The War On Hindus - Part 4 #PopulationExplosion

At the recent Vibrant Gujarat meet, Narendra Modi reiterated his 3Ds statement: "India offers you 3Ds - democracy, demography and demand and it will not be found anywhere else in the world. We have large number of hands to work. And, we have even larger number of dreams to be realised”. Over thirty years ago a political satire reflected the brilliance behind terminologies. LDC (Less developed country), UDC (Under-developed country) and then we moved to “Developing country” and then to HRRC (Video 2.10 mins):

As Humphrey explains HRRC is “Human resource rich country” – Countries that are grossly over-populated and begging for money. India isn’t exactly holding out a begging bowl now but everyone seems to like the HRRC concept. Population controls don’t seem to work so let’s rejoice being over-populated. Every part of Modi’s statement is true but he appears to be left with no option but to see a problem as an opportunity – Population. A majority of our metros and other major cities have become too crowded and threaten a lot of social issues. Take a look at the unemployment statistics on this page. The percentage goes up and down but the absolute number of unemployed people keeps going up.

There is another chart at LiveMint which shows the socio-religious break of employment (you will need to zoom into the chart). It’s not hard to escape the fact that Muslims are among the lowest employed in the formal sector. This contrasts with the fact that their population keeps showing a positive growth rate. 2013-14 unemployment had gone up in rural areas despite the massive spend on MNREGA. Here’s what the population growth looks like over 60 years:

The figures till 2001 census are available but the 2011 figures appear to be estimates. The Hindu population has been steadily declining while the Muslim population has been growing. In some states like Bengal or Kerala the Muslim growth might be more pronounced but the latest data isn’t available. So what was all the fuss about Sakshi Maharaj advocating Hindu women to have more children (or 4 as he suggested)? Whether one likes the statement or not there is nothing criminal about it and it is just another opinion that has come from an individual. The media jerks kept asking the PM to condemn the Maharaj’s statement. I wonder why. After all, it is Modi who touched upon the growing Muslim population in 2002 with the phrase “Hum paanch, hamare pachees”. And because Sakshi Maharaj made that statement some media crooks exploit it by making silly statements like this one:

Epitome of a good Hindu? Choose a convenient equation and then claim because of the “good Hindu” conversion seems a good option. I wonder what Tavleen Singh thinks is a good Muslim – that guy Qureshi of BSP who announced a reward of 51 crores to the Charlie Hebdo killers? Ironically, Tavleen Singh’s partner was the late (Pakistani) Salman Taseer who, between two women, had seven children. So it is indeed surprising that she is so annoyed with someone suggesting 4 kids. Is the Maharaj the first? Not at all, here are two reports from Kerala (here and here):

Not only does the Church encourage having more kids but also offers cash incentives. Where were all these media morons and Opposition whiners when these incidents were happening? Obviously, all these happened while the glorious lady from Italy was in the saddle which allowed anything Christian to pass. There isn’t the slightest doubt that many parts in NE (in states like Nagaland or Mizoram) there has been near total Christianisation of the population. These states are far removed from the media glare on anything so the activities of the Conversion Mafia too pass without notice. There are parts of metros like Mumbai (Bandra, Andheri etc) which have become Muslim ghettos with migrants from various places. And nobody has their numbers and they probably don’t figure in any census reports either. Here’s what I had quoted in a previous post:

Mumbai population explosion (India Online): 29 lakhs (1901), 12.5 Million (1991), 18 Million (2006) and 21 Million (2011)

(Rediff on Bangladeshis): In terms of illegal immigrants in Mumbai, Bangladeshis alone account for between 3.5 lakhs according to a minister and 16.0 lakhs according to Kirit Somaya, a former MP.  What would you say about a government that can’t even get its numbers right on such matters? This is in no way to suggest that any of this population is involved in crimes but the possibilities that some may be cannot be discounted. But it sure is a matter of serious concern.

At a hotel in Chennai recently, I was surprised to find the room-boys speaking Hindi quite comfortably. They told me they had come from Assam but I have a feeling they are from Bangladesh. Many taxi drivers, domestics, maids in Delhi are reported to be from Bangladesh. Narendra Modi dared to promise during the LS campaign that illegals will be packed and sent back. Forget that, our cowardly govts don’t even dare to release the census figures of 2011 with the demographics. As much as there is a growth in Muslim population there is also a large Muslim population that is unaccounted. The Wall Street Journal in an article reflects how Muslim growth rate is outdoing Hindu growth rate. Actually, that’s not a correct statement. Hindus are registering a negative growth; a decline in population.

