The AAP-Sucker Proxies

(This is a MaxiPost)

The best way to get to the bottom of any story is to go to its roots; the beginning. A person’s political ideology is formed very early and doesn’t change unless something dramatic happens. Does Arvind Kejriwal really want to form a govt and deliver on his party’s promises? I had doubted this since they day he called “Modi corrupt”. The simple reason is that the Congress and MSM have called Modi many things and names but “corrupt” is stretching imagination way too far. But that was the hint for me on what AK’s real job is. If AK claims the Delhi vote is against corrupt BJP and Congress, a vote for honest politics and a moral victory then AAP is obligated to form the govt when no one is opposing. We shall see. 

Old man, probably in his seventies, wealthy with a huge business goes crazy. He jumps off his top floor office. His secret letter leaves all his wealth to his successor but with some twists. So crafty, wicked board member finds an ordinary mail-room worker and appoints him President of the company in hopes he will destroy the company and lower the share value. This could help the board members buy all the shares at low value and take control. The mail-room moron apparently doesn’t know much but accidently invents a stupid ‘Shoonya’ (As TimesNow calls it) which the board members are convinced will be a big flop. It’s a circular thing that’s called after the hoopla around this guy. So it’s named the Hula-hoop. What an invention! Contrary to the villain’s expectations this hoop becomes a huge success and the moron becomes rich. He also becomes arrogant, bashful and rude. He finally comes to senses and is about to kill himself but gets saved. Let’s watch a preview (video 1.43 mins)

That little burst was from ‘The Hudsucker Proxy’. Arvind Kejriwal is no mail-room moron. He is a smart and wily guy who is good at planning and executing. Surely, as an IRS officer managing to stay in Delhi for 17 years without a single transfer takes some doing. That was his first miracle. Since December 8 when the election results were announced he is being hailed as the latest miracle that should be recognised by the Pope and accorded Sainthood. In my previous post I lauded AK for the grace he showed in the excellent debut that his AAP party made in the Delhi elections. Looks like I spoke too soon. The arrogance, rudeness and spite of AK (like Hudsucker’s proxy) would soon be on display when he made the following comment to a reporter which was aired on all channels:

Since the Delhi results threw up a hung-assembly AK believes the “besharamis” of Congress and BJP should be trusted to form an alliance. This reflects a man of intense contempt even as he knows that Congress and BJP would never be allies. If that were indeed to happen, many regional parties would be dead including the new-born AAP. He’s not the proxy here although he maybe a proxy for some other forces. But he already has proxies in the media and they look like this (do include the multiple organisations and people behind them):

All the above characters have been slaves of the Congress and promoters of Rahul Gandhi as the great white hope of India. Of course, all the above slaves would say “no we are neutral journalists”. But I think people now know them for what they are. Commie Fiberals! For instance, the Numero Uno Rajdeep grandly asked Sanjay Jha (Dec.9) “what was the one big idea RahulG produced in all these years”. Don’t bother about some lame answer Jha would have come up with. The puzzle is, if Rajdeep and his gang at CNN-IBN couldn’t see such an idea from RahulG how did they present him with an “Indian of the year” award for 2009. Any answers? We know Barkha as Barkha Darwin who did her best to “evolute Rahul”. As for Ashutosh, anyone to beat Hitler Modi would do. And Sagarika Ghose? Well, what can I say? The C5M was so thrilled AK answered her Twitter questions that nothing else mattered to her. We will get to all this but like I said, let’s get to the roots of the story.

In a short bio of AK The Mint quotes AK’s friends and fellow activists: Arvind has a set of views on how things should change and he would brook no opposition to it. He refutes everything with a belief that only what he says is correct… By that time, he was totally disillusioned with the RTI Act… He does not want to hear or listen, but he still wants to consult. Beyond a point, people lost faith in him as there is no point in only signing attendance registers… One of the major reasons why Arvind can be successful is that he is a very effective speaker, a fantastic organizer, which we all have seen in the past, and has a fairly high level of commitment and interest in the issues that he has taken up… The RTI activist cited above doesn’t think Kejirwal will be different from “other political leaders”, most of whom do not believe in a democratic system. “He is a leader with strong non-democratic traits; he is in a way choosing the conventional method of leading people, doing politics.

