Kejriwal Doesn't Care Two Hoots For Delhi

Let’s keep aside the fact that AAP and Arvind Kejriwal have no answers for the 2 Crore Hawala funding. A bunch of Delhi thugs who called everyone else “corrupt, chor, murderer, rapist” alleged to be a front for money laundering isn’t exactly a big surprise. The story of bogus companies funding AAP is not entirely new. Let’s keep aside the hyperbolic claim that BJP is a corrupt party according to AK. Let us say for argument’s sake that BJP is the only corrupt party in India. Let’s keep aside the lie that inflation has gone up since Modi became PM. Let’s keep aside AK’s lie that crimes against women have gone up 20% in Delhi. Let us also say for argument’s sake that the BJP govt hasn’t been performing. That should please AK & Co. In the meantime, more black money reports keep tumbling out as this Indian Express report suggests:

In October 2012 Rajdeep Sardesai went to Gujarat for his monkey tricks and had that bus-floor interview with Narendra Modi. Seems a long long time ago. Barkha Dutt went to Juhapura, the Muslim Ghetto in Ahmedabad, to inflame passions and campaign for Congress in November 2012. Sagarika Ghose too went to Juhapura and travelled through to Surat campaigning for Congress. Other media crooks campaigned against Modi from the studios. When the results came out even moronic PC said Congress had stopped BJP from getting 2/3rd majority so Congress didn’t lose in the Gujarat polls of 2012. Since December 2012 Congress and its bootlickers haven’t had a major election victory except Karnataka. The BJP not only walked away with major states in December 2013 but also won its first clear majority in LS polls in May 2014. Since then they’ve also won states like Maharashtra and Haryana. Even in JK the BJP is likely to be a member of the ruling coalition; something the Congress’s media pimps would have thought impossible.  It’s been a devastating time for the crooks, particularly the following club of nine-pimps:

“A horse, a horse, a kingdom for my horse… I haven’t had a win in six months” said the Raging Bull. It’s been a long time since our pimps had an electoral victory against the BJP. They are thirsting for blood. They are thirsting for revenge. As in the past, they have thrown all sense of decency in their campaign and projected “Mahatma” Kejriwal as their next messiah since Moses stepped on earth. Here’s what I wrote about the disgrace of these pimps back in December 2013:

“No matter what the results of an election and what their political preferences, media anchors and panellists are expected to carry out discussions with some semblance of reason and logic. All the nine persons above (and there were some more minor ones) were an absolute disgrace in their unwillingness to even grudgingly concede a victory to BJP and the impact of Modi. Their hatred of Modi has now become part of their DNA and disease and there is no cure. It is killing them inside and they know it. All these years these people sucked up to Rahul Gandhi as India’s Obama or the Great White Hope. He sunk them! The Congress doesn’t have an answer to Modi so far nor do these media slaves. Shankarsan Thakur said on TimesNow Congis are afraid to blame the Gandhis. Laughable! I keep saying the media boys and girls piss in their pants and skirts when they have to mention “Gandhi”, so are they now expecting Congis to blame or name Gandhis? The cowards and slaves in the Congress are no different from the cowards and slaves in the MSM. Should we talk of 2014? It’s too early, will drink that poison when the time comes… Arnab Goswami, acting like the regular circus clown, had a stupid question at his 6pm show on December 8: “Is AAP now a threat to Modi”? Well moron, get used to it! All of you are a threat to Modi including Congress, SP, JDU, RJD, RLD, DMK, CPM, AAP, Third Front, Fourth Umpire, CBI, Salma and Sabrina, IM, LeT, JuD and the Indian MSM collectively. He’s still standing. You’re the ones who have fallen to the pits. You’re the real losers”.

