Pet Canards - Part - 2

There are frequent surveys in the news media about the best schools and colleges. They rank the schools and declare some school as the best overall. What does it mean? That the particular school produces the most brilliant students and performers? That all the students from that school are Einsteins? And all the teachers at the school are the greatest in the world? I’m sure nobody takes these surveys to mean that. Or does the country with the biggest economy mean the most happiness? Lately there are surveys to rate the happiness quotient of countries. Some country topping the list surely doesn’t mean everyone is happy out there but it’s a general indicator from the samples taken. Our Fiberals who conduct such surveys do not like applying the same wisdom or theory to other areas. We shall see.

A few days back Yogi Adityanath was under the hammer again; this time in “Aap ki Adalat” by Rajat Sharma on IndiaTV. It’s fascinating how one man has rattled the media and they are unable to come to terms with the blunt truths he is dispensing. The Yogi is now headed to being tarred like Modi once was – Mass murderer, Hate-monger, Communal hater, Fascist, Bigot, Racist... Got any more names? Anyway, let’s watch some excerpts from near the end of the show (4.25 mins. Full video on Youtube):   

Wow! So when these morons have to confront the Yogi they are reminded of MKGandhi, Buddha and Mahavir. I wonder why these idiots never go to terrorists and teach them about turning the other cheek. Imagine, a man points a knife or a gun at you or is about to rape your mother, sister, wife or daughter and our Fiberals ask you to turn the other cheek. MK Gandhi has been put on such a pedestal that some of his serious mistakes are being white-washed by these scumbags. MKG wanted Hindus to suffer the Moplah rapes and murders. He wanted to support the Caliphate movement to appease Muslims (The ISIS is working on those dreams now). He wanted Jews to surrender to death peacefully. Most of all, MKG also wanted India shouldn’t have an Army, Navy or Airforce. Do these idiots want India to listen to MKG and dispense with our Army? When convenient, these criminal media crooks will pick up some quotes from Gandhi and throw at you without the whole truth. Did MKG prevent all the communal riots in his time? Why is it that MKG is not responsible for a faulty partition that has left India with the menace of communal riots when the partition itself was based on religion? The deceivers won’t have any answers.

As if all that wasn’t enough, the judge on the show is none other than Congress pimp Vinod Sharma. This guy is one sick man who shouldn’t be in the media or TV at all. He lectures the Yogi on virtues of peaceful living and how a nation cannot be run on “hate” and so on. One pet canard that Fiberals like to spread is that MKGandhi would have been non-violent no matter what. This is sheer nonsense. Here is what I tweeted in October 2011 to his degenerate great grand-son who scavenges in the name of Gandhi:

Was I wrong? It would cost me nothing to be wrong. But I doubt I am wrong. Here’s a CNN-IBN report reproducing some background on why MKG wasn’t considered for a Nobel:

"But Partition seems to have played a spoiler this time. The Nobel Committee report said: "The following 10 years, from 1937 up to 1947, led to the event which for Gandhi and his movement was at the same time the greatest victory and the worst defeat – India's independence and India's Partition… "Then he added: "...sharp turns in his policies, which can hardly be satisfactorily explained by his followers. (...) He is a freedom fighter and a dictator, an idealist and a nationalist. He is frequently a Christ, but then, suddenly, an ordinary politician."… “No one wanted war, but he could never advise anyone to put up with injustice. If all Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind. If there was war, the Hindus in Pakistan could not be fifth columnists. If their loyalty lay not with Pakistan, they should leave it. Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union."