In short, AK’s closest friends and those who supported his activism don’t really think he is different from other politicians. That doesn’t bother me much. The more dangerous comment is that he is a leader with strong non-democratic traits. Mint also mentions one of his tutors was Harsh Mander (of the Gujarat 2002 gang). This is the reason I have assessed that AK and AAP are more ideologically married to Congress and CPM rather than BJP. So it is absurd that AK makes a grand stand that BJP-Congress should form an alliance because both are similar. This is the LIE that AK hides behind and which the media gladly peddles to support his miracle. Truth is, AK is a Rahul Gandhi in all respects except that he isn’t dumb like RG. He is smarter, a good thinker and a better organiser as his friends testify. Does that explain why the crony editorialists I have named found a new alternative to Pappu in AK? That is what I tweeted in rejecting the cowardly nonsense of AK in his unwillingness to form a govt in Delhi when no one is stopping him.  I also tweeted the logic that neither BJP nor Congress would dare to pull down a minority AAP govt because they would face a severe backlash during the LS elections which is just a few months away and that is insurance.

Let’s now talk about the greatest electoral miracle that these scumbags and scumbaginis are calling AAP’s victory as. It’s an excellent debut but it is not a victory (although AK claims it’s a victory but remains unwilling to stake a claim to govt). The greatest electoral victory in India so far has to be indisputably Mamata Banerjee throwing out the Commies in Bengal. Our media morons seem to have short memories. TMC threw out a govt that had stayed in power longer than any other govt in a State or the Centre in India. Thirty four years! That’s right; it took a MamataB to throw out a govt that was in power for 34 years. Yet the media would have you believe that AAP’s debut, which is not even a victory, is the greatest electoral miracle. It’s fun if it were just labelling but these Pope’s agents are actually starting to believe it and asking people to believe it. These shameless proxies have a clear agenda and that is to make AAP look like the option to Congress as against BJP being an alternative. That AK is the challenger to Modi since their Pappu has been a complete disaster. This is what drives Barkha and Rajdeep. This is the reason they back AAP so strongly. Check these tweets from Ashutosh:

Ever heard a bigger moron? He is ridiculing “English elites”! And pray who are those English elites he talks about? If you look at the pic of the editorialists that I put up above, all the neighbours of Ashutosh are pretty much the English elites or Macaulay siblings. These are the people he hangs around with. Are these English elites AAP proxies or anti-AAP? All of them are Modi-hating Congress cronies but in the current slump of the party they have become AAP-Proxies. They aren’t AAP’s enemies as Ashutosh dreads. This is true for all the Commies who desperately hate Modi. Unfortunately for Ashutosh, Chaubeji let out his little secret that the entire IBN group was actively campaigning for AK and AAP. So the scumbag’s tweets are quite understandable.

If you look closely, although MamataB has replaced CPM in Bengal her ideology isn’t really different from them. This ideology is simply Commie ideology which is the same as Congress. It has a heady cocktail of subsidies, welfare schemes, doles and above all minority appeasement. So in what respects is AK a different politician or against the ideology of the Congress? His sole claim would be that of Corruption but his route to electoral politics is not one of just anti-corruption. Making tall promises that can’t be fulfilled is a trait of all Commies which is why Communist govts across the world have fallen. How did MamataB get there? Anti-incumbency and 2-3 years of relentless agitation in Bengal (Singur, Nandigram and all of that). Is AK’s route any different? It’s the same route, through use of Anna Hazare and hijacked by AK, that’s all. So it’s not as if AK came out of the blue and won some seats in Delhi in a miracle as the media cronies would have you believe. Mamata can’t be supportive of Congress so AK is the best option now to occupy the slot and thereby attempt to stop the Modi storm.

That miracle nonsense cleared, we can now look at the Twitter interview the queen of stupidity, Sagarika Ghose, had with AK. She was in raptures over what a great politician AK was because he answered her questions. Only idiots will buy the nonsense returned by AK to her. Some samples are enough:

Sagarika: How will you make up Delhi's power deficit?

Kejriwal: Delhi is a power surplus state now, not power deficit anymore.

