It
is not just Sanjay Leela Bhansali
who uses and abuses Hindu icons from history for his movies but there are many
others who have done so in the past. Bhansali’s disease seems to be more
chronic. The movie “Padmavati” was
alleged to have a dream sequence showing Padmavati singing and romancing the
mass-murderer and rapist Allaudin Khilji.
Maybe Bhansali quietly removed the scenes and then sent the movie to a handful
of media folks. This, when the movie does not have a CBFC certification for
release. These media guys (Like Arnab Goswami, Rajat Sharma and some others)
were then issuing “clean chits” for the movie - that the movie wasn’t offensive
to Rajput sentiments or didn’t show Padmavati romancing Khilji. Since then the
movie’s release has been postponed, presumably because the CBFC has told the
producers their application for certification is incomplete.
This
is not the first time Bhansali or other movie-makers are involved in such
controversies. He earlier made a “twisted” version of a movie called “Ram Leela” and also “Bajirao Mastani”. It has become a
“sponsored practice” in Bollywood to “twist” and if possible “slur” Hindu icons
and Gods and glorify Mughal and Muslim tyrants and murderers. Long ago, Sanjay
Khan made a TV series glorifying Tipu
Sultan. The man, to me, should be ranked in the top-20 mass-murderers in
history. This time, Bhansali & co messed with the Rajputs who are known to value “honour” for their history far more than idiots of Bollywood do. Now
this is where the controversy over Padmavati has taken a different turn – about “honour” in the “Jauhar” that
Padmavati and many women with her committed to escape the tyranny and rape by
Khilji.
Evidently,
our Sickular Commie men and women would prefer that women in their families
should surrender and enjoy rape, molestation, gang-rape, be “haremised” or even
be traded as sex-slaves by tyrants and murderers. The stupidity of their
arguments can be measured by the predictable utterances of their biggest
moronic sample – the C5M:
Let’s
see! The women being discussed, Padmavati and thousands of others, were in no
position to defend themselves (not being warriors or trained in Karate like
Sagarika) chose to protect their honour from being savaged. Long ago, a
Nigerian woman beat up this Dumbini Sagarika over a parking quarrel. The brave
Sagarika got thrashed, didn’t even file any FIR obviously because she thinks
there is no dishonour in getting physically thrashed over a parking issue.
Sagarika and her gang are also the same people who slobber over their darling rape-accused
Tarun Tejpal no matter what. There
are media criminals who still support sexual-harasser RK Pachauri. It’s their culture. In Lutyens, these people follow
the Confucius rule “If rape is
inevitable, lay back and enjoy it”. They seem to forget, even Bollywood for long never used the word
“rape” or “balatkaar” to describe the situation – they always used the term
“Izzat loot liya”.
That
usage of “Izzat” is apparently lost
on these idiots. Women are NOT prepared for a rape incident and sometimes get
murdered. Even rape victims do not straightway commit suicide even if they have
been raped and battered. It is in the context of knowing that a rape would
happen with mortal threat to life that some might prefer a death of “Izzat”
rather than being a brave warrior of sorts like Sagarika. Surely, Padmavati
wasn’t as moronic as Sagarika – she would have known damn well that what was in
store for her and other women was not merely rape or gang-rape. They know how
the Muslim murderer Khilji would consign them to a life of filth, slavery and
humiliation. When you know for sure
you are going to be raped and killed, it is better to die with honour than to
die in dishonour at the hands of murderers. It is the threat of that life
that compelled them to “Jauhar”. And controversies do surround movies often but
for the actress of the movie had the temerity to term all Indians as
“regressed” over this stupid issue:
And
others who protest the movie (even if their apprehensions are imaginary) have
no right to freedom of expression? Morons like Deepika Padukone are available dime a dozen in Bollywood for
various roles and their desperation for money and success doesn’t make them
stop and think about things they do or say. Deepika is just one person but
think about a whole family that is a “Tree
of morons” when it comes to extreme moronery. That’s right you have Javed Akhtar, Shabana Azmi and Farhan
Akhtar who form a glorious threesome of extreme moronery. This is what
Javed had to say about Rajputs because of his ire over the Padmavati issue:
Considering
street-thug is a usual liar I believe he deleted the tweet with the Muslims in
it and re-tweeted after correcting it to British. The British did not invade
Rajput territories as much as Mughals. And I also believe the British were
smart enough to realise the Muslim Nawabs and rulers were most vulnerable and
could be more easily conquered than the Rajputs. Rajasthan, in particular, is
not famous for British lust and invasions. Either way, there is a misleading
angel called “MK Gandhi” who wanted all Indians not to attack the British in
later stages. He wanted the whole of India to be a wimp unlike Netaji Subash.