The excuse offered by the census official, in the WSJ article, for not releasing the 2011 figures is “too many elections” around. This is India, every six months there is some election around the corner. So, to counter this unchecked growth of Muslim population and the steady rise in absolute numbers of Christian conversions, if the Hindus talk about a “Ghar Wapsi” or more children the Sickulars are immediately up in arms. The anti-GharWapsi argument is even more deadly. The Muslims and Christians want the rights to convert others but anyone returning to Hinduism is objectionable and our politicians and idiotic media stand in support of this hypocrisy. What about the growth of Muslim population in the West? Here’s a chart that shows why Europe is in strife with Islamists:

France clearly has the highest Muslim population in Europe. The Charlie Hebdo attack was a bloody one but there have been frequent attacks on Jews and Jewish establishments in France by violent Muslims. Other countries with lesser Muslim population are also facing social strife even though the percentages appear small. The population invasion is not one to be taken lightly. The late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi summed up future plans quite cleverly:

“We have 50 million Muslims in Europe,” Gadhafi said. “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

In Europe the Christians are facing a negative population-growth while the Muslim population is increasing steadily. It’s not very different for Hindus in India who are facing a negative population-growth although they are still a huge number. Therefore, an anti-conversion bill is a must and is inevitable. The Chrislamist war on Hindus is fought on many fronts – Population is an important strategy and tactic. Imagine when they collectively reach 35-40% And that is not very unimaginable if the current situation continues.

Concluded.

The War On Hindus - Part 3 #MultiprongedAttack

(This is a MaxiPost)

There are many ways a country can be invaded. An “invasion” is commonly associated with a Military invasion. There are other ways too – Politically, Commercially, Culturally, and Populationally. 

**********

The first time the Americans encountered Islamic terrorism was way back around 1784. The Arabs (the Ottoman states of Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers and also Morocco) had a practice of demanding a “tribute” (call it Jaziya or Hafta) for safe passage of ships through the Mediterranean sea around them. Refusal to pay resulted in capture and enslavement of the ship crews by Islamic pirates followed by demands for ransom (Somali pirates are only the modern version).

In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

“It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once”

Maybe Ambassador Abdrahaman was explaining the “root cause” that terror-apologists at NDTV, HeadlinesToday, TOI and G-37 specialists like Kiran Bedi are looking for. Later in 1801, then as President, Thomas Jefferson, refused to pay the Hafta and thus the first ever war by the US Navy was prosecuted against Islamic terrorism. It was also the first time US Navy came into international combat. It came to be known as the Barbary wars. The pirate states were defeated. Remember, Israel did not exist then. Oil wasn’t discovered in the Middle East till early 20th century, around 1908.

**********

During the 1960s and till the mid-70s most of the romantic films and songs of Bollywood were usually made in Kashmir. There’s a movie from 1962 called “Hum Dono” which features the song “Allah tero naam, Ishwar tero naam” although I’m not sure the Muslims will agree with that. They believe Allah is only one and there is no other God or name for him. There are movies with no Muslim characters in it but would suddenly have a Qawali out of the blue. Mind you, Qawalis are very entertaining and enjoyable. There were many Muslims in Bollywood who had screen names, like Dilip Kumar and Johny Walker. We discovered they were Muslims only much later. But nothing wrong in screen names.

Then in the 70s and 80s guys like the late Feroze Khan, an average actor who became a better director, who would often play characters with names like Rajesh, Ramesh or Shankar (Check out his character’s names in most of his movies). But sometimes his movies would suddenly spring an Islamic song out of the blue. “Qurbani” directed by him suddenly springs up the song “Allah ko pyaari hai qurbani” in a very contrived context. So too “Jaanbaaz”, with the song “Allah ho Akbar”. These “Allah” songs are often inserted in movies as stand-alone numbers with no relevance to the story or context. That trend continues till today. But the different turn is that there are songs that demean Hindu icons as Sushma Swaraj once pointed and Gaurav Sawant reminds us:

Over the years Bollywood has consistently ridiculed and abused Hindu icons. Alright, if you want to make satires or ridicule icons you are welcome to it. But what is obvious is that the very same people refuse to expose the hilarious nonsense in other religions. It has almost become mandatory to have some item number or movies which portray Hindu icons in a vulgar fashion while the slightest negative portrayal of a Christian or Muslim icon invites extreme anger and violent reactions. The cowards at the Censor Board not only cave into such reactions but also pre-empt directors from ridiculing religions other than Hinduism. One such anti-Hindu Sicko is the current Chairperson of the CBFC, Leela Samson, a Jewish-Christian:

