Crucifying India

(This is a MaxiPost)

The Closet Missionary:

In 2011 a US Homeland Security Committee started a series of hearings on radicalisation of American Muslims.  This committee was headed by US Congressman Peter King. I have no interest in commenting on the committee or its findings; that’s for the American people. But here’s a Congressman who testified with the committee in defence of American Muslims (video 2.11 mins):

Congressman Keith Ellison passionately and tearfully narrates the tale of a young American Muslim who died in the 9/11 disaster. He strains to explain how Mohammed Salman Hamdani, a 23-year old American-Muslim, died and was as much an American as anyone else. He tells us how Hamdani loved football and the Star Wars movies. There is nothing to dispute anything he said. Ellison bases most of his defence on the story of one youngster although I’m sure there are many such stories. What the video won’t tell you is that Ellison is the first Muslim Congressman in the US. I seldom use the term hypocritical and bigot together, but I would call Keith Ellison a hypocritical bigot. He’s a classic hypocritical Muslim. Let’s read some excerpts from a second article by David Cohen (the first one I referred in the post Saving Bhartayita):

“With exquisite timing, Congressman Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) is pushing a dishonest resolution that gratuitously insults the man who is the odds-on favorite to win that election. Ellison is teaming up with some Christian conservatives… who are, good intentions notwithstanding, picking the wrong battle against the wrong target… The focus of the congressmen’s ire is Narendra Modi, a free-market, anti-corruption reformer whom I have suggested might be India’s Ronald Reagan… House Resolution 417, co-sponsored and pushed by Ellison, is certainly a slur rather than a compliment—a slur against Modi and against India. It is a ham-fisted attempt to influence India’s election. While it will not succeed in doing that, it could certainly succeed in souring our relationship with what should be an important natural ally if passed. The resolution creates the impression that Christians are persecuted in India, but the primary example used to support that notion is fairly dated: a single outbreak of Christian-Hindu violence that occurred seven years ago (and had nothing to do with Modi)... However, a little perspective is in order: Of all the countries in the world where Christians are a minority, few are more hospitable to Christians than Hindu-majority India. That is why over 25 million Christians choose to live in India, almost 10 times the number in neighboring Pakistan. Given the large number of countries where besieged Christian minorities are in constant mortal danger, it shows a distinct lack of moral judgment to single out India for its supposed persecution of Christians”.

So, you see, Ellison’s heart bleeds for Muslims in America but he is willing to wrongfully accuse ONE individual in India of an imaginary threat of persecution of Christians. Because of a similar stupid question on what will happen to Christians I wrote the post “Burn down the mission” (borrowing the title from an Elton John song). This fake “persecution syndrome” is being peddled by American and Western Christian interests only because Modi has banned conversions in Gujarat. It threatens the illegitimate activities of Missionaries across India if he comes to power. That’s their fear. Ellison feeds those lobbyists in the US who have spent enormous time and money to revoke Modi’s visa to enter US. The entire exercise was based on falsehoods which the US Congressmen gladly bought and sold. Now that Modi may become PM these same vested interests want to spew hatred against him and India to try and influence Indian elections. So far, such activities in the US and Europe have received unofficial support from Sonia Gandhi’s Congress party. It seems evident to them that Modi will not brook the same level of foreign interference in Indian affairs.

What the Communist lobbies and the anti-Modi Muslims like Ellison do manage to do is that they will end up souring relations between India and the US. In any case, it is time India scaled down its relations with Western powers to cordial, need-based ones rather than support them in their selfish pursuits. It must also be recorded that on any given day American Presidents can be held responsible for crimes against humanity. Small states like Switzerland already have a warrant against George Bush. It won’t be hard to find a few hot-heads in a future Indian parliament to pass stupid resolutions like Ellison hopes to do. Hindus do not need lessons from the US or Europe on humanity, brotherhood or respect for religions. Also read: “Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Keith Ellison Introduces Bill BlamingHindus for Violence Which was Committed by Islamic Jihadists”.

----------------------

The State Missionary:

Hillary Clinton is often referred to as “Shrillary” in the US; perhaps, for good reasons. Writing in the Sunday Guardian, M Nalapat (who is not known to blabber) writes a scathing report about how Hillary pursued a policy of “get Modi”. He reiterates that the US ban on Modi had little to do with the Gujarat 2002 riots. Most of us know that too. The US doesn’t give a damn about anyone being killed anywhere. The US has turned a blind eye to known genocides in Rwanda and other countries. Nalapat writes some shocking stuff:

"Hillary Clinton likes to operate through NGOs, which are given funding through indirect channels, and which target individuals and countries seen as less than respectful to her views on foreign and domestic policy in the target countries," a retired US official now based in Atlanta said. He claimed that "rather than US NGOs, (the former) Secretary of State Clinton favoured operating through organisations based in the Netherlands, Denmark and the Scandinavian countries, especially Norway" as these were outside the radar of big power politics. These NGOs were active in the agitation against the Russian nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu, with "funding coming mainly from a religious organisation based in Europe that has close links with France".

Considering what Nalapat writes, there are many other questions that need to be answered in the future. Are Christians in India under any threat or is it that the Christian missionaries and funders a threat to India? All evidence points to the latter. That apart, considering the funding of various activities are reportedly also from Netherlands and some other European countries India must investigate the funding of the anarchist and separatist-supporting AAP party. The funding of many anti-Modi NGOs (like those of Teesta and Harsh Mandar) will also come under scrutiny. There are already known frauds by these NGOs. Need more reasons why the crooks fear and are against Narendra Modi? The US govt is not going to come clean on any of its covert activities. If Clinton followed a “get-Modi” policy and hunted him along with criminals in India then this too needs to be taken up by the next Indian govt for appropriate retaliation. There is little doubt that the Sonia Gandhi govt supported all these activities. The US nancy-boys in the embassy at Delhi were prancing around high security zones at will with passes given by the Sonia govt. All these perks are probably rewards for hounding Modi. This can’t be allowed to pass.