If all the Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind? Do our Fiberal idiots agree with MK Gandhi on this? Do these morons agree that there can even be a JUST CAUSE for all Hindus to be annihilated? Where do such statements come from? In the same breath MKG said "Similarly, Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union." Want to implement that quote of Gandhi too? Long before I made my tweet above, here is what a Nobel committee member said:

“Gandhi had many critics in the international peace movement. The Nobel Committee adviser referred to these critics in maintaining that he was not consistently pacifist, that he should have known that some of his non-violent campaigns towards the British would degenerate into violence and terror. This was something that had happened during the first Non-Cooperation Campaign in 1920-1921, e.g. when a crowd in Chauri Chaura, the United Provinces, attacked a police station, killed many of the policemen and then set fire to the police station”.

I don’t care if MKG was worth a Nobel. He was a great man anyway with all his faults. But our Fiberals misuse “Gandhi” to make the most nonsensical points to Hindus. If Mahatma Gandhi were alive he would have wanted to shut them up and most of their illegitimate practices. And if Buddhists are largely a peaceful community, are they going to be spared? Here’s what jokers like Rajat Sharma are too blind to see:

How is Indonesia bothered by Burma (or Myanmar). Even if there are problems in Myanmar with the Buddhists and Muslims why should Indonesians want to kill them? Oh wait! All Indonesians aren’t like that, are they? So if I point to Azad Maidan, they’ll say all Muslims aren’t like that. If I point to London and the crowd wanting to kill Salman Rushdie, they’ll say all British Muslims aren’t like that. Who the hell said “all are like that”? But the “sample” you consistently provide on all parameters across the world does get your community that tag. It is not wishful thinking by others. That’s how a college gets voted the best or a country gets voted the happiest. Let’s get back to where we left off in Part-1. Here’s a woman in red, a typical brain-washed Fiberal, who dishes out this same stupid logic. Tommy Robinson of EDL keeps asking how he’s a racist so she explains (0.36 mins):

Okay! So the bimbo says Robinson picked up a “tiny minority” from a whole community of hundreds of thousands (The sidekick interjects and says “billions”) and tarred all of them so that is “racist”. How lovely! This is the same stupid argument you hear all over India and all over the world. Your brother goes around killing people but if I ask you to put a leash on him you get back with “Don’t tar my family else you are racist”. Did Robinson say all Muslims or all British Muslims are thugs? I doubt it but you can see how the bimbos and liars hide behind such spurious logic. And if at all a “tiny minority” of your community is committing crimes then who is responsible for controlling them? Only the police? Not their families, not their community leaders or mosques that these people are members of?

In another event of the Heritage Foundation over the killing of the American Ambassador in Benghazi a similar incident happened. A Muslim argues that all Muslims cannot be tarred with the brush of terrorism. Actually, nobody even tarred any Muslim or talked about Muslims in that meeting. But she got a severe answer from a panellist, Bridget Gabriel. Watch the video (5.49 minutes):

The majority of the community just watch. The silent majority stays silent which is why the nonsense goes on. This is true for Hindus too. Because a majority of Hindus cannot see the nonsense of “Sickular” politicians and media they endure the abuse and atrocities on them. This is starting to change with many people speaking up (people like the Yogi) and that is bothering the criminal media folks immensely. It threatens their corrupt life and discourse. Following that response by Bridget Gabriel, some in the US media predictably called it a rant and hounding of the sole Muslim girl in that event. When the girl claims she’s the only representative there she is actually applauded by the audience and not taunted as some US media reports claimed. But here’s some damaging revelation: That girl, Saba Ahmed, turned out to be connected to a violent Jihadi.

Now what? Now you read the full report and it makes chilling reading. There is no getting away from the truth about all this anymore. These are pet canards media and politicians like to hurl at everyone who speaks the truth. Those who speak up will not be challenged with facts and logic but sentimental claptrap and name-calling. We are not done yet. In the aftermath of the expose of 1400 rapes in Rotherham there are some more chilling facts. Take a look at this:

It is something similar that the Yogi too argues. That the moment Muslim population starts rising in an area there is a disproportionate rise in communal riots. How does one explain 4% of British Muslims committing 91% of child rapes? Even if you provide for abundant discounts I doubt the picture can change dramatically. Will the bimbo in red who ranted against Tommy Robinson explain this? Would that moron called Saira Khan (in purple) explain this? Robinson and his EDL were formed with rival football club fans in Luton. I have been to Luton a long time ago. It is a sleepy town near London where one would have never imagined violent protests or Jihadi activities. Even if some of them were or are “football hooligans” why should that negate the arguments on a different issue? Well, that’s the Fiberal way of life. But wait, the shock is not over yet. Let’s watch this related video on this 4% Muslim population and crimes (4.32 mins):

When an advisory was sent to the Mosques to condemn the rapes 75% of them refused to read out the message or condemn the crimes. Should we interpret this as approval by the Mullahs of those who carried out the 1400 rapes over 16 years? Why not? Would that red bimbo and her types answer why? The bogus argument that a “majority” of a community are innocent is a misleading canard used to cover up crimes. Have we seen Mullahs in India condemning crimes and terrorism by Muslims? Are the idiots seriously suggesting that we should respond or speak only when all 1.2 Billion Muslims become violent? No society will exist if the entire population of a community became criminal. India wouldn’t exist if 800 million Hindus decided to become criminals and pursue a career in crime. This is another pet canard that our Fiberals use to dodge the real issue of consistent crimes from a community. 

Pet Canards - Part - 1

In a day or two the entire MSM will analyse the 100 days of Modi-Govt. Some members of the G-37 will tell you what the Modi-Sarkar did not achieve and how they have miserably failed. Political opponents of Modi will coin some phrases to describe the failures. They are masters at coining phrases and labels. Remember Nidhi Razdan and that British MP Barry Gardiner who invited Modi to the UK? She kept calling Modi “controversial” in every sentence she spoke. It’s not an accident and it’s not spontaneous. This comes with scripted hatred. Then there was the “Rambo” episode, the “Puppy” episode which used the words to “monsterize” Modi. Of course, the usual titles of fascist, murderer, Hitler, racist, anti-Muslim have been around long enough. There is something about his plain-talk (like “secularism ka burqa”) that upsets our Commie Congress, their Commie clones and our Commie media. The criminals in the MSM who parade as “liberals” are in fact “Fiberals” who cannot survive without lies and denials of truth. You could call those “pet canards”. Yogi Adityanath, the saffron-robed BJP MP, has been rattling the media and the Commie bunch with some blunt truths. Let’s read a sample response from Firstpost:

“Firebrand BJP leader Yogi Adityanath has attacked the minority community, saying riots happen wherever they are more than 10 percent in numbers while there is no place for non-Muslims where they are more than 35 percent. Defending his provocative speeches, the Gorakhpur MP, who is among three party leaders entrusted with leading BJP campaign for the upcoming bye-elections in Uttar Pradesh, said Hindus will reply "in the same language" if they are subjected to attacks or forcible conversions… "In places where there are 10 to 20 percent minorities, stray communal incidents take place. Where there are 20 to 35 percent of them, serious communal riots take place and where they are more than 35 percent, there is no place for non-Muslims," he said. "I have said, if you (minorities) kill one of us, do not expect that you will remain safe... If the other side does not stay in peace, we will teach them how to stay in peace," Adityanath said… Justifying his rabble-rousing remarks, he said, "Whatever I had then said was conditional. If the other is a danav (devil), not a manav (human), then one has to reply. If I have a mala (rosary) in one hand, I also carry a bhala (javelin) in the other". He alleged 'Love Jihad', a term coined by Hindutva activists to protest alleged organised conversion of Hindu girls, is an "international conspiracy" against India. He cited some court orders to buttress his claim”.

