The Devil's Pygmies

In an interview with PA Sangma who ran for President last year, this is what KaranThapar said to him:

“Mr Sangma, even if you look at the BJP, who you said a moment ago had increased their support for you to 26-28 per cent, are using you… as a stepping stone over the bridge to Jayalalithaa and Naveen Patnaik. Mr Sangma you are a tool. You are a part of a strategy that supports their convenience. That’s why they are supporting you, not because they believe in you”.

Imagine, someone calling a presidential candidate a “tool”. Ever since that day I have nicknamed KT “The Tool”. KaranTool (KT) is the son of late General PN Thapar under whom India lost the 1962 war to China after which he resigned in disgrace. Naturally, that makes KT an expert in how the Army lives and conducts itself. So after Narendra Modi’s speech to ex-servicemen in Rewari (Haryana) on September 15 KT has a load of advice for him in “Lessons the Army can teach Mr Modi”. Where does he write it? Of course, in one of the members of the Unholy Trinity called Hindustan Times. Fair enough! We can all learn lessons from the Army. It always amazes how the soldiers’ legs are exactly in alignment in a march-past, how when they hold the rifles they’re aligned too. When they stand in rows or columns, the space between two soldiers is almost exactly the same. These are routines that come with a lot of training and practice. The soldiers help each other in getting these routines right. Okay! So when KT writes balderdash, who endorses him and seeks “action” not “abuse”? This guy Ram Guha, the “eminent distortian”! Here’s what Guha tweeted:

Alright Guha, what action do you want against some stupid analogy that KT draws because Modi addressed an ex-military crowd? Oh by the way, I wonder if Guha thinks calling a presidential candidate a “tool” is action or abuse. Let him ponder. So one writes crap the other endorses by scratching his back. Guha and KT are like two random hearts that fell in love with each other because they hate Modi. So what does KT really have to say? I’ll just pick a few samples and that will tell you the general idea of his whole article.

Regiments of the Indian Army, depending on their character, have their own mandirs, masjids, gurudwaras or churches. They have regimental maulvis, pandits, granthis, and priests. The Commanding Officer participates in all religious festivals. On Eid he will happily wear a topi. On other occasions a tikka or a pagri… An article in Daily Bhaskar.com (16/9) says: “(The) Army is the only place where you can see a maulvi conducting the proceedings of Janmashtami as Panditji was on leave.”… The truth is you can serve in the Army for years without being conscious of the religion of your colleagues. It simply doesn’t matter except in their private lives… Fortunately, Mr Modi has realised the Indian Army is the country’s most secular institution. In fact, he wants us to “take lessons in secularism from the Army”. Perhaps he should be the first.

Those are excerpts and anyone wanting to read the full crap should visit the HT page. While claiming to be “public intellectuals” (As Cacafonix fondly describes them) these guys don’t pause to look inside and think for a moment. KT probably wrote the article before the Nairobi massacre where the terrorists killed 39 and injured another 200. They were kind. They first asked all Muslims to leave. The Mail even reports: “Charles Karani, 41, an IT engineer, said: ‘I hid under a car with my daughters, and I saw the men line up maybe 40 people and ask them who was Muslim, and if they were to prove it by saying the name of the Prophet’s mother. Those who got it wrong were shot”.

Most of us have been to school. Kids wear the same uniforms, attend the same classes and learn the same lessons. People from different religions work in the same office and share the company’s mission. If a group of Indians were to travel on a ship with other nationals and it were to sink, who do you think the strong Indians will save first? Would they ask whether you are Hindu, Muslim or Christian? This is what morons like KT and Guha don’t get. That when you travel the same journey and share the same mission, religions and prejudices tend to take a back-seat. This is even more so when one is in the Army and is trained to combat enemies of the state. Imagine a Hindu and Muslim playing in the Indian cricket team. The Hindu is not going to say “I won’t take the catch off that bowler because he is Muslim” and vice-versa. Whether it’s a sinking ship, an office, a school, a cricket team or the Army, the members have a “shared cause” and they live and operate in a very controlled or mission-oriented atmosphere. That is not true for society at large.