And all this for what? The media crooks have turned an ordinary election in Delhi which I call nothing more than a “Senior Municipality” in to a prestige issue, as has Kejriwal. All the recent defeats have battered their egos. On his part, AK is back to his muffler and lying ways. All the media goons made AK imagine he is such a great messiah that he could be the next PM of India. He believed that nonsense and instead of governing and doing good things for Delhi he quit as CM and went on to challenge Modi. He thought Modi was another Sheila Dikshit he could accuse of corruption and do another Uturn. It didn’t work out and as this interview shows, AK can throw allegations against anyone but is a “gaai” when it comes to answering questions. He doesn’t have any answers (1.34 mins):

When the questions are uncomfortable make a claim like “one-sided documents”. What exactly is a one-sided document? Does AK provide allegations against everyone with a two-sided document? Miss Hit & Run doesn’t have any answers. He quit as CM because he thought it’s a position with no powers and he should run the country instead. Like with other parties he wanted to challenge Narendra Modi and be a giant-killer. Fact is, this coward has no interest in governance, politics or anything except seeking a public position of prominence that will give him a life of comfort and make him immune to prosecution for his silly crimes.

He agitated in Gujarat after quitting as CM of Delhi. He employed nonsensical gibberish in his campaign at Varanasi claiming he will stay at Varanasi and serve its people even if he loses. All this balderdash is backed by media criminals because in AK they see a criminal who is rich in their own vein. Does AK care about Delhi? That’s a lot of BS that he knows quite well. He is not from Delhi and he doesn’t really care what happens to Delhi. In a classic case of lying and cheating this is what happened with a channel that was promoting him before LS 2014. There are pimps like Rajdeep and Sagarika who promote this deserter of politics and the number of times his lies have been caught is endless. Take a look (0.47 minutes - Youtube): 

The only thing that is important for Arvind Kejriwal is to somehow survive for his sponsors, whoever they are, for a limited purpose and for self-survival. AK doesn’t have a mission; he doesn’t know what to do. It is like crashing from one hole to another like I explained in “The reincarnation of ArvindKejriwal”. The last stop will be jail, if our laws really take their own course. Unlike in the past, no one has slapped or thrown ink at AK. This is a substantial improvement in his character (although there are a few days still left for voting). In between the last and the current election Aaptards have enriched themselves to further become more “Aam” than ever before.

The truthful thing for a politician to say would be to claim he wants power. I do not recollect ever seeing a criminal claiming he is an angel who doesn’t want power. Sometimes I do wonder how this uncouth, uncivilised bunch of thugs called AAP are even a party in contention in Delhi but then they are not very different from the average Delhi culture. As for Delhi, Kejriwal doesn’t give 2 hoots about the city or its people. He cannot survive a month without chaos or anarchy.

Pet Canards - Part - 2

There are frequent surveys in the news media about the best schools and colleges. They rank the schools and declare some school as the best overall. What does it mean? That the particular school produces the most brilliant students and performers? That all the students from that school are Einsteins? And all the teachers at the school are the greatest in the world? I’m sure nobody takes these surveys to mean that. Or does the country with the biggest economy mean the most happiness? Lately there are surveys to rate the happiness quotient of countries. Some country topping the list surely doesn’t mean everyone is happy out there but it’s a general indicator from the samples taken. Our Fiberals who conduct such surveys do not like applying the same wisdom or theory to other areas. We shall see.

A few days back Yogi Adityanath was under the hammer again; this time in “Aap ki Adalat” by Rajat Sharma on IndiaTV. It’s fascinating how one man has rattled the media and they are unable to come to terms with the blunt truths he is dispensing. The Yogi is now headed to being tarred like Modi once was – Mass murderer, Hate-monger, Communal hater, Fascist, Bigot, Racist... Got any more names? Anyway, let’s watch some excerpts from near the end of the show (4.25 mins. Full video on Youtube):   

Wow! So when these morons have to confront the Yogi they are reminded of MKGandhi, Buddha and Mahavir. I wonder why these idiots never go to terrorists and teach them about turning the other cheek. Imagine, a man points a knife or a gun at you or is about to rape your mother, sister, wife or daughter and our Fiberals ask you to turn the other cheek. MK Gandhi has been put on such a pedestal that some of his serious mistakes are being white-washed by these scumbags. MKG wanted Hindus to suffer the Moplah rapes and murders. He wanted to support the Caliphate movement to appease Muslims (The ISIS is working on those dreams now). He wanted Jews to surrender to death peacefully. Most of all, MKG also wanted India shouldn’t have an Army, Navy or Airforce. Do these idiots want India to listen to MKG and dispense with our Army? When convenient, these criminal media crooks will pick up some quotes from Gandhi and throw at you without the whole truth. Did MKG prevent all the communal riots in his time? Why is it that MKG is not responsible for a faulty partition that has left India with the menace of communal riots when the partition itself was based on religion? The deceivers won’t have any answers.