It goes beyond reporting. They call him a “rabble-rouser”. Pet canard! Why? Because he speaks some very blunt truths? Is it not true that as the Muslim population in certain areas increase there is a dramatic increase in riots? Why don’t we have so many riots in Goa with Christians or with Sikhs in Punjab? Others on NDTV, CNN-IBN, Timesnow are arguing about his statement like “If you kill one Hindu, we will kill a hundred” or “If they convert one Hindu girl, we should convert 100 of theirs”. Sure, these are provocative statements but all provocative statements are not necessarily hate speeches. While they want to hang the Yogi for such statements, none of our corrupt media anchors want to ask “Why should the Muslims kill even ONE Hindu or anyone at all”? In recent years all Muslim agitations have invariably been violent. I have rarely heard of a peaceful protest or agitation. From Azad Maidan to Saharanpur or all those movies, cartoons and Gaza protests. Someone had posted this sarcastic pic on Twitter:

Events across the world have completely demolished the nonsense of Commie arguments about terrorism has no religion or Muslims are being victimised. Many MSM “Candlelight sinners” mourned endlessly about Gaza but when the ISIS killings broke they all went into a hiding. The iRudali even did a show “Our rather volatile debate on whether India has abandoned her heart on the Gaza killings”. You won’t find her, or any other media crook, debating ISIS or some horrific incidents that came to light in England. First, let’s watch a small clip from a studio debate with a panel typically filled with “Barkhas of England”. In the audience as a volunteer is (ex) founder of English Defence League (EDL) Tommy Robinson (an alias) and this event was a few months before the horrific rapes of 1400 girls came to light. Let’s watch (5.09 mins):

Nice! The opening shot comes from a Muslim who wants to put Anjem Chaudhary and Tommy Robinson on an island and bomb them with Anthrax. I wonder what this obsession is with wanting to bomb anyone you hate. Anyway! Robinson tries to explain there is nothing racist about his protests against Islamists or their ideology and there isn’t really. There is a woman in a pink top and you can’t mistake the permanent scowl on her face which shows the contempt she has for Robinson. She keeps calling him “racist, racist, racist” but not once does she explain why he is a racist. Nobody does! Yet the MSM-brainwashed audience also cheers each time he is called a racist. The full video of that show is on Youtube and some comments on the page reflect more maturity than the panellists and the host:

The entire bunch of morons in that hall, including the idiotic host proved how an entire country was taken for a ride by “fake secularism” and manufactured fears of racism. Because, as we all know by now, this stupid “political correctness” resulted in the rape, abuse and some murders of 1400 girls in Rotherham. The morons like Saira Khan (the woman in pink) should feel like thorough bumpkins for refusing to see the truth. The facts about the cases that were buried and how victims were turned the accused is shocking to say the least. In one case a girl narrated how 250 men had raped her. Here’s another small bit from the Rotherham story:

The police arrested the victim. Looks like Rahul Kanwal would be pleased with that considering he wants to turn Tara Sahdeo into an offender. Ironically, the one everyone hated in that hall (Tommy Robinson) today stands vindicated. Let’s run through the report once again, this time from Frontpage:

“The abuse of at least 1,400 British girls took place because multiculturalism and denial came before their safety. Just as with terrorism, it was easier to close your eyes and chant, “Islam is a Religion of Peace”.

A culture of Left-wing political correctness led politicians and officials to ignore the plight of young girls who were being sexually abused by Asian men, Labour figures have warned.

Ann Cryer, an MP from 1997 until 2010, told The Sunday Telegraph how she had feared being called “racist” when, in 2002, she exposed a sex-abuse scandal involving Pakistani men in her constituency of Keighley, West Yorkshire. A “politically correct Left just saw it as racism”, she said. At the same time, Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, revealed that even now some of his colleagues disapproved of his efforts to uncover child abuse, because some were “obsessing about multiculturalism”. Mrs Cryer recalled how there was a politically correct Left that saw her fight as racism. “At the time I was dealing with this, 2002-04, political correctness was playing a big part. The Guardian at that time hardly mentioned these things… because it was so politically correct.”