Sagarika: How will you fast track police reforms?

Kejriwal: Delhi Police under Centre's control.

There! You happy now? Delhi is a power surplus state? Delhi police is under Centre! Okay, didn’t SheilaD already tell that to Sagarika? But she’s happy, no? These laughable stupidities are passed off as qualities of a great politician by an equally stupid media bimbo. And because Modi doesn’t respond to her stupidity he’s a bad guy. The Royal Bimbo forgets that Modi appeared in a ThinkIndia programme of CNN-IBN hosted by Raghav Bahl where he answered many questions. Modi even light-heartedly observed “Sagarika must be busy tweeting” (she wasn’t present at the event).

The less I say about the queen of telly trolls and the failed “evoluter” the better. She interviewed AK on December 9 and was happy to pass his entire BS unchallenged. Prior to elections Kumar Vishwas made a stupid claim of BJP poaching AAP candidates but refused to provide evidence. His demand? That BJP should promise to sack the person who attempted the so-called poaching. True to the circus-clown performer, Arnab Goswami debated that nonsense for a full half hour. The moronery of Vishwas in demanding action for a non-existent proof of poaching is like “I will make a movie but only if you guarantee me an Oscar”. AK made the same allegation post-election with Barkha. She let it pass too. You see, all these fraudulent interviews by these editorialists are meant to peddle as much muck against BJP which the media tries hard to tarnish every single day. So Barkha wonders if AK could be the roadblock that will halt Modi’s march to Delhi. Lovely! Scoundrels will hang on to anyone to do the hit-job that they failed to do all these years. It would be wonderful for these editorialists if AK also became a prosecutor like Teesta or Vrinda Grover and filed some cases against Modi; wouldn’t it?

Barkha was overjoyed with the prospect that the arrival of AAP in Delhi assembly could mean the possibilities of a 3rd or even a 4th Front. Hope floats for all the scumbaginis who want to see the death of BJP and Modi in any which way possible. Their deepest desire is to see AAP replace BJP as the challenger to Congress in all the states. Oh wait; they already have the SP, JDU blah blah so maybe they want AAP to fill in the blanks in Gujarat, Rajasthan, MP, Haryana and other states where there isn’t another option. These bitter proxies want that both options be like their darling Congress in ideology; Commies Fiberals in nature. Of course, the immediate priority is stop Modi from probable PMship at any cost. They don’t care if AK does it or IM or LeT does it; each with different methods. The darling of Barkha and Rajdeep, their IOTY Nitish Kumar, supports their claims as you can see from his response.

The last proxy in the gang is the constant hate-monger and flip-flopper Rajdeep Sardesai. He hasn’t tired of promoting AK in every which way he can. Multiple interviews before elections and multiple interviews after! In one interview a week before elections (around November 27) Rajdeep became such a suck up that he was doing most of the interview in Hindi on his English channel when both he and AK comfortably speak English. It’s not hard to guess who he was “eyeing” (to borrow his deputy’s line). The interview was laced with questions from Tweeple (some fake accounts, some AK supporters and some genuine ones). The stupid irony misses Rajdeep. If the C5M can do a “Twitter interview” on Twitter, as she grandly did, why does Rajdeep have to do a Twitter interview on a TV channel? Will AK answer Twitter questions only if routed through this bumbling duo?  Never mind!

How Tiffany-twisted Rajdeep is and how cheap he will get to somehow equate AK with Modi can be measured by his blog “Kejriwal and Modi: Agents of change promising too much, too soon” (Nov.29) again, just a few days before elections. The opening slaughter goes like this: “On the face of it, Arvind Kejriwal and Narendra Modi are literally chalk and cheese… It is unlikely that the ideologically contrasting Kejriwal and Modi will ever break bread, but both have one thing in common: both are 'gatecrashers' in a status quoist political system. Both, in different ways, claim to be change agents to be 'feared' by the incumbent government”.

