Crackerjack Diwali

Much has been said and written about the Taj Mahal in recent days. I am glad Yogi Adityanath brought it up first and pronounced it is not the only monument of interest in UP or India. It takes courage to do that in the face of historical liars who have glorified this building by cleverly concealing the crimes behind it. Over 2000o workers who built it had their hands chopped off and the murderer who built it, Shahjehan, is known to have had a harem of thousands of women. Tons of money, far more than on any other heritage monument in India, has been spent on preserving the Taj. During wars it was probably the only monument that was covered with scaffolding and protected from attacks:

 

Today, if a govt talks about a Shivaji statue on the sea or the tallest statue of Sardar Patel, there are end number of morons who protest and want the money spent elsewhere. These idiotic NGOs and assorted individuals with zero-brains even blame these non-existent statues and the Bullet train for the stampede at Elphinstone station. The Taj was built over 22 years, cost many lives and amidst starvation, poverty and a terribly bad economy. In modern times, the cost of Taj would be over $1 Bn and maintenance cost over the years $10 Bn. All this for a woman that Shahjehan is supposed to have loved but used as a sex toy to produce 14 babies in 14 years. She died on the 14th baby. It doesn’t take a deep reading of history for anyone to know that the Taj is a CRIME SCENE. People should visit its beauty to know how criminal and murderous the Mughals were.

There are many fashionable men and women who were fabulous clothes. You just have to wonder how they would feel if they learned that some of their clothes came from tiny boys and girls that toiled for 16 hours a day for Re.1 per hour. Taj is somewhat like that. The crimes are not visible. Our school history books are full of distortions and even outright lies. They glorify murderous Mughals. Bollywood takes it further by glorifying Mughal criminals. The onus is, therefore, on Hindu parents to teach their children true Hindu history and the lies of school books. Young minds are poisoned by such school books while our HRD Minister is usually busy RTing tweets of PM Modi or ribbon-cutting elsewhere. This particular episode from a missionary school that was relayed on Twitter a few days back should be shocking to all of us:

A Hindu kid supposedly writes an essay about his love for Jesus and Christmas. Nothing wrong with that. But he goes further to state that they don’t celebrate Diwali because he does not LIKE Diwali. I hold such Hindu parents responsible for turning their children into idiots. This particular kid will come out of school, having consumed all the poison, hating his own culture and identity. He will probably end up at JNU or some Periyar group chanting Anti-Hindu or Anti-India slogans. This is not a stray incident. There are many schools, NGOs and the missionary-mafia that teaches people contempt for Hinduism. It did not help that the previous and many Congress govts are partners in this Hinduism-hate. In particular, Congress under SoniaG had unleashed a large operation to destroy Hindus in every which way possible. The current ModiSarkar has not added to the damage but has also not done anything to undo the damage by Congress.

Jesus being born on December 25 is a myth. Even Vatican priests don’t believe that crap. The virgin-mother story is scientifically dubious. But more than Christians, it is the Hindu clowns who parade as Christmas angels or Santa Clowns. Christmas is “fashionable”, Hindu festivals are deemed regressive and backward. There is no dearth of fashionable morons exclaiming “Jeez” without knowing what it means. Consequently, the Congress-inspired NGOs and other outfits frequently knock the doors of courts, especially SC, to particularly attack Hinduism and traditional Hindu practices and customs. From temples to Dahi Handi to Jallikattu to Diwali crackers – the SC has ruled on everything. SC has even redefined what marital rape is. In Hindu matters, the SC is prompt on issuing judgements while on other matters, like Triple Talaq or Ram Mandir, it keeps issuing notices and reminders to the govt or parties that really have no say in it.

There is no Dahi Handi Act. There was no Jallikattu Act (till the cruelty to animal’s law). There is no Kite flying Act. There is no Karwa Chauth Act. There is no UCC either. The Constitution does demand UCC but our SC is not interested in enforcing it through the govt although it has made gentle demands in the past. Instead, the SC and other courts have frequently issued “Bans” on this or that. Having tasted blood against Hindu traditions and practices, more and more PILs are filed in courts. Thus, the ban on cracker sale in NCR, ONLY for the Diwali season incurs the wrath of people. There is no dearth of idiots who ask “were there crackers during Ram’s time”? Well, Goat-screwing, Camel-screwing and paedophilia were fashionable and common during Mohammad’s time. Is it legal today? Harems were practiced once, is it legal today? Of course, there are still many paedophiles in Chrislam that commit crimes and get away with it too. Even the Vatican is known to have child-abusers.

