Church Crimes - 1: How NDTV Concocts Anti-Hindu Slander

Over the phone:

NR: You said the church attack and rape was implanted.

MF: Yes, it seems like that.

NR: Who do you think could be behind the attack?

MF: I don’t know but it looks like an organised attack.

NR: Do you think some Hindu fringe group could be?

MF: It is possible but I cannot say for sure.

NR: If it’s a Hindu group, what do you think is the motive?

MF: I don’t know but it seems like a pattern.

NR: Could it have anything to do with GharWapsi?

MF: Yes, I think this has to do with GharWapsi.

NR: Can we do an interview on this? With your suspicions?

MF: Sure.

NR: And you will confirm your suspicions about GharWapsi?

MF: Yes, I think so…

NR is the NDTV reporter and MF is Maria Fernandes, the vice-head of the Bengal Minorities Commission. The conversation above, after the Nadia church attack and alleged rape of a 72-year old nun, is hypothetical. But make no mistake about its realistic nature. This is how news channels lead soundbite idiots to feed into their agenda. Where MF had no clue on who was behind the attacks to how she came to blame Hindus and GharWapsi has to go through a process. This is a process that news channels with an agenda feed on to gently and sometimes aggressively persuade the sitting duck or the willing “Bakra” to say exactly what they want her to say. MF is a Bakra who willingly participated in NDTV’s anti-Hindu, anti-Modi agenda. The evidence is astounding.

On March 17, MF spoke to ANI. That is when she went to Ranaghat after the incident. If you read the ANI report, she says the attack seems “implanted” and does not name any group and is not clear about the motive. She even estimates someone was specifically sent from somewhere to carry out the attack. The NDTV reporter hears that soundbite from ANI and quickly contacts MF and what follows is the conversation I estimated. Voila! MF tells the NDTV reporter it is Hindu fringe groups and GharWapsi being the motive. At NDTV they probably cheered loudly on “mission accomplished”. Monideepa Banerjee of NDTV Kolkata quickly files a report on the GharWapsi motive. MF is not an innocent Bakra here. NDTV just pushed her to say what she already wanted to say but nobody else asked her those compelling questions. NDTV is the murderer but MF is a willing accomplice. And as soon as the mission to tar Hindus and ModiSarkar was accomplished they put out a tweet followed by an evening show with MF on their channel:

Having accomplished that, Barkha Dutt wanted to drive the nail further. She wants to slander ModiSarkar even more – so she goes shopping. Someone wrote to me that the usual egg like Xavier’s Father of Mumbai would have been the regular choice but he had already tarred himself with his stupid anti-Modi email to students before LS2014 elections. So BD had to shop a bit more. She got lucky! She found an extreme hate-mongering scumbagini called Sr. Ananda Amritmahal of Sophia College, Mumbai and had already read what AA had written in an article. The article screams Christians and Women under attack and references to the Nazi trial (This is the impression they want to build about ModiSarkar like I wrote in Anti-Modi Christian Agenda). What a find for Barkha, eh? On March 25, a week after the nun-rape incident broke, Barkha was still trying to hang Hindus and ModiSarkar over their fake reports. She calls this Ananda for a debate and has Mohandas Pai on the panel too.

How a woman with so much hatred in her heart and so much filth in her head can even become a nun and a college principal does amaze me. This hatred and filth that passes by the name of Sr. Ananda started equating ModiSarkar with the Nazi regime of Germany. Barkha defended her Nazi nonsense by calling it a “metaphor”. Here is where we take a little detour because most people in the world have been brainwashed with the Christian nonsense that Adolf Hitler wasn’t a Christian. That this mass-murderer of Jews had nothing to do with Christian religion or ideology. This is one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated on Indians and people across the world.

