Rajdeep's Ugly Character - Part 2

If you haven’t already, please read the previous part: “Rajdeep reveals his ugly character at NY” and also “A question of Aroon Purie’s ethics & morals”.

Contrary to what a hack grandly claimed after Rajdeep Sardesai’s ugly Madison Square Garden incident, self-styled journalists do not have any Constitutional right to ask “obnoxious” questions. This dangerous assumption has been used to spew hatred on a certain segment of people by our MSM. This hatred had to inevitably result in the physical assault of a person that Rajdeep is guilty of. These sickos in our MSM have no business to talk about freedom or liberty. Wise men have long ago left this wisdom behind: “The liberty to swing your arm ends where another man’s nose begins”.

After the incident some Aaptards, led by you know who, put out part videos of RS being manhandled. Little did these idiots know that in this day and age anybody and everybody with a mobile phone is almost a citizen-journalist. But predictably, the “Box of parrots” that forms our MSM went on a rant about how RS was abused and assaulted. I have screenshots but to save space let’s summarise the initial morons:

These unworthies now have eggs on their faces. This is nothing short of a choreographed operation to make RS a “victim” of a “mob” as these scoundrels refer to the people who had come to hear PM Modi. All the evidences and videos have already been put up in the previous posts I referred to at the beginning. The question now is, what did Rajdeep do after the incident that drove this choreographed operation of #IStandWithRajdeep? Let’s read his “regret” which he published on October 10 (excerpts):

“However, I do believe it is important to put events of the day in context. I along with my camera person was outside Madison Square garden about three hours before the prime minister was to arrive. Our aim was to capture the mood, which was  joyous and excited. We were able to reflect much of this in our coverage… I was abused in terribly foul terms, my family was called names and I was kicked in the shins when my back was turned. The pushing and jostling continued even as I tried not to engage. I had gone to the event with hopes of goodwill instead the volley of name calling was unrelenting and shocking to me. My camera person and other witnesses would bear testimony to this… I do, however, believe that surrounding, heckling and hurling vicious personalized abuse while a journalist is doing a professional job is also unacceptable. We journalists have a challenging job at the best of times and only ask to be allowed to perform our duties unhindered without intimidation… The freedom of the press is an integral part of our democracy and should be respected  by all”.

Rajdeep uses all the balderdash in the world to defend his abuses and stupid behaviour. As a professional, if you’re heckled, you just walk away. You just find another spot to report from. The videos clearly show what this scoundrel was intent on doing: Inviting soundbites against Modi that will tar the PM and throw a sour note to the event. He was fishing for filth. RS claims he had his cameraman with him. What was that cameraman doing? Peeling onions? This is what RS tweeted:

A) If you got the “idiots on cam” where’s the video? B) It’s not that “mob” that released a “selective” video. It’s Rajdeep’s Aaptards who released a selective video. Fact: Rajdeep does have a video that his cameraman may have shot but unfortunately that video DOES NOT have any abuse or violence from people.  C) The full video which starts with Rajdeep turning back and assaulting Mr. Yellow Kurta was put up only after the “selective” video was put out by Aaptards.

RS represents a TV channel with a full crew but can’t put up a video to back his stupid claims? That’s the character that Rajdeep is and that is why his regret or apology is a mop-up operation that won’t pass. But the lies didn’t last long after the full video came up and that is why Rajdeep now tries to claim he was abused, his son was abused, all without the slightest shred of evidence. That calls for an estimate of what Rajdeep did after the incident, doesn’t it?

