Terror Support Services

Another cycle of violence in Kashmir and another round breast-beating from familiar voices. Another round of same comments from political and govt leaders. Another round of nonsensical Pak said this, Pak said that in the media. And while they rant against Pak, channels like Timesnow will also get familiar panelists from Pak and Arnab will keep screaming at them as if he is in direct military battle with Pak. The terrorists merrily continue their attacks and our political leaders offer the same rhetoric. Nothing changes. After the recent round of violence in Kashmir following the killing of a Hizbul terrorist we had the same rhetoric from Pakis in Pak and Paki-sympathisers in India – Human rights, plebiscite, lack of jobs for Kashmiri youth and so on.

There is a war against India on multiple fronts. The terrorists continue their attacks, especially in J&K. There are pockets in India where Hindus are being forced to leave their homes and towns and uncontrolled population growth of Muslims – the demographic war. On another front Christian missionaries continue their bribery and conversion acts without any hindrance or control. In much a similar manner of the exodus from Kashmir. When some ISI-funded media folks and activists were exposed of foolishly promoting the Pak agenda on Kashmir the then Congress govt did nothing. I am sure people remember Ghulam Nabi Fai and his stooges. The current govt has done nothing either. Suddenly there is a lot of focus on Zakir Naik as if the phenomenon of his hate speeches is some startling revelation. This guy has been spewing venom for a long time and politicians and media even danced with him bestowing legitimacy to his agenda.

Some recent reports from Kashmir are more alarming than ever before. Sample these: “Terrorists lob grenades at security men from behind stone pelters” or “Govt offices, police stations looted”.  And this includes mobs stealing weapons from police stations and kidnapping some cops. And some of our not so bright journos still think all this stone-pelting and terrorism is because of lack of economic opportunities.

Kanwal is not alone, there are many who parrot the same lines. When you portray the picture wrongly you are already doing the terrorists a great favour. It helps them and those mobs believe their cause is genuine and has wide-spread support. India has had poverty and unemployment for ages and such suffering people have not turned to terrorism and stone-pelting. It’s funny, that long ago these same mobs backed by Jihadis drove out the Pandits from Kashmir and what was the fake reason offered? Same as Kanwal’s nonsense. That the Pandits were “elites” and economically well-off. And who peddled that crap? None other than the one from Jihadi-sympathising NDTV (0.24 seconds)

Funny, isn’t it? One hand they claim the Pandits were driven out because of economic reasons and then they are suffering from lack of economic opportunities. If I have were to drive out those who can provide economic opportunities where do I get some from? This kind of illogical and nonsensical loose-change is what our media morons throw up to defend stone-pelters and terrorists.

It is important to understand that both Commies and Islamists understand the concept of indoctrination quite well. You will find the Commies poisoning brains of youngsters with fake history, fake promises and bleed the economy of a state or country. And worse, they will indulge in large scale violence and unending political murders and defend the worst terrorists as freedom fighters. Be it Osama, Yakub Memon, Afzal Guru or that Wani guy – you will find Commies defending them and holding peace marches and shouting “Bharat ke tukde” in campuses. Islamists are not very different. They indoctrinate kids to go on terror missions, they inculcate a sense of victimhood among their youth and will refuse to join the mainstream in a multi-religious society in India or elsewhere. Folks from media have now clearly been identified as belonging to terror sympathisers or being nationalistic and standing up for India. These comments should amplify my point:

Barkha calls him a Commander and son of a school headmaster (as if that is great glory by itself for anyone) and that Wani was an expert in SM usage. Sawant on the other hand clearly calls him a terrorist and terms him the face of terror in Kashmir. It is not so hard to identify who are those in the media, politics and our society who provide terror support services before and after ghastly incidents. Both NDTV and TimesNow frequently feature this anti-India Andrabi on their debates and “shows”:

It's not as if she merely has a different point of view on whats being done in Kashmir or that she is aggrieved. What she wants is the destruction of India, the destruction of every other religion in this country and only Islam to prevail and establish her dream Khilafah in the entire world. Why should such scumbags be on TV at all? Do they have any meaningful purpose or cause? Senseless blabbering is what our media does with their TV shows over Kashmir and terrorism. Andrabi is not the only one though. There is another deceptive guy who parades as a journo and pours hatred and injects poison into Muslim minds. Just read about Shahid Siddiqui who is also frequently on TV debates. He injects his virus in Urdu which most don’t read but poisons Muslim minds. Read this shocking article by Tufail Ahmed in the NewIndian Express.