As if all that wasn’t enough, the judge on the show is none other than Congress pimp Vinod Sharma. This guy is one sick man who shouldn’t be in the media or TV at all. He lectures the Yogi on virtues of peaceful living and how a nation cannot be run on “hate” and so on. One pet canard that Fiberals like to spread is that MKGandhi would have been non-violent no matter what. This is sheer nonsense. Here is what I tweeted in October 2011 to his degenerate great grand-son who scavenges in the name of Gandhi:

Was I wrong? It would cost me nothing to be wrong. But I doubt I am wrong. Here’s a CNN-IBN report reproducing some background on why MKG wasn’t considered for a Nobel:

"But Partition seems to have played a spoiler this time. The Nobel Committee report said: "The following 10 years, from 1937 up to 1947, led to the event which for Gandhi and his movement was at the same time the greatest victory and the worst defeat – India's independence and India's Partition… "Then he added: "...sharp turns in his policies, which can hardly be satisfactorily explained by his followers. (...) He is a freedom fighter and a dictator, an idealist and a nationalist. He is frequently a Christ, but then, suddenly, an ordinary politician."… “No one wanted war, but he could never advise anyone to put up with injustice. If all Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind. If there was war, the Hindus in Pakistan could not be fifth columnists. If their loyalty lay not with Pakistan, they should leave it. Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union."

If all the Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind? Do our Fiberal idiots agree with MK Gandhi on this? Do these morons agree that there can even be a JUST CAUSE for all Hindus to be annihilated? Where do such statements come from? In the same breath MKG said "Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union." Want to implement that quote of Gandhi too? Long before I made my tweet above, here is what a Nobel committee member said:

“Gandhi had many critics in the international peace movement. The Nobel Committee adviser referred to these critics in maintaining that he was not consistently pacifist, that he should have known that some of his non-violent campaigns towards the British would degenerate into violence and terror. This was something that had happened during the first Non-Cooperation Campaign in 1920-1921, e.g. when a crowd in Chauri Chaura, the United Provinces, attacked a police station, killed many of the policemen and then set fire to the police station”.

I don’t care if MKG was worth a Nobel. He was a great man anyway with all his faults. But our Fiberals misuse “Gandhi” to make the most nonsensical points to Hindus. If Mahatma Gandhi were alive he would have wanted to shut them up and most of their illegitimate practices. And if Buddhists are largely a peaceful community, are they going to be spared? Here’s what jokers like Rajat Sharma are too blind to see:

How is Indonesia bothered by Burma (or Myanmar). Even if there are problems in Myanmar with the Buddhists and Muslims why should Indonesians want to kill them? Oh wait! All Indonesians aren’t like that, are they? So if I point to Azad Maidan, they’ll say all Muslims aren’t like that. If I point to London and the crowd wanting to kill Salman Rushdie, they’ll say all British Muslims aren’t like that. Who the hell said “all are like that”? But the “sample” you consistently provide on all parameters across the world does get your community that tag. It is not wishful thinking by others. That’s how a college gets voted the best or a country gets voted the happiest. Let’s get back to where we left off in Part-1. Here’s a woman in red, a typical brain-washed Fiberal, who dishes out this same stupid logic. Tommy Robinson of EDL keeps asking how he’s a racist so she explains (0.36 mins):

Okay! So the bimbo says Robinson picked up a “tiny minority” from a whole community of hundreds of thousands (The sidekick interjects and says “billions”) and tarred all of them so that is “racist”. How lovely! This is the same stupid argument you hear all over India and all over the world. Your brother goes around killing people but if I ask you to put a leash on him you get back with “Don’t tar my family else you are racist”. Did Robinson say all Muslims or all British Muslims are thugs? I doubt it but you can see how the bimbos and liars hide behind such spurious logic. And if at all a “tiny minority” of your community is committing crimes then who is responsible for controlling them? Only the police? Not their families, not their community leaders or mosques that these people are members of?

