tag: MediaCrooks: Jihad

Privacy Policy

Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Britain Down The Drain


Over centuries, the Europeans had mostly forgotten the Crusades except for their mentions in history. They had forgotten much about Islam too. Sometime from the 13th century they started their quest for newer worlds. France, Portugal, Spain, Germany, the Dutch and even tiny Belgium routinely invaded and colonised countries with cultures alien to them. The worst of the lot had to be Britain which colonised many parts of the world and brought untold horrors to people of the lands they occupied. Late in the 18th century and early in the 19th, a group of Islamic countries – the Ottoman empire and their regions of Tripoli, Tunis and Algiers had a practice of collecting “tribute” from the ships that passed through their region in the Mediterranean Sea. In short, these were pirates who were collecting “Hafta’. Ships that didn’t pay would be captured and their crew jailed.

Some American ships paid the tribute too, some were captured. When the US President and their Ambassadors learned about it, they refused to pay this tribute. Thus followed the Barbary wars. Till then, the Americans didn’t know much about Muslims or Islam. The US Ambassadors learned, much to their amusement, the reason for this “Hafta” being collected by the Islamic State:
 
Sounds familiar? All nations that did not acknowledge Mohammad were sinners and it was, therefore, rightful to plunder and enslave them. The brave Muslim warriors who died in this venture would go to Paradise. And the first Muslim pirate to board a vessel would get an “extra slave” as bonus for his valour. The Barbary wars ended this piracy and formally birthed the US Navy which is now the most powerful force in the oceans. The Americans didn’t pursue any real estate ambitions but the British and other Europeans did. The most heinous crimes, mass-murders and violent abuse of human rights and an immoral rule was conducted by the British at no other place but in India. The barbarians that prided themselves claiming the sun never sets on the British empire face a new reality today – the sun doesn’t rise all that much in damp Britain. Then the oil boom made the British occupation of Islamic countries in the ME all the more profitable. But once they quit India, others followed. Israel threw them out violently, the Turks defeated them and Britain is now more or less restricted to the small island that it really is.

But even from within this small hole a country which had immoral barbarism as their primary cause to exist kept sermonising the world. The Indian political leaders and the elite dogs of the Lutyens society kept adoring Britain. They touted degrees from Oxford and Cambridge as the greatest accomplishments in the world. Barbarians beget barbarians. It is fair to say that many ordinary Britons were and are civilised but there has never been anything civilised about their political establishment. When they quit India, they ensured the country was broken into pieces, communities were left squabbling for long and Britain got to keep playing “Big Brother”, especially aided by their permanent slaves of the Nehru-Gandhi family. Today, much of Britain’s famed institutions are “Islamised”, whether they like to admit it or not. Almost all of then funded by Islamists with their oil money:
 
Since the mid-1990s, the Tony Blair govt and his Labour Party embarked on allowing more Muslim immigrants from Africa and Pakistan into Britain as part of their vote-bank politics. I guess they learned it from the Congress in India. This was their “Multi-Culti” nonsense that they wanted to promote. When immigration becomes an open door, the dregs of societies too make hay. The current Muslim population in Britain is just under 3% but they occupy pockets of Britain to exert enough influence in those areas. Birmingham, Manchester, East End in London are some examples. London and some other major towns in Britain now have Muslim mayors. Muslims accused of child sexual abuse are also in the House of Lords. The Pakistanis among them have been involved in thousands of rapes of young girls and quite alarmingly, the police in the UK have turned a blind eye. Criminals are making merry as this report would show:
 
The Muslim population in UK may be under 3% which seems like a small number. But bear in mind, this small minority is usually the most vociferous, most violent and at the same time plays the biggest victim. But Muslim population across the world has been growing dramatically all over the world. And in just over a decade this is projected to grow up to 8% in Britain:

While this population grows, the original British are slowing down in their population growth. Some parts of Britain have doubled their Muslim population within a decade. By itself, population growth shouldn’t be a violent threat but in the case of Britain and even in India, the “Jihadis” among the Muslim population want Islamic dominance, Sharia rule and the final creation of an Islamic State wherever they are. A top Euro official has warned Britain has around 35000 Islamic fanatics. My guesstimate is there might be more. And terrorism, frequent knife-attacks and violent agitations rather proves such claims.

