tag: MediaCrooks: Shehzada

Privacy Policy

Showing posts with label Shehzada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shehzada. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Desperate Measures - Part 6 (Fooling Muslims)



Fooling Muslims (Part A):

In a previous post I had written about my fascination for the Mafia since my childhood days. Mafia, crooks, terrorists and assassins they all deliver excellent management and leadership lessons. There is a lot to learn from their strategies and tactics. Watching one of them I had learned long back that leaders need to answer only 3 questions once they have decided on “What” to do. The “what” being their objective; like selling biscuits or shoes, like starting an airline business, killing someone or seeking political power. The “what to do” is decided for a reason. What are the next 3 questions? Let’s watch (0.40 mins):

There have been many attempts on the late French President Charles De Gaulle. “The day of the Jackal” is a fictional story based on such attempts. The Jackal was the perfect hired assassin. In the end he's nabbed only by accident and not by design. Once the Jackal has decided to accept the assignment to assassinate De Gaulle, money being the reason, all he has to answer is: How, When and Where. The How is a special slim, light-weight gun, with a telescope and a clean head shot. He even tests it for accuracy. When? On Bastille Day; the French National day! Where? At the Champs-Élysées! Is there anything about this that is so tough or difficult? That is all there is to leadership and management role, isn’t it?

The What: Seek political power and influence. The How: First pretend to fight corruption and launch a war against corruption. Get Narayana Murthy or Anna Hazare to back it. Make websites, collect funds, start SMS and phone campaigns, make Anna go on long hunger strikes and create drama. Get media cell to extensively promote it. Test it first. The When: Test it first in April 2011 and then launch it in a big way around Independence Day. The Where: Delhi (Jantar Mantar or Ram Lila whichever gets more people). The actors: Arvind Kejriwal (AK) and his closet Commies.

With his motives very clear AK used Anna and every other prominent person that he could to launch his campaign. When his real intentions became known people like Anna and Kiran Bedi pulled out of his campaign. With Anna gone, it was left to AK to carry on the hunger strikes. It didn’t work; nothing budged. It was an embarrassing situation. Out comes another closet Commie called Yogendra Yadav who collects signatures and appeals to AK to end his fast. At that time not many knew that Yogi was already an AAP (Aam Aadmi Party) member himself. All very clever, eh? In principle, there is nothing wrong in AK and his Commies wanting to be political or seeking political power. What interests me is that AK changed the “how” in the AAP agenda from a Superman-Corruption-fighter to one of that of another Congress party that appeases and fools Muslims. In other words, the AAP today is just another SP, JDU, RJD and nothing but a Congress clone. There are now also issues being raised about their foreign funding but that is not the concern of this post. (Also read: The Genie’s back in the bottle).
 
Even during Anna’s fast in August 2011 AK & Co. first pulled down a ‘Bharat Maa’ banner because Muslims objected. They stopped singing Vande Mataram because Mullahs objected. They ran to Imam ‘Wanted’ Bukhari to specially seek his support. And they ended Anna’s fast with two kids – one Muslim, one Dalit. Cut to 2013. The media cronies like Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose (on whose channel Yogi of the Idea of India cult is fitted furniture) realised that it has become impossible for them to defend the corrupt, non-performing Congress. So all channels started giving extraordinary time and space to AAP. For a young party that is neither in any govt nor in any Opposition they were given voices beyond reason. The AAP spokies like Yogi, Manish Sisodia, Mayank Gandhi, Shazia Ilmi were lucky guys who could simply abuse anyone as corrupt and a failure because they weren’t holding any responsibility. They were like balancing monkeys who could eat from both plates without being blamed for their own food being bad. The methods quickly became evident.

Post the Muzaffarnagar riots AK & Co. put up a press note on their website holding BJP responsible. On finding this was incorrect they quietly withdrew it. Let’s not forget this same AK also holds that Batla House was a fake encounter. Our police guys just shot themselves in the back twice and died. Prashant Bhushan, another closet Commie supports the idea of a separate Kashmir and once got thrashed in his office. Bhushan & Co. had filed a petition in the SC to declare the Batla prosecution a witch-hunt of Muslims. Huh? The SC rightly slapped him for being communal. This was long before AAP came around so it’s just that we didn’t read the signs.