The SC should know where to draw the line and not interfere with the “free will” of people unless it is repugnant to civilised life or threatens freedoms. Naturally, the urge to burst more crackers when banned will be the only outcome. The ban on liquor sale on highways (shops within 500 metres) has been circumvented in most parts of India. An effective method would be to use breathalyzers strictly, impose heavy fines and impound vehicles on the spot if there is drunken-driving. People don’t live in courtrooms. Something our judges seriously need to understand and that the best anti-crime laws are best made by people through their legislatures. A ban is usually a boon to those who make more money through black-marketing:

The weak link in the whole chain is the law-enforcement, especially the police force. Most corruption and illegal practices exist with the active support of corrupt cops. How else do Naxals get weapons and grenades? And the ban on cracker-sale in NCR has no scientific or logical evidence that only Diwali contributes heavily to pollution. There is, of course, some merit in reducing the pollution – both air and noise. But an SC ban is certainly not the most sensible thing to do. The crackers need to be controlled for emissions and decibels which can only be done through laws and not by the SC. Bans usually result in revolt if they try to strangle traditional practices. The ban on cracker-sale wasn’t any different in outcome. Apart from bursting crackers right outside the SC, these are now being door delivered:

There are certain freedoms that no court or govt should meddle with. At best, these can be regulated with sensible laws to avoid damage and to avoid injury or loss of life. Judges don’t have any responsibility for the outcomes from the bans and arbitrary rulings they make on social issues. Maybe someday a PIL will be in SC and the judges will rule whether Shahjehan really loved Mumtaz or treated her as a “baby-manufacturing unit”. The more the courts involve themselves in frivolous PILs the more the people are likely to lose respect for their rulings. Crackers are no exception. Maybe judges weren’t children at all.

A Happy Crackerjack Diwali to all!

Get Swamy

Seema Mustafa, in response to Subramanian Swamy’s article in DNA wrote: “The language that the politician who heads the one-man Janata Party has used is reprehensible to say the least and I am sure there are laws in this country that can be invoked to take him to task for inflaming passions through complete falsehoods.” There you are, a veiled invitation to trigger happy secularists to drag Swamy into FIRs and court cases over what he has written. Did she manage to have the desired effect? You bet!

Now, if the statement Mustafa made had come from some ‘secular’ politician it would have been understandable. Unfortunately, it comes from a journalist. Journalists are usually the ones to shout themselves hoarse over freedom of speech and ironically it is a journalist who tries to invoke the law to prosecute someone who has expressed his views. This is not just true for Seema Mustafa, this is true for all the so called secular media which doesn’t hesitate to drag The Gita into concocted controversy but doesn’t have the balls to ever even mention the Koran. If the secularists will somehow and someday learn honesty then the likes of Swamy wouldn’t need to write provocative articles. Swamy also exposes how thin and flimsy the tolerance of these secularists are. I had the privilege of going to school but had to learn in later life that the moghuls that our school textbooks glorified were actually villains and enemies of Hindus. You can now expect all the self-righteous nonsense to flow from the minorities commission and other groups to follow.

Here’s the first one from a petition by constituents of Harvard University:

“Swamy proposes a truly shocking set of "strategies" for "deter[ring] terrorism" in an op-ed appearing in the July 16th edition of the Daily News & Analysis, an Indian newspaper. These include "declar[ing] India a Hindu Rashtra in which non-Hindus can vote only if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus"; "[r]emov[ing] the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple and the 300 masjids at other temple sites"; "[e]nact[ing] a national law prohibiting conversion from Hinduism to any other religion"; and "[p]ropagat[ing] the development of a Hindu mindset…..Writing in the wake of the July 13, 2011, bombings in Mumbai, Swamy has exploited this event not only to promote a vision of Indian society based on Hindu supremacy, but to disparage and cast suspicion on the entire Muslim community in India. "Muslims of India," he states, "are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus."

The muslims in modern day India are not responsible for any of the past. But those denying the past and wilfully ignoring the aspirations of some Islamic agenda are clearly living in denial. Some of these honourable men and women come from the stock of the JNU, the Congress and the Communist ideology which glorifies the Islamic atrocities as secular rule in India. It takes rare character and courage to be as outspoken and honest as Swamy is. Sure, tar him as a maverick, call him names as Seema Mustafa does, ignore his multi-religious family as the media does and peddle lies about the history of India as the JNU lot do and you have a concoction for a heady clash of religions sooner or later.

Rahul Kanwal of Headlines Today, a bright journalist who is a rising star had this to tweet:

Rahul Kanwal:

Strange Twitter logic. When we do story against Cong, we are hailed as patriots. When we expose BJP, we are called Cong agents & traitors.

