At the same time, Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, revealed that even now some of his colleagues disapproved of his efforts to uncover child abuse, because some were “obsessing about multiculturalism”. Mrs Cryer recalled how there was a politically correct Left that saw her fight as racism. “At the time I was dealing with this, 2002-04, political correctness was playing a big part. The Guardian at that time hardly mentioned these things… because it was so politically correct.”

Simon Danczuk has written more: I believe that all those three agencies are run by a liberal, woolly-minded, middle-class elite who simply cannot conceive of the truly miserable lives that some inner-city children in this country are forced to endure, and who prefer to concentrate on media-friendly ideas such as multiculturalism, diversity and community values – rather than on something as wicked as the rape of a child. They do not pursue the perpetrators because, blinded by political correctness, they simply do not see the abuse”.

Do note that these multi-culti crimes started after Tony Blair promoted it since 1997 when he became PM and all these 1400 abuse cases are mostly during his tenure as PM. Votebank Sickularism kills everywhere. And as the report above indicates our stupid Indian media too does not pursue such cases because it would offend Muslims, because of Sickularism and because of their intense hatred for Hindus. Anyone who raises his voice will be called a racist, fascist, bigot and all kinds of similar names. The article above mentions The Guardian’s political correctness specifically. This is what the political pimps at the Guardian and Economic Review were busy doing in the past two years:

As penitence, The Guardian carried a piece by Ruzwana Bashir, an earlier victim. Although her article is poignant the paper still peddles the same political correctness with vague descriptions such as “Asian men” etc. The revelations of these crimes have surely proved the ones in the video and many Commie defenders of fake secularism and appeasement are the dumbest idiots in politics and media. The moment someone puts out a warning or sends signals they will brand him as a bigot, anti-Muslim and a racist. Yogi Adityanath had all of it coming since he made his stunning speech in parliament. Other cowards in the media like Rahul Kanwal of Headlines Today were busy trashing Tara Sahdeo, a victim of fraudulent marriage. There are others who are still idiotic when it comes to understanding who is a real victim like “useful idiot” Sudheendra Kulkarni:

You want to talk about the problems of Kashmiri Muslims that is one thing and they may have legitimate problems as people in every other state have. But how in hell is it related to the fate of KPs who have been raped, murdered and most thrown out of their own state. This is what our Intellectual Morons cannot distinguish. They equate the problems of victims with the problems of the aggressor. In the video in this post there is a woman in red who tries to explain why Robinson is a racist. She suggests he is tarring an entire community because of a small group that commits crimes. This is as lame as it gets. This is another of those pet canards that float around. We shall see in the next part how this is also a misleading canard and a deliberate LIE.