Fact seems to be that the truncated video was indeed passed on to “very senior Aaptards” by Rajdeep himself or his crew. The Aaptards put up the selective video and the boss sends a message to all his fellow Aaptards who then trend #IStandWithRajdeep. It’s based on this LIE that all the morons in the media started making him a “victim”. How do I know? Well, a very “Senior Bird” from Delhi called me up a few days ago to tell me the whole story. This Bird & Co. also had interactions with Rajdeep immediately after the incident. As soon as he went to his hotel, or wherever he went after the incident, Rajdeep probably realised that he had screwed up unforgivably. Once the heat of the moment was gone, his cold sweat probably caused him to realise his blunder. So what does he do? He calls up all members of the HATO (Hammam Associates Treaty Organisation). That’s a lot like the NATO you know. The job of this HATO is to protect their mafia member no matter what. That’s why Namita Bhandare foolishly rants “Assault of one journalist is assault on entire press”. Bravo! By the same logic, rape by Tejpal would also make the entire press a mafia of rapists. Wouldn’t it? That’s what someone reminded her:

And Namita Bhandare enters into long baseline rallies with another journo pointing to eyewitness accounts. Really? Eyewitness? In this age of candid camera? And she demands the “Union of snakes” which also passes by the name of Editors Guild must seek an apology from the organisers of the MSG event. Oh well, she quotes the eyewitness account’s narration. Here:

Well, well! As soon as the truth came out, the “eyewitness account” of Mistresses like Namita Bhandare disappeared. This moron who tends to blabber a lot about right-wing didn’t pause to think for herself. She was led like a babe in the woods to the stupidity she came to deliver on behalf of Rajdeep. After all, member of HATO, eh? As for eyewitnesses, Ashok Shrivastav of DD was also an eyewitness and he didn’t disappear or withdraw like Namita’s punk on FB. So, Rajdeep called up many of his HATO members to paint him a victim and they gladly obliged without a second thought or without any fact-checking. That’s what the criminal attempted – a black-wash of his crimes. You would have thought that Rajdeep who so bragged about “Citizen Journalism” while with CNN-IBN forgot that these same citizen journalists abound everywhere to screw his lies. If a legal authority were to scan the phone call records of Rajdeep from that day it would bear out what I have stated.

Next, Rajdeep runs into Gautam Adani in some restaurant and narrates his sob story. He tells him how he was abused and molested by the “mob” (Of the Gambino or Modino family?). Adani probably said he sympathises and any leader would condemn such incidents. Of course, you can safely assume Adani wouldn’t have seen or heard anything other than the sob story of Rajdeep. So Rajdeep gets a call from Sheela Bhatt (or maybe he called her to deliver another Salma story) and he tells her how Adani mentioned Modi was upset with the “mob’s” behaviour. Promptly, Sheela Bhatt runs a story on her Rediff pages with the headline “Modi upset over attack on Rajdeep Sardesai”. All this, when Modi would have probably have never even heard of the incidents in his busy schedule. And why would Modi even bother with the silly drama of Rajdeep? Even this lie could not run its course because Adani issued a clear denial of any such communication. So basically Rajdeep and Sheela Bhatt were doing their “Salma-Sabrina” act. Pathetic LIARS!

In summary, the fake stories of abuse, assault on him etc. were placed in the social media by none other than Rajdeep himself. He used his Hammam, senior Aaptards and gullible people like Sheela Bhatt to spread his victimhood. There isn’t a single piece of evidence that he was abused (except in retaliation) or physically assaulted. All the video-evidence points to Rajdeep being the criminal. And that is that! Rajdeep is also lucky Mr Yellow Kurta didn’t file a police complaint for assault, else he would have cooled his heels in a cold cell and still be in the US on bail. 

After Wimbledon this year Maria Sharapova blurted out she hadn’t heard of Sachin Tendulkar. That was enough to send thousands of his fans on a rampage. Sharapova was ridiculed, abused all over the social media and cartoons abounded on the MSM. Why would you go to a public event of PM Modi and deliberately abuse and provoke those who came to hear him? Why would you call them a “mob”? Would you call people assembled for an SRK show a mob? Would you call those attending Sonia’s rally a mob? All this is mindless hatred that Rajdeep and others in the MSM have nurtured. It culminated in his violent behaviour. The only mafia “mob” I see is lumpens from the MSM who spread lies and abuse people because they support Modi. You don’t shout “Fire” in a crowded theatre. Rajdeep and his entire Hammam now stand naked in front of you.