Simon Danczuk has written more: I believe that all those three agencies are run by a liberal, woolly-minded, middle-class elite who simply cannot conceive of the truly miserable lives that some inner-city children in this country are forced to endure, and who prefer to concentrate on media-friendly ideas such as multiculturalism, diversity and community values – rather than on something as wicked as the rape of a child. They do not pursue the perpetrators because, blinded by political correctness, they simply do not see the abuse”.

Do note that these multi-culti crimes started after Tony Blair promoted it since 1997 when he became PM and all these 1400 abuse cases are mostly during his tenure as PM. Votebank Sickularism kills everywhere. And as the report above indicates our stupid Indian media too does not pursue such cases because it would offend Muslims, because of Sickularism and because of their intense hatred for Hindus. Anyone who raises his voice will be called a racist, fascist, bigot and all kinds of similar names. The article above mentions The Guardian’s political correctness specifically. This is what the political pimps at the Guardian and Economic Review were busy doing in the past two years:

As penitence, The Guardian carried a piece by Ruzwana Bashir, an earlier victim. Although her article is poignant the paper still peddles the same political correctness with vague descriptions such as “Asian men” etc. The revelations of these crimes have surely proved the ones in the video and many Commie defenders of fake secularism and appeasement are the dumbest idiots in politics and media. The moment someone puts out a warning or sends signals they will brand him as a bigot, anti-Muslim and a racist. Yogi Adityanath had all of it coming since he made his stunning speech in parliament. Other cowards in the media like Rahul Kanwal of Headlines Today were busy trashing Tara Sahdeo, a victim of fraudulent marriage. There are others who are still idiotic when it comes to understanding who is a real victim like “useful idiot” Sudheendra Kulkarni:

You want to talk about the problems of Kashmiri Muslims that is one thing and they may have legitimate problems as people in every other state have. But how in hell is it related to the fate of KPs who have been raped, murdered and most thrown out of their own state. This is what our Intellectual Morons cannot distinguish. They equate the problems of victims with the problems of the aggressor. In the video in this post there is a woman in red who tries to explain why Robinson is a racist. She suggests he is tarring an entire community because of a small group that commits crimes. This is as lame as it gets. This is another of those pet canards that float around. We shall see in the next part how this is also a misleading canard and a deliberate LIE. 

G-37

At a recent event in Mumbai (on August 22) I had talked about how our MSM peddles perceptions to suit their agenda. A majority of their bogus debates has nothing to do with reality or truth. As Howard Beale strongly suggests, they are in the “boredom-killing” business. The corrupt media uses labels like “controversial”, “racist”, “fascist”, “communal”, “secular” etc. to suit the agenda of their political bosses. These fake debates borrow from American formats and are mostly peddled on NDTV, CNN-IBN, TimesNow and HeadlinesToday. The Hindi channels and regional channels borrow the same format. In the last few years TimesNow, in particular, has turned these bogus debates into a major circus with Arnab Goswami as the Chief Clown. Perpetrators of lies and criminal propaganda like Barkha Dutt, Nidhi Razdan on NDTV continue this practice. CNN-IBN had to get rid of Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose when they campaigned for AAP who trashed their bosses. I shared the following process of how the propaganda or perception is delivered:

Naturally, there has been a lot of curiosity about this “G-37” since then on the SM and in messages to me. G-37 is a name coined by Chitra Subramaniam for the regular group of panellists used by TV channels to peddle their propaganda or perceptions one way or another. Some people have been asking for the names of this G-37 group so I thought a compilation of the usual suspects would be helpful. Here it is, the G-37:

A word of caution: It is inevitable that there will be agreements and disagreements on the names. Some may want additions and some may want deletions. That is perfectly fine. What you can do is do that yourself and create your own G-37 and check how much it matches with this or deviates. I believe a majority of the names would be common on any G-37 list. The list here is from a period of the last five years. Post-elections 2014 a lot of changes have and will likely continue to happen.