The politicians and the political party these two guys so lovingly support and the news media have divided the nation so much that Indians as a whole DO NOT share many causes. These may be political, economic or social causes. When laws are made based on religion and caste the shared mission is eroded. When crimes of one community is overlooked, the shared mission is eroded. When SoniaG and MMS visit only Muslim victims of communal riots, the shared mission is eroded. The Army’s shared mission is fortunately not eroded so far but the politicians and media are working hard at it. The Army doesn’t have separate rules for Hindus or Muslims. It doesn’t even disclose the religion-wise composition of its members although one govt Committee did make an attempt to “sickularise” the army too. They wear the same uniform. They become one. They aren’t constantly bothered whether someone wears a skull-cap, tilak or a pagdi. The politicians and media will constantly bother and remind you of who wore a skull-cap and who didn’t and make it a national issue. That’s how stupid KT and Guha are. They have a very poor understanding of “structured organisations” with a uniform “mission”.

Society thrives in identities and prejudices; religion, colour, caste, creed, race, sexual-orientation. You won’t find KT or Guha complaining about ads for fairness creams, would you? It’s a reality only fools will deny. Narendra Modi didn’t create these. The best that Modi has done to combat this is “Sabka Vikas” and “India First”. On his stupid shows KT still sounds like “Pakistan First” and in an interview Madhu Trehan asked him why he was being seen as a “Paki agent”. KT may deny, but who created that perception? People? Or was it Modi?

The most classic line you will hear is that “Justice is blind”. Let me expand that line: “In this courtroom... justice is blind in matters of race, creed, colour, religion or sexual-orientation”. I love great lines from movies as most of us do (Video: 2.10 mins):

That’s a scene from the famous movie “Philadelphia” where Tom Hanks is sacked because he has AIDS. I wonder if KT or Guha would like to work with someone who has AIDS. I wonder if they would like to work with people not buying their vicious ideology while calling others “abusive”. The answer to the judge by Denzel Washington is simply stunning:

“With all due respects your Honour, we don’t live in this courtroom, do we?”

The Devil’s pygmies who pose as historians and media anchors would do well to learn that lesson. With all due respect to these Fiberals who distort and lie all the time, all of us don’t live in the Army, do we?

The Fiberal Lie-sense

Today, February 12, marks the 3rd Anniversary of MediaCrooks. From about the 8 or 9 lines I first wrote under “Time to rein in the Indian media” in 2010, I’m happy to be still here and writing. This is as good a time as any to take another look at our Fiberals.

I came across this unusual article by one TCA Srinivasaraghavan in the Hindu Businessline titled “Narendra Modi — India’s Nixon”? This appearing in a commie newspaper like The Hindu must have been an accident. TCA’s article is a well-directed missile against the so called liberals but he gets it a bit wrong when he equates Modi with Nixon and about India’s so called liberals. Let’s read a bit before we go further (edited excerpts in blue).

Few Indians today remember Richard Milhous Nixon, the 37th President of the US. He broke US law by obstructing justice and was forced to resign in 1974, halfway through his second term. Probably true but I have studied the Nixon story very closely and both Watergate and Nixon have frequently found mention on this blog, so I can claim not to have forgotten. Richard Nixon spent his last days in office 'covering-up'. Modi has been voted four times to office and is not busy with any cover-up.

Indeed, the utter illiberality of the liberals is one of the greatest paradoxes of our time. Academics have pondered long and deep over it and failed to come up with a solution. They seem as helpless as when trying to explain the depravities of the deeply devout… What happened to Nixon is very similar to what has been happening to Narendra Modi since 2002. In a nutshell, the American liberals had decided that Nixon was unfit to govern the US and went after him… In exactly the same way, the urban Indian liberals have decided that Modi is unfit to govern India. And they have been going after him, prepared like the Americans in the 1970s, to accept incompetents instead… This illiberal face of the liberals is seldom commented upon in India because if you do, the pack labels you as illiberal. That is their power… So who is a liberal, then? A liberal, by my reckoning, is a person designated as a liberal by other liberals, usually on a single communal sub-criterion. As a result, the most liberal person can be labelled illiberal by liberals and the most illiberal as liberal.

When Richard Nixon, a Republican, lost to John F. Kennedy in 1960 there were suspicions of ballot bungling in Chicago but he chose not to make an issue of it. (Oh incidentally, who do we relate ballot or EVM bungling with in India?) Then, remember, despite the liberals hounding Nixon (as TCA suggests) he won two elections and came to office in 1969 and 1973. It’s what he did towards the end of his first term that is known as the Watergate scandal. The Watergate burglary itself was just a cover. Even the reason for the burglary has many theories. While commonly accepted theory is that the burglars wanted to bug the Democratic HQ at the Watergate building, no bugs were found. So the other theory is that the burglars may have wanted to recover a damning tape, of a sex racket, that involved a top official of the Nixon administration who was also sentenced in the scandal. Nixon himself wasn't known to have anything to do with the Watergate burglary.

