tag: MediaCrooks: Sham Polls

Privacy Policy

Showing posts with label Sham Polls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sham Polls. Show all posts

Monday, June 4, 2012

CNN-IBN: The Greatest Indian Farce


First a confession from CNN-IBN: “Based on an internationally acclaimed format by BBC held in 22 countries, the initiative is to select that one great Indian after Mahatma Gandhi who is the most influential, iconic & inspirational and has impacted your life”. So it’s not CNN-IBN’s idea but something the BBC had done many years ago to find the greatest Briton. So after sham awards like “Indian of the year” CNN-IBN has now come up with this new gimmick to pick the Greatest Indian since independence. After Mahatma Gandhi! More of all that later.

First, it’s not so long ago that CNN-IBN picked Mamata Banerjee as the ‘Indian of the year 2011’ and since that it has been downhill for them with her. From trashing MamataB at every possible opportunity to the infamous walk-out at a public interview with Sagarika Ghose nothing has gone right with them and the Bengal CM. And two years prior they picked Rahul Gandhi as ‘Indian of the year’ only to consistently lament they knew nothing about him. Such petty past times are fine with say Cosmopolitan or Filmfare or those page-3 type magazines. Why would a supposed national news channel indulge in such nonsense? Oh, the BBC did it so they should do it too. And as they say “BBC’s internationally acclaimed format..”. What they don’t mention is that the BBC is loathed as much in the UK as the MSM is in India.

And why leave Mahatma Gandhi out? What gives the channel the right to decide on behalf of people that he is above everyone else? There is no denying his great contribution to India’s freedom movement but typically the media continues to create a myth around the man as if he is beyond any evaluation by normal people. This is what politicians have done but not expected from news channels. Or are they scared that MKG might end up being voted 10th or 20th in the list and that may be a great embarrassment for them and others who put him on an extra-ordinarily high pedestal? In Italy the most prayed-to person in times of crises is not Jesus Christ, it’s St. Paul. Jesus Christ is sixth on the list of most prayed-to holy persons. (Watch the second video in this post). That’s not me saying it, that’s a Vatican priest confirming it. Does that make Jesus Christ any lesser revered or any lesser the Son-of-God as Christians believe? Why this strange obsession and madness to put MKG over every other person who has made sacrifices for our freedom? Are we to believe that we would have never achieved independence had it not been for MKG? That remains a serious topic for another discussion though.

What then is the motive behind such silly greatest lists? There’s no other motive than some fun and trivial, meaningless pursuits in times of economic strife. Entertainment at best! There is no denying the final list of 50 eligible Indians for the vote has the most extraordinary people this country has produced. Some have dramatically changed the course of events through their expertise and some have not. How in the world do you fairly compare a B.R.Ambedkar to M.S. Subbalakshmi?  How do you fairly compare JRD Tata to Bismillah Khan? The list also contains 9 movie personalities and 6 sportsmen. Their contributions are immense but their impact is surely not the same. Of the current generation not many are likely to know MS Subbalakshmi’s work that well as they would A.R. Rahman’s. The British list was topped by Winston Churchill and at No.8 is John Lennon. Now, Churchill may have inspired a nation to victory in a war with his leadership but Lennon has the credit of changing the course of pop-music across the world forever. How would one make a comparison?

The BBC itself realised the folly of such rankings and later simply listed all the 100 Britons just alphabetically. All the 100 are special and there is no way there can be any fair comparison of their contribution and impact on Britain or on the world. While claiming to be inspired by the BBC format, CNN-IBN does not reveal the fact of BBC changing the rankings to merely listing the Greatest alphabetically. And what if B.R. Ambedkar ends up 50 th in the poll. Umm… that is sure to set off a juicy controversy, wouldn’t it? For that bunch of people who couldn’t tolerate a cartoon on Ambedkar, his ending up 50th in rankings would be absolute blasphemy. Well, that is exactly the motive and purpose of this farce. Stir up some unwanted debates and unwanted controversy. After all, nothing makes a media outlet grab TRP or circulation like a controversial episode. Not surprisingly, several people who appeared on the list of Greatest Britons also appeared on a parallel list of 100 Worst Britons. (Includes Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the current Queen Elizabeth II) That’s the very silly nature of such a poll. Read the 100 Greatest Britons for the story.

