Genitalyst Barkha

Believe it or not, in the ever-evolving glib professional world, there are many professions that might surprise you if not shock you. I am sure not many have heard of professions like Beverage Dissemination Officer, Chick Sexer, Problem Wrangler, Light-Bender, Twisted Brother etc. You can read about many such job titles at this site. I recall, many years ago a job-applicant at the US Navy entered his current profession as “Splosh-Maker”. Not wanting to sound stupidly ignorant, the recruitment Captain didn’t venture to ask what that was. The man went through all the recruitment procedures but no one asked him what a “Splosh Maker” was because no one wanted to sound foolish and ignorant.

After all routine ground training the man was assigned to a Navy ship. The Commander, on seeing the resume was bemused to see the past job description of this guy. So, he took the risk of venturing to call the man to explain what exactly a Splosh-Maker’s job was. The new recruit explained with all sincerity: “I was jobless for 10 years and used to collect large rocks and spend my time standing on the bridge over the river at my village. Every half hour I would drop a large rock into the river and it would make a gentle sound ‘splosh’, that’s why I call myself splosh-maker”. The Commander stared at the man for a few minutes and just said “Okay, carry on”.

I often say journos are not very bright people. But it appears journalism is now not their main profession at all for some. They have other secret professions. For instance, Sagarika Ghose is an exceptional “Semenologist” who can tell the religion of a man by his semen. She must be running a secret lab where she looks at, smells and tastes semen of all kinds to have acquired such expertise. That’s not all, the C5M can even tell the religion of a man even when the semen is inside a balloon. I think I now understand what Nena’s deeper, secret message was behind that song “99 Red Balloons”. If that wasn’t enough, now we have Barkha Dutt, the ever-whining, victim-playing narcissist complaining about someone sending her a pic of a dick. In doing so, BD let out her real profession that was so far unknown to all of us. She’s not a journo but in reality, a “Genitalyst”. Here’s the tweet she put out (for obvious reasons, I had to edit the image**):

Unbelievable, Barkha Dutt can just look at the image of a dick sent to her and instantly analyse and conclude that it’s a “Nationalistic” genital. So, that’s her secret profession. Although, these pics that I picked up from Twitter had something scribbled on the “member” (like a vehicle registration number). On the left is the pic I saw but was not able to figure out what was scribbled on it. However, putting the image under a “telescope” I discovered that it was a name of the owner of that “Tool” that was printed on it. And if you too take a closer look, I don’t think you would associate that name with being “nationalistic” unless Barkha meant “Pak nationalism”. If ever people are murdered frequently, as in the US or parts of Africa, and their genitals are missing, investigating agencies can now call on Barkha to at least identify if the man was a “nationalist” or a “communist”. That would narrow the job of identification of a “John Doe Genital” that is chopped off from the mainland body of its owner.

And BD has now confused the entire SM. So, far “DP” had a different meaning for us, Barkha has changed the meaning of the abbreviation of DP to “Dick Pic”. And people think she has no influence over SM. To the credit of ModiSarkar, though, it has to be said that the fully-depreciated, redundant abusive journos of the past are finding new professions in which they are finding great success. Sagarika is a “Semenologist”, Barkha is a “Genitalyst”, Shekhar Gupta and Rajdeep Sardesai are “Castalysts” (professionals creating caste-divisions in society). And much of this started with the Pulwama terror attack that martyred 44 of our CRPF Jawans. These India-haters, Army-haters, Hindu-haters and Modi-haters got busy inside of 48 hours to spin the attention away from the tragedy to turn Kashmiri students into “victims” at various places. It was an organised and orchestrated effort from the Paki-pimps in our media and Commie outfits. Here are some samples:

There is already some FIR against that JNU Thugni Shehla Rashid but I’m surprised why other criminal rumour-mongers and hate-mongers are not being prosecuted similarly for their FAKE “Kashmiris under attack” concoction. And do carefully read the tweet by BD at the left-bottom in the pic above. She claims her number is online and her DM is open and invites people to spam her. And then, this absolutely horrible wimp claims her number is being circulated by others and getting her all kinds of threats and messages:

 

Why would anyone have to circulate her stupid number when BD herself has indicated it’s all over the place and has also opened her DM on Twitter for anyone to message? That’s the kind of moron she is. Dig a hole for others in her fake “Kashmiris attacked” propaganda and then fall into it herself. And those who she claims are attacking her are “Nationalists”. I wonder how many dicks she has seen in her life to able to clearly identify which dicks or messages belong to “Nationalists”. Shameless creature that she is, she tries to cover up her criminal FAKERY over the Kashmiris attacked nonsense with such vile tweets and victimhood. A mentally deranged narcissist. Everyone on earth is now familiar with her stupid games and I had diagnosed way back in 2011 that this whiner has a severe psychological disorder and is a sick “Malignant Narcissist”.

Most people see an unknown number on WA and folks either delete it or block the number. This Sicko Barkha not only opens the message, gleefully sees the Dick Pic and concludes it’s a message representing “Nationalism”. I wonder how many Leftist and Naxal dicks Barkha has seen to have analysed this to be a “Nationalist” dick. And in the image, the genital was circumcised so the chances are likely that the ‘member” belonged to Barkha’s own community. To top it off, BD tweets to HM Rajnath Singh about her crap and wants him to chase some idiot and become a “Dick Hunter” for her. Apart from being hilarious, BD has now degenerated into a state of “Delirium”.

The delirious wimp doesn’t stop there. She wants Twitter to act on her porn pic even when the message she got was on WA. Barkha had no business to relay the porn “Dick Pic” to the public at large even if someone had sent it to her. She could have just gone to the cops. Naturally, when people reported it, Twitter asked her to either delete the offensive pic or be locked out. BD then proceeds to threaten Twitter with some “imaginary” legal battle. Talk about being a stupid Don Quixotini battling her delirious windmills concocted in her brainless head:

The more these useless, redundant, fully-depreciated journos fail, they degenerate into crass, moronic whiners and play victims of their own device. There are thousands of journos and many may face some genuine problems or threats or sexual abuse in their work-place or at the hands of politicians. What this foolish, hyper-delirious Barkha does is subvert their problems and genuine victims into oblivion with her bogus tantrums. Even in 2016 she claimed to be stalked, abused, receiving death threats and to have filed a FIR:

Nobody knows what happened to that case she refers to or if its another of her grand FAKERIES. Doesn’t matter! Seems BD is as frequently stalked, abused and given death-threats as pigeons dropping their gifts from the sky. Any person with the slightest of common sense would either change phone numbers or block stupid messages but then this idiotic-whiner announces her phone number is online, her DM is open to everyone just for her foolish theatre. Nobody is buying her crap anymore. But the good part is, where BD has failed in journalism, she can delightfully pursue her new profession of being a Genitalyst. There is, after all, some gains she made through her “Dick-whining”.

Note: **Image uses scribblings in modified version for “fictional” fun. 

 

Subscribe    Buy In INR     Buy in US$

  

Rahul & Digvijay - The Narcissist & The Sycophant

On June 20 CNN-IBN expectedly ran a program on Rahul Gandhi (RG) as PM following Digvijay Singh’s (DS) comments. That was Face the nation by Sagarika Ghose, of course. I can understand the likes of Vinod Sharma (Hindustan Times) and Congress spokesperson Jayanthi Natarajan being there to defend all the great qualities of Rahul Gandhi. However, I do not understand why sensible journalists like Swapan Dasgupta or Prem Shankar Jha come on to these programs. Do they really need to participate in these absurdities? Anyway, there are reports now that Sonia Gandhi is miffed with the glowing remarks made by DS. That sounds strange. By now DS would know what Sonia likes and dislikes, probably even down to her footwear maybe. So I believe DS would have only said things that would please madam’s ears and, surely, the future-PM’s ears. Never mind that either.

