Burn Down The Mission

(This is a MaxiPost)

"You don't make up for your sins in the church. You do it in the streets. You do it at home. The rest is bullshit and you know it"

That’s a quote from a Catholic man who once wanted to be a priest. One of the silliest ideas ever ingrained into the heads of many humans by other humans is that God is some kind of traffic cop. You know, he’s standing up there in the sky directing dead people to heaven or hell based on their performance on earth. It gets even better when some believe God has long had a “performance-reward system” through which he gives out rewards and awards. Frances Collins, the former Head of the Human Genome project, doesn’t believe in evolution. They all believe in Adam and Eve and the virgin birth. Interestingly, Collins is now Barack Obama’s head of the NIH and controls vast funds for research. You can imagine what a challenge it must be for him to keep his religious beliefs and his scientific work compatible. He’s an individual but he provides the soundest reason why State should never have anything to do with religion. So on April 12 on the ‘Aap ki adalat’ show, on IndiaTV featuring Narendra Modi, a woman’s question got me thinking.  

The woman asked Modi if “Christians will be safe under Modi’s govt”. It puzzled Modi as much as it puzzled me. I wonder if the question was tutored because it provided the chance for Rajat Sharma, the host, to ask if Muslims would be safe under a Modi govt. We have seen a lot of Hindu-Muslim conflicts but not many conflicts with Christians. There might be exceptions like Kandhamal but I can’t recall too many other incidents. That’s what brings us to this story. While many Muslim leaders have been opposing Modi and also the BJP for long it is the first time that we are seeing a lot of Christian activity being targeted against Modi. Well, there is indeed a very high organised Christian campaign against Modi. It is no secret that Modi has inspired a lot of Hindu denominations to unite with his leadership. I haven’t seen any torture of Christians in any form in Gujarat under Modi, so for that woman to ask that specific question doesn’t seem an accident. The answer is pretty simple really: The conversion factory of missionaries and the political powers behind them.

The Gujarat govt had made conversions illegal around 2003 and the US imposed a ban on Modi for violating religious freedoms in 2005. For long Modi’s opponents and our media have told the world the US revoking Modi’s visa was about the 2002 riots. That too is a load of BS. A bunch of US Congressmen used the anti-Modi activists as a platform to slap the ban on him but the motivation was clearly the ban on conversions in Gujarat. That had hit the missionary factory badly. The Hindu-Muslim conflict often comes out in the open but the Christian conversion factory is like Diabetes. It does its damage slowly and is largely invisible to the world. Pranay Gupte, a columnist in international pages, writes in Huffpost (though I refer to this particular article, my intention is not to single out Gupte. I use his article only as a sample):

I was born into a devoutly Hindu family in India's commercial capital of Mumbai (then known as Bombay). I studied at a Jesuit school. I attended mostly-Jewish universities in the United States: Brandeis and Columbia. And every Friday in the United Arab Emirates, where I've been living and working for the last seven years, I attend a prayer session at the royal mosque in the capital city of Abu Dhabi with Emirati royalty and everyday workers alike. So what does that make me? A man of many faiths? Yes. A man willing to enter any house of worship for the spiritual peace it induces? Yes. A secular man? Yes.

It makes me, most of all, a man who's proud of having been produced by a 5,000-year-old culture where a staggering number of diverse societies have coexisted over the millennia. I am a man shaped by my parents' sensibility that you can subscribe to many faiths or none at all, but that there needs to be a core to one's self. That core is the belief that no religion is superior to another, that the edicts and teachings of all faiths underscore the values of extending a helping hand to the dispossessed, embracing others with love, and spreading (not proselytizing) the message that charity, good will and good cheer help transform people and their societies into better entities… The polls suggest that, most likely, that government will be led by a man named Narendra Modi, currently the chief minister (the equivalent of chief executive) of the western state of Gujarat. He's a self-styled Hindu fundamentalist, which, in the Indian context, means that his core belief is predicated on the moral and existential superiority of Hinduism.

The above is the school-boyish writing of a man who neither understands religion nor Hinduism. This is the typical westernised Indian columnist who doesn’t know where his marbles are located. He is LYING in his spite for Modi. Hinduism is the only religion whose followers have stated over and over again that one can reach God through multiple paths and therefore through multiple religions. He also doesn’t know that Modi’s govt has demolished many Hindu temples built illegally on public land. He claims he studied in a Jesuit school, Jewish universities and attends Namaz in Abu Dhabi and he claims that makes him a man of multiple faiths. This is the idiotic nonsense most of the Macaulay types peddle. Let me tell you, I as a Hindu in India, go to a temple maybe once in five years for some specific reason. Many Hindus here attend Jesuit schools and universities. They also pray at Ajmer Sharif and Fatehpur Sikri. When these Hindus visit Taj Mahal they offer a silent prayer to Mumtaz Begum. They do so at Humayun’s tomb and Akbar’s tomb as well. So what exactly is Gupte trying to tell us? That Modi will change all that? That is fear-mongering and nothing else and Gupte is paid to do that.