Do you remember? When the Olympics allowed professionals into the games the Americans came up with the term ‘Dream Team’ for their Basketball players. All of them were big names. That’s not bad at all. One can always dream of a dream team in any sport. Football usually has the Peles and Maradonnas, Cricket has the Dons and Sachins. As against the greatest Indian it wouldn’t have been bad to have a dream star-cast in a movie with a great director or a dream concert with the greatest musicians. And yes, a dream Cabinet in a dream govt wouldn’t be bad either. So what would one of that look like? Let’s see…

Sardar Patel -Prime Minister, A.B. Vajpayee – External Affairs Minister, Indira Gandhi – Home Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru – I&B Minister, B.R. Ambedkar – Law Minister etc. and top it off with Mahatma Gandhi as the President. Go ahead, make your own dream team.

I’m not the gambling types but I can hazard a wild dream for CNN-IBN. Jawaharlal Nehru voted the Greatest Indian after Mahatma Gandhi. Then follow three rounds of debates that would include all the 28 member jury that CNN-IBN has conjured up, conducted, of course, by the stuttering Rajdeep Sardesai. Then a grand ceremony to award the Greatest Indian award… Oops, Nehru can’t be there, so Rahul Gandhi, the latest of the Nehru clan will receive the award on his behalf. Mission accomplished. Enjoy the Greatest Farce on TV!

Monday, January 17, 2011

India Today - Banana Polls

India Today (IT) has come out with another opinion poll: Mood of the Nation. This is the second of such polls, the first being around August 2010. Though the poll reflects a fall in the ratings of UPA-2 it also suggests if elections were held today the Congress (I) & Co. would be back in power. And that’s not all, IT once again reveals Rahul Gandhi is the top candidate for Prime Minister. Opinion polls are just that! Opinions! But when a magazine repeatedly makes such exercises a cover story it wants the poll to be counted as a referendum on various political issues and personalities.

I have yet to come across a single serious or critical analysis of Rahul Gandhi as PM by India Today. While frequently touting him as the next PM, based on Congress Gandhi lineage and therefore natural logic, the magazine finds no need at all to analyze the person or his suitability for the post. The greatest article they came up with on Rahul was ‘Who’d be a perfect Mrs. Rahul Gandhi’. That was on November 24, 2010 when the nation was in grips of all kinds of scams including the Radia tapes. The only other article of note was another one promoting Rahul as the PM by ex-editor Prabhu Chawla titled ‘Rahul Rising’. This was consequent to their August 2010 opinion poll. Keep touting the line and a gullible nation will fall for it!

In the December 2010 poll Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have all fallen in their ratings but Rahul still commands the lead for the PM post. Trailing him are Narendra Modi, Nitish Kumar, Mayawati by a long margin. And, of course, MMS and Sonia are trailing too, so is Advani. Now, why on earth would I ask someone if MMS, Sonia or Advani would make a good PM knowing well that these three people are not even in the race? Sonia declined the post in 2004 knowing well the legal complications, MMS might not even last this term and Advani would be a has-been by 2014. So thats the trick to opinion polls. Put up three real contenders, three meaningless choices and the answers become pretty obvious. It’s like asking what you will have for desert!  Icecream? Milk Shake? Roasted Papad? Or Karela juice? You see, the answer might be easy, that’s what such surveys and polls are meant to do. Then it’s easy for me to go to town saying Icecream or Milk Shake were the two most popular choices. That’s how banana polls work!
 

Take a look at their methodology. 12k voters surveyed in ‘stratified random sampling’! If you don’t know what that means, you can look it up anywhere and educate yourself. Now what exactly does that mean? Electoral politics in India encompass a wide variety of ‘stratified’ population. Hindus, Muslims, Dalits and other Castes etc. 

So what exactly does this stratified sampling mean? And this is from 19 states. Which are those states? Nobody knows. This is also supported by a rating of Chief Ministers. (See pic) 

How does one explain CMs like Sheila Dikshit, Karunanidhi, K. Rosiah and Ashok Chavan in the top 10? Two of them, Rosiah and Chavan, had exited by the time the polls were underway. 

And the corruption ridden head of Karnataka, B.S. Yeddyuriappa, is up there at no.13 too. In case you didn’t notice, the list makes up only 17 CMs. 




 Obviously, there was no time or relevance to rate the remaining 13 CMs. Thirteen out of 30 CMs is almost 50% and their states or performances aren’t relevant. Your guess is as good as mine! Most of those states would be those poor cousins of ours from the north-east, the one exception being Assam. There might be many reasons why governments neglect the north-east. Is there a reason for the media?


The CMs were probably measured on performance norms of some kind by respondents, real and perceived. So I find it amazing that the magazine finds people finding Rahul Gandhi fit for the PM job with no real or perceived performance measure and no governance experience either. Only one thing is clear, the media dearly wants to see this man as PM. So I’m running a poll too. Who could be a future PM? Vote on the poll on the right margin of this page.