Nationalism Haters

In July 2013, in an interview to Reuters, Narendra Modi stated he’s a Hindu and a Nationalist and therefore a “Hindu Nationalist”. Many political parties opposed to BJP and the media slammed this statement as if being a Hindu nationalist was some big crime. Ever since then, and especially after events at JNU anti-India slogans, there is a rage among Sickulars and their media cronies deriding nationalism as some kind of evil. Some even claim nationalism is anti-democracy. That’s how stupid it can get when their masters are out of power and they have to cling to all kinds of silly arguments. So what exactly is nationalism? And why do Sickulars keep ranting it is incompatible with democracy? In simple terms, nationalism is just an ideology that binds people of a nation together. Democracy is a form of govt and a form of life-practice too. We will get deeper into this in a bit.

When the Commies started falling all across the world they didn’t know which form of politics to adopt as an alternative. Having failed globally their only purpose of existence is to tar everything about their opponents and the very country they live in. True for India too. From Bengal to the Centre – the fall of Commies (and that includes Congress whose fountainhead Nehru was no less a Commie) is consistent. Take a look at one such Commie called Aruna Roy. In a recent panel discussion in Delhi (which also featured Piyush Goyal and Sunil Mittal) moderated by an ex-BBC reporter she pours lies like a yarn-factory (Video: 1.26 mins. You can watch the extended video on Youtube):

See what I mean? LIE through the teeth like there’s no tomorrow. Firstly, how is India not free or ModiSarkar restricting FoE? This woman blabbers all the nonsense and lies she wants. Media abuses Modi and his govt day in and day out. What more does she want? Everyone knows about the fake campaigns of Christians under attack and the bogus intolerance campaign. And there is no FoE? That’s not all. Aruna Roy even claims UR Ananthamurthy was targeted by SM with a one-way ticket to Pak because Modi wasn’t his choice for PM. Is that the truth? This liar Roy doesn’t mention that URA grandly threatened he would leave India if Modi became PM and that’s why he was gifted that ticket. She also claims she had criticised the previous Congress govt on many occasions. LIAR! She was one of the members of Sonia’s private coterie called NAC. And if she was at Jantar Mantar for the IAC rallies of Kejriwal & Co. it’s only as a visitor because those Johnies were her close friends and associates and she wasn’t protesting anything.

Such fakery abounds in Commies who have nothing else to do but whine all day. That Kejriwal wanted “Swarajya”. From what? From his delusional anti-corruption rants he now runs what could currently be the most corrupt state govt in India with goons and extortionists as his MLAs. And AK supports and whines for all kinds of terrorists. We may not be able to accurately define nationalism but we can certainly describe what is anti-national. Most of such people will not hestitate to defend terrorists, shed tears for Yakub Memon or Burhan Wani or peddle the Paki line on most issues. We know them well now. Why is Hindu nationalism so pronounced? It is simply because the original Faiths of this land (Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists) form a shared and combined culture over many centuries. Those from the desert religions in India are also from the same origins but they prefer to owe their allegiance elsewhere. For instance, for many Muslims the national anthem has become a sin which they now call anti-Islam:

During the UPA regime, a BSP MP walked out of the parliament when Vande Mataram was being played because it was against Islam. Those who believe our national anthem or song is against their religion – they can never be nationalists. NEVER! These symbols have been there 70 years and these India-haters had a choice to quit India if they wanted to long ago. Which is why many Muslims are more in tune with their Universal Brotherhood than with Indian Nationalism. And this very aggressive Islamist stance has come up only in the last couple of decades. Muslims did not have a problem with these symbols of nationalism earlier. Kazi Masum Akhtar, the headmaster of Talpukur Aara High Madrasa in Kolkata was badly beaten up and thrown out of the school because he coached his students to sing the national anthem? I firmly believe no school should exist in India which fills young minds with hatred for our national anthem and thereby for the country itself:

Here’s monkey-balancer Rajdeep Sardesai. This ignoramus par excellence goes to functions like the anniversary of great poet Munshi Premchand. There, instead of discussing his great works and reporting the proceedings the Sickos discuss democracy vs nationalism:

Consensus among whom? A bunch of Sickos cut from the same cloth? Why do they even have such debates when the only guys there would be folks from the same hammam or gutter? Still, on what basis did they conclude nationalism divides? Nationalism is not evil – individuals and groups can be evil. And I see such evil individuals and groups in the media and politics every single day. Before we go any further it should be known that pundits have, over the years, identified many different types of nationalism – there are at least a dozen types. Indians and Hindus (which includes religions of Indian origin) relate to a nationalism of shared culture, patriotism and putting country first. I have not met a single person from the Hindu culture who has ever put his religion above country – none! Liars like Rajdeep will not tell you who puts religion above country, Constitution, national symbols and anthems. Democracy is a form of governance and can also be a life-practice. Democratic practices can be in govt, in corporations, in schools and at home too. It does not conflict with nationalism.