What the Watergate scandal did expose was the massive operation to re-elect Nixon through misuse of campaign funds and defaming opponents. The well-organised campaign to plant fake stories about opponents, tarnish their reputations, manufacture lies and scandals was internally referred to as ‘Rat-F*****g’ (RF). Now, it’s members connected to the ‘CREEP’ (Committee to re-elect the president) who were involved in these covert operations and not liberals. Our commies are carrying out exactly the same RF operation for over a decade against Modi, aren’t they? They’re not really the liberals as TCA suggests.

The covert operations included marginalising various govt bodies including FBI and various other institutions of the govt. In India, with whom do you associate the marginalisation and misuse of CBI, IT Dept, ED, Judiciary and other govt institutions? That wasn’t the liberals in America doing that operation, was it? In contrast who is doing the RF operation against Narendra Modi and other opponents of Congress in India? Not too hard to guess eh? In the end Nixon was damned by his own tapes that he secretly maintained at the White House. The other erroneous mistake that TCA (and many others) make is that they equate “liberals” everywhere. The liberals or liberalism in the US has nothing in common with those calling themselves liberals in India. The first and biggest difference is freedom of speech. The US First Amendment provides for complete freedom of speech, the Indian liberals will never subscribe to such a freedom for anyone but themselves. When Obama won the recent elections our commie idiots celebrated as if the “liberal” win in the US is equivalent of a Congress win in India. In reality, neither the Congress party nor our so called liberals have anything in common with American liberalism.

What passes off as the liberal view in India is essentially the Communist view. Whether it’s text books, history books or the mainstream media it’s the communists and not liberals who have populated these areas. The commies suffer from a severe disease of intolerance of any view that does not match with their ideology. The Congress is pretty much a communist party which is why it gets on better with the CPM/CPI than with any truly democratic, liberal party. Given years of oppression and suffering of masses, most Indian political parties have a communist and socialist ideology. Consequently, the word “Socialist” was inserted into to our constitution.

One of the fundamental principles of a liberal is that s/he is strongly in opposition to monarchy and dynasty. Are our liberals anything like that? Those who call themselves liberals are mostly slaves of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty and other political dynasties. So TCA is wrong to even tag them as liberals. I call them Fiberals, which is far more appropriate. They pretend to be liberal and fib all their lives because they possess the lie-sense. So it’s not true liberals but commie Fiberals who are hounding Modi. Just look at the campaign by the likes of Aakar Patel and Ram Guha. Theirs would qualify to be categorised under the ‘RF’ operation during Nixon’s re-election campaign.

I had mentioned to Newslaundry that if I were to criticise Modi and Gujarat I would have been a panellist on many channels. It will surprise many that this blog doesn’t criticise any CM or any state. Isn’t that how Aakar built his career? From ranting against Modi in some ordinary rag he is now a regular TV panellist and to add to his Modi-hating resume he now runs a dedicated series on Modi in DNA newspaper. If that is not RF, what is? Look at the headline from NDTV. A separatist is a “moderate”? By what liberal measure is any separatist a moderate? It’s pretty much a communist idea that Arundhati Roy, friend of Yaseen Malik and Maoists, will agree to. In the US you may not be prosecuted with speeches that Yaseen gives but if he were to act and invoke people to secede he would be prosecuted for treason and sentenced to death. But for NDTV this guy who hangs out with Hafeez Saeed, a terrorist and enemy of India, is a moderate. And why is Malik with Saeed? To protest the hanging of another terrorist, Afzal Guru!

Who’s the likely beneficiary of the hate campaign against Modi? It is obviously a party that runs more like a monarchy which should have been the natural enemy of liberals. In India, the liberals are in love with this monarchy which is why the term “liberals” is a fake tag. Fiberals is the right tag. Let’s have some fun. Let’s see the definition of liberals by the Fiberals. There’s Rajdeep’s tweet about Salman Taseer, the Pak politician who was killed. Isn’t that a perfect definition of Rajdeep’s liberals? Sure I’m picking funny tweets but Rajdeep isn’t really joking. Umm… that’s the general definition of a liberal by our media standards. Wine, women and…RF?