So now when many people say AAP is nothing but a set-up by the Congress, I would agree there is merit in it. Shivendra Chauhan who was connected to the IAC in some ways earlier tweeted about a secret meeting AK had with Ahmed Patel (the guy who is SoniaG’s “unhappy” voice). We can't be sure though it seems plausible. On November 11 Shinde announced an inquiry into AAP’s foreign funding based on some complaints. That is a half-truth. The Delhi HC had ordered the inquiry on some complaint so it was a compulsion. So Shinde’s statement gave fodder to the media and everyone from Rajdeep to Arnab helped the AAP Commies to play “victim”, of being hounded while all other parties were corrupt. The trick: If AAP gets some sympathy and votes it will eventually end up in support for Congress. Assuming Congress may not do well in Delhi elections, AAP is an insurance to keep BJP out because if there’s a hung verdict the Congis know too well AAP will be on their side. Pretty neat!

A Muslim friend recently confessed to me that half their backwardness is because of poor education, partly the Madrassa type. It is unfortunate that the only leaders they have are Mullahs, some good, some bad. So while he fights elections in Delhi, AK goes all the way to Bareilly to “chadao” some “chaadar” and meets Tauqeer Raza, a Mullah famous for the Bareilly riots, death-fatwas on Taslima Nasreen and George Bush. On being asked why, AK explained that he didn’t know the background of this Mullah and was generally meeting all religious heads. Really? With this action, the “how” in AK’s agenda was now fully redefined and like the Congress and other Commies his route was Muslim appeasement. AK did not have one word to utter anywhere on the Patna blasts of October 27. Elections in Delhi but he goes to Bareilly and also talks about Muzaffarnagar but when asked about Pakistan this is what happened (video: 1.38 mins):

Uh… can we talk of Delhi? Okay! Why did you meet the Mullah at Bareilly? The answer wasn’t: Uh… can we talk of Delhi? Can we talk of Muzaffarnagar? The answer wasn’t: Uh… Can we talk of Delhi? Can we talk of IM, Pakistan, LOC or such things? The answer: Uh… Can we talk of Delhi? Last night all the AAP Commies were on all TV channels playing “victim” over the funding issue but on the night when the “Mullah visit” was being discussed they all went back into their closets. They all disappeared.

So, from being the Superman who was going to eliminate corruption from India there has been a change of plans. Lokpal bill? Dumped! Campaign against nepotism? Dumped! Campaign against scams of Robert Vadra? Dumped! Fight for Ashok Khemka? Used and dumped! This was never about fighting corruption or any scam. This was about political power and influence. One of the time-tested methods of the Congress and Commie outfits is to appease Muslims. Oh wait! We are now way past appeasement. It has now come down to simple fooling of Muslims. This is Part A and we shall continue to see how the old trick of appeasement has now morphed into a deadly epidemic of fooling Muslims in Part-B.


Fooling Muslims – Part B will be up soon.

Desperate Measures series – To be continued


Sunday, November 10, 2013

Desperate Measures - Part 5



Removing Modi:

They had problems before him. Racism and segregation still existed in some parts of southern US but life was one of working hard, living a dream, buying a second car and patriotism. This month, 50 years ago, Americans came to learn the expressions “The end of innocence” and “The end of optimism”. These phrases were born after their popular President John F Kennedy was shot dead on November 22, 1963. JFK promised to put man on the moon by the end of the 60s. If he hadn’t been shot he would have lived to see it. Open-car rides for Presidents ended, Americans became more wary of each other and then followed some terrible wars, civil protests and times of upheaval. More assassinations followed; those of Robert Kennedy, of Martin Luther King Jr and attempted killing of Ronald Reagan. India’s young democracy too had the moment when it lost its innocence.

