One of Narendra Modi’s pet themes or
slogans is 65% of India’s population is made up of youth. He uses that context
to promote “Make in India” as a
major policy to encourage the manufacturing sector. When the Congress tried FDI
in multi-brand retail, Arun Jaitley
stated: “India
will become a nation of sales boys and sales girls". Although I
don’t see anything wrong in more sales boys and girls, I agree with the policy
of making India a big manufacturing hub given our strengths. I only wonder if
Modi will acknowledge one important marketing principle – It is better to have a shortage of your product in the market than to
have excess stocks in the warehouse. And that is precisely the problem with
our youth population – excess in the warehouse. That may sound inhuman but not
so much when you consider that India’s population has been growing uncontrolled
and unchecked. To see it as an asset out of compulsion is to ignore a
problem. The religion-wise figures for Census 2011 were recently released and are more or less the pic I used in a
previous post:
The census report I have linked shows
Muslim population has grown by 24% during 2001-2011 while Hindu population has
fallen below 80%. In terms of numbers that would mean Muslim population is
around 18 crores. Average unemployment hovers between 5 and 9% in India. But in
case of Muslim youth, the unemployment is as high as 18% which includes educated ones. Take these figures as
indicative. The highest Muslim population growth has been in states like Assam,
Bengal and Kerala which is hardly surprising. We also don’t know if all the “illegals”
in Bengal, Assam, NE overall or in Maharashtra or Telangana are included in the
census. In Assam, Bengal and Kerala the Muslim population has crossed 25%, J&K
doesn’t need a mention as it is way above 65%.
It is fair to estimate that a good chunk
of the Muslim youth come out of the Madrassa system and find it difficult to
find employment in the mainstream economy as compared to other communities. So
they either turn to low-skill jobs or sink deeper in poverty. But there are
other temptations for the Muslim youth like the ISIS. A Sunday Guardian report indicates over 1000 volunteers had
joined the ISIS and which is spreading across Uttar Pradesh, Assam, West
Bengal, Kerala, Seemandhra, Telangana and Maharashtra. Investigation reveals
many of them haven’t returned because they were disenchanted but to set up ISIS
or terror cells in India. Indian authorities have no clue on how to deal with
this menace. There was that Mehdi guy who operated a Twitter account in support
of ISIS and spreading their ideology. He was an educated-employed youth.
Uncontrolled population growth cannot be an asset by any measure and it doesn’t
need Einstein to figure out that as the Muslim population grows, so does
aggression and militancy. Here’s an extract of Peter Hammond that I reproduced in August 2012:
As long as the
Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be
for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat
to other citizens. (This is the case in: United States --0.6% Australia --1.5%
Canada --1.9% China --1.8% Italy --1.5% Norway --1.8%)
At 2% to 5%,
they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups,
often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. (This is
happening in: Denmark -- 2% Germany -- 3.7% United Kingdom --2.7% Spain --4%
Thailand --4.6%)
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of
complaint about their conditions. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and
results in uprisings and threats….. (Such tensions are seen daily, particularly
in Muslim sections, in: Guyana --10% India -- 13.4% Israel --16% Kenya -- 10%
Russia --15%)
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic
cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and
move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is
on-going in: Bangladesh --83% Egypt --90%
Iran --98% Pakistan --97% (Remember Kashmir?)
The first para in the above extract
isn’t all that valid anymore. Even 1% population of Muslims is now causing
strife and friction in many parts of the world. Here’s an image of stats I had
put up in a previous post:
The top 10 countries in the chart above
are all facing Islamic strife, especially countries in Europe. France has the
highest of 8% Muslim population and they have seen frequent attacks on Jews,
intimidation, street violence and the Charlie Hebdo killings. And they are 8%
in a smaller country and we are 14% in a country which has a history of
communal violence. Some are worried the Muslim population will equal or exceed
the Hindu population some day in the future. So people like Sakshi Maharaj want
Hindus to have more children and others are doing a “GharWapsi” campaign. The problem is not the danger in Muslim
population exceeding Hindus because it doesn’t have to wait that long for
serious trouble. Kashmir has shown what can happen. In Assam, Bengal and Kerala
we have seen what just about 25% can do. Economic progress and success depends
on social harmony.
Our imprudent politicians partitioned
this country but even in that they left the job incomplete. If partition was
based on religious grounds then it should have been complete. It is inevitable
that the violence and strife similar to what we are seeing in and from Pakistan
are invariably going to infect states like Bengal, Assam and Kerala. A slow but
sure ethnic cleansing of Hindus, like that in Kashmir, is inevitable. In Mumbai
there are pockets of no-go zones. Mumbra and Malegaon are Islamic zones. Peace
in Gujarat has come after extreme retaliation by Hindus but even that isn’t
guaranteed any permanence. Any state, village or town that reaches 10-25% of
Muslim population is in for strife. It
is not imagination; it is a proven mathematical fact of numbers.
