The Ugly Face Of Jihadi Sickularists

Sometimes the awakening is rude. Sometimes it’s quite violent. That’s the hard truth for hypocrites and liars who have defended wrong principles all their life.  In all the past years our Sickularists have defended Islamic terrorists, Muslim agitators and rioters with a gallery of reasons. You had the “root cause” theory for terrorism. Then you had the “victimhood” theory for rioters. Even when it came to freedom of speech or expression they defended the offences by the Muslims and defended their right not to be offended. In India, their “Sickularism” meant one should never offend Muslims or their religious beliefs or icons while they can liberally offend everyone else. Among the greatest battles over free speech was that between MF Hussain and others. Here’s the classic Sickularist’s argument from none other than the “Happy-tongue hypocrite” Shashi Tharoor and I quote from the post:

“It’s the third issue that is striking. The discussion moves to the M.F. Hussain paintings. Here’s where our happy-tongue minister reveals his true self. He argues strongly that it was Hussain’s freedom of expression for which he should not have faced a backlash. Well, obviously Hussain was so blissfully ignorant that his controversial paintings would cause friction or offend a whole community. It needed Mr.Happy-tongue to defend him. But that newspaper editor and the Danish cartoonist shouldn’t have exercised their free expression rights as they would have been aware of the consequences. And that’s not all. Tharoor goes on to state that Hussain paints these Hindu Gods in various forms. That Hussain had once painted Indira Gandhi as Durga Ma ! Tharoor equates painting Indira Gandhi as Durga Ma to nude paintings of Hindu Gods. Even a moron can see that the Indira Gandhi painting would be seen as a compliment rather than an offence. This is how he misleads international audiences with his happy-tongue glib talk”.

So you see, when Hussain paints nude pics of Hindu Gods he is using his freedom of expression which we should admire but when others use their freedom of expression they should be aware of the “consequences” and desist. Frankly, I don’t give a damn what Hussain paints or what cartoonists draw and they can paint, write or draw whatever they want. But it’s the hypocrisy of the Sickularists that has now been severely shattered by none other than the Islamists themselves. The ISIS warriors came along and our Sickularists are finding it hard to defend or explain their actions. It has put them in a hole that they dug for themselves because the ISIS carries out all its actions in the name of Islam. So our poor Sickularists aren’t able to say “that’s not Islam or they are not Muslims”. What to do! So some exemplary morons in our country started on a new venture. They started an effort to somehow relate ISIS to Hindu practices, entities or icons. They had to; otherwise the survival of their hypocrite-life was seriously threatened. First off, let’s look at an Intellectual Moron (IM) who is now a frequent panellist on NDTV. And that should tell you everything, doesn’t it? An IM-panellist on NDTV has to qualify as a scumbag hypocrite. So what’s he say? Here’s trash-can discourse specialist Sudheendra Kulkarni:

The IMs like Kulkarni are so dumb that they have become incapable of seeing who is really a victim of a crime. Kulkarni is so idiotic that he brands the beheading of James Foley, an American journalist, as “hate crime”. Such IMs don’t care to think much about events as they happen. Foley wasn’t executed because he was white or American or Christian. They may hate them but in Foley’s case the crime was a political act to send a political message to those who want to stop the ISIS from spreading their terror further. It doesn’t take Einstein to figure that. And then the IM goes on to insult the death of Foley by grandly stating that the crime was against Islam. Oops! The crime wasn’t against Foley, his family or his country but the victim here is the religion of the perpetrator. You have to wonder how LK Advani, BJP and then our media nurture such brainless idiots. Of course, Kulkarni is an IIT-graduate.