If you miss the dreadful propaganda behind those lines you will miss what a terrible mis-reader Rajdeep is. Let’s ask! Does Congress fear Modi and AK for the same reason and in the same levels or dimension? I doubt Congress even fears AK at all. If Rajdeep is talking about Delhi then SheilaD was pretty much aware of the anti-incumbency so who is the bigger danger to Congress? Is Rajdeep that dumb? Secondly, how is AK a gatecrasher? He has been part of the Delhi establishment and Babudom most of his working life. He knows how the system works. Modi isn’t a gatecrasher either, except in the limited sense of Delhi limits. He is a career politician with most of his life in public service. The simple nonsense of Rajdeep is to somehow equate Modi and AK when there is no case. Why? Because the earlier gladiatorial contest between their darling Pappu and Modi has now gone up in smoke. Naturally, watching all the discourse on TV I couldn’t help the cheeky tweet about how BJP had lost the elections 4-0 and why Modi must resign. There was only victor for the media; and that was Arvind Kejriwal.

So what the Barkhas, Rajdeeps, C5Ms and Ashutosh want is AK to somehow combat Narendra Modi. Now that AK’s gang has won some seats in Delhi the prospect seems brighter to them. They couldn’t damage Modi for 11 years, here’s the new Brown Hope! All this nonsense of AK not wanting support from Congress or BJP is theatre. AAP is as much Congress in ideology, policies and appeasement as any other “Sickular” party is. Not surprisingly, by late evening on December 10 the Congress had offered unconditional support to AAP. Will AK now form a govt? I hope so but I have my doubts. You see, forming a govt will expose him as a non-performer where his bogus promises are concerned. It will also leave him lesser time to combat Modi, which is what his media proxies desperately want. The AAP-Sucker proxies want Modi decimated at any and all cost. They don’t give a damn about India or Delhi. They only care if their own nuts will be roasted, spiced and served with fine Champagne. I’m not kidding!

Not all were blind to the mischief going on at NDTV, CNN-IBN and TimesNow on December 8. Their mischief of showing AK as a miracle worth Sainthood and making BJP and Modi appear losers prodded a minor questioning of non-performance of Sonia and Rahul Gandhi on December 9 on TimesNow and CNN-IBN. A token show! 

Arnab actually looked pretty much like a chastised rat. In the previous post I mentioned Sonia Singh and Bhupendra Chaube partly admitting the Modi-effect on these elections. Rahul Kanwal was a lot more daring and called it like it is. He asked the media proxies to remove their hate-filled glasses.

TheJaggi at FirstPost sees no difference between the Dole-nomics of Sonia’s NAC and AAP. Surjit Bhalla (a more centre-right economist) says the BJP loves AAP because it is helping destroy Congress because, like I said, the AAP is nothing but a smaller Congress. Arvind Kejriwal and AAP are despising Congress without realising that they are despising their own ideology. The only difference is that AAP hasn’t yet had the chance to prove it is not corrupt like the Congress. That may take time because AK doesn’t want any responsibility at all. He wants to just be the agitator outside or inside a legislature. Therefore, it is not wrong for me to assess him as a substitute or a proxy for the Congress. In the last stages of Delhi election, the Congress having lost all hopes after walk-outs at RahulG rallies even stated they are open to a post-poll alliance with AAP.

Events are still unfolding. I’ve said before, it’s still too early for 2014 and we’ll drink that poison when we get there. But as if on cue there’s a report in Dainik Bhaskar on December 10 that reads: “Encouraged with its spectacular performance in Delhi elections, Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) wants to contest all the Lok Sabha seats from Gujarat to forge a challenge to BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi in his home state. According to sources, the strategy is to confine Modi to Gujarat so that his visits to other states are severely curtailed”. Isn’t that exactly what the Congress wants? Isn’t that exactly what the AAP-Sucker proxies Rajdeep, Barkha, Sagarika, Ashutosh and their entire tribe want? What was so surprising when AK called Modi “corrupt”? After all, it was that day he became a proxy for some forces.

Some of the charlatans who parade as editors in the MSM are nothing but the AAP-Sucker proxies. They don’t care about Delhi, they don’t care about India, and they don’t care about anything. Their AAP-Sucking of the new Saint Kejriwal is only to protect their own miserable lives. 

Polls 2013 - And The Losers Are...