India had leaders who were worshipped. Their pictures adorned schools and offices. We had people like Shastriji who were known to use public transport like everyone else. India lost her innocence on June 26, 1975 the day Indira Gandhi imposed Emergency. The Constitution was subverted, fundamental rights were suspended, political leaders were jailed, many deaths were unreported, localities were wantonly demolished and Kleptocracy took roots. Indira Gandhi was killed violently by her own guards on October 31, 1984. We now frequently hear this line: “Today we were unlucky, but remember we only have to be lucky once – you will have to be lucky always”. That chilling line was delivered by the IRA after their failed attempt to kill Margaret Thatcher at the Brighton Hotel on October 12, 1984. Narendra Modi was lucky on October 27, 2013 (Hunkaar rally, Patna) when no bombs got him. The terrorists and their political sympathisers are probably saying what the IRA said “...we only have to be lucky once… you will have to be lucky always”.

Michael Collins of Ireland is often called the “Father” of modern day terrorism but he is also revered as a patriot. Collins was true Irish blood who was killed by his own, the IRA, from the North at a young age of 31. He was somewhat of a Bhagat Singh who fought the British. Later in the 20th century it was Yasser Arafat who became the father of terrorism. India has a history of romancing terrorists. We even had politicians parading Osama look-alikes for votes in Bihar. These pics should show how our PMs since IndiraG have romanced Arafat:

For the Palestinians Arafat was a hero and to the Muslim world too. Reality, though, is Arafat wasn’t even a real Palestinian, he was Egyptian. India neither had stakes in Palestine nor any influence, yet our PMs have regularly entertained the man. Arafat was particularly close to the Gandhis. The only reason for that is our desire to stay cool with Arabs and appease the Muslim population at home. In their quest to tweak out some peace accord the West even awarded Arafat a Nobel Peace Prize. But in all of this, Arafat never laid down weapons. There are stories that he was a stooge of the Russians and funded by the KGB (read here). And now there are reports that he was poisoned to death but not clear by whom. The Russians were close to the Nehru-Gandhis too, weren’t they? Arafat’s legacy would be carried forward even more dangerously by none other than Osama Bin Laden. Collins fought for Ireland. Let us even concede Arafat was a patriot where Palestine is concerned. Even the Khalistanis wanted a separate State. The question now is what do the terrorists who want to kill Narendra Modi want? And why do they want to kill him?

All along the ISI and Pak-sponsored terrorists were about Kashmir. The local terrorists in Kashmir and the imported ones together cleansed Hindus from Kashmir. The Hindus can now never hope to return. What would they get by killing Narendra Modi? So the reason being consistently advanced is revenge for 2002. Is that so? Surely, there have been hundreds of communal riots before where more Muslims have been killed so why Modi alone? This takes us back to the extraordinary lies and propaganda about 2002 delivered by the Congress, their alliance partners and NGO/media cronies  like Rajdeep Sardesai, Barkha Dutt, Vir Sanghvi, Suzy Roy, Teesta Setalvad, Sanjiv Bhatt, RB Sreekumar, Mallika Sarabhai, Shabnam Hashmi, Javed Akhtar, Harsh Mandar, Salma & Sabrina of Tehelka, The Hindu, M Katju and the list is just too long. Teesta Setalvad was even funded by the Congress and CPM for election campaigns for them. The original objective of this entire cottage industry was to use 2002 to win the 2004 election by tarring Modi and the BJP. So much that it forced AB Vajpayee to start appeasement of Muslims. Maybe the plan to exploit 2002 electorally worked and Congress won in 2004.

But this gruesome gang just didn’t realise they made a mistake. They ended up making Modi a larger than life figure. They turned him into a huge monster challenge. He became known throughout the country and even the world. The bachelor Modi became the spouse to all these nags. The more they nagged, the more the public started suspecting their motives and started questioning them. The ones in the media are equally responsible for making Modi a terrorist-target owing to their constant hate-mongering against him.

