Propaganda is the biggest
weapon of Commies and Goebbels is their God. The most useless ministry of
I&B was created by Commie Nehru for that very purpose – propaganda. It’s a
form of political marketing for bad products. The biggest marketing programme
in the world is not from P&G or Unilever or any other business giant. The
biggest marketing programme in the world is from “Jesus Marketing Company”. It is hard to find authentic figures for
the Missionary spend on Jesus-sales but one site estimates it at $145 billion. Similarly, for
over 70 years, MK Gandhi has been
the biggest marketing show in India and in some parts of the world. From
glorifying MK Gandhi to “Mahatma” to
“Father of the nation” much has been
spent to promote his image as next only to God.
Much has been written about
MKG, his good deeds and bad deeds. But when someone starts going overboard with
fake Gandhigiri and Gandhi-Bhakti it is time for another reminder that MKG was
excessively anti-Hindu and often naïve in his politics. He neither understood Islam nor understood Hinduism. Many hold him
guilty for the Partition. I don’t have a problem with Partition but I do find
the Gandhi-Nehru decision to have not exchanged Hindu-Muslim populations in
full a serious crime against India. The consequences of this foolishness are
being seen on a daily basis in India. This year is MKG’s 150th birth
anniversary. It is natural for the GOI, States and many people to celebrate it.
But I fear an overkill. And it starts
with the not so truthful Gandhigiri of PM Modi and his excessive Gandhi-Bhakti.
None of it seems real and appears more of theatre, histrionics and political.
Modi didn’t have so much
public love for Gandhi while he was in Gujarat. It all started after he became
PM. The only Gandhi-act he did in Gujarat was to ban a book by Joseph Lelyveld which alluded to
Gandhi being Gay. In Gujarat, it was “Sardar-Sardar”
all the way because Gujaratis themselves don’t revere MKG all that much. The
theatre and drama of Modi started after he became PM, especially if you notice
his “bowing techniques”. In 2014 he
bowed and did a full Namaskar at the footsteps of Parliament. 2019 he bowed to
the Constitution. And whenever he gets the opportunity he bows to statutes of
Gandhi as much he does his famous back-bending Yoga exercise, in reverse. What
do the Gujjus really think of MKG? This clip from Telegraph of December 2017
(during Assembly elections) should provide a sample (in purple boxes):
Asked why Gandhi was more
revered outside Gujarat, the Congress supporter says “Only
illiterate people support Gandhi. No educated person who knows India’s history
would support him. His methods and agenda were not acceptable”. Another
guy says “Gandhi helped Pakistan; Modi works for India”.
Such is the sentiment for MKG in Hindu-dominant Gujarat. Far from reverence,
there is almost a contempt for him. The Congi is right. The political-rich, the
Lutyens elites and assorted fraudsters use “Gandhi” to fool the poor and the
illiterate. Even the educated fall into the trap. The other thing apart from
MKG, the very name “Gandhi” has been a curse on this country for other reasons.
In 2019, after he became PM
for a second term, Modi went one step further in his Gandhi-Bhakti. After the
swearing-in he started his first day at office with a Cabinet meeting. Before starting
work, he did a pooja of Gandhi with rose petals at the PMO and had the media
beam it Live across the world. Of course, Sardar had to be there too else it
would betray his own heart:
Some days ago, I had
summarized in some tweets what Gujjus really think of Gandhi and that he stands
nowhere in their hearts when compared to Sardar. Whether it’s Congress or BJP,
every political party knows that over-glorifying MKG is not politically
profitable in the State. The Hindu-dominant population of Gujarat consider Gandhi
a “traitor” of Hindus and in private conversations you will even hear the
choicest abuses hurled on him. There are no big monuments to Gandhi in Gujarat,
not even institutions, most are dedicated to Sardar:
Gandhi’s ideas of religious
equality or uniformity were equally misinformed. Some of his statements were
seriously absurd and he got away with such garbage only because of lack of
media-speed and because he became an over-whelming leader in the freedom
struggle. Would any Hindu – forget Hindu, would any sane person of reason
tolerate the kind of nonsense MKG peddled? He
wanted Hindus to die willingly if Muslims wanted to kill them. This series
of tweets by Rivaldo, a part-time stand-up, is sufficient to explain the
phenomenal absurdity of MKG:
Hindus must die willingly.
The Sikhs killed at Jallianwala didn’t die brave men. MKG wanted the Sikhs who
survived to offer themselves to murder. If some political leader makes such
statements today, he would be trashed to pieces and dumped in a garbage can and
there would be universal outrage.
Gandhi was a Commie, Autocratic and Anti-Hindu
None of Gandhi’s grand
ideas are follow-able or implementable. Modi thumps his chest over Surgical Strikes and Balakot. Had he truly followed Gandhi;
India wouldn’t have had an Army because Gandhi didn’t want one. Worse, if Modi
was a true Bhakt of Gandhi, he would have sent some 100 more Jawans to be
slaughtered by the Paki terrorists. That is what Gandhi would have wanted and
applauded – to willingly die and
sacrifice yourself to those who want to kill you and establish “Jannat” on
earth. And all MKG ideas and
policies were Communist in nature. It’s not just me, international researchers
see Gandhi for the Commie he was. This is from a previous post of mine “Getting Past Gandhi”:
A university in Ghana knocked off Gandhi statue over
his reported racist attitude towards Africans. The report says: “In his early writings
he referred to black South Africans as "kaffirs" - a highly offensive
racist slur. He also said that Indians were "infinitely superior" to
black people”. Kaffir is pretty much what Muslims refer to Hindus and
non-believers as. MKG used the same terms. What would you call me if today I
said “Indians are superior to Blacks”? Imagine the abuses by MKG that were
condoned. MKG was stubborn, tantrum-throwing and autocratic. All the epithets
one would use today for Arvind Kejriwal.