In another event of the Heritage Foundation over the killing of the American Ambassador in Benghazi a similar incident happened. A Muslim argues that all Muslims cannot be tarred with the brush of terrorism. Actually, nobody even tarred any Muslim or talked about Muslims in that meeting. But she got a severe answer from a panellist, Bridget Gabriel. Watch the video (5.49 minutes):

The majority of the community just watch. The silent majority stays silent which is why the nonsense goes on. This is true for Hindus too. Because a majority of Hindus cannot see the nonsense of “Sickular” politicians and media they endure the abuse and atrocities on them. This is starting to change with many people speaking up (people like the Yogi) and that is bothering the criminal media folks immensely. It threatens their corrupt life and discourse. Following that response by Bridget Gabriel, some in the US media predictably called it a rant and hounding of the sole Muslim girl in that event. When the girl claims she’s the only representative there she is actually applauded by the audience and not taunted as some US media reports claimed. But here’s some damaging revelation: That girl, Saba Ahmed, turned out to be connected to a violent Jihadi.

Now what? Now you read the full report and it makes chilling reading. There is no getting away from the truth about all this anymore. These are pet canards media and politicians like to hurl at everyone who speaks the truth. Those who speak up will not be challenged with facts and logic but sentimental claptrap and name-calling. We are not done yet. In the aftermath of the expose of 1400 rapes in Rotherham there are some more chilling facts. Take a look at this:

It is something similar that the Yogi too argues. That the moment Muslim population starts rising in an area there is a disproportionate rise in communal riots. How does one explain 4% of British Muslims committing 91% of child rapes? Even if you provide for abundant discounts I doubt the picture can change dramatically. Will the bimbo in red who ranted against Tommy Robinson explain this? Would that moron called Saira Khan (in purple) explain this? Robinson and his EDL were formed with rival football club fans in Luton. I have been to Luton a long time ago. It is a sleepy town near London where one would have never imagined violent protests or Jihadi activities. Even if some of them were or are “football hooligans” why should that negate the arguments on a different issue? Well, that’s the Fiberal way of life. But wait, the shock is not over yet. Let’s watch this related video on this 4% Muslim population and crimes (4.32 mins):

When an advisory was sent to the Mosques to condemn the rapes 75% of them refused to read out the message or condemn the crimes. Should we interpret this as approval by the Mullahs of those who carried out the 1400 rapes over 16 years? Why not? Would that red bimbo and her types answer why? The bogus argument that a “majority” of a community are innocent is a misleading canard used to cover up crimes. Have we seen Mullahs in India condemning crimes and terrorism by Muslims? Are the idiots seriously suggesting that we should respond or speak only when all 1.2 Billion Muslims become violent? No society will exist if the entire population of a community became criminal. India wouldn’t exist if 800 million Hindus decided to become criminals and pursue a career in crime. This is another pet canard that our Fiberals use to dodge the real issue of consistent crimes from a community. 

News Traders & Interviews

In recent times the one series that comes to my mind on tough-talking interviews is BBC’s “Hard Talk”, especially with its first presenter Tim Sebastian. He anchored the series for nearly seven years. Tim was skilful in asking the toughest questions without intimidating or screaming at his guests. When he didn’t get an answer he pushed the question further but never appeared bent on demanding the answer he “wanted to hear”. In addition, he had a good voice which added pleasantness to the hard questions he asked. In India some like Karan Thapar imitate Sebastian but KT comes out with a scowling face, growling voice and distinct unpleasantness. Others like Barkha Dutt, Arnab Goswami and Rajdeep Sardesai conduct interviews with a pre-set agenda which becomes very evident to the viewer apart from the fluffiness of their show. And if, by mistake, someone did give an interview to C5M Sagarika Ghose, I would have to categorise that person as a moron too. It is in this context that I have assessed some of the best interviews this election season to be of Narendra Modi by Rajat Sharma of IndiaTV, Sanjay Pugalia of CNBCAwaaz and Smita Prakash of ANI News.