Tailpiece: To the bimbo who claimed journalists have the right to ask “obnoxious” questions my only warning is to expect “obnoxious” answers. There’s a video floating on Facebook about a similar obnoxious behaviour by a reporter. She epitomises what Rajdeep did at MSG. The street guys responded with far more maturity.

Telling people “You have money but have no class… Did Modi teach you this?... You American-Indians have no values” is nothing short of racist behaviour by Rajdeep. And these are the bimbos to teach us freedom of press and democracy? 

A Question Of Aroon Purie's Ethics & Morals

(This is a MaxiPost)

The Editors’ Guild (which is a Union of Snakes) condemned the imaginary attack on Rajdeep Sardesai by PM Modi’s supporters. This relates to the incident at Madison Square Garden, New York. I don’t have to add that the EG is filled with people like Rajdeep (a former president of the EG). They’re people who have forgotten what their job is, what their code of conduct is and what their ethics are. The entire media mafia reacted predictably; without evidence and without facts. Do these people really qualify to be editors? A few days back the same EG issued a grand statement demanding greater access to the PM and PMO: 

“A statement issued by the Guild said that a "top-down, one-way interaction in a country with limited internet connectivity and technological awareness cannot be the only answer for large masses of readers, viewers, surfers and listeners. Debate, dialogue and discussion are the essential ingredients of a democratic discourse… By delaying the establishment of a media inter-face in the Prime Minister's Office, in restricting access to ministers and bureaucrats in offices and in reducing the flow of information at home and abroad, the government in its early days seems to be on a path that runs counter to the norms of democratic discourse and accountability”.

Democratic discourse and accountability? The EG members who can blatantly lie, as also other media crooks in the MSM, do not demonstrate any accountability themselves and they think they are God’s messengers to demand it from others. Evidence has proved beyond any doubt that RS was the aggressor, the offender who physically assaulted a person at MSG. All of these clowns exploded against what they call “Modi Bhakts”. They’re just “Modi Bhakts” and not people who came to hear the Indian PM? Well, not according to Rajdeep as we shall see. We would be right in calling these clowns “Congress Coolies” who are predominantly anti-Modi and have been so for over a dozen years. Let’s look at comments from some of these hate-filled clowns:

Let’s do it serially. First, there is this ultimate Morongini from NDTV – Sunetra Choudhury. In her rage she even thinks they have the right to ask obnoxious questions. Like what? Like her stupid boss Barkha asked Tulsi Gabbard are you “going to stick to Hinduism”? Not so long ago another bimbo from NDTV (Nidhi Razdan) screamed “we have the right to question our Supreme Court”. Who the hell are these people? Grannies-in-law of all of India that they can blabber anything? Then there is the stupid Shiv Aroor who claimed he saw the video “frame by frame” and the local guy attacked Rajdeep. Seriously, this guy is totally blind if that’s what he saw and the rest of the world saw something else. Then there is the usual scumbag called Varadabhai who vomits filth at every chance to tar Modi. This anti-Indian American squats in India and spews his hatred on anything that’s connected to Modi, RSS or Hindus. That’s his life. Sick, venal! And then there’s the iRudali who passes for editor at NDTV (responsible for nothing by the way) who as usual is quick to condemn anything to do with ordinary Indians that she hates right from head to her little toe. And all these morons are supposedly editors of the garbage variety who didn’t spare even a few hours to check facts of the incident. This is who they are. And they demand accountability from the PMO?