He didn’t respect the verdict of Congressmen electing Sardar Patel the Head of
party and thereby the PM. He chose Nehru over a democratic election. There wasn’t one bone of democracy in
Gandhi’s body:
The Deception of Non-Violence
Gandhi is called a
“Mahatma” and an apostle of non-violence. Nothing could be more deceptive.
Hypothetically, let’s ask some questions – What if something un-natural
happened to Sonia Gandhi or Asad Owaisi or Narendra Modi? What if they fell to some terrorist plot? Damn
right! You can be assured there would be riot and violence all over the country
targeted at some community or some group that is suspected to be responsible. Much similar to the way Brahmins were
targeted on Gandhi’s assassination. Gandhi’s death brought violence and the
killing of Brahmins is proof. The British knew damn well that if something
happened to the “Fakir” (As Modi too
likes to call himself) the entire country would have been engulfed in flames
and the British would be slaughtered like pigs if something had happened to
Gandhi. Thus, the fakery of non-violence is merely a shield that hides the
potential threat of violence.
It is this cloak that Gandhi wore that helped him
peddle his non-violence delusion against brutalities by the British while sending Indians to die in their wars. Gandhi
and the British both knew what would have happened if something happened to him.
Thus, even while in custody, Gandhi was mostly housed in “luxury jails” like that of Sashikala in the present day. And when
free, in his later years, Gandhi lived in the sprawling complex of Sabarmati
Ashram. This property would cost nothing less than 1000 crores at current
market prices. As his admirer Sarojini
Naidu once quipped, it cost the
nation a fortune to keep Gandhi in poverty.
Now, let’s come to back to
the new-found “Gandhi-Bhakti” by PM Modi. It wasn’t so much when he started out
as PM in 2014. It became more pronounced as months went by and, particularly,
after then US President Barack Obama’s
visit to India. This excerpt from a report summarises why Modi turned into a
Gandhi-exploiting PM:
Ashley Tellis is a veteran
journo now with the Carnegie Endowment. He accurately explains why Gandhi is politically-profitable for Modi. Sardar
is not so well-known across the world but Gandhi is. The more Modi keeps bowing
to his statues, the more he expects the world to view his image in the shadow
of Gandhi. Thusly, more the awards and more the acceptance. As Modi pointed out
to Smita Prakash of ANI in his January
2019 interview, one of his regrets was being unable to win over the Lutyens
crowd. Gandhi-Bhakti is a sure way of winning over Sickulars, universal
Fiberals and everything that stands for deception. Gandhi’s 150th
anniversary will and should be celebrated, being one of the leading freedom
fighters and nothing more. All this Mahatma and Father of the nation titles is
immature and unworthy of a vast nation for which many have died during the
freedom movement. Some of the programmes announced by BJP and ModiSarkar are
downright childish in this day of communication-pollution:
Gandhipedia? GANDHIPEDIA? You must be seriously out
of your heads if in this day and age a govt is going to spend money and time
over this. There is enough material on MK Gandhi and even Sunny Leone on the
internet for anyone who wants to know. This is how govt spends money on Commie
propaganda. I often call it “PropaGandhi”.
I hope the Padyatras and similar mis-adventures are paid for by the BJP and not with public money. Any public money
used for Gandhi anniversary must be modest and ModiSarkar would do well to
declare their budget for these celebrations. The statement underlined in red in
the above pic is stark in its hypocrisy and fraud.
Amit Shah claims
Modi has ended “appeasement politics”.
Utter LIE and DECEPTION. Every single day ModiSarkar is on and on about
Muslims, reforming Madrasas, scholarships only to Muslims, ignoring their
violent crimes and there is no appeasement? The first step to end appeasement
is to dismantle this fraud called “Minority
Ministry”. And “Minority” is a camouflage for “Muslim” and this ministry is
mostly manned by a Muslim. Sikhs, Parsis, Jains, Buddhists don’t beg for doles.
In this quest for a “refined image” across the world Modi
has fallen victim to bad choices and maybe wrong counsel. He is trying to be someone that he is not and never was. Within the
first month of the second term Modi has angered many Hindus with his “Selective Pain” for Muslim victims of
some incidents. Many Hindus are angry that the blabbering, rotund Amit Shah
appears helpless against Muslim violence right under his nose in Delhi,
including destruction of a Durga temple. I am in absolutely no doubt Modi is
destroying his chances of being a great PM by foolishly following the failed
principles of MKG and Muslim appeasement. In the eyes of MKG only Muslims can
be victims. Hindus must die if the Muslims so desired and prove to the world
the stupidity of non-violence:
Nehru failed as a PM only
partly because he led a luxurious lifestyle and a disconnect. The major reason
for his failure was imposing his “Personal
Love” for the likes of Stalin, Lenin, Nasser or Mao on this country and
being a “Muslim by choice”. This led to failed polices like Panchsheel, NAM,
Kashmir, Indus Water Treaty and so on. PM Modi would do well not to impose his
“Personal Gandhi-Bhakti” (even if it
is politically-profitable for his image in the world) on the country. In a
month after return to power again, ModiSarkar has no new ideas, nothing
dramatic to offer. Even the Budget hasn’t created too much noise or excitement.
The biggest talking point of the Budget being the “Red cloth” used by the FM. The “Wow” effect is GONE. And, therefore, MK Gandhi will be used
abundantly to cover up. Excessive Gandhi
is nauseating and insulting to Hindus. Keep the celebrations modest and
don’t risk an overkill. Gandhi himself wouldn’t have liked such an overkill
over his anniversary.