That thing about “… Malamaal” isn’t a stray case either. Jokes about Johny Lever’s name Abdullah made the Censor Board force the film-makers to change his name in the movie to Habibullah. They can’t even stand jokes about a name but they’re okay with ridiculing Shiva or Radha. I need not remind anyone about the violent agitations over “Vishwaroopam” by Kamal Haasan. And another movie that ridicules Christian priests has been blocked by the same Censor Board for over two years:

Wow! It’s been held back because it might hurt the Christian community. This might hurt Muslims that might hurt Christians but no problems with anything that offends Hindu sentiments. It is this hypocrisy that Hindus are now revolting against. Our media pimps like Barka, Sagarika, Rajdeep and Co. stand by these hypocritical morons of CBFC and claim they are all for freedom of expression. These pimps and the morons in various State and Central govts cannot tolerate any play or book about Nathuram Godse. Sure he killed Gandhi and he did so knowingly and willingly. He’s a murderer but what is so tolerant about all these morons that they cannot stand a play about him? And that is their idea of free speech? Sick slaves of Sickularism! So how does Bollywood abuse Hindus and Hinduism so daringly and get away with it? What’s their incentive?

The other phenomenon that can’t be missed – Since the late 1980s and early 90s there has been a great influx of Muslim actors in Bollywood and TV. There are Khans from Bollywood families and from outside too. If there’s a shortage, the producers import Muslims from Pakistan (like Nargis Fakri or Veena Malik). In principle, there is absolutely nothing wrong if a good number of talented Muslims get into movies and TV. But is that the only thing? Mahesh Bhatt converted to Muslim to marry a second woman and is now a prime-promoter of Islamic culture in Bollywood and a ubiquitous spokie for them. Is all this mere coincidence or incentivised? The cultural turn in Bollywood to abusing or ridiculing Hinduism alone (PK is only one of many such incidents) is an “invasion” that  shouldn’t go unnoticed. Many Muslim actors from here and there are included in a movie out of financing or coercion by the mafia; like that Monica of Abu Salem.

**********

Many years after oil was discovered in the Middle East, OPEC was formed in 1960 with their HQ in Vienna, Austria. This is a Trade-Bloc or like a Cartel of oil-producing and exporting countries. From being barren desert regions, many ME countries suddenly grew wealthier and economically more influential. This time they had Israel as common enemy. So during the 1973 Egypt-Israel war the OPEC choked oil supplies to US and other countries and the prices dramatically soared due to the “rationing”. This embargo lasted a year resulting in inflation, recession and unemployment in many parts of the world. The Islamists realised their power and muscle. This was eventually combatted by alternate energy, other production sources and by 1980 the OPEC was in to an oil glut in the market. Prices dropped dramatically as they pumped out more oil than ever before. There was a deep impact on India too.

From the mid-70s onward lakhs of Indian labour migrated to ME to find jobs and earned better money than they did at home. They were exploited, their passports were seized, they could not follow their own religion, they could not strike. In short, they were turned into bonded slaves. Sheiks from the ME came to Hyderabad and Mumbai to shop for young girls to take back as slaves for their harems. The stories are too many and you can look them up. People sent home a lot of money, labourers returned home with two-in-ones in their hands and large bags of goodies. Parts of Kerala, like Cochin, had turned almost Dubai-like with Islamic influence. They went as labour but came back as Islamists. The Saudi Wahabis and others in the ME started investing in “Islamism” in India and her neighbours. Even countries like Sudan funded a rash of Madrassas – to amounts like 3000 crores. There are many towns in India which were completely Islamised with funds from ME. Bollywood too was no exception.

Since the mid-70s Petro-dollars have been funding Bollywood and simultaneously a new underworld, supported by certain politicians and ME funding, blossomed not only to control Bollywood but Mumbai itself. And it then extended to terrorism, cultural codes like Muslims who earlier wore dresses like anyone else adopted more Pathani dresses, skull caps and burqas. There was phenomenal growth of Mosques and Madrassas. If all that was only for educational upliftment of Muslims that would be one thing but it became an “assertive” Islamic culture which resulted in more and more demands and our Central and State govts fuelled this culture with more appeasements. Kashmir Pandits were thrown out of Kashmir. Kerala saw a dramatic Islamisation of the State. Bengal and Telangana are following the same routes. UP and Bihar became terror-hubs.