Next, the other thing that a liberal believes in is absolute freedom of speech. S/he either responds to such speech or ignores or switches off speakers that don’t suit the liking. But no, our liberals want others to simply shut up so that they can have their monopoly on crap everywhere – On TV, in print, on Facebook, on Twitter; everywhere. And when they don’t like it they go to the extent of calling them trolls, uncouth, violent (on Twitter?). They want these trolls to shut up when they can very well use the block button as suggested. And, of course, these TV morons will complain about anonymous accounts on Twitter or FB but will gladly follow many anonymous accounts themselves. They wallow in this nonsense. Hardly liberal!

The biggest sign and identification of these liberals in India is their badge of hatred for anything Hindu or connected to Hindu culture. Hindus, Hindu icons, Hindu rituals and practices are all fair game for hatred for these Fiberals. But hey, mention the Religion of Peace or Christianity and they will all crawl under some stone. Their mouths and pens get zipped. The sword scares their pens! So TCA in The Hindu got it a bit wrong although his article was well-intentioned and technically correct. Those hounding Modi are NOT liberals. They are commie slaves to a monarchy. That’s what they are flanking and protecting. And they do so using the RF technique which involves heavy-duty lying. That’s the reason I call them Fiberals with a lie-sense. Some of them are paid, and showered honours too, for their services. 

 

Narendra Modi V Proxies

In a private chat with a Muslim lady I was asked a question: “Is it possible to succeed in politics in India by ignoring the biggest minority”? My answer was a simple no. I added, though, that biggest or not, you can’t ignore anyone in politics but at the same time you have to choose if you wish to merely appease the biggest minority or help them with progress of their choice. The question from her was not merely curiosity. It was partly an assertion that appeasing the “biggest minority” is the only way to succeed in Indian politics. AB Vajpayee tried that route in 2004 and failed. When some members of the media mafia tell you that the Gujarat model will not work across India, this is exactly what they’re telling you. Why shouldn’t the Gujarat model work across India? Is there some evil curse in that model? Is that model funded by the Gambino family? Is that model importing sand from Africa and Arabia to fill the deserts of Kutch? Does the Narmada water in Sabarmati flow only under some bridges and not all?

In the 2008 election campaign Sarah Palin was asked in an interview about her views on the “Bush Doctrine”. Palin, who is as learned a scholar as our Rahul Gandhi or Sagarika Ghose, paused for a few moments and then asked “which part of the Bush Doctrine”? When our media morons refer to the Gujarat model they are asking a similar question. You see, there is no such thing as the Bush doctrine. It’s a name given by the US media to set of foreign policy principles of George Bush such as “you are with us or against us”. But instead of acknowledging her ignorance, Palin asked “which part”. The Gujarat model is something similar. It has not even been defined in any manner whatsoever by anyone. Basically, when our MSM refers to this model, the real question they’re asking is: Can Narendra Modi succeed without appeasing Muslims? Narendra Modi’s unnamed doctrine is “Justice for all and appeasement of none; minimum govt, maximum governance”. As simple as that! Now, if the Gujarat model is being referred to so frequently, what exactly are its elements? It’s simply, good governance, good infrastructure, good power supply, empowerment and jobs instead of subsidies and doles and so on. Now, why should such a model not work anywhere in the world, let alone India? How far the model is successful is determined by the electorate, as they have done over and over again in Gujarat.

What the pundits and the media mafia are pointing out is that unless Narendra Modi does what the Congress, SP, JDU, or BSP do, it’s not possible to succeed at the centre. They’re only avoiding adding massive scams and corruption to the list. And that he must also give free TVs, washing machines, laptops and tablets to succeed at the centre. Does the MSM mafia really give a damn about Muslims or Dalits or anyone at all? Laugh till you drop! They don’t! What worries them is that the Gujarat model also does not include appeasement of their mafia. It does not include huge doles in many forms that our media currently gets from the centre. It may also not include frivolous awards and honours. Modi may not celebrate the births and deaths of all his ancestors with full page ads and TV ads. Modi may not facilitate dubious sources and hawala funding of this mafia. This is what bothers them. Otherwise, if the Gujarat model is meant to signify development and growth there is no reason why the model shouldn’t work anywhere. The only difference will be the local natural resources and available skills. Even in that respect Gujarat is hardly a state that is blessed with great natural resources. And one of the most important elements of the Gujarat model is that it also, to some extent, delivers freedom from the nuisance of govt. So why complain about all this? Because Narendra Modi challenges the existing order of the establishment; an order under which some media mafia members have become extraordinarily wealthy and influential. The thought of losing this power bothers them.

