Removing Modi:
They had
problems before him. Racism and segregation still existed in some parts of
southern US but life was one of working hard, living a dream, buying a second
car and patriotism. This month, 50 years ago, Americans came to learn the
expressions “The end of innocence”
and “The end of optimism”. These
phrases were born after their popular President John F Kennedy was shot dead on November 22, 1963. JFK promised to
put man on the moon by the end of the 60s. If he hadn’t been shot he would have
lived to see it. Open-car rides for Presidents ended, Americans became more
wary of each other and then followed some terrible wars, civil protests and
times of upheaval. More assassinations followed; those of Robert Kennedy, of
Martin Luther King Jr and attempted killing of Ronald Reagan. India’s young
democracy too had the moment when it lost its innocence.
India had
leaders who were worshipped. Their pictures adorned schools and offices. We had
people like Shastriji who were known to use public transport like everyone else.
India lost her innocence on June 26, 1975 the day Indira Gandhi imposed Emergency. The Constitution was subverted,
fundamental rights were suspended, political leaders were jailed, many deaths
were unreported, localities were wantonly demolished and Kleptocracy took
roots. Indira Gandhi was killed violently by her own guards on October 31,
1984. We now frequently hear this line: “Today
we were unlucky, but remember we only have to be lucky once – you will have to
be lucky always”. That chilling line was delivered by the IRA after their failed attempt to kill Margaret Thatcher at the
Brighton Hotel on October 12, 1984. Narendra
Modi was lucky on October 27, 2013 (Hunkaar rally, Patna) when no bombs got
him. The terrorists and their political sympathisers are probably saying what
the IRA said “...we only have to be lucky once… you will have to be lucky
always”.
Michael Collins of Ireland is often called the
“Father” of modern day terrorism but he is also revered as a patriot. Collins
was true Irish blood who was killed by his own, the IRA, from the North at a
young age of 31. He was somewhat of a Bhagat Singh who fought the British.
Later in the 20th century it was Yasser
Arafat who became the father of terrorism. India has a history of romancing
terrorists. We even had politicians parading Osama look-alikes for votes in
Bihar. These pics should show how our PMs since IndiraG have romanced Arafat:
For the
Palestinians Arafat was a hero and to the Muslim world too. Reality, though, is
Arafat wasn’t even a real Palestinian, he was Egyptian. India neither had
stakes in Palestine nor any influence, yet our PMs have regularly entertained
the man. Arafat was particularly close to the Gandhis. The only reason for that
is our desire to stay cool with Arabs and appease the Muslim population at
home. In their quest to tweak out some peace accord the West even awarded
Arafat a Nobel Peace Prize. But in all of this, Arafat never laid down weapons.
There are stories that he was a stooge of the Russians and funded by the KGB (read here). And now there are reports
that he was poisoned to death but not clear by whom. The Russians were close to
the Nehru-Gandhis too, weren’t they? Arafat’s legacy would be carried forward
even more dangerously by none other than Osama
Bin Laden. Collins fought for Ireland. Let us even concede Arafat was a
patriot where Palestine is concerned. Even the Khalistanis wanted a separate
State. The question now is what do the
terrorists who want to kill Narendra Modi want? And why do they want to
kill him?
All along
the ISI and Pak-sponsored terrorists were about Kashmir. The local terrorists
in Kashmir and the imported ones together cleansed Hindus from Kashmir. The Hindus can now never hope to return.
What would they get by killing Narendra Modi? So the reason being consistently advanced
is revenge for 2002. Is that so?
Surely, there have been hundreds of communal riots before where more Muslims
have been killed so why Modi alone? This takes us back to the extraordinary
lies and propaganda about 2002 delivered by the Congress, their alliance
partners and NGO/media cronies like
Rajdeep Sardesai, Barkha Dutt, Vir Sanghvi, Suzy Roy, Teesta Setalvad, Sanjiv
Bhatt, RB Sreekumar, Mallika Sarabhai, Shabnam Hashmi, Javed Akhtar, Harsh
Mandar, Salma & Sabrina of Tehelka, The Hindu, M Katju and the list is just
too long. Teesta Setalvad was even funded by the Congress and CPM for election
campaigns for them. The original objective of this entire cottage industry was
to use 2002 to win the 2004 election by tarring Modi and the BJP. So much that
it forced AB Vajpayee to start appeasement of Muslims. Maybe the plan to
exploit 2002 electorally worked and Congress won in 2004.
But this
gruesome gang just didn’t realise they made a mistake. They ended up making Modi a larger than life figure. They turned
him into a huge monster challenge. He became known throughout the country and
even the world. The bachelor Modi became the spouse to all these nags. The more
they nagged, the more the public started suspecting their motives and started
questioning them. The ones in the media are equally responsible for making Modi
a terrorist-target owing to their constant hate-mongering against him.