It is only because the current govt is one that is not of the choice of these Sickos that they will tarnish every symbol of national pride or nationalism as “jingoism”. In practice, democracy doesn’t really unite people. It divides people but, in principle, not meant to be in a harmful way. People can be with BJP or Congress or SP or NCP etc… and all these parties have only marginal difference in their approach to governance. BJP can claim to be far less corrupt than these other parties but is no less Socialist in its policies. To date, ModiSarkar has not made a single law or policy that discriminates any community or stifles any group in anyway whatsoever. All this garbage about FoE, intolerance are concocted campaigns that the haters keep building. And at the slighest difference of opinion over problematic events these Sickos do not hesitate to claim “India is a failed democracy” as this sick writer at TheNewsMinute claims:

There are shootings, murders and rapes almost every week in the US. Do these Sickos call it a failed democracy? And which law in India allows any kind of “vigilantism” let alone about cows? If you ask this question they will claim the journalistic right to crap nonsense without being pilloried. Which democracy doesn’t have a problem? Democracy itself is meant to be imperfect and slow in its nature. Those Sickos, because of their hatred, that call India a failed democracy for flimsy reasons are as much anti-nationals as those who shout “Bharat ki barbadi tak” and this applies to people like Rajdeep and all those media goons who trash India rather than the problem or a particular govt. And when it comes to sucking up to Pak, ISI or indirectly promoting the agenda of Hafiz Saab, can NDTV be ever far behind?

India is about to celebrate her 70th Independence Day and all that the NDTV jerks can debate is why giant flags or Rakhis at the border. Mind you, the Rakhis are for our Jawans. What is there to debate about this? Apart from being petty, this, for me, constitutes anti-national behaviour of the most third-rate kind. There is no purpose or objective except to tar the govt and the country with nonsensical statements and debates. Even dictators like Hitler or Mussolini have promoted aggressive nationalism of a different kind. That is not comparable to nationalism in a democracy. 

What’s the problem with these Sickulars? The fact that their elite snobs have been voted out and a man of ordinary background is PM. The elites who blabber most about nationalism being “jingoism” or anti-democracy have fed on the blood and toil of ordinary people. People like Shobhaa De who pour scorn on athletes from middle-class or extremely poor families who had to fight hard to get somewhere. Athletes that wear our flag which means nothing to elites. Democracy is meant to defeat such elites who only have place in a Communist Tabela. Modi is a publicly “elected” PM, not an “appointed” PM and that is the big difference.

Democracy primarily being a political system does divide. That’s why we have more than 100 political parties in India. The BJP or NCP or SP and their supporters may disagree on most issues but I would believe all of them will stand at attention for national anthem, national song and our flag. These nationalistic symbols unite us across the country:

These are symbols of nationalism and not of democracy. The level of nationalism among individuals may vary. Nationalism practiced by different countries need not be the same. But in India, democracy and nationalism are perfectly compatible except for those who have vested interests and the motivation to break India. Feasting at the Pak High Commission even after learning about jawans being killed at Pampore is clearly anti-national. Glorifying convicted terrorists is anti-national. Wanting India in pieces is anti-national. Calling Maj Gen. GD Bakshi, who fought for India, a hate-monger because he trashed Pak is anti-national. Those who promoted that IIT-M lout for his stupidity are also anti-nationals. Those who concoct conspiracies to create fear among masses and tarnish India abroad for no genuine reason are also anti-nationals. Most of all, disrespecting our national anthem, poisoning young minds against it, disrespecting our national song and our flag is the most anti-national act. Doesn’t matter if one is not a nationalist by any definition but it is important that anti-nationals are not tolerated.

Happy Independence Day!