So, what is the context of the moronery of Javed Akhtar? NONE, ZERO! Like him,
his moronic wife Shabana too has her own hypocritical line of stupidity:
The
Muslim community is usually out on the streets protesting violently against
anything that offends their “fragile
sentiments” – from cartoons on Mohammad to any movie or satire that rattles
them. They murdered the publisher of “Rangeela Rasool” about Mohammad. And
these two (Javed and Shabana) believe these sentiments should be sacred but
Hindu sentiments can be freely offended as FoE. Not to mention, these two
people belong to a Cult that still stones women to death and awards them lashes
for the silliest of reasons. Had history been different and had Padmavati been
raped, idiots like Javed and Shabana would have demand she produce five
witnesses or be punished again – such is the cheapness of their hypocrisy. There is “honour” even among thieves but
there is never any honour among hypocrites. Then other Commie pigs then go
into action to throw in their handful of muck on history claiming Padmavati
never existed:
Is
that the issue with Padmavati? Whether she existed or not? NO! It’s a matter of BELIEF. It’s the
belief of Hindus in general and Rajputs in particular that she existed and
represents the “honour” when facing Islamic murderers and rapists. Did Jesus exist? Where was he from the
age of 1 or 2 till he turned 32? Did
some angel really whisper to Mohammad in a cave? And why? God is so
powerful, why does he have to send someone to whisper in someone’s ear? And if
Padmavati didn’t exist why is a movie being made about her? The folks at
TheHindu and other Commie pigs will believe the virgin birth and stories about
Adam and Eve and even Santy Panty but will constantly question Hindu icons.
You
ask these people about verses in Quran that are violent they will tell you that
the context was different when it was written. But does “Jauhar” have any
context today? Is it being practiced because there are murderous rapists
invading parts of India (except for the terrorists killing innocents and
Jawans)? No, there is no context for
“Jauhar” in this age but these Commies will make it sound as if Hindu women
practice it as routinely as the Lutyens scum indulge in orgies. Such times
of controversy also show up some Bollywood idiots like Ashoke Pandit for who and what such scumbags really are. This guy
held a full presser with a whole team to defend “Padmavati” as FoE and that
Bollywood is under attack and to the extent he calls it “terrorism”:
Ashoke
was offended that the movie “Haider”
batted for terrorists while he thinks KPs are victims and that our Army was
shown in bad light in the movie. How is that not FoE for that film-maker? His
KPs should be respected for their sentiments but Rajputs don’t have any right
to protest and are indulging in “terrorism”. This Pandit hardly makes any
movies. I am not aware of any work he has done in the last seven years. All he
does is shout and blabber nonsense on TV on various issues. But like the
typical Rajdeeps and Sagarikas of media, he too is another who knows nothing
about honour and continues to live a life of shame as a refugee without honour.
KPs have completely forgotten what they should be fighting for because of
idiots like Ashoke Pandit.
There
are politicians who utter nonsense every now and then. There are the likes of
Lalu who eternally vomit crap. And then there is one called Mamata who speaks like she is
permanently possessed by the devil and not one nice word ever comes out of her
mouth. Mamata routinely jails cartoonists and young people making silly posts
on Facebook and now she pretends to be a champion of FoE. She’s the one who
restricts Durga puja, Hindu processions and even blocks access to public
platform for leaders of the BJP and the RSS. And this rotten woman claims to
bat for FoE over Padmavati? The answer is simple – Commies will bat for anything that is “Anti Hindu” and defend
atrocities of the Chrislamists. During the CPM rule in Bengal all the
barbaric crimes of Muslim invaders were white-washed into smaller acts of
violence. Bollywood, funded largely by Islamic money, is just another
anti-Hindu mafia as has been shown over and over again.
In
1994 a song from the movie “Khuddar” which went “Sexy sexy sexy mujhe log bole”
had to be changed to “Baby baby mujhe log bole” because of
objections. Sushma Swaraj protested in parliament over Hindu Gods and icons
being abused in Bollywood songs with reference to a song involving Radha. There is an organised “operation” to
glorify Mughal murderers and show Hinduism as a regressive culture. This is
done by books, movies, social commentary, bogus litter-fests and political
campaigns. The ones ranting about honour of Hindu women or a particular
community are the ones most indulgent of illicit practices in the fields where
the dogs of society howl:
Like
I stated earlier, even in movies the term most used for instances of rape is “Izzat” and anyone who has seen
Bollywood movies long enough will know that. To now debate whether “Jauhar” by
Padmavati and hundreds of other women with her is a deceptive and failed
attempt by the same dogs of “Society” that wish to tarnish Hindu history and
icons. The word “honour” is indelibly
linked to life and existence. The wisest of men have known and experienced
it:
Ignominy
is worse than death as some say. A life without honour is no life at all unless
a person is a willing pimp for evil as many in Lutyens, Bollywood and media
are. MP has banned “Padmavati” and Punjab has followed. It should be a stern
message to Bollymorons and Anti-Hindu agencies that Hindus are not willing to
tolerate their nonsense anymore.
