(This is a MaxiPost)
The Editors’ Guild (which is a Union of Snakes) condemned the imaginary attack on Rajdeep Sardesai by PM Modi’s supporters. This relates to the
incident at Madison Square Garden, New York. I don’t have to add that the EG is
filled with people like Rajdeep (a former president of the EG). They’re people
who have forgotten what their job is, what their code of conduct is and what
their ethics are. The entire media mafia reacted predictably; without evidence and without facts. Do
these people really qualify to be editors? A few days back the same EG issued a
grand statement demanding greater access
to the PM and PMO:
“A statement
issued by the Guild said that a "top-down, one-way interaction in a
country with limited internet connectivity and technological awareness cannot
be the only answer for large masses of readers, viewers, surfers and listeners.
Debate, dialogue and discussion are the essential ingredients of a democratic
discourse… By delaying the establishment of a media inter-face in the Prime
Minister's Office, in restricting access to ministers and bureaucrats in
offices and in reducing the flow of information at home and abroad, the
government in its early days seems to be on a path that runs counter to the
norms of democratic discourse and accountability”.
Democratic
discourse and accountability? The EG
members who can blatantly lie, as also other media crooks in the MSM, do not
demonstrate any accountability themselves and they think they are God’s
messengers to demand it from others. Evidence has proved beyond any doubt that
RS was the aggressor, the offender who physically assaulted a person at MSG.
All of these clowns exploded against what they call “Modi Bhakts”. They’re just “Modi Bhakts” and not people who came to
hear the Indian PM? Well, not
according to Rajdeep as we shall see. We would be right in calling these clowns
“Congress Coolies” who are
predominantly anti-Modi and have been so for over a dozen years. Let’s look at
comments from some of these hate-filled clowns:
Let’s do it serially. First, there is
this ultimate Morongini from NDTV – Sunetra
Choudhury. In her rage she even thinks they have the right to ask obnoxious questions. Like what? Like
her stupid boss Barkha asked Tulsi Gabbard are you “going to stick to
Hinduism”? Not so long ago another bimbo from NDTV (Nidhi Razdan)
screamed “we
have the right to question our Supreme Court”. Who the hell are these people? Grannies-in-law of all of India that
they can blabber anything? Then there is the stupid Shiv Aroor who claimed he saw the video “frame by frame” and the local guy attacked Rajdeep. Seriously, this
guy is totally blind if that’s what he saw and the rest of the world saw something
else. Then there is the usual scumbag called Varadabhai who vomits filth at every chance to tar Modi. This
anti-Indian American squats in India and spews his hatred on anything that’s
connected to Modi, RSS or Hindus. That’s his life. Sick, venal! And then there’s the iRudali who passes for editor at NDTV (responsible for nothing by
the way) who as usual is quick to condemn anything to do with ordinary Indians
that she hates right from head to her little toe. And all these morons are
supposedly editors of the garbage variety who didn’t spare even a few hours to
check facts of the incident. This is who they are. And they demand accountability from the PMO?
So what kind of questions did Rajdeep
ask? Apart from the usual nonsense of 2002 and the US visa denial he asks the
street-people “Is
Modi BJP’s PM”? Then he tells them “only 31% voted for Modi” (factually
wrong but immaterial) so “what do they have to say to the remaining critics of Modi”.
So all the remaining 69% (according to Rajdeep) are haters like him who do
nothing all day but rant about and criticise Modi for no reason or rhyme? And
this is what these thugs call journalism? All the video evidence is in my previous post. When you imply by
questions that the PM is not a PM for everyone but only for one political party
then you are indeed abusing your country.
How does it matter whether Modi got 31% or 16% votes? Have Modi and his party
not won the election fair and square? You
land up on foreign soil and abuse your own democratic system then that is
indeed abusing India as the poster someone made rightly says.
If
you are unwilling to accept a democratically elected PM as your PM: Get out of
India and rant and abuse all your life. This is not criticism or demanding
accountability from anyone but mindless abuse of the PM and ordinary Indian
voters because they voted one particular party. Don’t stay in India or claim to
be an Indian if you cannot accept
her democratic procedures and verdicts. What
code of conduct is that, Mr Aroon Purie? What ethics is that? And do people call Rajdeep a hate-monger and
Modi-abuser just for fun? Do they have any genetic motive to dislike him? Not
at all? Both Rajdeep and Sagarika have a history of abusing people and Modi.
Half the people on SM are writing about media because this hate-filled duo (along
with others like Barkha) deserved a spanking. Just go through all the links in
this post “The eternal lies of Rajdeep” for a full dossier on Rajdeep’s lies and abuse. This
scumbag even claims to be a journalist or an editor? Where in the world is so
much hatred peddled by a media-couple? Any
answers, Aroon Purie? So too the bimbo Sunetra. Just as Rajdeep abused NRIs
as people “With
money but no class” this bimbo loses an argument and ridicules a
woman just because she’s an NRI:
You hate and ridicule a woman for being
an NRI? These scumbags now not only look down upon Indians but also NRIs. The
only race that is acceptable to them is the race called “media Sickos”. They keep getting better with time after C5M’s “Ugly Indian males” statement. And they are
journalists? They have the right to ask “obnoxious” questions? Fly a kite! And
after all this the India-abuser, stuttering, stammering, blabbering Rajdeep
goes on another rant about Modi not taking questions from him. Laughable! Watch (1.16 mins):
If you bear so much hatred towards the
PM of the country and its citizens you are naturally going to be mocked and
ridiculed by ordinary folks. But there is a question of professionalism, of
professional code of conduct and ethics. And
that is the question that Aroon Purie needs to answer since he is the
chairman of the company that employs this hate-monger. Let me remind these
people about Virat Kohli and the
incident when he was booed by the public. This was Kohli’s reaction:
Mind you, Kohli didn’t assault anybody
or insult anyone verbally. For showing his middle finger he was fined 50% of
his match-fees. It is a known
convention, practice and part of the code of conduct that when professional
figures are with crowds they will be applauded and they will be mocked, booed
and ridiculed. The professional is expected to take all that in his stride
and move on. If he fails, there is a price to pay for breaking the code and
professional ethics. What is the price
Rajdeep is going to pay, Mr Aroon Purie? Then there was the case of Inzamam-ul Haq in 1997 when he
was ridiculed by a spectator with a megaphone who kept chanting “Aloo Aloo” (meaning fat as potato) at
Inzamam. The player got into the enclosure and almost beat up the spectator. No
matter what the provocation Inzamam was not forgiven for his conduct. He was
banned for two ODIs. Has Rajdeep even issued an apology yet, Mr Aroon Purie?