Hitler was very much a Christian (a Catholic). Pope Pius XII even came to be known as Hitler’s Pope. The Jews were slaughtered because Hitler believed it was his duty as Christian and not the Nazi reference that media criminals keep throwing. Sr. Ananda probably belongs to the same Catholic community that murdered millions of Jews. If anyone is Nazi here it is she and her denomination of Churches. In short, it was Christian mass murder of Jews. But clever propaganda by the West and Christians in India, our Commie historians and our Sickular media criminals disconnected Christianity from Hitler. Watch this video (5.50 mins – Pause the video at some points to read the text and captions in full):

The Church not only didn’t oppose Hitler but in many cases supported him. Now, our Sickular media would have you believe that Britain, US and others were against Hitler because of the holocaust. That is sheer nonsense. All these Christian bigots just watched Jews being slaughtered. (They have also watched the Armenian genocide and the Rwandan genocide). Britain’s PM Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich treaty with Hitler to buy peace. This allowed Hitler to take over some parts of Czechoslovakia. He didn’t stop there; he took the whole of Czechoslovakia. Europe and US watched as Hitler further took over other small countries in Europe like Austria, Belgium and finally Poland too. He ran over France as well. He then bombed Britain to hell and declared war on the US. It is not to save Jews but to save their own countries that the allies got together and fought Hitler. None of them really cared that millions of Jews were slaughtered. Sometimes they argue about the number of Jews killed – they say it wasn’t 6 million. How much would please you? Would you be happy with 300,000? The mass-murder of Jews was and will remain the biggest crime of Christians. It was Christian murder and not merely by some Nazi party.

Now then, the frequent morons like Sr. Ananda and many other political idiots who like to equate ModiSarkar or RSS or any Hindu outfit with the Nazis are essentially liars who cover up Christian crimes. Never in the history of Hindus has any mass-murder of the level of the Christian slaughter Jews ever happened or will ever happen. Yet, for stray attacks on churches they want to tag Hindus and ModiSarkar as Nazis. The GOI must not allow this Nazi nonsense to pass and must evolve a way to prosecute the slanderers. NDTV’s slanderer and liar-in-chief even had the gall to deny she condoned the Nazi nonsense on her show:

The lying scumbagini she is, Barkha raised no questions but passed off the Nazi nonsense of Sr. Ananda as “metaphor” despite protests from Mohandas Pai. These are not accidents. How these three scumbaginis in alliance with NDTV peddled lies about the Nadia nun-rape to slander ModiSarkar is a very well-coordinated act. Now that it has turned out that all the rapists in that incident happen to be Bangla Muslims these three criminal slanderers have gone into hiding. Remember these ugly faces of Christian propaganda against Hindus:

That’s Maria Fernandes, NDTV’s Liar in chief and Sister Nazi herself. MF is such a fool that she was lured into citing GharWapsi as the reason for vandalism and rape by NDTV. She is unfit to be the head of anything let alone vice-head of a minority commission. Now that the truth is out she is hiding in her hate-filled hole. None of these criminals will apologise or retract their lies – they will live dishonourably and shamelessly.  I am not even interested in making a comparison of how many temples, mosques or gurudwaras were attacked in similar fashion during the same period. Those attacks were not turned into “communal” incidents by anyone as SisterNazi and Barkha did with the Church incidents. They were mere acts of vandalism by criminals. It is only these Christian propagandists who have termed it a war on Christians by elements supporting ModiSarkar and that is nothing but slander. Like I said in my previous post the Christians didn’t start this slander recently. They started it from the day BJP won the LS elections – May 16, 2014. The entire continue saga of the Christian and media mafia combine is captured fairly in this image:

Following the concoction of lies by NDTV and a few more media houses the anti-Modi Christian agenda promoters went into action. Subtle racist pigs from NYT, BBC, Reuters all ran the same chant – Christians under siege. They now have no place to hide with all their lies, having been exposed in the Bengal rape case and the other incidents. They have already put into action the second phase of their sinister plan. What is that and where is it all going? We shall see in the next few installments.