So what kind of questions did Rajdeep ask? Apart from the usual nonsense of 2002 and the US visa denial he asks the street-people “Is Modi BJP’s PM”? Then he tells them “only 31% voted for Modi” (factually wrong but immaterial) so “what do they have to say to the remaining critics of Modi”. So all the remaining 69% (according to Rajdeep) are haters like him who do nothing all day but rant about and criticise Modi for no reason or rhyme? And this is what these thugs call journalism? All the video evidence is in my previous post. When you imply by questions that the PM is not a PM for everyone but only for one political party then you are indeed abusing your country. How does it matter whether Modi got 31% or 16% votes? Have Modi and his party not won the election fair and square? You land up on foreign soil and abuse your own democratic system then that is indeed abusing India as the poster someone made rightly says.

If you are unwilling to accept a democratically elected PM as your PM: Get out of India and rant and abuse all your life. This is not criticism or demanding accountability from anyone but mindless abuse of the PM and ordinary Indian voters because they voted one particular party. Don’t stay in India or claim to be an Indian if you cannot accept her democratic procedures and verdicts. What code of conduct is that, Mr Aroon Purie? What ethics is that? And do people call Rajdeep a hate-monger and Modi-abuser just for fun? Do they have any genetic motive to dislike him? Not at all? Both Rajdeep and Sagarika have a history of abusing people and Modi. Half the people on SM are writing about media because this hate-filled duo (along with others like Barkha) deserved a spanking. Just go through all the links in this post “The eternal lies of Rajdeep” for a full dossier on Rajdeep’s lies and abuse. This scumbag even claims to be a journalist or an editor? Where in the world is so much hatred peddled by a media-couple? Any answers, Aroon Purie? So too the bimbo Sunetra. Just as Rajdeep abused NRIs as people “With money but no class” this bimbo loses an argument and ridicules a woman just because she’s an NRI:

You hate and ridicule a woman for being an NRI? These scumbags now not only look down upon Indians but also NRIs. The only race that is acceptable to them is the race called “media Sickos”. They keep getting better with time after C5M’s “Ugly Indian males” statement. And they are journalists? They have the right to ask “obnoxious” questions? Fly a kite! And after all this the India-abuser, stuttering, stammering, blabbering Rajdeep goes on another rant about Modi not taking questions from him. Laughable! Watch (1.16 mins):

If you bear so much hatred towards the PM of the country and its citizens you are naturally going to be mocked and ridiculed by ordinary folks. But there is a question of professionalism, of professional code of conduct and ethics. And that is the question that Aroon Purie needs to answer since he is the chairman of the company that employs this hate-monger. Let me remind these people about Virat Kohli and the incident when he was booed by the public. This was Kohli’s reaction:

Mind you, Kohli didn’t assault anybody or insult anyone verbally. For showing his middle finger he was fined 50% of his match-fees. It is a known convention, practice and part of the code of conduct that when professional figures are with crowds they will be applauded and they will be mocked, booed and ridiculed. The professional is expected to take all that in his stride and move on. If he fails, there is a price to pay for breaking the code and professional ethics. What is the price Rajdeep is going to pay, Mr Aroon Purie? Then there was the case of Inzamam-ul Haq in 1997 when he was ridiculed by a spectator with a megaphone who kept chanting “Aloo Aloo” (meaning fat as potato) at Inzamam. The player got into the enclosure and almost beat up the spectator. No matter what the provocation Inzamam was not forgiven for his conduct. He was banned for two ODIs. Has Rajdeep even issued an apology yet, Mr Aroon Purie? How are you dealing with this case? Not enough? Okay, here you go, watch another video (1.22 mins):

France’s great football hero, Zinedine Zidane, a much-admired professional player across the world (not disliked like Rajdeep) was red-carded and sent off for head-butting an opponent in the WC Finals in 2006. Zidane’s opponent had supposedly abused him verbally to which he reacted. Even THAT is not acceptable under professional code of conduct Mr Aroon Purie. Even when two teams are on the ground and one opponent (not some spectator) abuses you, you are not entitled to physically assault him. It invites a punishment. In the case of Rajdeep there were no opponents but ordinary people. Even if they heckled him he had no right to assault anyone. In fact, Rajdeep was the first to call someone an “asshole” and when that person returned the compliment, RS turned back and physically assaulted him. Under which code of conduct or ethics is Rajdeep entitled to this behaviour Mr Aroon Purie? Yours? Just as Zidane received an instant red-card, Rajdeep deserves an instant sacking. And this wasn’t even some “personal” fight that Rajdeep was involved in, he was there as a reporter for India Today group.   