How does this manifest itself? Frequent terrorist attacks, violent protests and political blackmail. Britain is currently facing an epidemic of “knife-attack” by such Jihadis. I guess it started with the gruesome murder of the British soldier Lee Rigby in broad daylight in 2013. Two Muslims of African origin simply forced Rigby’s car to stop, stabbed him and slit his throat. They didn’t run off. They stood there proudly displaying their bloodied hands and knives:
Just as many institutions in Britain are now under Islamic monetary dominance, so are many of their politicians. Obviously, politicians need money to run their campaigns and create pockets of “minority vote banks”. Indians are all too familiar with these tricks. So, when the GOI junked Article 370, some of the most vocal agitators in Britain were politicians of the “Islamic orientation”. Jeremy Corbyn was supposedly a PM aspirant. Another moron called Liam Byrne blabbered about Kashmir and all the HR nonsense that usually flows from another criminal British product called Amnesty International. All of these are Jihadis and Jihadi-funded operators:
These politicians not only sermonise India but also led agitations on the streets. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan – a Paki by origin, covertly encourages the violent thugs on the streets of London that attacked the Indian High Commission there. The now impotent and incompetent UK police just watched not once but twice in the month of August. The foolish British govt should be under no illusion that India will neither forget these attacks nor forget handsome payback. This attack on the Indian HC was littered with broken windows and garbage thrown at it:
India’s relations with the UK have already been on the downslide for quite a few years. It has been more on the downslide since ModiSarkar took over in 2014. I am absolutely sure India has nothing much to gain from this tiny, Jihadi country anymore. They are flowing down the drain slowly but surely. Since 2012 India has also declined to accept aid from Britain. Another UK MP, Peter Bone, called the “Statue of Unity” a “nonsense” in 2018 and grandly claimed Britain should not give any more aid to India when we had already rejected their aid 6 years earlier. Indo-UK ties are not all that great at the moment and are unlikely to get better anytime soon. ModiSarkar has clearly realised Britain is now a “use and throw” country with not much value left in it. India is now a bigger economic and military might and shouldn’t take any sermons from an immoral gang of British MPs and politicians, some of whom are outright Jihadis:
And its not just their politicians, there are racist journos and channels like BBC and print and online media of Britain which have constantly heaped vile abuse, fake news and contempt on India. Here is one sample called Andrew Duncan who mocks Chandrayaan with the same racist contempt that the New York Times once made a cartoon on our Space pursuits:
Every barbaric gang and country that has wrought mass murder and violence on others has eventually perished. Britain is not being destroyed by some external powers. This tiny country is being destroyed from within and due to their own follies. And those who have a record of barbaric crimes in history neither have the moral stature nor should we allow them to lecture India which still has very high moral standards in comparison. Britain is going down the toilet drain. If anything, we should just simply press the “Flush”.

 Subscribe To EF/                        Contribute
Buy The EF Handbook               INR / US$

Monday, February 7, 2011

JuD: Jihad, N-War Solutions To Kashmir Issue


Any ‘moderate’ muslim anywhere in the world will tell you ‘Jihad’ is an ‘internal struggle’ for spiritual cleansing. I am confident that the likes of Digvijay Singh and Rahul Gandhi will agree. It’s only idiots like us who do not understand the real meaning of ‘Jihad’ and frequently stereo-type muslims.

India has shown disappointment over the release of Hafiz Saeed, chief of Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and a suspect for masterminding 26/11 Mumbai attacks. JuD is suspected to be a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba. The release questions Pakistan’s seriousness in combating terror...Hafiz Saeed is also reported to be a co-founder of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT)”.  That was a news report from June 2009.

On Sunday, February 6, at a Kashmir Solidarity Day meeting Lahore, Hafiz Saeed’s speech for spiritual cleansing of Kashmir was reported as under: (From DNA)
"You (Manmohan Singh) must remember that the movement of the Kashmiri people is nearing an end and I am telling you very clearly to immediately leave Kashmir. Otherwise we are ready to start a war against you to get this at any cost," "The only solution to the Kashmir issue is jihad," said Saeed. The jihad should continue "as long as Kashmir remains under Indian occupation" and there would be "no problem" if the fighting leads to nuclear war between Pakistan and India, he contended".

Well, we need not worry much about the JuD or the LeT. We have a bigger terrorist threat at home through Hindu Terror outfits. That is what Rahul Gandhi told an American Diplomat. Hafiz Saeed also blamed India for masterminding the 26/11 attacks. He is not wrong. The Digivijay Singhs and Aziz Burneys of India have also expressed similar sentiments. It was probably an RSS conspiracy.