Since the 1990s terrorism was spreading to many parts of the country. We had the Bombay blasts of 1993 (supposedly revenge for Babri). Okay, I don’t know what the Coimbatore blasts of 1998 targeting LK Advani were for. Then there was the attack on Parliament in 2001 I don’t know what that revenge was for. Mumbai train attacks in 2006; I don’t know what revenge that was for. There were blasts in Gujarat in 2008. Revenge? Delhi, Hyderabad, Malegaon, Varanasi. Shashi Tharoor is the best person to tell us all what “advertisement” caused these attacks because the English Laloo tweeted Gujarat was an “advertisement” for some terror attack. Finally, there was 26/11 in 2008 and I don’t know what revenge that was for. Do you?  

After the Brighton Hotel bombing Margaret Thatcher was taken to safety at the nearest police station and she proclaimed that her party’s conference will go on as scheduled the next day and terrorists will not be allowed to threaten democracy. This after 5 of her party members were killed in the blast. We have known people like Manmohan Singh routinely condemn blasts, claim they won’t bow to terrorism and even some stupid statements like “terrorists had advantage of surprise”. Here’s what Sonia Gandhi said after 26/11: "We will never bow before terrorism. We will give a befitting reply”. Can anyone tell us what our “befitting reply” was? We simply had more attacks, more LOC killings and more Biryani diplomacy. And we will not bow before terrorism she says as do many other cowards. Let’s see! How serious is Sonia Gandhi about terrorism? In the past she brought down a United Front govt because the DMK was a component of it. She objected to DMK because the party was supposedly supportive of LTTE which killed Rajiv Gandhi. Good choice! But the Congress, under Sonia Gandhi, has been hugging and kissing the same DMK for the last decade under UPA, including being partners in major scams like 2G. And Congress claims to fight terror? Laugh yourself to death! And the guy blamed by Congi MS Aiyar for mishandling the RajivG assassination is the keeper of the nation’s jewels.

Even normal sensibilities to terror attacks were turned into comic episodes. Shivraj Patil was reportedly changing clothes thrice a day to talk to the media. RR Patil said incidents like 26/11 happen in all major cities. Dr. RahulG who yesterday lamented the Chattisgarh Maoist killing of Congis and the killings of his Daddy and Daadi earlier was reported partying after 26/11. Shinde went to a Bollywood party after the recent Patna blasts. We are serious about terrorism indeed!

The post “Miracle at Gandhi Maidan” on the terrorist attacks at Patna during BJP’s Hunkaar rally has now become the most read post on this blog. It connected with people because it said what the cowards in our media and parties opposed to BJP did not say. The BJP, Modi and the people in Patna and Gandhi Maidan DID NOT bow to terrorism. They did not allow the terrorists to win or disrupt the rally or force a cancellation. I call it courage under fire. And many politicians and political parties, including Asad Owaisi, who threatens a 3rd wave of radicalisation in parliament, wanted (on Timesnow) that BJP should have cancelled the rally. Isn’t that exactly what the Congress, JDU and similar parties wanted? That the Modi rally shouldn’t happen because it was a strong political expression? Which is why things look very fishy?


Many have called 26/11 India’s 9/11. Alright! After 9/11 the US took to war but they also made some internal corrections. They created the Homeland Security and made entry for potential terrorists difficult. A new set of procedures and practices were put in place. What exactly did the Congress govt do? Practically nothing! A few months later our stupid morons at TOI were running an “Aman ki Asha” campaign. Money talks! After such a major attack the security forces should have been hounding and hunting down sleeper cells across the country. Did they? Everyone knows major terror fountains are in UP and Bihar. Our “secular” folks don’t want to annoy them. What exactly was Digvijaya Singh doing? He was concocting stories just like AR Antulay and even releasing books about RSS being behind 26/11 (the author of that stupid book has since apologised). He was and probably still is a mentor to RahulG. Typically, RahulG also parroted Diggy lines like “Hindu extremists are more dangerous than LeT” and “SIMI = RSS”. And as if politicians and media folks aren’t enough to muddy the waters there are jokers like Mahesh Bhatt and Javed Akhtar from Bollywood who inspire hatred against Modi.