**********

From the late 1970s and 80s onward the Islamic and Muslim influence in Bollywood and other forms of arts started seeping in. Prominent among the conflict with Hindus was the nude paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses by MF Hussain and artists at Commie hotbeds like JNU.

Those who are offering a veiled defence for the #CharlieHebdo (CH) killings by Muslim terrorists cannot stop defending the perverted portrayals of Hindu Goddesses by MFH. Goddess Saraswati is considered the icon of knowledge by Hindus. Vijaya Dashmi is celebrated by Hindus with a “Puja” of their weapons, implements, tools and books – whichever is the work-pursuit of the person. Why would a moron want to paint her nude? And those who find CH’s cartoons offensive continue to defend MFH’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses. The C5M even asks why a nude Saraswati can’t be done when Indian laws specifically prohibit such a religious offence. Our laws prohibit any form of nudity and obscenity for commercial purposes. Hindus treat Goddesses as mother. Let me be extremely harsh and blunt – Only the most perverted pimps like Sagarika, Barkha, Rajdeep and their Commie filth encourage such hypocritical nonsense. I believe the MFH defenders are either perverts who have seen or want to see their mothers having sex or bisexuals or lesbians who are aroused by such paintings. And these are the very scumbags who will scream about women being used as commodity and sex objects.

Their hypocrisy has no limits when it comes to offending Muslim sentiments. That’s Islamic money and fear talking and not a sense of fairness. Let’s see some more perverts and their cowardly hypocrisy:

It’s a common refrain. The movie PK which ridicules and abuses Lord Shiva in an attempt to portray fraudulent godmen is fine with them but CH cartoons are not. There are fraudulent godmen, fraudulent and violence-encouraging Mullahs and pedophile Christian priests but the only ones consistently being targeted by Bollywood and media are the Hindu ones. And that is what is arming the Islamic violence further. The fear of Muslims agitating and/or killing the “offenders” makes our Bollywood and media pimps wet their pants and skirts. In contrast, the worst perverts in the media, like street-thug Rajdeep, equate the protests against MFH to the CH killings. Another bimbo called Rana Ayyub of the dead Tehelka equates even protests against Praveen Swami to the killings of CH artists. And the best part is, both Rajdeep and Sagarika, India’s most moronic media-couple behave like they are the real victims of the CH killings.

What is the message these cowards are sending? That unless Hindus too arm themselves and kill those who offend their religious sentiments it is okay to offend Hinduism, Hindu Gods and Goddesses and Hindus in general? MFH wasn’t killed. The cowardly Hindu-abuser ran from the Courts of India to a desert and died there. Maybe it’s nature’s retribution that he didn’t deserve to die in the holy soil of India which many ordinary people are blessed with the fortune to.

**********

If all that wasn’t enough, here’s the High-Pimptress of Hypocrisy and cheerleader of Pakistan and the anti-Hindu brigade in media:

As Rana Ayyub points out? I can’t help rolling over in laughter. This is Salma quoting Sabrina to somehow slam France in a twisted defence of the CH killings. The bimbo further goes on to slam France for practicing dual-standards of free speech. I wonder if she ever looks in her bathroom mirror at the face of hypocrisy and dual standards. First, France wasn’t the first country to ban protests. In fact France was one of the earliest victims of Palestinian terrorism (remember the AirFrance plane hijacked to Entebbe in 1976?).  France was the first country to impose an arms embargo on Israel after the 1967 war with Egypt to appease Muslims and Palestinians. Secondly, France is the country that housed the known fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini for ages before he returned to Iran and pronounced a death-fatwa on Barkha’s permanent darling Salman Rushdie. For both these Moronginis, Barkha and bimbo Ayyub, someone has specially written an article on how Muslim appeasement is making France pay a price. May be they should read and educate themselves because India has been paying this price for over 60 years and the cost of appeasement will only go higher.

After the CH killings there were Sickos on NDTV like Kiran Bedi and their anchors and some on Headlines Today who were still discussing the “root cause” nonsense. Street-thug Rajdeep called Taslima Nasreen for a discussion on CH killings. She slammed Islamic terrorists and she slammed cowardly hypocrites so much that he suddenly cut off the show to move to a breaking-news that wasn’t really urgent. I think I have fairly explained the “root cause” of Islamic violence, earlier in this post, which caused the Barbary wars.

The Chrislamist invasion and attack on Hindus follows multiple paths – Weaponry (through terrorism), Culturally, Politically and Commercially. Who’s the target? Hindus! Anything I left out? Oh yes, Populationally! We will deal with that in the concluding part of this series.