To be continued…

The Hatemonger's Sermon

Here are some outstanding epithets for one’s epitaph on a memorial or a tombstone or excellent self-description if one is considering enhancing his resume for a higher office. The choices: Snake, Scorpion, Filthy man, Raavan, Gandi Nali ka kida (Guttersnipe), Lahu purush, Paani purush, Asatya ka Saudagar, Ghanchi (mocking reference to an OBC person), Monkey, Victim of Rabies, Mouse, Dawood, Failed husband, Badtamiz, Nalayak, Who is his father, mother? Hitler, Pol Pot, A Virus, Bhasmasur, Pagal Kutta (Mad dog), Yamraj, Maut Ka Saudagar, Hero of hatred, Mass murderer, Frog in the well, Gangu Teli…

Want some more? There’s still some time to go before the 2014 general elections and that time period might add to the list above. We are lucky! We are more civil now than Benjamin Disraeli (19th century British PM) who, when asked to differentiate a misfortune and calamity, referred to his rival and explained “If Mr. Gladstone were to fall into the Thames, it would be a misfortune. But if someone dragged him out, it would be a calamity”.

I could say the same about a scumbag like Rajdeep Sardesai but there’s one difference. If Rajdeep were to fall into the already-polluted Yamuna that wouldn’t be a misfortune but if someone dragged him out, that would be a calamity. Such is the hatemonger’s hypocrisy that the only thing that stands out it in any of his dialogues is utter contempt for truth. He’s not alone; his partner in the Mom & Pop stores called CNN-IBN, Sagarika contributes her share of filth in the discourse. Both these wilful morons insult people’s intelligence and act as brokers and campaigners for political parties. Their latest has been as active campaigners and promoters of the AAP party. Many had suspected the entire IBN group was rooting for this party and my previous post ‘AAP-Sucker Proxies’ also deals with this. Here’s IBTL (a news website) further explaining how tweets were constantly exchanged and relayed between the IBN group members and AAP members to promote the party.

The texts under the red circles may not be quite legible so I suggest you look up the Tweet and enlarge the image to read. It is not just that Rajdeep often peddles garbage; he often promotes those who peddle garbage to suit his political agenda. Having a bias or political is not a crime. If a media house wants to promote a certain party or political ideology it would be honourable if they said it upfront instead of claiming to be ‘neutral’. Forget the neutral part, when do media crooks need to repeatedly assert who they are unless their conscience keeps hurting? Why else would this comic duo have to send out messages like these?

We are journalists! We are journalists! Don’t shoot us! Even Manmohan Singh never asserts being the PM so much, even though technically he is one.

The problem with deceptive spinners is that they aren’t really reminding YOU, they remind THEMSELVES of what they have forgotten they were supposed to be. Both these people don’t spare a chance to sermonise the world. Vinod Mehta is a colourful media celeb. I call him “The Claw” for the way he dangerously brandishes his hand while talking on TV panels. At a recent fun event in Lucknow the Lucknow Boy entertained the audience with some anecdotes, some confessions and what he really thought about news TV. This is from a TOI report (Dec.8,2013):

Mehta didn’t shock anyone as most viewers knew he was drinking on TV debates. That’s the least of the issues. He confesses talking rubbish and still being invited. Still, after this confession of “I speak rubbish” he as was back on CNN-IBN a day later to talk about the AAP party. You see, for Rajdeep it doesn’t matter if you’re drunk or talk rubbish as long as it supports his agenda. But hey, don’t shoot us, we are just the messengers. Really? There is a slight difference between a messengers and ‘go-between’. What does it say when someone like Digvijaya Singh accuses him of losing focus? Yes Diggy, of all people, who is an expert at distracting from real issues. This exchange is hilarious:

As with his shows on TV, Rajdeep totally forgot what the topic was at the recent HT Summit. It was about a “Vision for India” where Arun Jaitley and Digvijaya Singh were panellists and Rajdeep was the lost. I mean host! The whole discussion deviated from the topic and in the end the Pop couldn’t help bringing up his son’s question on why political discourse has so much slander. Oh yes, Numero Uno, Numero Unee and now Numero Sonny! Sonny boy is privileged so he gets to ask questions; even in absentia. Nepotism is a problem not just with politicians but also with media crooks. So what was the son’s concern? Let’s find out from this clip (3,53 mins. You can watch the full show on Youtube):