All the mafia members – Editors guild, assorted Sickos from TV and print – all of them collectively lied about the MSG incident and portrayed Rajdeep as the victim when the truth was exactly the opposite. Rajdeep was and is the criminal. This mafia doesn’t even follow the first basic rule of journalism: fact-check and double-check before blabbering or reporting. Even carpenters and tailors follow the golden rule: “Measure twice, cut once”. To this day this mafia carries on its hate-campaign against Modi and his supporters. Why in hell do they expect he should talk to them or even share a seat with them? Which of these sickos have apologised for their false portrayal and reporting of the MSG incidents? None! On the contrary a news website, Rediff, grandly published a news item claiming Modi had condemned the attack on Rajdeep. Predictably, this was “Salma-Sabrina” reporting with no basis. Rediff quoted Gautam Adani as having communicated Modi’s comments (as if Adani is Modi’s spokie). The poor guy had to issue a clarification:

So Rajdeep goes and whines with Adani. Fair enough! He claims they abused his son – no way to verify. But if that causes him so much grief then he should ask himself how Modi, as a PM, tolerates all his abuse (and those of others) with professional decency without ever retaliating. This mafia even ridicules Modi's mother. The PM sends the right message by talking to people directly through mass media, social media and now also radio. These mongrels that grovel for crumbs while abusing the man certainly do not merit an audience. Some of them are anti-nationals and who knows which one might pull a knife or a weapon given that scoundrels like Rajdeep can attack ordinary people.  And when the truth had hit them all like it always does, this is what his bitter half tweeted:

While Rajdeep maybe a hero to his family it is now established beyond any doubt that this hate-mongering couple is nothing but public nuisance. Sagarika’s tweet is also a veiled admission that she realises that her hubby was the fool and the criminal at MSG. Now that the real story and the truth is out, the spotlight has to turn to Aroon Purie on how he’s going to handle this criminal. Purie was once caught plagiarising content from a magazine. It’s a crime. But he blamed ‘jet-lag’ and his Delhi staff for feeding him those lines as he didn’t know much about the subject he was writing about. That’s how Chief Editors and Publishers of magazines write and then offer the usual excuse about their staff having “fed” them the stuff. Purie apologised and one can forgive his offence as a stray incident and move on.

Rajdeep has not apologised to his victim or to anyone else. In this case apology isn’t enough and Rajdeep is a chronic offender. Rajdeep has breached all codes of decency, of public conduct and any journalistic ethics that the Editors’ Guild claims it has. Does Aroon Purie follow any code of conduct, ethics or morals? If so, these morals and ethics demand that Purie sack this criminal immediately from his company. If he does not, there is a message he sends to his entire team and to the journalistic community at large that they do not have any moral rights to question anyone’s conduct. They will be in no position to demand the resignation of any violent or corrupt politician. Their targets will ask them to look inward instead of pointing fingers at others. Rajdeep belongs in jail. To send him there or not is the choice of the injured party who was assaulted. But it’s now a question whether Aroon Purie has any ethics or morals. That is his and the media’s test.

Tailpiece: On October 3, Rajdeep tweeted (No.1) wondering why someone was tweeting his 6-month old tweet and that it was mischief. The tweet in question (No.2) was one where he plays “victim” after slyly abusing Modi as a “Dog” (No.3 – That was the Nemo-NaMo walk tweet of his). And on February 9, 2014 Rajdeep claimed he was receiving death threats and abuses and fears for his granny (No.4). This sick moron abuses, plays victim and claims fake threats. This is the criminal at his game for over a dozen years. Naturally, Tweeple asked him if he could carry on his nonsense of 2002 for 12 years why he’s averse to being reminded of his 6-month old tweet? Karma! 