The War On Hindus - Part 2 - #FakeWings

Sometime in 2013 there was an outrage over Narendra Modi stating he was “born Hindu” and a “nationalist” and therefore a “Hindu nationalist”. A Muslim writer went on to analyse this ordinary statement like a space scientist. The problem wasn’t so much that he claimed to be a nationalist but with being a “Hindu” nationalist. In general the term “nationalist” is associated with the Right Wing or the Far Right Wing by Western and Indian (English) pundits. However, there are times like the recent Pak-boat incident which show up who are nationalists and who are anti-nationals. The anti-nationals peddled imaginary theories that ridiculed our govt, Coast Guard and threw a defensive-rope to the Pakis. Apart from the media crooks who indulged in their fabricated stories, the Congress party proved once again why they are anti-nationals by strengthening the Paki hand. During 26/11 actual attacks happened, people died and some Congis still blamed the RSS for the death of Hemant Karkare and other cops.   

If you have watched old Raj Kapoor movies; those B&W ones of the 50s and early 60s, the hero usually played a poor guy or a tramp. The rich lived in mansions. They ate, drank and smoked in posh hotels while watching cabaret dances. They were evil. The hero usually struggled his way to the heroine’s heart defying all social and financial hurdles. The Commies like that kind of story. No wonder Raj Kapoor’s movies were quite popular in Russia too. These movies of the 50s stemmed from the philosophies of Gandhi and Nehru who were essentially Commies. Nehru was inspired by Stalin and saw the Russian revolution and Communism as the new world order and the future to a happy society. Gandhi-Nehru sowed the seeds of Communism so deep that it is nearly impossible for India to get out of it. The Left Wing (LW) and Right Wing (RW) are concepts from the French or the West which had come to soak the soil of India. Because we wanted to be a mixed bag, we adopted the concocted “Socialist” term. Thus, IndiraG embedded that word into our Constitution during the Emergency. A British group fairly plots the ideologies of some world icons:

Nehru was a great admirer of Stalin. Sonia Gandhi would be between Stalin and Hitler. There is no RW in India. Modi too is a great follower of Gandhi and his principles. So where would you place him? Surely not with Thatcher! This is a fallacy that is perpetrated by our pundits and media. It is nearly impossible for a political party to be RW in India. That would take courage. And politicians are usually not courageous. Therefore, in India we only have Chrislamists and Hindus and not fake wings. Gandhi and Nehru were Chrislamists although Gandhi admired and followed Hindu philosophy at a personal level, not at a political level. And though Gandhi admired Hindu philosophy he really didn’t read much about it. He is also reported to have written “Even if Muslims decide to wipe out the Hindu race, there is no point in Hindus getting angry on Muslims. Even if they slit our throats, we should be patient and accept death”.

To understand the war on Hindus let us first get past the neurological disease of LW and RW that is often talked about in politics and our media. There is extreme Communism in the form of CPI and its eggs in Indian politics but there is no RW. There are RW thinkers among the public but not in politics. The BJP is wrongly and conveniently identified as a RW party but it is not; just as it is wrongly identified as a “communal” party when the real communals are the Chrislamists. The Commie ideology was to wage an armed struggle, political murders to overthrow elected govts to establish Commie rule. That was true in India too. But since Nehru was a great friend of Russia, the CPI in India broke into a wing now known as CPM which embraced mainstream politics while the other branches of CPI still continue to wage war. Others are commonly referred to as Maoists and Naxals. All the Commies are Maoists, some more violent than the others. Since CPM came into mainstream politics they dropped their policy of violence and war against the State. Mind you, they dropped it as a policy, not as a practice.

The seeds were sown by Gandhi-Nehru and the final nail hammered in the form of “Socialism” into our Constitution by IndiraG. Once the seed grows into a tree, it is very difficult to uproot it. Politicians are not brave people; most are cowards of the first order. As Sir Humphrey would put it, a controversial decision or policy would cost them votes but a courageous decision would cost the election. Which politician of any variety is willing to lose an election with courageous decisions? Does it surprise you then that even BJP leaders keep chanting “terror has no religion” after the latest Paris shooting? Therefore, whether it is BJP or any other party, their policies and decisions are rarely influenced by what is right.