The same Digvijaya still maintains, despite court ruling, that the Batla House encounter was fake. He has sympathy for the terrorists who were killed. Johny-come-lately Arvind Kejriwal’s colleagues file a petition in SC wanting Batla be declared a witch-hunt of Muslims. The SC soundly slapped them on being communal. Lately, to appease Muslims, this Kejriwal meets a Mullah who issues ‘death-fatwas’ to further his election campaign. Looks like the corruption-fighting Superman Kejriwal does wear a "Red" underwear. Home Minister Sushil Shinde writes to all CMs not to arrest Muslim youth on terror suspicion. These are the signs that the GOI and the ‘sickulars’ are serious about terrorism. Terror-accused Afzal Usmani escapes from a Mumbai court even under police watch and is re-arrested in Bihar after the Patna blasts. Here’s more:

Two foreign writers, Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott-Clark, recently released a book about 26/11 titled “The Siege”. In the book they claim there were 26 alerts given by the US to India about such an attack. More importantly, they claim there was/is a mole in the Indian security establishment who leaks files to ISI/Pakistan which helped plan 26/11. This mole has been codenamed “Honeybee”. How nice! It is no secret there are many terror sympathisers in our establishment, including our media. Did the GOI take the slightest action against those media folks and activists named as “friendly” to ISI operative Ghulam Nabi Fai? Did they even investigate the links? We don’t know. But these guys parade as “intellectuals” on our TV channels. Rajdeep Sardesai wonders why it takes outsiders to write our story. Well, my answer to Rajdeep was you sit all day in your studios and abuse Modi. Investigating and writing verifiable facts requires some serious work and getting out of the studio. The comfort of the “Hammam” has never brought out any truth. It’s true for CNN-IBN and it’s true for NDTV, TimesNow and all the channels who are parading as “news” channels.

Incidentally, the #65Traitors who wrote to Barack Obama to deny a visa to Modi have neither been investigated nor prosecuted. The reports now streaming in about the tragedy at Patna on October 27 make dangerous reading. Original plan was to eliminate Modi at hotel, says IM operative (read here). 90 bombs on hand- What was the IM planning? (Read here). Assassinating Modi abroad would be far less consequential than if it were to happen in India. Murdering unwelcome Third World leaders, like Belgian Congo’s Patrice Lumumba, is the customary practice of countries which espouse democracy and human rights with alacrity even as they commit genocide (read here). Will Pakistan decide the next Indian PM? (Read here).

Look at the Rainbow Alliance: Congress, SP, JDU, RJD, DMK, CPM, CPI, NCP, NC and some more, all heavily depend on the Muslim votebank. The fact that even Muslims are now beginning to accept Modi is frightening. Modi’s political opponents, which includes all the media celebs, didn’t even stop to ask why MoS RPN Singh and the media was repeatedly describing the Patna blasts as “low intensity”, as if the intensity is a measure of good and bad terrorism, when it killed 6 people and injured over 80. Not one TV channel recognised it as an attempt on Modi’s life at least on October 27 and the next 2 days. On the contrary they hurried to bury the story. Shinde went on to attend a Bollywood party in the evening on October 27. Salman Khurshid, who can’t string together one coherent sentence, came up with the gem “Shinde has a life beyond Patna”. PonyTail would have been proud: “Dare to think beyond Patna and bomb blasts”.

The threat to Modi is real and it’s not because of the 2002 riots. It is simply because the man threatens the regime of Congress and its “secular” alliance partners, in short the Communists. The growing crowds at his rallies and their responses are frightening them to say the least. After every speech of Modi some Congis and media folks (like Vinod Mehta) start concocting falsehoods by distorting his statements. Such is the fear.

The conduct of Bihar CM Nitish Kumar during and after the Patna blasts has raised quite a few eyebrows. Some are now wondering about the purpose of his visit to Pakistan. Bihar doesn’t have much to do with Pakistan, except maybe some Pakistani terrorists use the Nepal border to get into Bihar. When Yasin Bhatkal was arrested the Nitish govt didn’t even want to take custody or interrogate him. Hardly the behaviour of a govt of a State infested with terror havens, is it? Ex member of JDU, Shivraj Singh has accused of JDU of receiving “enemy funds”. Sunil Rajguru summarises various observations in his note “Something is rotten in the state of Bihar”. Former military intelligence officer RSN Singh writes “Indian Politicians:Pakistan's Proxy Soldiers”. It doesn’t seem very far-fetched anymore, we just heard of ‘Honeybee’.