Some of our politicians and most of our
media crooks like and cover up for Muslim crimes. Maybe their funding compels
them to do so. Many of these crooks, like Mani Shankar Aiyar, come from the
Commie hotbed of Cambridge. Yes indeed, most people don’t know that Cambridge
is a Commie den just like JNU is. Of course, Jawaharlal Nehru too was soaked in
Cambridge, so were Rajiv and Rahul Gandhi. It is a stunning fact that most of Britain’s
anti-national spies and traitors came from Cambridge. The notorious five are known but there may be many that weren’t
discovered or found. Same is true for India. And it is not as if Oxford is a
saint, they too have Marxist clubs. So the Macaulay Putras and Putris in our
media who forever hate and abuse Hindus have a background and indoctrination in
Commie-love and Hindu hatred. And usually, the Commies in India prefer Islamic
ideology because it is quite similar to theirs – hating Hindus being the
consequential practice. These crooks in media and politics shouldn’t be
tolerated and must be shamed every single day of the rest of their lives.
After every terror attack there is this
now laughable statement by politicians, religious heads and jokers in the media
who will tell you Islam is a “Religion of peace”. After the killings this is
like adding salt to the injury. People are waking up but ever so slowly. Here’s
a report from the Spectator:
“In France,
Britain, Germany, America and nearly every other country in the world it
remains government policy to say that any and all attacks carried out in the
name of Mohammed have ‘nothing to do with Islam’. It was said by George W. Bush
after 9/11, Tony Blair after 7/7 and Tony Abbott after the Sydney attack last
month. It is what David Cameron said after two British extremists cut off the
head of Drummer Lee Rigby in London… In private, they and their senior advisers
often concede that they are telling a lie. The most sympathetic explanation is
that they are telling a ‘noble lie’, provoked by a fear that we — the general
public — are a lynch mob in waiting. ‘Noble’ or not, this lie is a mistake.
First, because the general public do not rely on politicians for their
information and can perfectly well read articles and books about Islam for
themselves. Secondly, because the lie helps no one understand the threat we
face. Thirdly, because it takes any heat off Muslims to deal with the bad
traditions in their own religion. And fourthly, because unless mainstream
politicians address these matters then one day perhaps the public will overtake
their politicians to a truly alarming extent”.
The day is not far off in India when
non-Muslims overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent and
retaliate. It is therefore better to sound the warning now than repent later.
Narendra Modi claiming youth population being an asset is only partly true. The
Imam of Brooklyn has shown
the courage to say “We Muslims are a time-bomb and hate
Christians”. In India, replace Christian with Hindus and the situation
is no different. On the contrary, in India Muslims and Christians unite in
their contempt for Hindus. The recent episode of Jayanthi Natarajan has shown
how many Christian NGOs have thwarted India’s economic progress to serve their
western masters.
IAS officer C. Umashankar of TN was suspended because he was proselytising and
indulged in conversion activities. On a TV show he kept lying in his defence
but went on to claim that he owes his allegiance to his Christian faith first
and not to the Constitution when it comes to serving the country as a Civil
servant. That’s how deep the rot is. Both these faiths, their leaders and our
Commie politicians appeal to Muslims and Christians to vote en bloc for the
Commie parties from Congress to AAP. But if Hindu leaders made a similar appeal
the same politicians and our media morons cry “communal”. In support of this
moron Umashankar the usual dolt John
Dayal also claimed he follows Christianity because he considers it better
than other religions:
The Commie media, politicians,
Bollywood, print magazines have all made it mandatory – the more educated a person is, he or she must demonstrate it by
slamming and abusing anything that is Hindu or related to Hinduism. These
cowards claim Barack Obama’s reference to Article 25 and freedom of religion
was an indicator to Modi and the Hindu parties for tolerance. Morons! The same
Obama went to Saudi Arabia next and many Americans are asking why he didn’t
make a similar statement there. You see, cowards lecture Hindus (who are already
excessively tolerant) because they know they are tolerant and will not
retaliate. Try doing that in Pakistan or Arabia or elsewhere, it is unlikely
you will remain one piece for long. Beyond
a point tolerance is not a virtue; it morphs into cowardice and
self-destruction.
Let me paint an extreme picture. What if
some Hindu gangs too armed themselves with bombs and AK-47s? What if in their
anger they bombed or killed some abusive Bollywood movie-makers? What if they
bombed the offices of the Hindu-abusing NDTV? They will outrage, condemn and
shout that it will not stop their freedom of speech. But let me assure you the
cowards will go into a shell and you will not see much abuse for long and
continued violent attacks on them will stop the abuse. And that is the fear
that Islamists have planted in them. That is why they wet their pants and
skirts even mentioning the crimes of Islamists and keep parroting it’s a
“religion of peace”. If such an extreme outcome happens would the same media
morons and political hypocrites chant “NDTV had it coming” or “the director and
actor had it coming” like they do for Charlie Hebdo? But, unfortunately, some
do have it coming as constant clashes in Bengal show. Tolerance is over-rated
and no one should ever suffer or be killed for being tolerant but history shows only the tolerant are killed.
Concluded.