Defeats are normal in politics and there is absolutely no dishonour in losing a democratic election. Some defeats are tolerable, some are severe. Either way, it is how a party and its leaders respond to that defeat that defines their character. Mother Gandhi and Son Gandhi came out in the evening on December 8 and accepted defeat in all the 4 states (Chattisgarh, Delhi, MP and Rajasthan) and congratulated their “opponents” for their victories. This is a reflection of poor character and pathetic lack of spirit that is traditional with the Congress. The mother-son duo was so pathetic that they didn’t want to name “BJP” as the winners and congratulate them. Rahul Gandhi went further to state “we have to learn from AAP” on how to reach out to people or campaign. Bravo! While AAP has made an excellent debut in Delhi there isn’t anything that would suggest they have swept to power in the state. Like the Gandhis, all the Congress spokies who were on TV channels were simply too arrogant to accept defeat honourably. These morons don’t seem to realise that this is the same arrogance that cost them the elections in the first place. This is the same arrogance that showed up when RahulG turned up a presser to declare “complete nonsense” and directly ridicule his own party’s PM.

Will they learn? I doubt it! These Congis aren’t very bright people at learning. That brings us to the media who too were extremely unwilling to accept the BJP sweep. Well alright, if these doormats at NDTV, CNN-IBN, TimesNow, IBN7 etc. don’t want to accept a 4-0 for BJP then they can at least concede it’s a 0-4 loss for the Congress. Doesn’t matter who they lost to, does it? All they were interested in was to toast the AAP as the biggest victor of the elections.

AAP made a great debut in Delhi but there are clear reasons for it. Any joker knew Sheila Dikshit was going to face the flak for Congress failures. There was anti-incumbency, there was that Nirbhaya rape and crimes in the city, there was corruption. So the SheilaD govt was a sitting duck. But as they say in cricket, even if it’s a loose ball someone has to hit it for a boundary. This is what AAP did well. The BJP didn’t finish the task in Delhi because for all the heavenly reasons, most of the top BJP leaders in Delhi have their eyes on the PM’s chair and not on Delhi. Be it Advani or Swaraj or Jaitley, the BJP heavyweights were hardly bothered about Delhi. Late in the game they came up with Dr. Harshvardhan as their CM candidate. The other thing is the modest, soft-spoken Dr.H is not exactly a charismatic, inspirational leader who can jump into a ring full of gladiators. If at all BJP salvaged Delhi to become the single largest party in these elections it surely was because of the hectic rallies by Narendra Modi in the last week before elections. If not, AAP would have been sitting pretty with a clear majority. Even an ordinary person like me could predict that in a tweet. But the MSM would like to tell you “No Modi effect”. That’s their LIE!

So whose votes did AAP take away? The answer is an unambiguous: BJP! They took the BJP votes because whatever anti-Congress votes were available should have gone to BJP. But this had to be shared with AAP. Yes, it’s possible that AAP also got some of the traditional Congress votes but the bigger loss is clearly BJP’s “anti-Congress” votes in this particular election. That the BJP still survived this dent and emerged the largest party is clearly due to Modi and nobody else. The MSM deceives in not acknowledging this. That naturally brings us to the question: Why is the MSM so upset with the victories of BJP? Let us acknowledge that the BJP may form a minority govt in Delhi which will be constantly under threat of being pulled down. Technically, the AAP can also form a govt with outside support from Congress who would like to keep the BJP out or there may be another election soon. Pulling down a minority govt is pretty much a given because the Congress has a historical tradition of pulling down govts. So why is the media making out as if this election was all about AAP?

If you observe the results, the BJP retained Chattisgarh with almost the same number of seats, even though it looked tight. BJP retained MP with a bigger count (per last reports). In Rajasthan it would not be wrong to say the BJP simply massacred the Congress. The thrashing was so severe in Rajasthan that even anti-incumbency cannot explain it. All the above are scenarios aren’t some mystery that the Congress media cronies couldn’t see earlier. They did see the writing on the wall quite clearly but in their anti-Hindu and so called pro-secular frame, the BJP simply had to be defeated. Therefore, for much of the media the AAP became a darling, especially Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghose, Ashutosh, Bhupendra Chaube and some from NDTV. On Election Day, December 4, the preference for AAP in Delhi became even more pronounced and I couldn’t help saying that the MSM was actually campaigning and goading people to go for AAP in the face of inevitable Congress defeat. This question by me in a tweet got a predictable answer (Of course, Chaubeji has since deleted the tweet):