To add to all this there are uneducated, uninformed idiots in India and Pakistan who shout “PLEBISCITE, PLEBISCITE, PLEBISCITE” at the drop of a hat over Kashmir. Here’s an ordinary activist from Pakistan and their PM too uttering the same nonsense:

And each time the Pak PM or any politician utters such illogical and untenable nonsense our media folks promptly parrot and relay as if his demands mean anything to anyone in the world. Nobody really gives a damn anymore what Pak wants on Kashmir or anything else; except the Paki-stooges in India. Indian media, at best, should be reporting it as a one-liner for sake of history instead of tom-toming such silly rants over and over again on TV, online and in print. Such is their newslessness and poverty of real news. It is not just that, at book-discussion by prominent author and Pak commentar C. Christine Fair, there was a “Foolbright” scholar too from Pak who asked dumb questions about the plebiscite and the Jihadis and got a resounding slap from her (video 6.23 mins – Youtube link):

And the moron asking these questions, even after he has read Fair’s book, is supposedly a Fulbright scholar. We know quite a few dumb idiots in our media who are also Rhodes scholars or Oxbridge scholars with moronery that is bigger than their body itself.

It is generally assumed that terrorists are funded, given weapons and training by organisations and countries that want to destroy India or kill people anywhere in the world. That is partly true. We have seen time and again that terrorism and terrorists are also fuelled by “terror support services” by a high number of people in our media, NGOs, some campuses, preachers that our GOI completely ignores. Such people vent anger against India, our security forces and even glorify terrorists by holding peace marches for them and calling their killing “extra-judicial”. It is time our govts took a serious note of such people and looked into their activites, funding and relations with organisations that sponsor terror. There might one or two batsmen at the crease scoring runs but they are spurred on by thousands who watch the game. Same is true for terrorism. Those who watch, covertly applaud and spur such acts are equally dangerous.

Fantasy Evidence For Hatred

Sometimes the people you run into have interesting things to say, sometimes intriguing things. In autos, buses, trains, ships, planes and balloons. I too run into a lot of people. I remember that one time I was in bed and flying from Dindigul to Delhi and a co-passenger got chatting with me. Based on this mid-air encounter here’s what I tweeted on March 16, 2006:

That guy spoke the truth. Rajdeep Sardesai did get a Padma Shri in 2008. But seriously, how credible is a Padma award from Congress govt? By Rajdeep’s logic, since the SC, the SIT and the lower court are spurious where Gujarat 2002 and Narendra Modi are concerned the Padma given to him has no credibility. I could conclude by RS’s logic that the award was given to him was for Gandhi-family services (as my flight co-passenger told me) and not for any journalistic achievements. Fair enough?

Over the years you would have heard many such claims of strangers dropping juicy stuff into ears of media folks and other “specialists”. The pioneer has to be Shekhar Gupta. Almost every person, famous and ordinary, runs into Gupta and gives him juicy stuff. Read a sample here: “Over the past three weeks I have been stopped by ordinary people at airports, in shopping malls, at a petrol pump, in a spiritual ashram, at the national athletic games in Bangalore and so on with a question that seems to have become a clamour: why are you in the media so scared of the Gandhis”? Oh yeah! Why? I’ve been asking this question for long. Why do they piss in their pants and skirts when “Gandhi” is mentioned? Even folks at spiritual ashrams are confounded it seems as ShekharG tells us. But he has still not managed to answer the question though.

Then there used to be a guy called Markandey Katju who used to often rant against Modi through extensive sky-research. Read this: “I was flying from Delhi to Bhopal recently. Sitting beside me was a Gujarati businessman. I asked him his opinion of Mr. Modi. He was all praise for him. I interjected and asked him about the killing of nearly 2,000 Muslims in 2002 in Gujarat. He replied that Muslims were always creating problems in Gujarat, but after 2002 they have been put in their place and there is peace since then in the State. I told him this is the peace of the graveyard, and peace can never last long unless it is coupled with justice. At this remark he took offence and changed his seat on the plane”. So you see, such crap is the foundation of a whole article where an individual’s unverifiable gossip is peddled as the basis of a commentary on the entire state of Gujarat and Modi. Splendid! Of course, I don’t have to tell you that Katju is lying when he claims 2000 Muslims were killed. Well, I also suggested why not claim 10000 killed if you had to throw up a “Worli Matka” number? This is what the media has been doing for a long time, haven’t they?

The twisted Rajdeep claims someone told him about dictatorship on a flight. The same practice also continues in interviews with people. Anchors throw all kinds of questions with no evidence or basis. When the motive of an interview is to peddle a pre-set agenda of the anchor, it becomes plainly obvious to even the casual viewer. Rajdeep still claims the SC rejection, SIT findings and the lower court rejection of petitions trying to hold Narendra Modi responsible for Gujarat 2002 are unacceptable to many critics. Are court rulings subject to acceptance of critics? And who the hell are these critics? Well, members of the same filthy Hammam that Rajdeep represents; his anti-Modi, anti-Hindu gang. So it stands to reason that RS’s Padma award is also corrupt and purchased. There are many critics who question if he deserved it at all. How many of you agree this cheap propagandist deserved a Padma? Naturally, Rajdeep’s hatred takes it further when he is angry that a Muslim like MJ Akbar has joined the BJP after criticising the party and Modi for many years.

