A Native American elder once
described his own inner struggles in this manner: Inside of me there are two
dogs. One of the dogs is mean and evil. The other dog is good. The mean dog
fights the good dog all the time. When asked which dog wins, he reflected for a
moment and replied “The one I feed the
most”.*
There is a reason why a certain breed of
dogs shouldn’t be fed beyond a point. This is the question Narendra Modi seems to have raised in a meeting of the party heads
on December 24. Here’s what The Pioneer
reports: “Why do senior BJP leaders turn up at news
shows on issues involving not so important Congress leaders? And why is that
the BJP spokespersons give a sound ‘bite’ at the drop of the hat? These and
many more such issues plague the mind of BJP’s prime ministerial candidate
Narendra Modi, who unveiled his media strategy before members of the party’s
election campaign committee that met on Tuesday”.
One of the worst attributes of BJP
spokies is to turn up on every debate on TV even when they know it is
nonsensical, scripted and fixed. On December
26 a court in Ahmedabad accepted the SIT report on the accusations filed by
Zakia Jafri against Modi and several
others in the Gujarat 2002 riots. This report was also found to be fair by the
SC which did not find any merit for an intervention earlier in 2011. Following
the Ahmedabad Court’s acceptance of the SIT closure report all that the BJP
needed to do was a presser to state that the 2002 issue, where Modi is
concerned, is closed and that justice for victims and those involved in the
riots and killing should continue due course of law. Instead, like fools the
BJP spokies were all over on TV once again defending against motivated crap.
They don’t learn. After 11 years do
these people still believe the media wants to hear the truth? If they do,
then I have to say this is a sorry bunch of lipstick-hunters. The tweet I’ve
quoted indicates the hatred in the media and no court is acceptable to them. Another bimbo has called the SC
judges “crackpots”. Why bother
arguing with them?
The best course after a victory is to
let the dogs of hatred and calumny fight it among themselves and push back. You
don’t need to feed the evil dog when you’ve already won. After the December 26
acceptance of the SIT report by the court the headlines and comments were many.
Modi not found guilty said some! The
media bimbos who claimed this remain ignorant that this wasn’t even a trial of
Modi but a petition by Zakia to start a case. The comic Times Now reporter from Ahmedabad even called Zakia’s lawyers
“defence lawyers” when she wasn’t an “accused” in anything. He further
commented on whether Zakia will “appeal” the court’s verdict. This is as
legally-bimbo as our MSM folks get where law is concerned. Fortunately, the
biggest legal-bimbo of all was on vacation or it could have gotten worse.
Narendra Modi was neither under trial nor was there ever a case or FIR against
him in the Gujarat 2002 issue. That’s where the other headlines get
interesting. Here’s one from TOI on December 27:
Smart, isn’t it? Keep throwing mud and
dirt at someone for 11 years yourself and then claim his shirt was soiled.
Since Independence the witch-hunt of Modi has been the single biggest ever. I
would also rate it as the biggest media
crime ever. Almost everyone used similar headlines. TV’s ‘Hate-monger in
chief’ Rajdeep Sardesai was no
different. I had to explain to this extreme hate-monger that the mud he hurled
doesn’t amount to taint:
And you know what? This Rajdeep gets
angry and upset even when someone points out to him that he called Dawood a
"patriot" which is actually a fact. The truth is the court found no
case for charging Modi and found the petition by Zakia unacceptable. One cannot
help but sympathise with the lady. She has been led up a political ‘yellow brick road’ to a fake
sense of justice by those who acted on behalf of political powers. Those who
fooled her are today richer by crores while she still seeks justice. Those who
fooled her also subverted true justice in the process by diverting the entire
process and focus to hang one man. NDTV,
one of the chief media-accusers of Modi, holds out highlights from the
Ahmedabad court verdict:
On the evening of December 26, after the
verdict, Commie mouthpiece Brinda Karat was out again with sound-bites still
holding Modi responsible for the ‘genocide’.
Earlier, her party comrade Sitaram Yechury (one of the famous #65Jaichands) had
coined a new convenient term ‘communal
pogrom’. I believe, if anyone now calls the 2002 riots a pogrom or genocide
it should be treated as contempt of court and, more importantly, contempt for
truth. All the politicians and media crooks who have used these terms are
nothing but illiterate, uneducated morons and liars. While, politicians opposed
to Modi are predictable and shameless I consider the media crooks to be more
shameless. Someone created a wall of shame for those who ran the malicious
campaign against Modi for 11 years. A few were forgotten (and maybe some more
are left out) and I added those faces to this “Black Wall of Shame”:
It’s not Modi but many of these faces
that now stand tainted with their lies and fake reports. Some of these faces
may even have serious allegations against them. They say politics is the last
resort of a scoundrel. I believe that needs a change in our times. We fairly
know what to generally expect of politicians but it’s the MSM that has become the last resort for scoundrels. News media
should have stood for facts, truth and logic but has become just another last
resort. A resort where the dogs of
society howl. Since the mid-2000s the SM emerged as strong alternative to
these rogues. If not, you can imagine what destructive campaigns these faces
would have carried forward unchallenged. A tribute to this “Wall of Shame”
would be appropriate:
So goodbye yellow brick road/
Where the dogs of society howl/ You can't plant me in your penthouse… What do
you think you'll do then/ I bet that'll shoot down your plane/ It'll take you a
couple of vodka and tonics/ To set you on your feet again/ Maybe you'll get a
replacement/ There's plenty like me to be found/ Mongrels who ain't got a
penny/ Sniffing for titbits like you on the ground. **
On their part, the BJP spokies foolishly
think the dogs of society were only after Modi. They weren’t! Since 1999 a systematic campaign
has been carried out against the right wing party for the Congress plus Commies
and everyone knows it. It started with NDA being re-elected (after Jayalalitha
knocked them out with 1 vote), then Kargil bashing, “coffingate” and then Kandahar.
The party must decide whether to feed
the good dog or the evil dog. So far the evil one hasn’t managed to win
where Modi is concerned. But there is a lesson to be learned because they are
not going to stop their hunt as we shall see in a future post.
In this entire 11-year episode there is
clearly only one winner; Narendra Modi. He won 4 elections, is seen as a top
performer and his popularity has grown beyond expectations. His detractors now
simply don’t know how to combat the man. Now they suddenly think Arvind
Kejriwal is their saviour. Goodluck! They just don’t have an answer. In all
this time Modi was the one who carried himself with dignity despite the vulgar
campaign against him.
The only man who behaved
sensibly was my tailor; he took my measurement anew every time he saw me, while
all the rest went on with their old measurements and expected them to fit me. ***
That goes for many political parties and
the entire MSM where the dogs of society howl, and all those detractors in
India and abroad. They will continue with the same old measurements. Modi has
moved on to new measurements of performance. He never fed the evil dogs. We are
now into the final phase.
* & *** Quotes from George Bernard Shaw.
** From “Goodbye yellow brick road”
– Elton John/Bernie Taupin.