For all you know if not for so much slandering and hate-mongering against Modi by the Congress & Co, media and NGOs he would have been probably only as well-known as Keshubhai Patel or Chimanbhai Patel (former Gujarat CMs). In some corner of their hearts Sonia Gandhi, Congress, Barkha, Rajdeep, Sagarika, Vir Sangvhi, Teesta, Aakar Patel, Manish Tewari, Nitish Kumar etc. must be regretting that they put Modi under a microscope for the whole country to dissect. The results have been damaging for them. People looked through that microscope and found the truth. The Modi they wanted to demonise has unwittingly become the hero of the masses who now fires the hopes and aspirations of millions. More bad news is that the nation adores him as a great political orator as well. Modi’s march to power currently seems unstoppable. Whether in collusion with some political party or by enemies alone it seems there is only one way to stop Modi. And no one described that better than Karan ‘The Tool’ Thapar when he wrote in the last para of his 2007 article: “Only the sudden removal of Narendra Modi can stop this”.


To be continued

Friday, November 8, 2013

Desperate Measures - Part 4



Lie like hell

We have seen in the previous part that India is more or less a “disguised dictatorship”. Democracy doesn’t course in the veins of the parties currently ruling it. If they don’t like democracy within their own party there is hardly any chance they are going to like it for you as the govt. You know, like the Twitter profiles that say “tweets are personal”. I guess they mean if “tweets were professional” they would be different. Liars will be liars, whether personal or professional. Sustaining a dictatorial regime requires frequent and large doses of LIES. It requires frequently creating distractions from real issues. It requires attracting the most corrupt and slavish people from the Establishment. This includes the bureaucrats, the law enforcers and also the propagandists. The propagandists who participate in such a dictatorial venture often call themselves journalists or editors. Collectively, they also help in the game of victimhood and fear-mongering.

Desperate times call for desperate measures. Some Congress members in MP were stupid enough to demand that the EC cover Lotus flowers in ponds because the Lotus is the symbol of BJP. The Congress, of course, is the party of “educated” members like Shashi Tharoor, Jairam Ramesh, Salman Khurshid, Kapil Sibal, ManiShankar Aiyar and yes, Manmohan Singh too and most of all, Liar-in-Chief Digvijaya Singh. Who can deny that, eh? I don’t need to add that Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi too are impeccably educated. Not done with flowers the Congress in MP has officially complained to the EC against the use of ‘Diyas’ by the BJP in some posters or images. It seems ‘diyas’ are a communal symbol that appeals to religious sentiments. Except for one religious community, for all others a diya or a candle symbolises ‘light’ which means knowledge, enlightenment, remembrance, new beginnings or learning and truth. Those who live by lies hate truth. Naturally, they object to diyas. That’s how comic the canards are starting to become. Let’s lie!

Early in the day on October 27 (Hunkaar Rally of BJP in Patna) CNN-IBN was at its poisonous best. By now we know this is a hate-mongering ‘Mom & Pop’ store run by Numero Uno Rajdeep Sardesai and Category5Moron Sagarika Ghose. It’s interesting how they have co-opted Bhupendra Chaube, an otherwise decent anchor, into to their lying and hate-mongering. Chaubeji came up with a bizarre theory about the huge crowds at Modi’s Patna rally. He suggested that since the BJP team was the one beaming the images to TV channels the crowds were “simulated” to look large in numbers. He was suggesting Modi was using Hollywood FX techniques to show crowds of lakhs when it was just thousands. This is what the moron was implying:

This is not done during LIVE programmes. Modern movie techniques use a ‘GreenScreen’ which is later filled with images required in the sequence. These are hi-fi digital effects that aren’t easy to do during live shows. Considering he works in a studio and a channel which bungles and lies with “Look-Live” techniques it is appalling that Chaubeji doesn’t know of these simple facts. Because Modi’s rallies get huge crowds the TV channels invent these lies to provide ammunition to their favourite party, Congress. But it’s not in just one rally. Crowds have been pouring into Modi rallies in huge numbers at all rallies.