To set the record straight, Rajat Sharma’s “Aap ki Adalat” is NOT a typical interview. It is more of an entertaining chat show. The Adalat does not, naturally, make any adverse pronouncements on the guest. Therefore, some media folks cribbing against Sharma’s show (calling it fixed, scripted etc) neither understand it, nor the context. Even Ajay Maken had to fall into the silly crowd and play the fool:

What made Sharma’s show a high-TRP hit is that watching Modi in any show itself is a pleasant experience for most people. He exudes hope, positivity and speaks the way only a man with tremendous commitment, wisdom and work-experience can. Only his opponents and detractors, who will rant even if Modi walks on water, will deny that. Thus, a Modi interview is now a bigger challenge to an interviewer as compared to interviewing some other politician. Even when Madhu Kishwar merely got a “conversational” recording of Modi which was aired on NewsX the typical green media-morons reacted stupidly. It wasn’t an interview by any measure but more like a documentary presenting the Modi-side of the story on 2002 and other issues. The reason for ridiculing that film is that idiots like Rajdeep, Barkha, Saba Naqvi (a frequent flyer on TimesNow) believe that Modi would have told a different story had they interviewed him. That’s how idiotic their bunch is. Modi uses the term “News Traders” for this sorry lot of losers who neither have any morals nor any journalistic principles. Let’s look at two of the recent interviews of political figures; one of Modi and the other of Raj Thackeray.

There may hardly be an interview where the interviewer doesn’t feel “I forgot to ask that question” or “I should have asked that question differently”. Some of it comes out of poor homework. While the overall interview was fair, here’s a quick look at the Smita Prakash (SP) interview and you’ll see how she goofs up on multiple issues (6.30 mins):

00.17 What’s your strategy against Kejriwal? That’s a lame question and maybe it wasn’t worded properly and it got a simple answer from Modi. I’m sure SP would want to think how she could have rephrased it.

00.30 SP says RahulG talks about women’s security and of Gujarat being an offender in that regard. Now, questions like “he said, she said” are dumb because political opponents mostly say stupid things about each other. It needs some data digging before posing such a quote. Naturally, Modi easily dismisses it with Congress having 7 among top 10 state govts where crimes against women are high.

01.45 Congress says Modi spends 10000 crores on marketing himself. This was the dumbest of the lot. It was dumb also because SP is quoting Congress again. Modi tells her not to pass off a Congress question as her own unless she believes what they say. The awful truth that comes out of this question is that media folks don’t really understand what can be marketed and what cannot. They also do not understand the difference between advertising and publicity. When a villager in UP talks about the “Gujarat Model”, it’s because some friends or family members have been telling him stories about Gujarat, through their transactions and experiences. You cannot market a bad product for sustained period of 4-5 years. The Gujarat story is being talked about for many years. “Experience” is felt and related to others. For instance, did it take Sanjaya Baru’s book for people to believe SoniaG was the backseat PM who was clearing files? Most people knew MMS was a puppet without any book or document. They see it, they hear it and they sense it.

05.25 This is not only dumb but even alarming. SP says many feel the High Court may not accept the SIT report that has been accepted by the lower court. After the same SIT report SC did not find any merit to intervene. How on earth did SP or anyone derive or conclude HC may not accept the SIT findings? Such moronic speculation is passed off as a question. Modi went past it but it actually deserved a spanking.