Secondly, although Gupte claims he’s a man of multiple faiths, the preachers of Islam and Christianity do not agree on all religions being equal. Even Gods are jealous Gods it seems. I’m not kidding; it says in the Bible that God is a jealous guy. And because that got written, the middle-men, who often to talk to God on iPhone, constantly interpret it as something secretly noble about their God. You know, God could be angry or kind; He has his moods; that much even I can understand. But why in the world would an all-powerful God be jealous? Preachers of both these religions consistently tell the world their religion is superior to all others. A majority of conflicts and violent events are because of this. In the middle of what I quoted above Gupte says “spreading the message not proselytizing”. This is the problem. Men like Gupte do not acknowledge that Christian conversion factories go beyond preaching to their followers. They induce and seduce the poor with some crumbs. They catch helpless children at a young age to sell religion (read Children as leverage). In the South they even converted little Ganpati. Gupte is not alone; a majority of these sick seculars live in denial of this crime. This is why conversions were banned in Gujarat and it angered a lot of the conversion factory owners. The ban on Modi happened in 2005 when George Bush was the president of US. Bush famously said “God wants everybody to free… and that’s part of my foreign policy” (See NaMo and the truth above US visa). So God even dictates foreign policy and you’d have thought secularism had nothing to do with religion. Didn’t you?

Meet Matt Jones. He’s a Special Agent working for Jesus in an international operation. This is what Jones tweeted on April 4:

Before the tweet above Jones grandly tweeted that the main roads in Dharwad (Karnataka) were blocked because of a huge meeting arranged for local folks with Jesus. He later deleted that tweet so I don’t have it. He then posted this one to show how Jesus saves those rural folks through connectivity. Surely, are we to believe Matt Jones, sitting somewhere in the US or elsewhere, has a particular fondness for Dharwadis? There’s another project that has mapped out spots in India that are in desperate need of connectivity. That’s the Joshua Project which has marked out spots in India in “red” where people need to be “harvested” and connected to Jesus:

Are all of these just a figment of my imagination? Try asking who funds Kejriwal & Co. and why? Why would Ford Foundation be interested in funding political activity in India? There are stories that mass conversions were undertaken in Andhra after YSR Reddy became the CM. I personally know of a friend whose brother is a prominent social activist in AP who was offered 1 crore by YSR’s gang to convert to Christianity. The foreign bimbos writing in newspapers and magazines aren’t the only ones. The following is a recent article from a Hyderabad newspaper:

This fear-mongering and hate-mongering against Modi by Christian organisations in India and from abroad is a well-coordinated action. When have Christians been under attack in India? If anything, the conversion factories have been slowly destroying the demographics of this country through money and other inducements. Why should we tolerate it? Day after day after day we have been seeing “hate-Modi” articles and “fear-mongering” from The Economist, The Guardian, New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other sundry Christian sites. Sonia Gandhi begs Muslim votes through Bukhari but here’s one from Bangalore:

So what’s with all this Christian fear-mongering and appealing in India? And they are the ones who are suffering in India? Recently the US Minority Commission suddenly convened a panel for another round of Modi bashing and Christian fear-mongering. The panel was soundly criticised by a Hindu representative, Tulsi Gabbard, for their attempt to interfere in Indian elections. The evil that this US Panel and many other evangelical US organisations bring to India cannot be overlooked anymore. In the garb of helping the poor there is a lot of covert political activity going on. The so-called “Sickular” writers of Indian origin are no more than a bunch of ignorant morons. Or they are wilfully blind! This unholy conversion factory must be ended. People are free to practice and preach religion to their followers. The proselytizing must end. And on the lines of the Gujarat ban on conversions I would definitely want a national ban on this evil activity. This is what bothers the hate-mongers who are peddling articles against Modi. It is not criticism, it is about protect their jealous God and their covert agenda to break and destroy India.    

Even in the old ages the bosses of the Christian faith lived in luxury in their missions. They still do while the ordinary folks suffered. Does anyone really think Jesus would live in the palace at the Vatican? And the call to burn down the mission also comes from the Christian. I have made a small montage with such a song with the hate articles. Watch (4.55 mins).