I wouldn’t be exaggerating if I said that this guy is getting the crowds that even movie stars and rockstars don’t get. In India the spiritual “Gurus” are the real rockstars if one were to go by crowds but even they don’t get the kind of crowds that Modi has been drawing. This is naturally bothering Congress, JDU, SP, NC and the rest. They are trying to dismiss this reality. Take Her Royal Bimboness Sagarika Ghose; for all her hate-filled rants against Modi when asked if she ever criticised something that’s wrong with Congress, this is what she pulled out:

To prove she is a fair C5M she digs up eight years to show she has criticised the Congress as much as the BJP. Then the Congress now wants to ban opinion polls. They offer the defence that the EC had proposed it and they simply express their agreement. Ever heard the word “engineering”? In what way is it the EC’s job to monitor propaganda or opinions? None! The EC’s job is to hold free and fair elections and ensure model codes are followed. In what way do opinion polls flout any codes? None! It is true that opinion polls are often fraudulent and mischievous but then most of the statements of politicians and political parties are equally fraudulent. This sabre rattling by the EC is engineered by none but the Congis who are receiving adverse feedback in such opinion polls. But is that the only reason for all the lie-mongering? Not really! It is Congress’s own internal survey that tells them they have hit rock bottom and that is what bothers them. The opinion polls just seem to magnify it. Read the dismal prospects that the party sees in its internal assessment (particularly a thrashing in UP and Andhra) in this Telegraph article.

Bibek Debroy provides a good answer to the stupidity of EC and Congress on opinion polls: “Do you remember a sting operation conducted in 2005? That showed some MPs accepting money for asking Parliamentary questions. Does that prove that the system of asking Parliamentary questions is bad and Parliamentary questions should be banned?” It is increasingly becoming comic. Let’s LIE about history.

When Modi announced a monument to Sardar Patel (proposed as the tallest statue in the world) the Congress was up in arms. ‘You are stealing Sardar from us’ they screamed. One can’t help laughing at these jokers. Modi further added insult by stating “If Sardar had been our first PM the nation would have been very different”. This is a debate that will always go on and nothing wrong with it. In my own assessment Nehru neither had the vision nor the foresight to run a company far less a nation. Events have proved that. But would Sardar have made a better PM? We will never know because Sardar died in just a few years after independence. But one thing is sure, it is quite possible that Congress and India may not have turned into a dynastic dictatorship had Sardar been the first PM. Of course, Nehru may have still become PM on his death. Predictably, the Congis started their emotional whining that they respected Sardar, things were fine between Nehru and Sardar blah blah. Awful truth is, neither Nehru had cordial relations with Sardar nor has the Congress ever given the man his due. The following report reveals a lot more:

The Pioneer reveals notes where Nehru called Sardar a “communalist”. By that token Sardar surely belongs to BJP rather than Congress. They claim Sardar banned the RSS but won’t like to mention that the same Sardar also removed the ban. In between, lies, lies and more lies about the history of Sardar. Truth: This Congress (I) meted out the same treatment to the memory of Sardar that Nehru did when he was alive. I’m not even going to discuss the stupidity of the late Bharat Ratna because in India such awards are political marketing and nothing else. I simply do not respect these awards. I do respect the recipients but consider these govt awards unnecessary.

There was that speech of Modi at the Patna rally where the serial blasts went off. It was an attempt to kill him. The media and the Congress washed away the incident as just another ‘chota-mata blasts’ as Sreenivasan Jain of NDTV would call it. We will deal with that in a later part. But all the Congis got together claiming Modi didn’t know history, that he mentioned Taxila was in Bihar wrongly, that he mentioned Alexander The Moron died near the Ganga or about Chandragupta Maurya dynasty. Shashi Tharoor, the happy-tongue hypocrite, commented “Modi is not a particularly well-educated man”. Oh well, we have seen what “educated” men like Tharoor, Jairam, Khurshid, MMS, MSAiyar and Sibal have done to this country. There are too many lies these Congis have peddled so I simply recommend you read this post at NitiCentral which explains all of it.