A few days ago I wrote a post titled ‘Egypt & The Fifth Column’. The separatists in J&K are understandable. Why should we believe that there aren’t hidden separatists in the other parts of India? The more the weakness of the UPA government and greater their attempt to cloak the real threat of Islamic Terror with strident cries of Hindu terror the more emboldened the likes of JuD and LeT are likely to feel. For long many leaders have been calling upon muslims in India to merge with the mainstream. It may have happened to some extent. But there is a certain religious intolerance among certain sections of muslims which will inevitably fall prey to the designs of JuD and LeT, if they haven’t already done.

Not surprisingly, British PM David Cameron has recently announced that multiculturalism has failed in Britain. This follows earlier such announcements by Angela Merkel of Germany. The community being responsible for this according to them is not Hindus or Jains or Sikhs. They singularly point to muslims who have proved to be against any norm of democratic and liberal society. And on cue, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has announced that they would like to implement the ‘Sharia’ in Egypt.

Here is a video of a Fox News interview with Imam Anjem Chowdhary. This Imam is one who deeply desires complete Islamisation of Britain and is also reported to be a Sharia Court Judge in one of Britain’s Sharia courts. A Sharia court in Britain? Yes, there are more than 80 of them. And this is the multiculturalism that David Cameron states is failing.

                           Anjem Choudhary on Fox News "..You can live under Sharia"

Let me caution you, Fox News is often cited as a right-wing conservative news channel. I have not pasted this video for a Fox News’ programme but to reflect on the views of Anjem Choudhary. And he holds out this promise in the video “...Islam is coming to your backyard...you can live under Sharia”. But when our own politicians and media tarnish many Hindu outfits as ‘right-wing’, ‘communal’ and such choice tags you have to know what they are inviting into this country through a backdoor. A veritable fifth column. If we talk about these, don’t be surprised getting labelled as ‘Racist, Bigot, Propagandist or an Islamophobhe’.

So all the mediacrooks who were tom-toming the theory that the protesters in Egypt were seeking democracy, freedom and liberty should now stop lying and realise the fact that much of the protests was fueled by the Muslim Brotherhood and their ultimate aim is Islamic rule in Egypt. Our friendly neighbour, Pakistan, is already an ‘Islamic Democracy’. The Times of India, NDTV and similar news outfits desire nothing but great peace with Pakistan. Nothing wrong with that. The only problem is Islamic rule and Democracy are not compatible. According to the Islamists, democracy is man-made and that is not acceptable to them. Therefore, their God-made laws and systems will always triumph over man- made ones. That’s a certainty.

The columns that some of our media friends write could well be ‘The fifth column’ in reality. Aziz Burney was not the only one strident with his conspiracy theories about 26/11. Digivijay Singh, A.R. Antulay are among prominent subscribers of that theory. And among the many journals that espouse such theories has to be Tehelka. Yes, the journal that employs journalists who believe in journalism and who get paid to tell the truth!

An interesting piece about Tehelka titled “Turncoat Tehelka” appears on Sandeepweb, and I produce some excerpts below:

.....Back to the fearless paper’s fearlessness, we see that Tehelka in February 2009 published an article entitled THE CURIOUS TALE OF MUMBAI TERROR by one Raveena Hansa. The full text of the article is here. An unending stream of the author’s medically-untreatable bowel movements on an overdrive, it basically says the following:
  • There are unanswered questions about 26/11.
  • There are doubts about who killed Hemant Karkare.
  • The attack is not entirely the work of Pakistani terrorists.
  • We can’t rule out the possibility of “Hindutva terrorists.”
  • Pakistan is as serious about shutting down terror networks as India is.
And then inexplicably, Tehelka took down that article from its site, a fact that went by unnoticed except that the indefatigable Barbarindian detected this sleight-of-hand and posed a question to the fearless paper. The paper responded with:

@barbarindian Sorry that article wasn’t published on Tehelka. Altho, same article on Countercurrents w/ diff headline Here.

That is the fearless Tehelka denying an article it carried supporting the conspiracy theories about 26/11. One needs to be reminded that Tehelka had nearly shut down some years ago. The blog Sans Serif carries a post about how the Congress government helped restore Tehelka. Is it any surprise that such a fearless journal would need to reward the Congress with some propaganda?