So the entire clan of media celebs with their also-ran columnists, historians, propagandists, bimbos, acrobats, tin soldiers, carpenters, masons, rat-catchers, lion-tamers, snake-charmers, grave-diggers, scavengers, snake-oil salesmen are now once again busy trashing Narendra Modi. Keshubhai Patel famously said “there is fear in Gujarat” and lost. It’s fair to now say “there’s fear in Delhi and the Delhi media mafia”. The first episode had started with, of all things, a speech by Narendra Modi to students of Shri Ram College in Delhi on February 6 and then his meeting with EU representatives. So let’s see what burned our media folks.

A good place to start is always with some tools. So let’s start with the Karan Thapar show called “Last word”. It’s in line with the studio-created battle that’s lately going on at every channel. If after so many years in media KT has to ask a stupid question like “Rahul V Modi: Who is a better leader?” then you know how many years KT has wasted and learnt nothing. The awful truth is that lately Modi’s stocks are going up and RahulG’s stocks have been plummeting. This has been rattling our media folks for quite some time and they have, naturally, tied themselves into a knot over this. What is at stake is their own future, not that of RahulG. Now KT’s opener is from Ashok Bhattacharya (AB) who is the editor of Business Standard. Must be a very educated guy, right? So despite knowing the topic he lands up on the show as a very indecisive “leader” of a newspaper. When you’re given only two options, the obvious task assigned is that you weigh both and make a choice. But our editor from Business Standard does neither.

Here’s what AB shoots: “As a short answer to it – it’s neither of them… Can’t measure Modi only by economic performance and RahulG is a commodity who has not been tried. He has not done much, he has not said much. He is like an absentee landlord… had the opportunity of doing things but he kept aloof from action”. Now, a person describes RahulG like that and admits Modi has economic performance behind him. What does logic suggest a choice should be? And yet AB says “neither”. It should be obvious that this guy who’s an editor doesn’t seem to make sensible or logical choices. To him RahulG is clearly a non-performer but Modi? Oops! The only reason for not choosing Modi is pretty obvious isn’t it? So why do TV channels even call such indecisive people? Well, they need to balance the nonsense by saying “no to Modi” even when the reasons to choose him over RahulG are compelling and clear. If our Air-force is to go into dogfights in the air and AB is asked to choose between an experienced Top Gun and a rookie; guess which he will choose? Neither eh? Not surprisingly, AB is the one who used some bogus statistics on Gujarat’s economic growth in May 2012 and had to correct it within 24 hours when Tweeple pointed it out to him. That’s a long story.

We have to see Narendra Modi’s growing stature in light of the “larger picture”, right? And who else sees the larger picture better than flaky Nidhi Razdan of NDTV (Is Modi's international acceptance growing? February 7)! In one of the most idiotic discussions on NDTV, among the many things that Nidhi came up with was and I quote the essence of her statement: “Modi now talks about development and governance and not about temples”. Oh really? As far as I know Modi has always talked about development and governance no matter how one may measure him on that count. But temples? The temple comment is obviously being made with a few mentioning Ayodhya and Ram Mandir at the Kumbh Mela. But when has Modi ever waded into the Ayodhya issue since he became CM of Gujarat? This is not to suggest that he is not in favour of the temple but he hasn’t been vociferously campaigning for it. Fact: Under Modi many Hindu temples that were built illegally on encroached public land in Gandhinagar were demolished in October 2008. Yeah, 80 temples were fully or partly demolished (read TOI report). Now, is that consistent with his policy of “no appeasement” and not allowing illegal constructions? Can Congress or some of the parties I named earlier take similar action against illegal Muslim structures? So that’s another load of rubbish that Nidhi and her channel churned out. NDTV is consistent in their garbage.

Then it seems Narendra Modi forcibly invited himself to a lunch with representatives of the EU. He had a meeting with them in Delhi and as their “guest” he was the one who hosted a lunch for them. How nice! The guest hosts the lunch. After UK the media’s worst fears came true. The EU has more or less removed the boycott of Narendra Modi and Gujarat and may be doing business with the state. UK? Doesn’t matter! EU? Doesn’t matter! The media now claims the US has still not lifted its so-called ban on Modi. When the US too falls, the media can always claim that Jupiter has still has a ban on Modi. So Arnab The Apologist predictably started screaming and asking if Modi had apologised to the EU for 2002 on TimesNow. And that stirred a whole lot of dormant “apology-seekers” into action. There was Rajdeep Sardesai who is the default Minister of Apologies for 2002.