It took America nearly 100 years, since independence in 1776, to abolish slavery in 1865. That would take a courageous decision. It took even longer, almost 200 years, for Civil rights and voting rights to Blacks in the US around 1965-68. Courage to do the right thing takes hundreds of years. Appeasement takes only a whim. That’s what Nehru did with Reservations. That’s what MMS does when he says “Muslims have the first right on resources”. This is true for the Chrislamists and this is true for the BJP. So why is it that the BJP is called a RW party by foreigners, Indian pundits and our media? It is not! Let us ask a few questions of the BJP if it is indeed a RW party:

#Would the BJP be willing to put a deadline for Reservations to end? Say, something like “by 2025”?

#Would the BJP be willing to take temple interference by govts away? Would they constitute some kind of national body to oversee temples without the Chrislamists?

#Would they be willing to amend the free speech bill and remove the nonsensical “ifs and buts” incorporated by Nehru?

#Would they be willing to repeal the draconian 66A in the IT Act?

#Uniform civil code? (And that doesn’t even have anything to do with any wing)

Those are merely some sample questions. The RW in the public mocks Akhilesh Yadav or JJaya for free laptops or Amma Idlis. They mock Mr. Zero for “free Akash tablets”. Well, even Shivraj Chouhan has given free laptops and devices in MP, hasn’t he? And I won’t even get into Article 370 because that needs some legislative numbers. But even if the BJP had the numbers where they want them, do you really think they will amend Article 370? You are welcome to fly a kite. We know China to be Commies, we know MMS and Congress to be LW but are they really so in practice? Take a look at this (from the same site I linked earlier):

Hu Jintao falls under Right? MMS falls under Right? Barack Obama falls under Right? The Pope is a Commie? Dalai Lama and Nelson Mandela are closer to Gandhi as Centre-left. Does any of this surprise anyone? While Jintao, MMS and Obama are generally classified as LW most of their actions and practices place them under RW. So what are we left with?

Mahatma Gandhi was a good man with noble intentions but he definitely lacked vision. He wanted to turn the other cheek like Jesus but supported wars and the Khilafat movement. Shockingly, Nehru even thought we didn’t need an army and that the police was enough for our security. I doubt Gandhi would have objected to the ISIS and may have encouraged the Yazidis to surrender to their rape and death. A partition on religious lines, like that of India, should have been complete. The two desert religions – Christianity and Islam, now form a political axis in India, while they have been historically at war at every other place on earth. The Muslims were a true minority after Independence but they are not anymore. They are a “country within a country”. As for the Christians, they lagged behind so they are catching up through the Christian conversion mafia. They prospered more under the SoniaG regime. The only thing that separates the BJP and other Sickular parties is that BJP is not “Anti-Hindu” as the Sickulars are. Thus, in India, it is Chrislamists Vs Hindus (with the extreme Commies like CPM, CPI on the side of the Sickulars).

East and West Germany could unite only because they were divided by “political ideology” and not really by religion. The Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots remain divided owing to religion. Ireland and Northern Ireland remain divided owing to religion. North and South Korea aren’t divided by religion but by political ideology. In 2011 Sudan was divided by Christians and Muslims on religious lines. Who are our politicians and media fooling with the nonsense of LW-RW conflict? India is a country of religions and it has and will remain a conflict between Chrislamists Vs Hindus unlike other parts of the world. It is natural that the Chrislamists object to and ridicule anything that is remotely Hindu. Let’s look at some samples:

There are many people (including Hindus) who ask: Why are Hindus bothered? Is their Faith so weak as to be threatened by minorities like Chrislamists? If it were a war waged only in India it would have been a very different thing but it’s not. Indian Muslims violently protest for anything and everything from Ulhasnagar to UK, Islamabad to Iran or Iraq or Andheri to America. Any small thing is enough to ignite their anger and violence. This is a Universal Brotherhood and not merely Muslims in India. Same goes for the Christians. John Dayal petitions the US to extend the ban on Modi. Earlier, the gang known as #65Traitors petitioned the US president to ban Modi from the US. 

Who are these people fighting in alliance with? Foreign media of the Christian mafia call Hindus “militants” and the pimps at NDTV promptly invite an anti-Hindu called Gardiner Harris to discuss the “idea of India”.How far it works is a matter of estimates but the Chrislamists believe their brethren in other parts are with them in their war on Hindus. Just read the tweet of the former Tehelka bimbo to understand who her warriors against Hindus are.  You could blindly say the Faleiro types are the Chrislamists who infest our media – St Stephens, some work or qualification from England or US and so on. Now, if we can get past this neurological disease of fake left and right wing nonsense in India we can proceed further with how the war on Hindus works. It is purely Chrislamists Vs Hindus, as it has been for ages. More to come!