The dangers of the media being corrupt and not willing to call the lies spread by several politicians or events that unfold in the nation and the world is a clear warning that propagandist media will eventually destroy every democratic value and freedom that we cherish. Hafiz Saeed and his JuD are emboldened to threaten Jihad and N-war. And on the sidelines of the current SAARC meeting our journalists are busy interviewing various people on the next move for peace with Pakistan. We need a watchdog over the media so that they do not abuse the very freedom we cherish to open the backdoors to those who wish to destroy India.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Islamic Terror, Government & The Indian Media

Condemning the  recent Varanasi bomb blast, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said it was an attempt to "weaken" India's resolve to fight the "evil forces of terrorism" in which they would not succeed. Hmmm, resolve? Resolve is the last thing I would associate in any way with a man who has headed the most corrupt government in the history of this nation.

Let’s hear another voice though, of  Veerappa Moily (of the Moily tapes fame) on laws needed to combat terrorism. "Yes yes... there is a limitation as law and order is a state subject. We need to evolve ourselves to meet these kind of challenges. We need to evolve such systems and also the laws to meet such challenges". Who the hell is ‘WE’?

As for the third stooge from the UPA, P. Chidambaram, he just feels it’s a lesson for the police and security is a state matter. Wait, this guy even says UP government was provided intelligence reports 8 months ago about possible attacks. Eight months ago? And how updated was that intelligence report? Poor Mayawati! She waited months for this attack to happen and unfortunately it happened after that report was outdated. Well, she need not worry. Next time Chidambaram’s departments will provide security warnings 2 years in advance. That should be comforting for any state government.

So let’s understand what the 3 stooges have said. The first stooge, PM talks about resolve. Resolve is usually shown by messages or by action. There is neither any message nor any action. Afzal Guru still continues to live in some jail. Killers of Rajiv Gandhi are still in jail. Ajmal Kasab continues to dance around Indian courts every week. Now that, I suppose, is resolve for you.

Now law minister Moily, he wants appropriate laws. Mind you, this is the same UPA government which has repealed POTA. This is the same government which has disallowed the GUJCOCA bill of Gujarat (while a similar law exists in Maharashtra).  He also laments that NGO and other activist groups stand up for terrorists and not for victims. What? This asshole is the law minister? And he complains about NGOs and activists? That’s courage for you!  Laws don’t fight terrorists Mr. Moily, people do! And as representatives of people this government has removed all shackles and fear from the hearts of terrorists. So having dumped laws targeting terrorists, stop educating us on what laws are needed.

The third stooge! The smooth-talking Chidambaram, who was quick to realise how dangerous ‘saffron terror’ is and educate police chiefs on that,  had said there was no intelligence failure after the Pune blast a few months ago. He also said it was an ‘insidious’ act. So by logic,  there can be terror attacks which need not be ‘insidious’. He went on to say after that incident that the terrorists had picked a ‘soft target’! Okay, so why don’t you Mr. Home Minister give them a list of  hard targets they should pick upon? Would you be a hard target for them? Someone has to crack it into the skull of this minister that a majority of victims of terror are innocent civilians. And they indeed will always be soft targets. So after the recent Varanasi blast this HM again suggests there was no intelligence failure. Now, he has a added another line to that as well as his ‘soft target’ and ‘insidious’ line that security is the primary responsibility of the state. Damn! So all the CMs in this country are idiots who didn’t know that yet?
 
Now, the last stooge in this whole drama has to be our beloved media. They will run campaigns, candle vigils and play activists for issues like Jessica Lal, Niraj Katara and the Mattoo lady. As they should. Now where are their campaigns against terrorism. NONE! On the contrary, they run deplorable and parochial campaigns like ‘Aman Ki Asha’.

Time and again the media treats terror attacks for sensational reporting and nothing more. The 26/11 reportage received almost as much derision as the terror attacks themselves. Besides, they will use the same language that the government uses to tackle terror issues. If Chidambaram calls it ‘saffron terror’ they will harp on it. Nothing beyond that. Not one journalist, I repeat not one journalist or TV anchor has the guts to call a spade a spade. Truth of the matter is India has been the worst victim of ‘Islamic Terror’. Politicians have motives to coin terms like ‘saffron terror’ or statements like ‘terrorists have no religion’ or terrorists have hijacked Islam. (Hijacked a religion?) But what is the compulsion of the media beyond being politically correct or being faithful to their real paymasters?