After the meeting the only statement EU ambassador Joao Cravinho made about 2002 was that “We were pleased that he was able to tell us that because of a number of changes that he has introduced that such events could not be repeated in 2013”. Any CM would naturally assure anyone that riots would not happen again. Where does it say anything about an apology? Besides, Modi has proved in the past 11 years that there have been no riots and it’s enough proof of his commitment. What the cottage industry built from 2002 want is that Modi should somehow apologise despite petitions against him and a massive industry of scavengers wanting to hang him as guilty over the riots. Sorry, not happening. And Modi will say and do what is right and not what these proxies of the Congress party, like Javed Akhtar, want him to do.

Then there are the likes of Ramachandra Guha. I call him an “Eminent Distortian” even if he parades as a historian. This guy is not a Modi critic; he’s a Modi-hater. He and Aakar Patel would make a lovely couple. He even uses a heavy dose of lies and distortions to vent his hate. In 2011 when this guy visited Ahmedabad he could write about nothing but sign-boards that said “Mahatma Mandir”. That is how stupid the man is. He couldn’t see Ahmedabad, he couldn’t see roads, he couldn’t see the 24X7 power supply and he couldn’t see Gujaratis and other people living in the city. All he could see was one sign-board and he wrote a whole school-boy essay about it. And he continues with more lies about Modi in his latest distortion titled “The man who would rule India” in The Hindu (February 8). Fear seems to have groped Guha all over. He misleads the public by claiming Modi had banned the movie “Fanaa” and other one called “Parzania”. This is not a mere distortion but outright lie. Although the movies faced protests there was no ban whatsoever. Mr. Goofer doesn’t care about facts; he is one of those historians who has a license to lie like many other of his gang. SandeepWeb (Guha Gargles Goo Again – February 9) has called his bluffs for the 50th time. That’s a Golden Jubilee of lies, distortions and bluffs. 

Is there anyone else? Sure, the woman who passes as the Social Genius and the biggest Modi-hater of all is so burned with Modi’s rising stocks that she couldn’t help ending up in a massive orgasm of hate. In my previous post I had explained her moronery on legal issues. Now she demonstrates her moronery on Modi. In what I count as hate-write titled “Modi’s ‘strongman’ image echoes an Indira Gandhi era” on Firstpost, Sagarika Ghose, the journalistic-bimbo vents her mindless rant over everything connected to Modi. She says “Anyone on Twitter or Facebook who dares to voice a single word of criticism against their ‘Beloved Leader’ is vilified for days as a “Congress agent”. Isn’t that written like a victim? Come to think of it, it’s not those who speak against Modi but those who speak in his favour that have been vilified by both the Congress and the MSM, including Rajdeep and his Dubiousy Editor Sagarika. Amitabh Bachchan, Ghulam Vastanvi, Anna Hazare and many more have been vilified by the media. Some have been forced to withdraw their favourable comments on Modi. Ghulam Vastanvi lost his job because of his favourable comments. Madhu Kishwar is being targeted by Congress supporters and the MSM for her change of views on Modi. And idiots like Sagarika are worried about Twitter and Facebook? And Modi is like Indira? That’s the depth to which a Modi-hater has fallen.

Indira Gandhi hated freedom in business and in any form. Modi is the exact opposite. IndiraG cemented the policy of appeasement and votebank. Modi is the opposite. IndiraG was unchallenged in the Congress as President or PM. Modi is neither president of his party nor an unchallenged PM candidate of his party. That is enough said. Only immature bimbos can equate Modi to IndiraG. The Macaulay Putras and Putris who live on the crumbs of the legacy of Nehru and Indira Gandhi cannot stomach that a home-grown desi like Narendra Modi has come to centre-stage in such a dramatic fashion. What they are unable to fathom is that the guy who they thought they had successfully buried post 2002 has risen beyond their comprehension. He has outsmarted, outwitted them and played his own game and never bothered what these idiots say.

So whether it is Rahul Gandhi or Renuka Chaudhury who is the PM candidate for Congress they aren’t the ones who are really fighting a battle. It’s only their foot soldiers, cronies and poodles in the media who are currently fighting the battle. Modi doesn’t feed them crumbs. These are the proxies who are scared of Modi. Very very scared! That’s the only reason they hate the Gujarat Model. It wouldn’t exactly have been surprising if the Congress had put out a ‘disclaimer’ stating the hanging of Afzal Guru has nothing to do with the rise of Narendra Modi. Maybe members of the media mafia need to put out such a disclaimer too, just to hide and camouflage their being proxies of the Congress.