Since the
1990s terrorism was spreading to many parts of the country. We had the Bombay
blasts of 1993 (supposedly revenge for Babri). Okay, I don’t know what the
Coimbatore blasts of 1998 targeting LK Advani were for. Then there was the
attack on Parliament in 2001 I don’t know what that revenge was for. Mumbai
train attacks in 2006; I don’t know what revenge that was for. There were
blasts in Gujarat in 2008. Revenge? Delhi, Hyderabad, Malegaon, Varanasi. Shashi Tharoor is the best person to
tell us all what “advertisement” caused these attacks because the English Laloo
tweeted Gujarat was an “advertisement”
for some terror attack. Finally, there
was 26/11 in 2008 and I don’t know what revenge that was for. Do you?
After the
Brighton Hotel bombing Margaret Thatcher was taken to safety at the nearest
police station and she proclaimed that her party’s conference will go on as
scheduled the next day and terrorists will not be allowed to threaten
democracy. This after 5 of her party members were killed in the blast. We have
known people like Manmohan Singh
routinely condemn blasts, claim they won’t bow to terrorism and even some stupid
statements like “terrorists had advantage of surprise”. Here’s what Sonia Gandhi said after 26/11: "We will never bow
before terrorism. We will give a befitting reply”. Can anyone tell
us what our “befitting reply” was? We simply had more attacks, more LOC
killings and more Biryani diplomacy. And we will not bow before terrorism she
says as do many other cowards. Let’s see! How serious is Sonia Gandhi about
terrorism? In the past she brought down a United Front govt because the DMK was
a component of it. She objected to DMK because the party was supposedly
supportive of LTTE which killed Rajiv Gandhi. Good choice! But the Congress,
under Sonia Gandhi, has been hugging and kissing the same DMK for the last
decade under UPA, including being partners in major scams like 2G. And Congress
claims to fight terror? Laugh yourself to death! And the guy blamed by Congi MS
Aiyar for mishandling the RajivG assassination is the keeper of the nation’s
jewels.
Even normal
sensibilities to terror attacks were turned into comic episodes. Shivraj Patil
was reportedly changing clothes thrice a day to talk to the media. RR Patil
said incidents like 26/11 happen in all major cities. Dr. RahulG who yesterday
lamented the Chattisgarh Maoist killing of Congis and the killings of his Daddy
and Daadi earlier was reported partying after 26/11. Shinde went to a Bollywood
party after the recent Patna blasts. We are serious about terrorism indeed!
The post “Miracle at Gandhi Maidan” on the
terrorist attacks at Patna during BJP’s Hunkaar rally has now become the most
read post on this blog. It connected with people because it said what the
cowards in our media and parties opposed to BJP did not say. The BJP, Modi and
the people in Patna and Gandhi Maidan DID
NOT bow to terrorism. They did not
allow the terrorists to win or disrupt the rally or force a cancellation. I
call it courage under fire. And many politicians and political parties,
including Asad Owaisi, who threatens a 3rd wave of radicalisation in
parliament, wanted (on Timesnow) that BJP should have cancelled the rally. Isn’t
that exactly what the Congress, JDU and similar parties wanted? That the Modi
rally shouldn’t happen because it was a strong political expression? Which is
why things look very fishy?
Many have
called 26/11 India’s 9/11. Alright! After 9/11 the US took to war but they also
made some internal corrections. They created the Homeland Security and made
entry for potential terrorists difficult. A new set of procedures and practices
were put in place. What exactly did the Congress govt do? Practically nothing! A few months later our stupid morons at TOI
were running an “Aman ki Asha” campaign. Money talks! After such a major attack
the security forces should have been hounding and hunting down sleeper cells
across the country. Did they? Everyone knows major terror fountains are in UP
and Bihar. Our “secular” folks don’t want to annoy them. What exactly was Digvijaya
Singh doing? He was concocting stories just like AR Antulay and even releasing
books about RSS being behind 26/11 (the author of that stupid book has since apologised). He was and probably still is a mentor to
RahulG. Typically, RahulG also parroted Diggy lines like “Hindu extremists are more dangerous than LeT” and “SIMI = RSS”. And as if politicians and
media folks aren’t enough to muddy the waters there are jokers like Mahesh Bhatt
and Javed Akhtar from Bollywood who inspire hatred against Modi.
The same
Digvijaya still maintains, despite court ruling, that the Batla House encounter was fake. He has sympathy for the terrorists
who were killed. Johny-come-lately Arvind
Kejriwal’s colleagues file a petition in SC wanting Batla be declared a
witch-hunt of Muslims. The SC soundly slapped them on being communal. Lately,
to appease Muslims, this Kejriwal meets a Mullah who issues ‘death-fatwas’ to
further his election campaign. Looks like the corruption-fighting Superman Kejriwal does wear a "Red" underwear. Home Minister Sushil Shinde writes to all CMs
not to arrest Muslim youth on terror suspicion. These are the signs that the GOI and the ‘sickulars’ are serious about
terrorism. Terror-accused Afzal Usmani escapes from a Mumbai court even
under police watch and is re-arrested in Bihar after the Patna blasts. Here’s
more:
Two foreign
writers, Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott-Clark, recently released a book about
26/11 titled “The Siege”. In the
book they claim there were 26 alerts given by the US to India about such an
attack. More importantly, they claim there was/is a mole in the Indian security
establishment who leaks files to ISI/Pakistan which helped plan 26/11. This
mole has been codenamed “Honeybee”.