The Christian agenda is then peddled by hate-mongers in our own MSM who tom-tom each article as a tool for spurious debates. The recent book by Sanjaya Baru on the handling of important files by Sonia Gandhi instead of the PM is a serious issue which the media is pussy-footing under the garb of “political timing”. Baru himself does not answer an important question. SoniaG’s friends are known to have been involved in the Bofors scam. She and her family go abroad and return without anyone knowing or no records of their trips in the public domain. Who is to say there aren’t many foreign forces behind the way she handles those important files? Why does she have any access to those files anyway? She has no authority and the PM is guilty of breach of the Official Secrets Act.

I ask to burn down the mission of many of these charlatans proselytizing but also their agents in our media. It is not in any way to physically burn any mission but to legally end the conversion factory. It is also important to burn down the mission of spurious funding of NGOs in India who are primarily into anti-India activities. This cannot be delayed any longer and I am positive Modi will undertake that task if he becomes PM. That is what scares these hate-mongers. Their political mission is under threat.

# Opening quote in the post of Martin Scorsese; movie “Mean Streets”.

# “Burn down the mission” – Song in the video by Elton John/Bernie Taupin.

At Your Feet, Obamaji

Thus spake Rahul Gandhi while addressing a two-day media conclave of his party members on July 22: "Keep the level of debate dignified; don't let the language or the attack be below the belt. We are the party of Mahatma Gandhi". I safely assume the warning was only for language and not for actions. Even as he was speaking some of his Youth Congress goons forced a restaurant in Mumbai to temporarily shut down. Reason being a hilariously sarcastic footnote the restaurant owner had printed in his bills to protest the luxury tax on AC restaurants. It read:  “As per UPA government, eating money (2G, Coal, CWG scam) is a necessity and eating food in an AC restaurant is a luxury”. Sarcasm like this is bound to offend and there are thousands of other cartoons on the Congress-UPA scams. There are also reports that clearly indicate the order to shut down the restaurant came directly from Delhi. I guess it’s exactly what the Mahatma would have done. Right? This is how our media, like a box of parrots reproduces what the Gandhi man says without questioning.

MKGandhi neither wanted Congress to exist nor would he ever be a supporter or sympathiser of the present Congress. The current Congress also has no connection to the INC but they simply usurped that name without anyone objecting. This is Congress (I) as it has been since the days of Indira Gandhi. So a truthful statement by RahulG would have been “We are the party of Indira Gandhi”. That would be justified because this Congress respects democracy as much as IndiraG did. In comparison to another deed by some of his party colleagues RahulG’s Youth Congress act of shutting down a restaurant would seem a smaller offence which is in line with the party’s usual conduct. The other act borders on treason and anti-national activities. 65 MPs of different parties had written a letter to US President Barack Obama in November and December 2012 to maintain their policy of not allowing Narendra Modi a visa to enter the US.

This appeal to Obama was placed in the public domain after a public appeal by Rajnath Singh to restore Modi’s visa during his trip to the US. Rajnath’s public appeal was a silly thing to do and he should have just talked to US officials and lawmakers if he wanted to press for Modi’s case. The letter and the appeal was an initiative of an independent RS member named Mohammad Adeeb and signatories include Abhishek Singhvi, Asaduddin Owaisi, Sitaram Yechury, MP Achutan and quite a few members of RahulG’s party. The most idiotic explanation offered on TimesNow (On July 23) by Adeeb and another guy called Ali Anwar Ansari (on the right corner of the image) was that they wrote this appeal to Obama as “Journalists”. That should tell you how brainy these people are. Regardless of whether one is a journalist or a street dancer, the letter to the American president to act against an Indian citizen, especially a constitutional head like CM, is an outright anti-national act. The letter shows it wasn’t written as some private citizen even. A copy of it being circulated on the net shows official stationery of an MP with the national emblem on it. Maybe idiotic journalists get to use such stationery too.

As usual TimesNow was holding a nonsensical debate on an issue that deserved nothing but condemnation and seeking of legal action against the erring MPs. Now, why do these MPs need to be legally prosecuted? There are some very compelling reasons. Though some Congress members have shown public delight in the US revoking Modi’s visa the official GOI stand is that it has protested the US move. The Indian foreign Secretary is also on record discussing the issue with Robert Blake then US Ambassador and objecting to the visa revocation. Therefore, the action by these MPs amounts to interfering with the official foreign affairs business of the GOI and going against the official national position on the issue. If legal action seems excessive then certain a resolution in the parliament condemning this act must be moved so that such acts are not repeated. The list of signatories being circulated reads as under:

Sitaram Yechury claimed he had signed no such document although his name and signature prominently appears on it. As for the real reasons for the US revoking Modi’s visa, I have already explained it in a previous post. This has precious little do with the riots and there have been hundreds of communal riots since 2002. The MPs who did sign the petition have actually acted against India’s national interests and it should worry everyone that we have such people in the parliament. Political differences and political fights need to be fought in the Indian political arena. Going to another country to beg for action as these MPs have done is a dangerous precedent. Tomorrow some MPs might even write to the American President or the British PM to intervene and take over an Indian state because of failure of law and order. What will the Congress do then? What will the parrots in our media do then?