----------------------

The Caged Missionary:

The Supreme Court called his organisation a “Caged parrot” but Ranjit Sinha turns out be more than a parrot. He is allegedly the CBI head who also doubles up as a “caged missionary”. Sinha was in Rome recently it seems but he told the media he had met the Indian Ambassador to Italy and discussed issues pertaining to the Agusta Westland chopper scam. All the joyrides that our investigators have taken to Italy and other countries in Europe so far are a big sham. It always appears they make the trips to muddy the cases rather than solve any. But what was Sinha doing out there? Let’s read an interesting bit from this report by TheNewsMinute (TNM):

“Unable to get any answers for the plea-bargaining deal, we conducted our own investigation and this is what we found. The conference on human trafficking was organized not by the London Police but by the Vatican. Titled “Church and Law Enforcement in Partnership, the conference held on 9-10 April 2014, had four aims: Prevention, Pastoral Care, Reintegration and Developing an International Network of Bishop’ Conferences and Law Enforcement agencies. TNM also found out that preparation for this meeting was underway or several weeks. On March 11, 2014, the head of London’s Metropolitan Police, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe was confirmed as participating in the meeting which was chaired by Cardinal Vincent Nichols”.  

The plea-bargain referred in that excerpt relates to one Mr Haschke who is alleged to have distributed all the bribes in the chopper scam. He was, of course, allowed to comfortably fly out of India sometime last year if I remember correctly. If you read the full report of TNM it would be clear that the London Police was just a go-between. The actual conference was organised by the Vatican. And the programme is titled “Church and Law enforcement”? Heady stuff! TNM states:

“During his speech, India’s top sleuth said many NGO on the ground were not connected and starved of funds that needed to be better channelized. “The CBI can be a nodal agency with the help of known experts in India and this agency can be the facilitating body for channelization of funds, if required.” How can the CBI channelise funds? Did Ranjit Sinha get any clearance before saying this? Sinha said an important initiative in preventing trafficking in the source area and in containing demand is involvement of religious priests. An Inter Religion Priest Forum (IRPF) was set up in several States in India like Bihar, Jharkhand. “These forums had religion priests from different communities and religions in India …IRPF has made tremendous impact in preventing and combating human trafficking,” said Sinha adding that this good practice could be replicated elsewhere in the world.

Given the international nature of the problem, Sinha said IRPF and AHTU could be institutionalized more robustly. “Congregation of religious priests from different communities and religions can be organized across the globe…It could generate a “Global March of Religious Priests against Human Trafficking.” Pope Francis addressed the 20-odd participants. “Human trafficking is an open wound on the body of contemporary society, a scourge upon the body of Christ. It is a crime against humanity,” he said.”

Fantastic, isn’t it? How in the world is the CBI director making offers of Church-related deals for combatting human-trafficking? And why was he hiding all this information from the public if there was no hanky-panky? On whose instructions was he attending this conference? It’s not that the CBI director can’t attend some conference but why is it such a great secret that he didn’t release the information to the media when he spoke to them on his return? In a related report this is what TNM states:

“The Vatican had asked India to sign an undertaking that they could work with missionaries and other religious groups and NGOs in India to combat human trafficking. “We are a secular country and we turned down this request,” Ranjit Sinha, Director CBI told The News Minute (TNM) today. “This was also conveyed to the Vatican through appropriate channels including the MEA,” India’s top sleuth said… Vatican Radio and news sources accessed by TNM clearly state that the initiative was the brainchild of the Bishop’s Conference of England and Wales… Sinha was unclear about the exact roles and responsibilities of Vatican, London Met Police and Interpol, but this document dated March 11, 2014 clearly states the meeting was organized by the Vatican… If Vatican’s request had been acceded to, religious groups from Europe and UK would have access to over 220 districts do conduct what the documents say includes “vulnerability mapping.”

Vulnerability mapping? Ha! Let me explain that bit. In the post “Burn down the mission” (link provided earlier in this post) I had shown a map of Joshua Project where they had marked in red dots the territories that need to be connected to Jesus. This could be a similar map of 220 districts where the missionaries would connect people to Jesus and help them avoid the grave danger of human trafficking. Quite nice, wouldn’t you say? Would the US, UK or Europe allow a project that is titled “The Hindu project to combat human trafficking”? Mr Ellison? Mrs Clinton? This is the nonsense that Narendra Modi threatens.

----------------------

It is worthwhile to remember that none of these so-called “moral brigades” who are bigots in disguise have ever stood by India in any international issue or conflict. In each war that India faced, the US, UK and their allies have supported our enemies. Rajeev Srinivasan on Rediff explains the grand plans of America to somehow prevent BJP/Modi from coming to power. If that fails, engineer mass conflicts in India using AAP and destroy the fabric of India. Sonia Gandhi had a puppet in MMS. America wants a puppet in Delhi. The West is quite aware Modi won’t be a puppet. The question, therefore, is why should Christians feel threatened? They’ve never been persecuted in India. A stray communal riot does not amount to persecution anyway. The goal is the other way around. Break and crucify India. People should know the West all too well by now. Human rights, peace and all that is BS to them!