(This
is a MaxiPost)
The
Closet Missionary:
In 2011 a US Homeland Security Committee
started a series of hearings on radicalisation of American Muslims. This committee was headed by US Congressman Peter King. I have no interest
in commenting on the committee or its findings; that’s for the American people.
But here’s a Congressman who testified with the committee in defence of American Muslims (video 2.11 mins):
Congressman Keith Ellison passionately and tearfully narrates the tale of a
young American Muslim who died in the 9/11 disaster. He strains to explain how Mohammed
Salman Hamdani, a 23-year old American-Muslim, died and was as much an American
as anyone else. He tells us how Hamdani
loved football and the Star Wars movies. There is nothing to dispute
anything he said. Ellison bases most of his defence on the story of one
youngster although I’m sure there are many such stories. What the video won’t
tell you is that Ellison is the first
Muslim Congressman in the US. I seldom use the term hypocritical and bigot
together, but I would call Keith Ellison a hypocritical bigot. He’s a classic
hypocritical Muslim. Let’s read some excerpts from a second article by David Cohen (the first one I referred in the post
Saving Bhartayita):
“With exquisite
timing, Congressman Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) is pushing a dishonest
resolution that gratuitously insults the man who is the odds-on favorite to win
that election. Ellison is teaming up with some Christian conservatives… who
are, good intentions notwithstanding, picking the wrong battle against the
wrong target… The focus of the congressmen’s ire is Narendra Modi, a
free-market, anti-corruption reformer whom I have suggested might be India’s
Ronald Reagan… House Resolution 417, co-sponsored and pushed by Ellison, is
certainly a slur rather than a compliment—a slur against Modi and against
India. It is a ham-fisted attempt to influence India’s election. While it will
not succeed in doing that, it could certainly succeed in souring our relationship
with what should be an important natural ally if passed. The resolution creates
the impression that Christians are persecuted in India, but the primary example
used to support that notion is fairly dated: a single outbreak of
Christian-Hindu violence that occurred seven years ago (and had nothing to do
with Modi)... However, a little perspective is in order: Of all the countries
in the world where Christians are a minority, few are more hospitable to
Christians than Hindu-majority India. That is why over 25 million Christians
choose to live in India, almost 10 times the number in neighboring Pakistan.
Given the large number of countries where besieged Christian minorities are in
constant mortal danger, it shows a distinct lack of moral judgment to single
out India for its supposed persecution of Christians”.
So, you see, Ellison’s heart bleeds for
Muslims in America but he is willing to wrongfully accuse ONE individual in India of an imaginary threat of persecution of
Christians. Because of a similar stupid question on what will happen to
Christians I wrote the post “Burn down the mission” (borrowing the title from an Elton John song). This
fake “persecution syndrome” is being
peddled by American and Western Christian interests only because Modi has banned
conversions in Gujarat. It threatens the
illegitimate activities of Missionaries across India if he comes to power.
That’s their fear. Ellison feeds those lobbyists in the US who have spent
enormous time and money to revoke Modi’s visa to enter US. The entire exercise
was based on falsehoods which the US Congressmen gladly bought and sold. Now
that Modi may become PM these same vested interests want to spew hatred against
him and India to try and influence Indian elections. So far, such activities in
the US and Europe have received unofficial support from Sonia Gandhi’s Congress
party. It seems evident to them that
Modi will not brook the same level of foreign interference in Indian affairs.
What the Communist lobbies and the
anti-Modi Muslims like Ellison do manage to do is that they will end up souring
relations between India and the US. In any case, it is time India scaled down
its relations with Western powers to cordial, need-based ones rather than
support them in their selfish pursuits. It must also be recorded that on any
given day American Presidents can be held responsible for crimes against
humanity. Small states like Switzerland
already have a warrant against George Bush. It won’t be hard to find a few
hot-heads in a future Indian parliament to pass stupid resolutions like Ellison
hopes to do. Hindus do not need lessons
from the US or Europe on humanity, brotherhood or respect for religions. Also
read: “Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Keith Ellison Introduces Bill BlamingHindus for Violence Which was Committed by Islamic Jihadists”.
----------------------
The
State Missionary:
Hillary
Clinton is often referred to as “Shrillary” in the US; perhaps,
for good reasons. Writing in the Sunday Guardian, M Nalapat (who is not known to blabber) writes a scathing
report about how Hillary pursued a policy of “get Modi”. He reiterates that the US ban on Modi had little to do
with the Gujarat 2002 riots. Most of us know that too. The US doesn’t give a
damn about anyone being killed anywhere. The US has turned a blind eye to known
genocides in Rwanda and other countries. Nalapat writes some shocking stuff:
"Hillary
Clinton likes to operate through NGOs, which are given funding through indirect
channels, and which target individuals and countries seen as less than
respectful to her views on foreign and domestic policy in the target
countries," a retired US official now based in Atlanta said. He claimed
that "rather than US NGOs, (the former) Secretary of State Clinton
favoured operating through organisations based in the Netherlands, Denmark and
the Scandinavian countries, especially Norway" as these were outside the
radar of big power politics. These NGOs were active in the agitation against
the Russian nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu, with "funding
coming mainly from a religious organisation based in Europe that has close
links with France".
Considering what Nalapat writes, there
are many other questions that need to be answered in the future. Are Christians in India under any threat or
is it that the Christian missionaries and funders a threat to India? All
evidence points to the latter. That apart, considering the funding of various
activities are reportedly also from Netherlands and some other European
countries India must investigate the funding of the anarchist and
separatist-supporting AAP party. The funding of many anti-Modi NGOs (like those
of Teesta and Harsh Mandar) will also come under scrutiny. There are already
known frauds by these NGOs. Need more reasons why the crooks fear and are against
Narendra Modi? The US govt is not going to come clean on any of its covert
activities. If Clinton followed a “get-Modi” policy and hunted him along with
criminals in India then this too needs to be taken up by the next Indian govt
for appropriate retaliation. There is little doubt that the Sonia Gandhi govt
supported all these activities. The US nancy-boys in the embassy at Delhi were
prancing around high security zones at will with passes given by the Sonia
govt. All these perks are probably rewards for hounding Modi. This can’t be
allowed to pass.