How nice! It is no secret there are many terror sympathisers in our
establishment, including our media. Did the GOI take the slightest action
against those media folks and activists named as “friendly” to ISI operative Ghulam Nabi Fai? Did they even
investigate the links? We don’t know. But these guys parade as “intellectuals”
on our TV channels. Rajdeep Sardesai wonders why it takes outsiders to write our
story. Well, my answer to Rajdeep was you sit all day in your studios and abuse
Modi. Investigating and writing verifiable facts requires some serious work and
getting out of the studio. The comfort of the “Hammam” has never brought out any truth. It’s true for CNN-IBN and
it’s true for NDTV, TimesNow and all the channels who are parading as “news”
channels.
Incidentally, the #65Traitors who wrote to Barack Obama to deny a visa to Modi have neither been investigated nor prosecuted. The reports
now streaming in about the tragedy at Patna on October 27 make dangerous
reading. Original plan was to eliminate Modi at hotel, says IM operative (read here). 90 bombs on hand-
What was the IM planning? (Read here).
Assassinating Modi abroad would be far less consequential than if it were to
happen in India. Murdering unwelcome Third World leaders, like Belgian Congo’s
Patrice Lumumba, is the customary practice of countries which espouse democracy
and human rights with alacrity even as they commit genocide (read here). Will Pakistan decide
the next Indian PM? (Read here).
Look at the
Rainbow Alliance: Congress, SP, JDU, RJD, DMK, CPM, CPI, NCP, NC and some more,
all heavily depend on the Muslim votebank. The fact that even Muslims are now
beginning to accept Modi is frightening. Modi’s political opponents, which
includes all the media celebs, didn’t even stop to ask why MoS RPN Singh and
the media was repeatedly describing the Patna blasts as “low intensity”, as if the intensity is a measure of good
and bad terrorism, when it killed 6 people and injured over 80. Not one TV
channel recognised it as an attempt on Modi’s life at least on October 27 and
the next 2 days. On the contrary they hurried to bury the story. Shinde went on
to attend a Bollywood party in the evening on October 27. Salman Khurshid, who
can’t string together one coherent sentence, came up with the gem “Shinde has a life beyond Patna”.
PonyTail would have been proud: “Dare to think beyond Patna and bomb blasts”.
The threat
to Modi is real and it’s not because of the 2002 riots. It is simply because the man threatens the regime of Congress and its “secular”
alliance partners, in short the Communists. The growing crowds at his
rallies and their responses are frightening them to say the least. After every
speech of Modi some Congis and media folks (like Vinod Mehta) start concocting
falsehoods by distorting his statements. Such is the fear.
The conduct
of Bihar CM Nitish Kumar during and
after the Patna blasts has raised quite a few eyebrows. Some are now wondering
about the purpose of his visit to Pakistan. Bihar doesn’t have much to do with
Pakistan, except maybe some Pakistani terrorists use the Nepal border to get
into Bihar. When Yasin Bhatkal was arrested the Nitish govt didn’t even want to
take custody or interrogate him. Hardly the behaviour of a govt of a State
infested with terror havens, is it? Ex member of JDU, Shivraj Singh has accused of JDU of receiving “enemy funds”.
Sunil Rajguru summarises various observations in his note “Something is rotten in the state of Bihar”. Former military
intelligence officer RSN Singh writes “Indian Politicians:Pakistan's Proxy Soldiers”. It doesn’t seem very far-fetched
anymore, we just heard of ‘Honeybee’.
For all you
know if not for so much slandering and hate-mongering against Modi by the
Congress & Co, media and NGOs he would have been probably only as
well-known as Keshubhai Patel or Chimanbhai Patel (former Gujarat CMs). In some
corner of their hearts Sonia Gandhi, Congress, Barkha, Rajdeep, Sagarika, Vir
Sangvhi, Teesta, Aakar Patel, Manish Tewari, Nitish Kumar etc. must be
regretting that they put Modi under a
microscope for the whole country to dissect. The results have been damaging
for them. People looked through that microscope and found the truth. The Modi
they wanted to demonise has unwittingly become the hero of the masses who now
fires the hopes and aspirations of millions. More bad news is that the nation
adores him as a great political orator as well. Modi’s march to power currently
seems unstoppable. Whether in collusion with some political party or by
enemies alone it seems there is only one
way to stop Modi. And no one described that better than Karan ‘The Tool’ Thapar when he
wrote in the last para of his 2007 article: “Only the sudden removal of Narendra Modi can
stop this”.
To be
continued…