That brings us to the other important issue. All the TV channels were eager and the panellists more than willing to dismiss there was any Modi-effect or Modi-wave in these elections. They were behaving like they were sourpuss Congress leaders. Even Arvind Kejriwal was far more gracious in his party’s performance than these cronies were in the severe Congress losses. Panellist Sunil Alagh told Sagarika Ghose “more than Congress it is you who is more Modi-centric”. The petty and pathetic Aarti Jerath on TimesNow wanted to desperately differentiate between a Modi-effect and Modi-wave, inspired, of course, by an article in her own paper by Swaminathan Aiyar. Well, what would constitute a Modi-wave? That all the seats in all 4 states would go to BJP? Or that 70% of seats would go to BJP? Those days in Indian elections are over when one party (Congress) used to get those kinds of majorities.

 

Whatever one may call it, it remains an immutable fact that Modi now does bear immense impact on elections. Would BJP have won all 4 states without Modi’s rallies? I doubt it. In MP and Rajasthan they may have won but Modi’s impact made the margin bigger and victory a certainty. In Chattisgarh it helped pulled the BJP nuts out of the fire. In Delhi it saved BJP a severe embarrassment. That is what Modi has achieved for BJP. And Arnab Goswami was shamelessly feeding questions to Jyoti Scindia “Is this a 4-0 victory for BJP or a 4-0 loss for Congress”? Well moron, there is only one loser in all 4 states and that is Congress. Even AAP can be considered a winner for that matter, even if they didn’t win a clear majority. At least two media people had the grace to partly admit the fact about Modi’s impact and effect.

Arnab was so pathetic he was already screaming for Congress to bring out Priyanka Vadra from the closet (Oh she becomes “Gandhi” during campaigns though). I have already said in my previous post that this is the end of the road for Rahul Gandhi. He is a disaster and as usual a scumbag sycophant like Manishankar Aiyar said (on NDTV) RG is only responsible for Youth Congress and has nothing to do with these election outcomes. I would go a step further: RG is responsible for NOTHING! Bihar, UP, Gujarat, MP, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh and Delhi lost by Congress but the moron RahulG had nothing to do with any of that. Sure, when Congress won Karnataka it was all Rahul magic. This is why I say for India to progress Congress must die. A party with no inner democracy and a culture of sycophancy and slavery cannot wish you freedom or democracy ever. That much is predictable of the Congress and some in the media. But to me there were some people in the media who were a bigger disgrace than the Congress. And the losers are:

No matter what the results of an election and what their political preferences, media anchors and panellists are expected to carry out discussions with some semblance of reason and logic. All the nine persons above (and there were some more minor ones) were an absolute disgrace in their unwillingness to even grudgingly concede a victory to BJP and the impact of Modi. Their hatred of Modi has now become part of their DNA and disease and there is no cure. It is killing them inside and they know it. All these years these people sucked up to Rahul Gandhi as India’s Obama or the Great White Hope. He sunk them! The Congress doesn’t have an answer to Modi so far nor do these media slaves. Shankarsan Thakur said on TimeNow Congis are afraid to blame the Gandhis. Laughable! I keep saying the media boys and girls piss in their pants and skirts when they have to mention “Gandhi”, so are they now expecting Congis to blame or name Gandhis? The cowards and slaves in the Congress are no different from the cowards and slaves in the MSM. Should we talk of 2014? It’s too early, will drink that poison when the time comes.

Arnab Goswami, acting like the regular circus clown, had a stupid question at his 6pm show on December 8: “Is AAP now a threat to Modi”? Well moron, get used to it! All of you are a threat to Modi including Congress, SP, JDU, RJD, RLD, DMK, CPM, AAP, Third Front, Fourth Umpire, CBI, Salma and Sabrina, IM, LeT, JuD and the Indian MSM collectively. He’s still standing. You’re the ones who have fallen to the pits. You’re the real losers.