Rajdeep Reveals His Ugly Character In NY

One usually goes to a place to discover and learn. We know about the place from a map. We know a bit about its people from what we have read or heard. Still, actually being there has to be an experience to see, to hear and to learn about the place and its people. But some people go with pre-conceived notions and convictions and seek “confirmation” of their own prejudices. If I go to America with the intention of finding people who hate Narendra Modi it’s not very difficult to do. We know the people who campaigned against his visits or his interactions. It’s easy to find the gang of people who hate him. With the general public it is better to seek to learn rather than provoke them with pre-conceived conclusions and convictions. Some of our media crooks were in New York for the last few days exactly for that reason: Provoke hatred for Modi or ridicule their religion. Unfortunately for them, they failed.

My thrill, my joy comes from the fact that ordinary people are a lot more open and often quite blunt with the truth than our politicians and media morons. They’re simple people with passions who are often classified by our media mafia as “bhakts”. Media criminals like Barkha Dutt and Rajdeep Sardesai hate ordinary people who are smarter than they are. They hate Indians (and Hindus) – in India or in America or anywhere in the world. Character is not built during a testing situation, it merely reveals itself. And Rajdeep Sardesai revealed which gutter he comes from right in New York during the PM’s visit.

What was the purpose of Rajdeep’s visit? Not to report on the PM’s visit or events and developments around it but to sing the same old worn out nonsense of 2002, ask silly questions about Modi’s visa and how only 31% have voted for Modi and others did not. All these issues are in the past and have been ranted over and over again by our media fools and have not gotten them anywhere. One cannot claim to be a journalist by harbouring political vindictiveness and grudges against one person; especially since that person is now the PM of India. This cheap engagement of Rajdeep was not with some panellist or politicians but ordinary people on the streets. The uncouth character of Rajdeep’s discourse with ordinary people can only be described as hate-mongering and pimping to get anti-Modi soundbites. Every person he talked to virtually slapped him and wasn’t willing to buy the nonsense being peddled by Rajdeep. Take a look at this cheap moronic tweet:

RS is not even factually correct because my tweet included the pic (on the left) of the NYT front page with a report about Modi. But is that really an issue? What kind of bickering, unhappy moron who calls himself an editor bitches about and ridicules Modi for not being on NYT’s front page? In what sense is a front-page coverage by NYT or any other US paper any kind of certification of Modi’s relevance or importance? This is mindless hatred for Modi that Rajdeep has enriched himself with and wants to continue peddling his nonsense to Indians in the US and American citizens too. Dislike for a politician should not reach such levels that a person pretending to be an editor starts vomiting filth every time he mentions the name of that person. This filth runs in the family duo of Rajdeep and Sagarika who have made their hatred and bitching a personal industry of sorts. Take a look at this tweet from the Category5Moron:

Seriously, what kind of character bitches about her former colleagues in public? It has to be an extreme low-life who does this sort of thing. It is not just that she bitches about them and ridicules them in public but does not think for a moment that she was designated a Deputy Editor at CNN-IBN and most of the people she bitches about would have been junior to her in hierarchy. You bitch about your juniors in public? This extreme hatred and bitching seems to run in all their discourse, especially where Modi is concerned. She does this here and the bigger moron takes it out on people at New York. Take a look at this video (1.24 mins)

He goes around telling people on the streets only 31% voted for Modi and Modi must answer many questions. He talks about the Visa issue when it’s long done and buried. His face turns into one of a pimp that didn’t get a customer when the people on the streets reject his nonsense and are cheerful for Modi. Why shouldn’t they be? Is Rajdeep expecting that all the people in the US, whether Indians or Americans, should harbour the same hatred for Modi that he has? That they shouldn’t come and cheer our PM because of his personal prejudices? And because those people come and cheer for Modi and India they are called “Bhakts”? Which schools teach this level of hatred to a moron like Rajdeep? Did he inherit it from his parents or from his wife? It did not end there. Rajdeep went on to another fracas with the public on the streets outside Madison Square Garden where a major Modi-event was scheduled. After ridiculing people and calling someone an “Asshole” Rajdeep gets back in the same coin but is unable to take it. He turns around and starts hitting out physically at the person. And after the incident this is what the liar tweets:

Does this stupid moron make any sense? He is a TV guy and has a team of cameramen around him. If he was indeed abused or kicked where is the video footage? If Rajdeep was on cam as he claims where is his own footage of the sequence leading up to his violent reaction? And throughout the day he kept whining as a victim when he was actually the offender who should have been arrested for his stupid behaviour. An American described Rajdeep’s stupidity perfectly in this tweet:

And all the pigs from the farm came out to support Rajdeep and “stand with him” in his hour of grief. That someone claiming to be a journalist has reduced himself to such street brawls does not even cross their minds before they tweet their support to him even when he is the criminal in the incident. The shameful gang of Barkha Dutt, Shiv Aroor, Shabana Azmi and many celebrity morons came out for Rajdeep without even bothering to check facts of the incident. It is the age of social media and technology which challenges these brain dead idiots and their lies. Someone did put up a video of the incident which leaves no doubt about who the criminal is in this scene:

That a scumbag like Rajdeep even physically touched a person is a crime by itself. The sicko goes much further and physically assaults the man. Ordinary people can be provoked and may get passionately angry (as Barkha Dutt once learned when she was booed and shooed away at Jantar Mantar) but you don’t call yourself a professional and react in the manner that Rajdeep reacted violently. There cannot be any excuse for this reaction. And then they call the people “Modi supporters” or “Modi Bhakts” or “Lunatic fringe”. Do these morons even realise that they were out to support and hear an INDIAN PM? Last night (Sep 30) in a discussion with Swapan Dasgupta, Barkha ranted “Modi dislikes journalists”. No moron, he doesn’t dislike journalists. He clearly knows journalists from hate-mongering pimps. He kindly calls them “News traders”. And then Barkha claimed Modi hasn’t said anything or condemned the people for attacking Rajdeep. They attacked Rajdeep?

If despite the video evidence she can so blatantly lie, then Modi is clearly right in ignoring fake journos like her. Most of all, people like Barkha, Rajdeep and Sagarika have made it a “personal” grudge with Modi when he hasn’t. Zee News ran a special programme on the incident and it does not make great viewing for the media mafia at all (4.57 minutes):

We should applaud that at least one channel put out the shameful truth about the two chronic hate-mongers Rajdeep and Sagarika. Both are a disgrace to their own mafia and have consistently lowered the level of gutter they soak their lives in. In a public area, with ordinary people on the streets that a so-called editor even calls people “assholes” should warrant condemnation from all around. Instead, the mafia pimps treated Rajdeep as a victim and ran to his defence. Their personal grudges and prejudices have brought Rajdeep and Sagarika to live a life of hatred. Hatred for others and even their own former colleagues and those who report the incident. #ShameAbroad was the trend and rightly so. What burns the hearts, minds and bodies of these idiots?

The undeniable fact is that hate-filled, ugly characters like Rajdeep are unable to stomach the popularity of Modi all around. His visit to the US and UN has been a grand success with politicians, businessmen and ordinary folks. It burns the bottoms of the Rajdeeps and Sagarikas of our media mafia. You may like or dislike a politician but you don’t go to the extent of revealing the ugliness of your character at the time of major events concerning the country’s Prime Minister. More so on foreign soil. Time has proved over and over again that while Modi continues to grow in stature, the ugliness of Rajdeep, Sagarika and their media mafia friends keeps growing. They keep revealing their ugly character more often.

I will leave you with another video where this cheap hate-monger tells people “Aap ke paas paisa hai, class nahin” (You have money but no class). That applies to Rajdeep and Sagarika more than anyone else. And ordinary folks know it all too well now.