In general, I think SP was overawed with getting a chance, probably unexpected, to interview Modi. She asked him if media would be under threat if he became PM and he explains no editor or reporter has ever been thrown out of Gujarat in 14 years of his CMship. Also, it’s the media darling Kejriwal who has held out such threats. Ironically, SP happens to be a “news trader” and I say that in a good sense. As far as I know, ANI News, of which she is an editor, does not run a channel of its own but feeds news videos to news channels. Their basic business is selling news to news outlets. Maybe she lacks the experience of interviewing top leaders but in the overall context she did a good job. But what one would really like to see is questions on how Modi will deal with important issues; say, like the Naxal problem. A question that asks him to outline in 2-3 points how he will turn around the economy, create jobs and so on. Instead, it is more of the same “he said, she said” type of interviews that the media sells. The other interview of the week simply has to be the worst of the year. Here’s Rajdeep with Raj Thackeray (6.12 mins):

Rajdeep’s interview with RajT came on the back of one already done by Arnab Goswami. Right from the start till the end Rajdeep’s questions are a bundle of absolute BS. Poor body language, arrogantly waving hands and fingers at the guest, jumping out of the seat often are all signs of a moron who has forgotten his job. Not just that, Rajdeep believes RajT is a joker who is just to be ridiculed unlike SoniaG who he worships. I am no fan of either of the Senas but once you have a guest as an interviewer you treat him or her with a certain amount of respect. I have called Rajdeep the “Father of media-filth” and he gives us proof again.

00.15 Rajdeep keeps asking if RajT’s objective is to defeat SS or to help Modi become a PM. Even after RajT says he wants to help Modi become PM Rajdeep keeps trolling him. RajT’s answer isn’t wrong. He says clearly backs Modi and not BJP. It is morons like Rajdeep who don’t get it that RajT may not have backed someone else from BJP in the same manner. Rajdeep keeps repeating “Modi and BJP” are the same. They are in the same party but they are not the same candidate. Clearly, Modi gets a backing that others like Rajnath or Advani may not have received from RajT. It seems this doesn’t go through the head of Rajdeep.

02.10 Rajdeep tells him “log kehte hai”, people say “Raj bhokta hai” (“Barks”). Now what kind of extreme moron would use language like that with his guest? Only a third-rate filth from the lowest gutter would do that. And Rajdeep says “log kehte hai”. Well “log” also say Rajdeep is corrupt, he is a Dalal and got his 52-crore bungalow by corruption. Oh wait, that’s not just “log”, it was one of his ex-employee who said that.

02.32 RajT is absolutely right when he points out Rajdeep had built his own ‘political party’ AAP, which flopped in 49 days. Everyone knows that! “Log” kehte hai Rajdeep was and is a pimp for the AAP party. He was the one who awarded an IOTY to Arvind Kejriwal. His channel was the one who gave maximum air time to AAP. So while pimping for AAP Rajdeep thinks he has the moral authority to question the future of RajT’s party. Naturally, RajT cut him to his pygmy size and put him place for his political pimping.

03.06 On reporting only violence from MNS and not Assam violence against Biharis, Rajdeep is so bamboozled it is simply unbelievable. The moron blurts out “Listen to my double standards”. That is how drunk he is and unaware of what he is uttering.

03.31 Rajdeep says “log kehte hai” RajT is a nautanki and dramabaaz. There isn’t much to say for this except that Rajdeep has nurtured the biggest nautankis in the media; Kejriwal and the Category5Moron Sagarika. Both are ingredients of the nautanki of CNN-IBN. I think Sonia’s poodle already knows this. “Log kehte” hai Rajdeep is a “bika hua news trader”. I don’t think many will disagree.

Those were the two contrasting interviews of the past week. Clearly, the interviewer looks better with Modi because he calmly answers questions. The corrupt news traders like Rajdeep and Sagarika were earlier screaming “Modi doesn’t take questions”. Now they are mourning Modi is doing a media blitzkrieg. They have reached a “saturation” point as mentioned in the interview. Rajdeep and his ilk are stuck in 2002 and their brain died that year. The extra-ordinary claim that Rajdeep makes in his interview is he is not a public figure. That should explain his irresponsible behaviour throughout his TV career. When the editor of a TV channel believes he is not a “public figure” you know he has thrown out accountability and responsibility long back. That one single claim by Rajdeep explains who is a “news trader” and who is a real interviewer or journalist.