----------------------
The
Caged Missionary:
The Supreme Court called his
organisation a “Caged parrot” but Ranjit Sinha turns out be more than a
parrot. He is allegedly the CBI head who also doubles up as a “caged missionary”. Sinha was in Rome
recently it seems but he told the media he had met the Indian Ambassador to
Italy and discussed issues pertaining to the Agusta Westland chopper scam. All
the joyrides that our investigators have taken to Italy and other countries in
Europe so far are a big sham. It always appears they make the trips to muddy
the cases rather than solve any. But what was Sinha doing out there? Let’s read
an interesting bit from this report by TheNewsMinute
(TNM):
“Unable to get
any answers for the plea-bargaining deal, we conducted our own investigation
and this is what we found. The conference on human trafficking was organized
not by the London Police but by the Vatican. Titled “Church and Law Enforcement
in Partnership, the conference held on 9-10 April 2014, had four aims:
Prevention, Pastoral Care, Reintegration and Developing an International
Network of Bishop’ Conferences and Law Enforcement agencies. TNM also found out
that preparation for this meeting was underway or several weeks. On March 11,
2014, the head of London’s Metropolitan Police, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe was
confirmed as participating in the meeting which was chaired by Cardinal Vincent
Nichols”.
The plea-bargain referred in that
excerpt relates to one Mr Haschke who is alleged to have distributed all the
bribes in the chopper scam. He was, of course, allowed to comfortably fly out
of India sometime last year if I remember correctly. If you read the full
report of TNM it would be clear that the London Police was just a go-between.
The actual conference was organised by the Vatican.
And the programme is titled “Church and
Law enforcement”? Heady stuff! TNM states:
“During his
speech, India’s top sleuth said many NGO on the ground were not connected and
starved of funds that needed to be better channelized. “The CBI can be a nodal
agency with the help of known experts in India and this agency can be the
facilitating body for channelization of funds, if required.” How can the CBI
channelise funds? Did Ranjit Sinha get any clearance before saying this?
Sinha said an important initiative in
preventing trafficking in the source area and in containing demand is involvement
of religious priests. An Inter Religion Priest Forum (IRPF) was set up in
several States in India like Bihar, Jharkhand. “These forums had religion
priests from different communities and religions in India …IRPF has made
tremendous impact in preventing and combating human trafficking,” said Sinha
adding that this good practice could be replicated elsewhere in the world.
Given the international nature
of the problem, Sinha said IRPF and AHTU could be institutionalized more
robustly. “Congregation of religious priests from different communities and
religions can be organized across the globe…It could generate a “Global March
of Religious Priests against Human Trafficking.” Pope Francis addressed the
20-odd participants. “Human trafficking is an open wound on the body of
contemporary society, a scourge upon the body of Christ. It is a crime against
humanity,” he said.”
Fantastic, isn’t it? How in the world is
the CBI director making offers of Church-related deals for combatting
human-trafficking? And why was he hiding all this information from the public
if there was no hanky-panky? On whose instructions was he attending this
conference? It’s not that the CBI director can’t attend some conference but why
is it such a great secret that he didn’t release the information to the media
when he spoke to them on his return? In a related report this is what TNM states:
“The Vatican had
asked India to sign an undertaking that they could work with missionaries and
other religious groups and NGOs in India to combat human trafficking. “We are a
secular country and we turned down this request,” Ranjit Sinha, Director CBI
told The News Minute (TNM) today. “This was also conveyed to the Vatican
through appropriate channels including the MEA,” India’s top sleuth said… Vatican
Radio and news sources accessed by TNM clearly state that the initiative was
the brainchild of the Bishop’s Conference of England and Wales… Sinha was unclear
about the exact roles and responsibilities of Vatican, London Met Police and
Interpol, but this document dated March 11, 2014 clearly states the meeting was
organized by the Vatican… If Vatican’s request had been acceded to, religious
groups from Europe and UK would have access to over 220 districts do conduct
what the documents say includes “vulnerability mapping.”
Vulnerability
mapping? Ha! Let me explain that bit.
In the post “Burn down the mission” (link provided earlier in this post) I had
shown a map of Joshua Project where they had marked in red dots the territories
that need to be connected to Jesus. This could be a similar map of 220
districts where the missionaries would connect people to Jesus and help them
avoid the grave danger of human trafficking. Quite nice, wouldn’t you say? Would
the US, UK or Europe allow a project that is titled “The Hindu project to combat human trafficking”? Mr Ellison? Mrs
Clinton? This is the nonsense that Narendra Modi threatens.
----------------------
It is worthwhile to remember that none
of these so-called “moral brigades” who are bigots in disguise have ever stood
by India in any international issue or conflict. In each war that India faced,
the US, UK and their allies have supported our enemies. Rajeev Srinivasan on Rediff explains the grand plans
of America to somehow prevent BJP/Modi from coming to power. If that fails, engineer mass conflicts in
India using AAP and destroy the fabric of India. Sonia Gandhi had a puppet
in MMS. America wants a puppet in Delhi. The West is quite aware Modi won’t be
a puppet. The question, therefore, is why should Christians feel threatened?
They’ve never been persecuted in India. A stray communal riot does not amount
to persecution anyway. The goal is the other way around. Break and crucify India. People should know the West all too well
by now. Human rights, peace and all that
is BS to them!