No less than the Supreme Court rapped Teesta Setalvad for attempting to take the Gujarat riots issue to the UN in an attempt of misadventure. Independence and freedom never course in the veins of slaves. So what next? We remember one Congress member releasing an ad with the headline “At your feet, Madamji”. These 65 MPs just reaffirmed their slavery by indirectly stating “At your feet, Obamaji”

NaMo & The Truth About US Visa

When the Green Revolution was conceived in the 1960s India started major imports of fertilisers. Among the types of fertilisers was Muriate of Potash (MOP) of which India has no production at all even today. Most shipments came from Germany, which is among the top MOP producers; some even came as free gifts and aid shipments. While the GOI liberally gave out fertilisers they didn’t educate farmers all that much on the usage and dosage. As a consequence even soil which was fairly rich in Potash was fed with it. Naturally, the soil got used to it and so it needed the fertiliser even more regularly. Force of habit! As the consumption grew the suppliers substantially increased the prices over the years. The import of MOP has gone up from almost zero in 1960 to 4 million tons in 2011-12. The price of MOP in 1980-81 was 1300 per ton (subsidised) for farmers. In 2011-12 it was 17000 (subsidised). Without subsidy the price is 32000 per ton. Potash also has industrial uses. It came as a friend, as a free gift and now has a heavy price as an addiction for the soil.

Excessive fertilisers that came as friends turned our soil into addicts. There are other friends who came to India. Some came as refugees, some came as visitors, and some came as traders with gifts and goodwill. Some of the visitors realised that apart from tea and other products there is a bigger potential market in India. This was the market for sowing a foreign religion among Tribals, Dalits and other backward castes and people who were struggling at the bottom-rung of society. Some of the investors of religion came in violently, like the Islamists. Some came in cleverly as traders and well-wishers and also explored and exploited the vast market for Christianity.  After centuries of work they are now ready for a “harvest” as VK Shashikumar puts it. The Joshua Project, World Vision and many other assorted NGOs funded by a world-wide network and there are some also funded by Hawala channels. The ultimate objective of the funders in the US, Europe and other places is to break India into pieces. This is work-in-progress and one man threatens this work: Narendra Modi.

In March 2005 when Modi was invited to address a gathering of an Indian association some Congressmen in the US moved the house and revoked his Visa. Although he was a CM Modi had not applied for any Visa under the Diplomatic category but the US revoked his regular visitor visa. That anti-Modi clan of NGOs like Teesta, Shabnam, Mander, the media reports (NDTV and CNN-IBN and Arnab too, then all under NDTV), claimed that they had successfully lobbied against Modi’s visit due to the Gujarat 2002 ‘pogrom’, ‘genocide’ or whatever fanciful terms came to their heads. One charlatan, Angana Chatterjee, who is a known commie islamo-fascist even claimed credit for the visa revocation. In her claim she also repeats the same bogus stories of Arundhati Roy and Teesta that stand discredited now. Of course, they all claimed “visa was denied” as if Modi had applied for visa. Now who is Angana? Let me save words and typing effort and let you read a two-part dossier on this queenie at Sandeepweb.

Does the US govt care about some Hindus and Muslims dying in a riot in Gujarat? Only an idiot of the first water will believe such nonsense. Does the US care about charlatans like Teesta or Angana? Make a wild guess! America doesn’t give a crap about anybody but itself. Neither America nor Europe did anything about the Armenian genocide (Upper estimate of 1.8 million killed). If that seems a century ago, they did nothing about the Rwandan genocide (Upper estimate of 1 million killed or 20% of the population) either. The Americans didn’t give a damn about 4000 Sikhs being killed in the 1984 pogrom by the Congress party (Upper estimate of 10000+ Sikhs killed across India). So what makes these “useful idiots” in NGOs and our media think that the US revoked Modi’s visa for the riots? Nothing, except their fancy world of queens and fairies which earns them huge doles for being absolute scoundrels and anti-nationals. The Sonia/MMS govt made a mild protest with the US but the Congress members were visibly delighted.