So from a “Vision of India” Rajdeep turned it into how politicians slander each other. Talk about a hatemonger sermonising the world. Another guy from the HT warehouse jumps in to say politicians don’t like “neutral” stands. Sure, HT and its foot-soldiers must know what neutral is all about. Err.. Licking both feet of Madamji equally would be neutral? And what is the problem? That Modi called Pappu a Shehzada. So Rajdeep probably wants to keep political discourse as close to the holy Quran or Bible as possible. Diggy says he never called Modi “Bhasmasur”. Fair enough! He calls people “thugs” and endorses “26/11 RSS ki Saazish” and “RSS bomb making factories”. I guess those don’t fall into the “slander” category. I opened this post with all the choice epithets that the Congress and MSM have hurled at Modi and Rajdeep, the former Congress politician and now the AAP-Sucker, wants clean discussions. Even Diggy calls Rajdeep a part of politics in the end. What a rise!

What exactly is so offensive about Shehzada? After all, it’s just an Urdu word for Prince. Isn’t it? But as Sunetra Chaudhary points out in her profound article, it is okay to abuse in English but the same thing wouldn’t pass if it were in a local Indian language (Why desi netas willnever charm the English media). So you see, the English Laloos can get away but the desi ones have to pay a price if they call someone “Shehzada”. Hypocrite Rajdeep knows that too.   

 

All the abusive words hurled at Modi have passed right through all TV channels and many events. Congress whining is out of “victimhood” but why is Rajdeep whining? Rahul Gandhi has been called by the MSM as “Crown Prince” or “Prince” for many years and many times. Here are just a few samples at India Today, Firstpost, Time Magazine, TOI, Rajdeep Sardesai and Rajdeep Sardesai. Prince is English, so it can pass. After all this, neither Congress nor Rajdeep have any moral authority to sermonise the world on good language or to avoid slander. I would in fact go a step further and state that Rajdeep (as the entire MSM) has built his career and wealth on slanderous discourse. Please do remember that repeating a slanderous message - knowing it to be so - is equally liable for defamatory action. If Modi ever wanted it then pathological slanderers like Rajdeep and some of his co-scumbags in the media would have been in jail for mindless slandering and wanton use of abusive language, diverting from the topic of an event to deliberately humiliate and slander a person. The problem with the hatemonger is that he forgets too soon. It’s our job to remind him. This is the same HT Summit from 2007 (Video 3.42 mins):

Hero of hatred? Mass murderer? That is not as offensive and slanderous as Shehzada I suppose. And this is being said in front of a select audience to deliberately insult a Chief Guest and keynote speaker. This is the culture Rajdeep wants to pass on to his son? Did the son watch that video with the pathetic slandering by dad? As Digvijaya inconveniently pointed out in HT 2013, the same happened in HT 2007 as well. In 2007 the topic for that day was “Centre-State relations”. What does Rajdeep do? He turns it into a tirade on Gujarat 2002, discrimination against Muslims, hero of hatred, mass murderer, blah blah. I sincerely believe this editorialist would pollute the Yamuna if he were thrown in it. That is the level to which he has degraded journalism and public discourse. And that HT sidekick thinks people don’t like neutral stands. Who are these people trying to fool?

Post the Tejpal episode Sagarika Ghose laments how editors have been “de-valued”.  I don’t call these people “editors”; they are unworthy of that title. They are “editorialists” whose job is to swing opinion one way or another. Let’s see, they have no problems in welcoming a spokie who indulged in sexcapades in his office with certain promises. Morals! They still invite a person who admits he talks rubbish and 50% of news channel content is a joke. Morals! Rajdeep defended Radia-tainted media celebs and even tried to get in Vir Sanghvi through the backdoor into debates. The list can get longer if put under a search. Both he and Sagarika call politicians and people names at their will and demand public discourse is clean. They say "charity begins at home". The woman who abuses Indian males as ugly, calls ordinary people guttersnipe, ridicules court judgements has now heaped the ultimate insult and slander on the Indian judiciary.

The SC did nothing but rightly ruled that the Gay rights issues was best decided by Parliament and not the judiciary. What's the response of the C5M? Absolute contempt, slander and abuse of the judge:

Rajdeep talks about his son being concerned about slander in politics. A small mirror on the streets of Delhi just costs around Rs.25. Rajdeep would do well to keep one in his pocket all the time. Hatemongers shouldn’t be sermonising others so often.