How are you dealing with this case? Not enough? Okay, here you go, watch
another video (1.22 mins):
France’s great football hero, Zinedine Zidane, a much-admired
professional player across the world (not disliked like Rajdeep) was red-carded
and sent off for head-butting an opponent in the WC Finals in 2006. Zidane’s
opponent had supposedly abused him verbally to which he reacted. Even THAT is not acceptable under
professional code of conduct Mr Aroon Purie. Even when two teams are on the
ground and one opponent (not some spectator) abuses you, you are not entitled
to physically assault him. It invites a punishment. In the case of Rajdeep
there were no opponents but ordinary people. Even if they heckled him he had no
right to assault anyone. In fact, Rajdeep was the first to call someone an “asshole”
and when that person returned the compliment, RS turned back and physically
assaulted him. Under which code of
conduct or ethics is Rajdeep entitled to this behaviour Mr Aroon Purie? Yours? Just as Zidane received an
instant red-card, Rajdeep deserves an instant sacking. And this wasn’t even
some “personal” fight that Rajdeep
was involved in, he was there as a reporter for India Today group.
All the mafia members – Editors guild,
assorted Sickos from TV and print – all of them collectively lied about the MSG
incident and portrayed Rajdeep as the victim when the truth was exactly the
opposite. Rajdeep was and is the criminal.
This mafia doesn’t even follow the first basic rule of journalism: fact-check and double-check before
blabbering or reporting. Even carpenters and tailors follow the golden rule: “Measure twice, cut once”. To this day
this mafia carries on its hate-campaign against Modi and his supporters. Why in
hell do they expect he should talk to them or even share a seat with them?
Which of these sickos have apologised for their false portrayal and reporting
of the MSG incidents? None! On the contrary a news website, Rediff, grandly published a news item
claiming Modi had condemned the attack on Rajdeep. Predictably, this was “Salma-Sabrina” reporting with no basis.
Rediff quoted Gautam Adani as having communicated Modi’s comments (as if Adani
is Modi’s spokie). The poor guy had to issue a clarification:
So Rajdeep goes and whines with Adani.
Fair enough! He claims they abused his son – no way to verify. But if that
causes him so much grief then he should ask himself how Modi, as a PM,
tolerates all his abuse (and those of others) with professional decency without
ever retaliating. This mafia even ridicules Modi's mother. The PM sends the right message by talking to people directly
through mass media, social media and now also radio. These mongrels that grovel for crumbs while abusing the man certainly
do not merit an audience. Some of them are anti-nationals and who knows
which one might pull a knife or a weapon given that scoundrels like Rajdeep can
attack ordinary people. And when the
truth had hit them all like it always does, this is what his bitter half
tweeted:
While Rajdeep maybe a hero to his family
it is now established beyond any doubt that this hate-mongering couple is
nothing but public nuisance. Sagarika’s
tweet is also a veiled admission that she realises that her hubby was the fool
and the criminal at MSG. Now that the real story and the truth is out, the
spotlight has to turn to Aroon Purie on how he’s going to handle this criminal.
Purie was once caught plagiarising
content from a magazine. It’s a crime. But he blamed ‘jet-lag’ and his Delhi staff for feeding him those lines as he
didn’t know much about the subject he was writing about. That’s how Chief
Editors and Publishers of magazines write and then offer the usual excuse about
their staff having “fed” them the stuff. Purie apologised and one can forgive
his offence as a stray incident and move on.
Rajdeep has not apologised to his victim
or to anyone else. In this case apology isn’t enough and Rajdeep is a chronic
offender. Rajdeep has breached all codes of decency, of public conduct and any
journalistic ethics that the Editors’ Guild claims it has. Does Aroon Purie follow any code of conduct, ethics or morals? If
so, these morals and ethics demand that Purie sack this criminal immediately
from his company. If he does not, there is a message he sends to his entire
team and to the journalistic community at large that they do not have any moral rights to question anyone’s conduct.
They will be in no position to demand the resignation of any violent or corrupt
politician. Their targets will ask them to look inward instead of pointing
fingers at others. Rajdeep belongs in
jail. To send him there or not is the choice of the injured party who was
assaulted. But it’s now a question
whether Aroon Purie has any ethics or morals. That is his and the media’s
test.
Tailpiece: On October 3,
Rajdeep tweeted (No.1) wondering why someone was tweeting his 6-month old tweet
and that it was mischief. The tweet in question (No.2) was one where he plays “victim”
after slyly abusing Modi as a “Dog” (No.3 – That was the Nemo-NaMo walk tweet
of his). And on February 9, 2014 Rajdeep claimed he was receiving death threats
and abuses and fears for his granny (No.4). This sick moron abuses, plays
victim and claims fake threats. This is the criminal at his game for over a
dozen years. Naturally, Tweeple asked him if he could carry on his nonsense of
2002 for 12 years why he’s averse to being reminded of his 6-month old tweet?
Karma!