There are many reports that Franklin Roosevelt wanted to join the war against Germany and therefore he and other high officials did not act despite advance knowledge of the Pearl Harbour attack. This is because the American Constitution allows joining a war only if the US is attacked or there is clear danger of attack. And they care about Hindus or Muslims in Gujarat? Laughable! So all the BS that Modi’s visa was revoked because of the Gujarat riots is as much BS as all the charlatans and TV morons like Rajdeep, Barkha, Arnab and others have systematically peddled. Make no mistake; the US govt doesn’t give a damn about people dying anywhere (as I have shown), unless it’s a US citizen.

Remember the guy who was in office when this entire ‘Modi-visa’ thing happened? Yes, it’s that guy who drilled a lot of holes in Texas that never brought out any oil. The same guy who allowed 50+ friends and relatives of Osama Bin Laden fly out of US within days after 9/11. George W Bush, a devout Christian, and his team concocted a lot of evidence to bomb Iraq in March 2003. His foreign policy principles after 9/11 came to be known as the “Bush Doctrine” in the media. Only, not many know that this doctrine itself had a “divine” inspiration. So take a look at this video (17 secs):

“I believe God wants everybody to be free… and that’s part of my foreign policy”. There you go; the US President had claimed that God’s will was part of his foreign policy. And the bimbo in the video says “I don’t know much about politics but I’ll vote for President Bush because of his faith”.  So although the anti-Modi gangs made a lot of noise in the US, the Gujarat riots weren’t the reason for the revocation of his visa. Our media LIED to you as they always lied on many issues concerning Modi and Gujarat and which continue even now.

So what was the real reason for the visa revocation? Here’s what a Wiki entry says:

In 2005 Modi was denied a diplomatic visa to the United States. In addition, the B-1/B-2 visa that had previously been granted to him was also revoked, under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act which makes any foreign government official who was responsible or "directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom" ineligible for the visa.

Wiki is a good source for information but not always reliable. Let’s check this out from another source too. This is an article by a self-confessed stringent critic of Modi writing in Rediff (I recommend reading the full article):

The Christian fundamentalist organisations in the US played an important role in ensuring the re-election of President Bush and he owes them a political debt. They have made it appear that their action in demanding that Modi be barred from entry into the US was motivated by their outrage at the plight of Muslims in Gujarat. The real reason is their anger at his (Modi’s) alleged action to prevent foreign Christian missionaries from indulging in proselytization…  Those who supported the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. Those who strongly opposed any action or even an inquiry against Rumsfeld and his senior officers for the gross violation of human rights of Iraqis. Those who justified or rationalised the inhuman treatment of Muslims by the US in the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. Those who are supporting the call for a regime change in Iran. These are the elements which are closest to the US administration, and their intervention against Modi at the urging of the so-called secularists, led to the humiliation of an Indian by the US at the instance of other Indians. They have not so far been able to succeed in their attempts to drive him out of power in Gujarat. So they sought America's intervention.

The charlatans in the anti-Modi NGO factories and the anti-Modi media celebs fooled Muslims by making them believe America was acting on their behalf. Like Congress and other Sickular politicians, these NGOs and media-celebs have milked the Muslim emotions and tears to enrich themselves beyond the wildest imagination.

Truth is that the Christian organisations and funders have a grand design of turning much of India into a Christian stronghold. The Gujarat govt passed a law banning religious conversions in 2003 which made it mandatory for a change of religion to be registered with a District Collector, failing which there were severe fines and penalties. This is the true and only reason for the “God-inspired” foreign policy decision of the George Bush administration against Modi. In a recent interaction a much-respected journalist confirmed to me that a former top secretary level diplomat of the US had mentioned the simmering plans to Break India. The Christian conversion-factories operate in many tribal areas and backward areas in India as charity organisations with the sole aim of converting the poor people with inducements. This has been the reason for frequent religious conflict in states like Orissa, Gujarat, Karnataka and some more. Many of these charities are supported by prominent media celebs. (You may also want to read “Children as leverage” on how kids and orphans are primary targets for these charities).

There is a price to pay for falling for free fertilisers. There is a price to pay for ignoring the threats of anti-nationals within India. I have put up a free ad for the book “Breaking India” which details the Missionary designs in great depth. It’s not just the Congress, other Sickular parties, assorted criminal NGOs and media celebs but a whole religious agenda from foreign countries that are trying hard to dismantle Modi. The US Visa is just one episode for Modi as an individual but greater damage awaits India if people remain unaware.

Note: Video clip from Bill Maher’s ‘Religulous’