Why is the media not bringing the same kind of pressure on the government on terror as it did with those famous murder cases? Why this fear? To me it is clear that those in the media are simply afraid of themselves becoming targets by using the term ‘Islamic terror’. P. Chidambaram smartly used the saffron terror term knowing well Hindus are not going to pull out guns and knives for his comment. So does the media. Do they have the courage to face those who will pull out guns and swords if they correctly identify ‘Islamic terror’? Or as wikileaks reported terror funding by Saudis, are our politicians and media also being funded by similar sources? Who’s their sugar daddy?

Fighting a real battle or war against terror requires identifying the enemy correctly and honestly and not by resorting to semantics and systematic eyewash.  Lt. Col. Allen West of the US Army who has served in Iraq and Afghanistan had this to say :

“...I’m sick and tired of people saying “war on terror”. There is no such thing as war on terror. In World War Two, how smart would it have been, if the United States of America said they were at war with the Blitzkrieg. Or if they were at war with the Kamikaze.......  A nation does not go to war against a tactic. A nation goes to war against an ideology, and that’s what we’ve been talking about here today....” His speech in February 2010 can be youtubed.

If the ideology has to be identified then there shouldn’t be any doubt that the war is against Islamic Jihadists.They have not ‘hijacked’ any religion, they swear by it,  as the email of Indian Mujahideen following the Varanasi attack clearly shows.  If Barack Obama dodges that call, the American people don’t. Jihadwatch.Org is almost a chronicle of daily atrocities, terror attacks and cases of intolerance of the ‘religion of peace’. As of date, the site ‘Religion of Peace’ lists 16493 terror attacks since 9/11. And the most lives lost in such terror attacks are Indian. More than Iraqis and Afghans.

So will the three stooges ever wake up and speak the truth? I don’t expect them to. But where is the media. Why are they quiet and untruthful?

Also recommend:
Times Aman Ki Asha crap,   Saffron Terror: Chidambaram's cheap trick
Die **** Infidels: Ver 2010 at Sandeepweb 

Monday, November 8, 2010

Obama: "Yes we CON"

Among pathological Presidential liars who have visited India, Barack Obama probably has only one predecessor in Richard Nixon.  Obama, has misled his country in his election campaign and continues to do so on various fronts. It is, therefore, not very surprising that he and his party received a drubbing at the recent US elections.

His silence on the Pak involvement in terrorism may be a political compulsion. Staying at the Taj Hotel in Bombay with the area virtually a fortress hardly makes any bold statement to terrorists. But his worst lies were saved for a response to a young college girl’s question on ‘Jihad’ at the St.Xavier’s College in Mumbai. Obama’s response:
"All of us recognise that this great religion, in the hands of a few extremists, has been distorted... The religion teaches peace, justice, fairness and tolerance. All of us recognise that this great religion cannot justify violence...”

Distorted? In what way? Those who choose to kill and die, commit suicide bombings and beheadings swear by the inspiration derived from the Koran. They read verses from it to support their crimes. And yet it is distorted?

Justice, Fairness, Tolerance? Stonings, amputations, death to apostates, death to homosexuals, inequality of women, suppression of freedoms, free speech. All signs of fairness and tolerance? Countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan etc. fall into the category of Islamic countries with Islamic laws and practice the worst violation of human rights and the worst punishments. Do these countries fall into the “distorted” category? And these countries are fair and tolerant of other religions? And each time a crime is committed and claimed to be inspired by the Koran, the apologists don’t hesitate to say it was “misunderstood” or “distorted” by “few” extremists.

The greatest uprising against Islam today is in Obama’s own home country, the USA. Does he ever bother to understand why? Dismissing it all as Islamophobia is one thing, but to seek to understand why so many Americans are up against Islam is a question any serious President would ask. It has gone far enough for the state of Oklahoma to ban the use of Sharia law in a preemptive legislation.

The list of sites dedicated to a watch on Islamic Jihad is growing. Not only radical Islamists but even scholars from Islamic universities and Imams are overt in their call for implementation of Sharia law across the world. They make no secret about their goals.

There’s a good chunk of the population in the US that believes Obama is a muslim owing to his words and actions ever since he was elected president. His words actions in India seem to follow that pattern. In a Hindu majority country the most important shrine he could find to visit was Humayun’s tomb? And following that he will visit the largest mosque in Indonesia. Surely, Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi, the Congresss (I) and its allies couldn’t have found a greater “muslim-appeaser” as a guest than Barack Obama.

After listening to his answer to her Jihad question, the student must have muttered under her breath “what a load of bullshit”! Obama’s real line has to be “Yes we CON”