In an interview of MJA on March 24 Rajdeep asks him many questions which have no basis or are at best hypothetical. He asks MJA “Are you today giving Modi a clean chit”? Oh! So MJA is authorised to give clean chits? And is that even acceptable to a Gandhi-family poodle like Rajdeep? MJA explains that for 10 years Modi was scrutinised by every legal authority and that too under a non-BJP govt and they still couldn’t find any linkages to the riots but that is hardly acceptable to Rajdeep. Then RS asks MJA “So you were mistaken”? And MJA tells him bluntly “We were all mistaken in putting personal linkages. We should have the ability to accept the facts”. Unable to digest the truth RS then says “There have been many question marks over the SIT inquiry”. What are those questions? And who are the ones raising those questions. Even that was tested in the lower court at Ahmedabad and the questions rejected. I would have to say only predominantly anti-Hindu rogues like Rajdeep are raising those questions. It is not just because of Modi, it is because they hate the RSS, they hate the BJP and they hate anything that is remotely connected to Hindutva. To them Hindutva is “evil”.

Then RS asks “Are you saying Modi was a target of witch-hunt by journalists like you”? It doesn’t occur to the corrupt Rajdeep that that is a question he should ask his own mirror. And then follows another moronic question “Would Nehru approve of Modi’s version of secularism”? (That is India-first, no appeasement and so on). Who the hell is Nehru to approve of anything today? Would Nehru approve of corrupt and bribe-taking journos like Rajdeep? That is the question I would like to ask. A guy fired from IBN had protested, called Rajdeep a “Dalal” and asked how Rajdeep got his 52-crore bungalow. Where did Rajdeep get such money except by corrupt means and bribery? Who are the ones who paid this corrupt media crook? Any answers Rajdeep? MJA pointed out to RS that it’s a Congress govt at the Centre that hounded Modi through various agencies. Similarly, it is a Congress govt which has protected Rajdeep’s corruption so far. Isn’t that plausible? And that is why RS rants against Modi and continues his witch-hunt. Isn’t that true as well? Because a non-Congress govt will prosecute him for illegal wealth?

And the biggest concern for Rajdeep has been Muslims, Muslims, Muslims! And when MJA pointed out Congress has left Muslims impoverished, Rajdeep was not willing to listen. MJA at one point had to ask him to show the patience to “listen” as a journalist should. If there are Muslims opposed to Modi, there are also Muslims in favour of Modi. Rajdeep believes Muslims should hate Modi as much as he does and that’s his problem. Muslims themselves have as many opinions as is natural in a large population like India. But here’s a sample of Muslims:

Rajdeep’s hatred has closed his doors to all other points of view that Muslims hold. Perhaps he too desires Muslims must remain a downtrodden community who should not take their chances with another leader without being prejudiced by corrupt media morons like him. Failure is not a person, failure is a situation. That applies to a community too. Muslims are not failures. They have been forced to believe they are but it’s a “situation” they too can overcome if not led by selfish politicians and parties. Modi has no selfish motive. If he wants to lead India to a better future he seems to possess the ideas to do so and he has shown no signs like some dynastic cronies of personally enriching himself in doing so. This is probably what compels the likes of Akbar and Siddiqui to reverse their opinions about him. I have pointed at the corruption of Rajdeep for the simple principle that allegations hurled without evidence or based on hearsay from Salma or Sabrina on a flight doesn’t count. Anyone can hurl a thousand. The answer to such nonsense is what is called Hitchens’ Razor:

For 10 years Rajdeep and the other crooks in the media have hurled any number of allegations against Modi without any evidence. They must remember, it is easy to concoct Salma-Sabrina stories from flights, it is easy to throw allegations like Rajdeep’s 52 crore bungalow. Rajdeep was so rattled by the 52-crore allegation that he pleaded that video be removed (and it was removed from Youtube). Therefore, it demands that he too be careful on mindlessly continuing to hurl allegations against others, especially when the courts of the country have dismissed them. Respect the law, moron!

But Rajdeep does have one good habit though. Every night he sings a lullaby for his Twitter followers. But even MJA told him to complete the song “Chodo kal ki baaten” which he sang with the second line “Naya daur hai, nayi umang hai”. It’s not just MJA but even others are telling Rajdeep not to sing “incomplete” songs but to complete with the second lines which are often more important. Whispers on a flight, “He said, she said” kind of evidence, motivated pimpernels like Teesta or Sanjiv Bhatt do not constitute evidence. Teesta in all likelihood will be prosecuted and sent to jail. Rajdeep may have his fantasy islands of all such evidences and witnesses. In the end they couldn’t survive. RS claims he is not a Congress or Gandhi doormat. But if he observes his Twitter feed and comments on his articles the Congress supporters usually defend him staunchly. And just to tell him, even though this site is often called a RW site, MJ Akbar (who was very anti-Modi) was still voted one of the best journalists. Rajdeep must wonder why. Living in fantasy is not a crime, but living in fantasies filled with hatred will invariably take its toll.

PS: The first image in this post with tweets of March 2006 is also a fantasy. Twitter wasn’t launched till July 2006.