August 3 – 22.30

Oh yeah? Who exactly called you agents and traitors? What Rahul forgets is that he tends to ridicule the BJP and Hindutva at every step of the way. Every political party has factions and each faction has their leader. That is why we have elections too. Is that logic lost on journalists? If Rahul Kanwal was sensible enough he would find an answer to his tweet in his own stupid tweet he made earlier:

Rahul Kanwal

How can hand picked nominee of tainted CM be expected to prosecute boss to whom he owes elevation & existence. #MoralHighGroundOnCorruption

August 3 – 16.26

There, that stone-throwing, calling someone a hand-picked nominee ignoring the fact that there was a secret ballot held to elect the leader of the Karnataka BJP is not the doing of the Twitterati but Kanwal’s own way of casting aspersions. The election by secret ballot of a CM is one of the finest things to have happened in Indian democracy and a practice that should become more frequent and common and yet media brokers like Kanwal ridicule that process and then wonder why the twitterati are against him or his channel. No, they aren’t against you but the severe bias with which you report events and colour news items.This same bias colours every aspect of the Hindu-Muslim reporting that the media indulges in. Hindus are fair game, muslims are victims. That's the media line.Those who die are the aggressors!

Forget temples that Swamy talks about, I am not even willing to accept all the crap about even the Taj Mahal. If you go through the writings and investigation by Stephen Knapp there are lies that have been peddled through the centuries. Would the secularists dare and be open to a detailed investigation of the Taj Mahal? When Swamy talks about temples being destroyed, let’s start with the Taj Mahal itself. The rest can wait. Knapp’s site has sufficient evidence and photographs to warrant a detailed investigation. You may want to go through his site and many others who claim it to be a Shiva temple.

One needs go through the roads less travelled across this country through Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and many other states to notice the many small Islamic townships that have come up. Many of them resplendent in their riches and well-built houses and shops. You have to wonder in amazement where all that money and wealth comes from to set up such mini Islamic colonies. The radicalisation of those willing muslims who may wish to overthrow democracy and our way of life is not unique to India. Take a look at this little poster and the related news item:

Daily Mail: "Islamic extremists have launched a poster campaign across the UK proclaiming areas where Sharia law enforcement zones have been set up. Communities have been bombarded with the posters, which read: ‘You are entering a Sharia-controlled zone – Islamic rules enforced.’

The bright yellow messages daubed on bus stops and street lamps have already been seen across certain boroughs in London and order that in the ‘zone’ there should be ‘no gambling’, ‘no music or concerts’, ‘no porn or prostitution’, ‘no drugs or smoking’ and ‘no alcohol’. Hate preacher Anjem Choudary has claimed responsibility for the scheme, saying he plans to flood specific Muslim and non-Muslim communities around the UK and ‘put the seeds down for an Islamic Emirate in the long term". The media in UK suggests it’s the work of sick minds but those living there have already wound up their shops and many others have exited the area and moved to other places where they aren’t threatened by these Islamists.

I have read news reports which mention Hindu homes were marked with yellow paint for slaughter in the erstwhile East Pakistan, now Bangladesh. Swamy sort of warns you not to wait for such a day to arrive in India. Subramanian Swamy, I think, only alludes to the fact that there might be many stray muslims and muslim organisations in India who wish to emulate or secretly dream the dream that Anjem Choudary has. Are all muslims involved in that dream? Certainly not, but there are no muslim voices against those who nurture that dream. Their voices only come up when provoked by writers like Seema Mustafa to invoke stupid laws which should not exist in the first place.

For those petitioners in the US who want Harvard University to get rid of Swamy I have to say that they must constitute the greatest gathering of useful idiots who neither know the law nor the idea of freedom. The US supreme court once dismissed even a suit by religious leader Jerry Falwell who was featured in a silly ad by Larry Flynt (Of Hustler magazine) which was outrageous and even allowed a Nazi march through a predominantly Jewish area in Chicago. That is the kind of freedom of speech that democracies need.

The stupid hate speech laws should be removed. You don’t need freedom to say nice things. Real freedom of thought cannot be stopped by laws. You can stop speech but you CANNOT stop thought. And I wish our politicians would wake up and alter such laws. Whether you agree with Swamy or not, give him the space to utter whatever he wants. Let’s not forget that joker from Samajwadi party who announced a prize for the head of the Danish cartoonist who made the Mohammad cartoons. That man still roams free despite encouraging murder in public. Swamy hasn’t incited or encouraged any violence whatsoever. Those who can’t stand his writings are free to write against him. If not, they can shut themselves in their bathrooms and weep.

The best part of the whole drama is that Subramanian Swamy loves a court battle. Anyone dragging him to court would only be stupid enough to oblige him and when they do, there will be more worms crawling out of the secular can. These fools should realise that the ‘Get Swamy’ campaign will not work.