Sagarika Ghose, intelligent as ever, raised a question in her program: Does Rahul Gandhi have a vision for India? At the risk of sounding boringly repetitive I am reproducing a statement made by her own boss at CNN-IBN, Rajdeep Sardesai (when RG was declared Indian of the year 2009 by CNN-IBN):

“Rahul Gandhi has been chosen CNN-IBN politician of the year over many of his more experienced colleagues and rivals because no one toured India the way he has in the past 60 months. Nobody has enunciated a vision of new India the way he has and none has understood the immediate need to bridge the city-country divide the way Rahul Gandhi has. His efforts show that hard work pays even in the uncertain world of politics.”  So Sagarika should remember statements from her own channel before raising silly questions.

Well, if Digivijay Singh is stupid and a known gutter-mouth, the media isn’t too far behind. However, what is now and consistently coming forth is that there is a strange relationship between Rahul Gandhi and Digvijay Singh. All of us would like to be appreciated and praised for some good work or some accomplishment. It’s quite human. But if someone were to keep on praising and flattering me for no particular reason and even crediting me with skills and talents I do not posses I would start to suspect that person and at some point would find that person obnoxious enough to ask him to shut up. I would even start to loath such a person.

The Narc's reflection

All we have seen so far of Rahul Gandhi is the behaviour of a ‘Mr. Hit and Run’, stray stories of Kalawati, parachuting suddenly into places of agitation, uttering nonsense that college students have laughed at, accepting no responsibility for election losses. In fact accepting responsibility for nothing. On Sagarika’s program Prem Shankar Jha pointed out that we know nothing of views on anything. What is that? Is that supposed to our blind side? And for a person to be revelling in the utterances of a DS so frequently must indicate some psychological or neurological disorder. RG has shown nothing but traits and indications of such disorders, especially that of a narcissist. I am no shrink. But I now firmly believe that to understand the RG-DS equation one has to really understand the equation of a narcissist and a sycophant. I don’t think even DS would deny that he is a great sycophant. But what makes RG a narcissist which sustains this relationship? A definition or attributes or behaviour of a sycophant is not as hard to define and understand as that of a narcissist. Let us therefore rely on some experts who have laid out the following:

From ‘The mind of the narcissist’

According to the legend of Narcissus, this Greek boy fell in love with his own reflection in a pond. In a way, this amply sums up the nature of his namesakes: narcissists. The mythological Narcissus rejected the advances of the nymph Echo and was punished by Nemesis…Narcissists are punished by echoes and reflections of their problematic personalities up to this very day.

Narcissists are said to be in love with themselves. But this is a fallacy. Narcissus is not in love with himself. He is in love with his reflection. There is a major difference between one's True Self and reflected-self.

Loving a reflection has two major drawbacks:

1. One depends on the existence and availability of the reflection to produce the emotion of self-love.

2. The absence of a "compass", an "objective and realistic yardstick", by which to judge the authenticity of the reflection. In other words, it is impossible to tell whether the reflection is true to reality – and, if so, to what extent.

I would dare to say RG loves his reflection. His drama-queen behaviour, his choreographed public meetings, his parachuting at trouble spots and then suddenly reclining in to extreme solitude would explain his narcissistic behaviour. Mr. Hit and Run suits him. Especially when the reflection takes a beating, like the 4 seats in Bihar elections, it drives him into a hiding. This is because his hollow reflection starts to confront him, while his sycophant(s) continue to adore him and tell him his clothes are fine and that he is not naked. This is a problem RG is probably grappling with. So let’s see if his behaviour matches narcissistic disorders:

From: Narcissistic Personality Disorder:

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1. Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

2. Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

3. Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

4. Requires excessive admiration

5. Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

6. Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

7. Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

8. Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

9. Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

When I searched more for the relationship between a narc and a sycophant I found this brilliant piece and I believe it explains the RG-DS equation quite well:

Narcissists and Sycophants: A Marriage Made in Hell (excerpts):

“Let’s begin with some descriptions. A narcissist is a person with inordinate fascination with himself or herself. They have few social control mechanisms, fewer friends, little or no psychic demands to do the right thing (even though they give lip service to this concept) do not look for approval from others, lack social barometers of how to conduct themselves, and are driven to be captivating, inspirational, charming and seductive. They have a desperate need to get others to buy into their worldview–their vision, to create a world that they populate with their devoted followers. They are grandiose, don’t listen to others, are prone to angry outbursts (often used to control others who disagree with them), bully subordinates, dominate meetings and are often isolated and paranoid. According to Twenge and Campbell, narcissism is “a disease that causes others to suffer.” Narcissism is nearly always corrosive to social relationships as it breeds distrust. Narcissists are prone to using people like they use books, information and knowledge—they pump them for information and then when they are through, throw them aside. To the narcissist, there are only friends or foes; you are either for or against their vision. There is no middle ground.

Sycophants are self-serving servile flatterers and are often slavishly submissive to the narcissist.  The narcissist and the sycophant need each other. The narcissist is completely dependent on the sycophant to feed his ego, to feel important and powerful.  The sycophant, on the other hand, is also dependent on the narcissist for the narcissist makes the sycophant feel included and connected to someone the sycophant believes is powerful and important and will elevate the sycophant to great success, recognition or social standing. The sycophant derives a lot of self-worth from the narcissist as the relationship with the narcissist gives the sycophant social standing he otherwise would not have. In short, the relationship between the narcissist and sycophant is symbiotic; each feeding and dependent on the other. Without sycophants, the narcissist struggles, becomes depressed and feels his or her life has no meaning. A narcissist must have blind allegiance and the adoration of sycophantic followers because that is the food of the narcissist. Most often, a narcissist surrounds him or herself with “yes men” (slavishly submissive flatterers) who the narcissist sees as no threat to him or herself but yet, who are also not much good for advancing the narcissist’s vision. But that is ok with the narcissist, because he or she has all the answers, knows what is best and right and doesn’t listen to others anyway. The “yes men” are the means to an end, they help the narcissist get what he or she wants and will only be kept close as long as they serve a purpose.

As a group, sycophants find meaning and purpose out of protecting and becoming the narcissist’s handlers. They bond with other sycophants in this common purpose and are simultaneously validated by each other for how dysfunctional this interpersonal interplay is, either on a conscious or unconscious level, depending on the dysfunction of each individual. In such groups, everyone suffers. There are no winners in this symbiotic relationship. The narcissist’s hold is so great it is hard for the sycophant to escape the narcissist’s seductive embrace. At some point, depending on the amount of pain the sycophant has had to endure, they will wake up when they are no longer able to tolerate being used or when their own ethics or integrity will no longer permit them to be passive participants in the destructive world of the narcissist. Faced with abandonment, the narcissist acts more and more out of desperation, devolves deeper into his or her pathology and ends up alone and even more isolated, completing the cycle of narcissistic self-destruction.

In the end, narcissists die alone and sycophants suffer stunted emotional and psychological growth, unless they grow strong enough to break their addiction and choose to value their own self-worth instead of abandoning it for the advancement of the narcissist…”

Digivijay Singh’s career of any public responsibility is already over. He will inadvertently kill Rahul Gandhi’s too. The sycophancy has reached a point that we will know RG only by what RG allows DS to speak of him. Trouble is Subramanian Swamy has once again pointed out that Rahul Gandhi is legally not eligible to become the PM of India. I really don’t care if RG is saved from the viciousness of DS. I do care that India is saved from the laughing stock that Rahul Gandhi is. My prediction is that India’s luck will hold out.