Jairam Ramesh even cries and whines with the old moth-eaten lines of “Modi is a Hitler”, it is the rise of the “Third Reich”. Even creative insults have gone for a toss; the Congis have hit rock bottom. But their comrades in the media continue to still be nostalgic about 2002 hoping desperately it will somehow reverse the trend. The Commie, N Ram, writes in an article titled, again,Narendra Modi and why 2002 cannot go away”: “He (Modi) has rhetorical skills, although nothing that approaches the heights of political oratory that Atal Bihari Vajpayee could attain at will, with practised effortlessness, over the decades”. This stupidity will pass as “educated” according to the likes of Tharoor and Khurshid for argument. Ram cleverly conceals the fact that Modi draws far bigger crowds than ABV.

Is there any relevance to N Ram’s nonsense? Are people going to Modi rallies to check if he’s a better orator than ABV? This is our media; brainless and stupid. This is an editor writing with nothing but contempt in his heart and not facts or logic. Sunetra Chaudhary relays the poor turnouts at Congress rallies. Why is that? Because RahulG is not handsome? Or because he doesn’t shave? N Ram would give you reasons like that. Why am I quoting Sunetra? She wrote long back “Why desi netas will never charm the English media”. So absolute nonsense from Tharoor, Khurshid, Jairam, MSAiyar, Sibal in “English” will be glorified by the MSM but sound logic and vision by a “desi” will be scorned. There is a reason why I call these guys “English Laloos”. Let’s LIE some more.

To the demand of additional security for Modi following the Patna blasts and attempted assassination, the Congress minister RPN Singh came up with a fantastic theory on why Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated for lack of security. As the Congress’ faithful parrot quotes him: “I want to tell the NDA (the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance) that Rajiv Gandhi wasn't given the security of even a sub-inspector when they were in power. Maybe that's why he lost his life" to which NDTV itself adds: The BJP-backed National Front government was in power when Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated in 1991. Of course, the Congress liars NDTV would have altered the report by now because in 1991 the govt was headed by Chandra Shekhar with outside support from Congress itself. Now, it is not as if RPN Singh had made a faux pas as the MSM claimed. If it were so, he would have apologised. But these are deliberate lies let loose and let them have their run as far as it carries. The principle in the Congress as with media is LIE BIG, retract small. Anyone remember the Rambo lies?

That is only half the story. The foolish claim of RPN Singh of lack of security is FALSE. I have written before on this site that both IndiraG and RajivG did not follow security advices. IndiraG ignored advice on her personal guards and RajivG flouted security routines in as many as 40rallies. Who broke the security cordons and rules in Sriperumbudur where RajivG was killed? I tweeted the following from the page I have linked:
Far from being sober about the killings of former PMs who were Gandhis, the Congress has been using the deaths as emotional blackmail and mindless chest beating. RahulG went as far as claiming he is under threat and not afraid of dying. Such filmy dialogues and drama is what most of Congress electoral discourse is made up of. Given our history and current terror-threats there are many politicians who face threats. But only an idiot would deny that Modi is the biggest target in the country. He is a target not just for terrorists but as the Patna episode showed he does not enjoy any sympathy for having survived from his detractors or from hate-mongers in the media. 

The lying and smearing is not restricted to politics. Everyone who was every praised or associated with Modi has been smeared and tarred. Gen VK Singh, Anna Hazare, Ghulam Vastanvi and even Amitabh Bachchan. Next on the list is probably Lata Mangeshkar who endorsed Modi as PM. The I&B ministry has even issued an advisory in the manner in which the PM’s speech should be covered by media and not Modi’s speeches. Who does that? Only Fascists and Nazis do that! The emotional whining and “victimhood” doesn’t stop. The last we heard the Congress had decided to pull out of debates on opinion polls. A more honourable thing would be to pull out of politics if they cannot survive without lies and have to employ desperate measures.


To be continued