What can you say about Kavita Krishnan? First, you have to wonder how this brainless bimbo got planted in the media. The answer to that is not very hard. In accordance with the Commie policies of the Congress and its clones they created a practice through which they would “plant” panellists in the media. People like Krishnan and Kulkarni were born from that practice. Need more such examples? You have people like Tehseen Poonawalla who was the secret ace up the Congress sleeve. Tehseen represents everything intelligent about the Congress. Anyway, so this Kavita Krishnan was too dumbfounded to find any answers to the ISIS actions and brutality. So she equates ISIS to RSS. You can picture it clearly. Those RSS guys running around with knives, swords and guns killing Muslims, Christians, Jews, Parsis, Sikhs, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Buddhists, Animists, Scientologists! Any community left? What Hema Malini was to Bollywood movies, Kavita Krishnan is to hate-mongering and hypocrisy. She’s the Sickular “Dream Girl” who dreams all these sequences of RSS doing stuff like ISIS in her dreams. You could say I hold KK in extreme contempt but what happens when this bimbo can’t sell her stupidity to someone who “loves her and hates RSS”? Here’s what:

Stupidity born out of extreme hatred for Hindus and Hindu culture is hard to hide beyond a point. Like I said at the beginning, KK has fallen into the hole she dug herself. The best is yet to come. The permanent Hindu-hater, sponsored by Congress and CPM, who made her career out of lies, hate-mongering, fake affidavits, dining and wining with the money meant for victims of communal violence topped all of the previous morons. Teesta Setalvad should be in jail for her crimes and I estimate she will end up in one sooner or later. What do you know; she could well be the first Padma Shri in prison. And instead of merely her prison number ID, the warden may have to address her as “Padma Shri 420”. Here’s what Teesta came up with:

So Teesta, like the previous hate-mongering hypocrites, simply didn’t know how to defend the actions of ISIS. She comes up with a classic comparison to the Hindu deity Kaali who slays evil demons. The guy in the bottom left pic is, according to Teesta, Lord Krishna in the desert using his “Sudarshan chakra”. Naturally, the question many people were asking her is why she couldn’t draw a comparison with the Prophet himself? You see, that’s the problem. That it is okay to offend Hindus and their religion (even without knowing what the deities symbolise) and equate them to the ISIS terrorists when the mass crimes are by Islamists themselves. The best part was Teesta told the world that the image “was still to be worked upon” and was put up in haste:

Well scumbagini, maybe you should have taken some more time and worked it to perfection. Maybe you could have shown Lord Krishna landing in the Middle-east and slaughtering Jews, Yazidis and Non-Muslims. That would have been a thrill for you. No? I am sure there will be many FIRs against her although she deleted the tweet and the pic. That doesn’t matter. What does matter is that all these folks have nurtured a deep-rooted hatred for Hindus and Hindu culture. Our media gives them prominent space to rant against Hindus and their practices. Whether Teesta offends me or not is irrelevant but she did break a law. And it’s this selective demand for punishment that makes people like Rajdeep or Barkha criminal hypocrites.

Teesta apologised and withdrew her pic and message and Rajdeep tweeted that was enough to close the matter. Had the case been the reverse of a Hindu public figure or editor who offended Muslims with an article or statement you can rest assured it would be debated in the media for a week. His or her office would be destroyed by now and s/he would be attacked violently. From Azad Maidan to Saharanpur and Meerut these media and activist hypocrites have been covering up crimes of the Muslims. The ISIS dealt such a severe blow to them that they left them no place to hide. Even the Indonesian president had to come out strongly against the ISIS. He stated that the ISIS is an embarrassment to Muslims. One would think it’s much worse than mere embarrassment. The chant of “religion of peace” was shattered long back but the ISIS made it extremely difficult to defend that position. I think Tarek Fateh, regular writer and observer of Jihadi elements, described it all with a fascinating term:

Although Tarek’s response was to another person in a similar context of Islamic violence his term describes Sudheendra Kulkarni, Kavita Krishnan, Teesta Setalvad and their promoters like Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Arnab Goswami & Co. That “Jihadi Botox” cannot hide their hatred and prejudices any longer. Their ugly faces have been shown up by the ISIS in the most devastating way.