Modi Haters Naked

No interview of a Prime Minister is ever going to be perfect. And considering Narendra Modi doesn’t speak to media all that much it causes greater heartburn. It is also impossible to cover all the issues confronting India in an hour-long interview for any anchor. So when Arnab Goswami landed an interview with PM Modi for the first time on TV since the latter became PM it naturally became the talk of the whole country. It is not so much about Arnab but that people care to hear Modi speak. Whether the questions and responses of the PM were good, moderate or bad is something that depends on the menu of the person who watches it. So, we will safely leave that to the subjective views and opinions of individuals. What the interview did do is that it brought out thousands of idiots who still have no objectivity but limitless hatred for the PM. They have been unable to come to terms with the fact that this is a PM working at tremendous pace who has had more successes in a short period than his predecessors.

That in poll after poll Modi continues to remain a popular PM riles almost all these haters. Let’s look at some of the morons who responded to the interview and how their cup of hatred over-flowed. Where better to start than the Category5Moron (unfortunately I cannot assign a higher title to her):

Ahem! Sagarika is challenging Modi to hold a presser instead of favouring one individual. It doesn’t occur to this Goddess of Moronery that this individual is a senior colleague from her own Tabela called TOI. Leave that alone for a minute. This C5M has a problem with Arnab landing the chance to interview PM but not long ago she was begging for a “Sit-down” with her Street-thug, garbage of a journo called Rajdeep Sardesai:

So a Modi sit-down with Rajdeep would be TV Gold? Laughable idiocy! Modi did make Rajdeep sit-down on the bus-floor like a cleaner and made mince-meat of him in October 2012. Well, that is TV Gold for the C5M. These fools must now realise that their petty hatred has long dimissed their claim to be called journalists in any form. TOI naturally took her to task for her stupidity and forced her to delete her tweet on Arnab. For Sagarika, stupidity and lack of discretion is eternal. I have often called her the “Sergei Bubka of moronery”. She is likely to break her own record again. So let’s move to another chronic Modi-hater, the darling of Sagarika and Rajdeep. The camera-seeking-item-dancing Arvind Kejriwal (who chants Modi,Modi,Modi non-stop every day and night) who is India’s first and only National TwitterCM. Here:

This TwitterCM RTs his own tweet. Amazing! And he again calls Arnab a propagandist for Modi, like he did after an interview in April 2014. The TwitterCM forgets, of course, that he grandly tweeted his own appearance on an interview with Arnab on the same “Frankly speaking” show in 2013 over Delhi elections. Considering Kejri is an “Imandaar” CM as he grandly calls himself here is how he discourages propagandists:

That article in May 2016 in Fountain Ink exposes how AK courts media by appointing dozens of journalists to various govt bodies and institutions under Delhi Govt control. FountainInk is not accurate – I would call it “PURCHASE OF JOURNOS” for propagandising every foolisheness of AK as a grand accomplishment. And the names in the list of journos include some prominent bootlickers who frequently appear on TV shows or write columns in papers. Thus, Modi-hater AK has actually innovated new methods to PURCHASE journos and make them his slaves apart from bogus ads to various outlets. And they are rewarding him with 24X7 coverage of his lungi-dance. As with this pyschotic moron, the Congress couldn’t help being ahead of him:

Our journalists? Sometimes these losers don’t think before they speak. They still think they are in power and their slaves like Barkha, Shekhar, Rajdeep or Sagarika will cover up for them. It’s a bad goof-up that exposes the acute poverty of thought within the Congress. If their initial response was to poke holes into what the PM said or did not say, then that would have at least been passable criticism. No! They are stupidly poking holes at Arnab and his interview and claiming “our journos” merited asking questions. We all know what kind of scumbags the Congress had bred under inside their warehouse. It was one of my strongest reasons to start this blog itself to expose such crooks. Dumb as they are, the Congis even clarified that by “our” they meant entire nation:

Entire nation? And where was Arnab from? The hometown of their stupid boss RahulG in Jupiter? It is fascinating that fools tend to compound their own stupidity by clarifiying an unintended admission. That brings us to the biggest media AAPTards and Modi-haters in the league who let their envy of Arnab go to distastrous and distasteful lengths. Here are the scumbags of AajTak:

Individuals on SM trolling Modi or media is one thing, but a media house to publicly troll another media colleague and the PM with tasteless comments is truly unheard of. Even if they had criticised the interview with some points that could have passed. But no, this is raw hatred from AajTak that is pouring against Modi. And this cannot go un-noticed. Their nonsense was well caught by @ManicheJain who interacted with me on this and sent me info on how they begged him to delete his tweets:

You have humans behind machines? And the PM is what you morons – a machine parading as Modi? It is not just the channel that was pleading with him to delete his tweets but also individuals behind the nonsense who were trying to emotionally blackmail him into deleting:

Her job is at risk? It damn well be – sack the moron and sack every scumbag in IndiaToday group that believes that political hatred is passable in their jobs. These scumbags employed by AajTak also personally and professionally spew hatred against Modi? And Arnab is a Chamcha as AajTak claims? Have these Paid-Morons forgotten that Krantikari interview of AK by PP Bajpai. That wasn’t even an interview – it was an absolute SCAM! It is alarming that such shameless people are employed by news channels who exercise no discretion in venting their political frustrations and persuasions. They do have a right to their political preference but certainly not to the extent they start publicly pouring scorn on the PM and another media colleague. These are not common citizens who rant for one or other reason on SM. And this is not the first time from the garbage-can called India Today which has accumulated filth like Rajdeep, Karan Thapar etc. IT can pour filth on a BJP spokie in this fashion?

Thus, the Arnab-Modi interview, regardless of its contents, helped completely expose the pigheadedness of many media scoundrels who want the glory days of corruption of Congress back to profit from. This is where NaMo must strongly pull up Arun Jaitley too. Jaitley is publicly seen as the Durbari who patronises all these channels who pour mindless scorn on the PM and BJP ministers and members. Nobody has a problem even with harsh and invalid criticism. But to pour endless hatred and Jaitley still patronising channels like NDTV or India Today group will cost ModiSarkar heavily. As I&B minister he has done nothing to curb this nonsensical hatred. SM has exposed these Modi-haters naked over and over again. They are not going to change; ModiSarkar will have to.

An Incoherent Mind

Someone in the Congress party and Rahul Gandhi’s image managers decided he must finally do a TV interview. They decided to do it big. They decided it shouldn’t be a “chota-mota” interview with regular Congress propagandists like Rajdeep Sardesai or Barkha Dutt. They decided it should be a full-length, almost 75 minutes, interview with Arnab Goswami on TimesNow (January 27). I had recorded the whole thing but thankfully TimesNow also put up the transcripts but seem to have later removed it but it’s also available here. If you watched the interview you would know RG had come thoroughly prepared for the task. He had memorised all the answers he could but it turned out they were all answers to questions his coaches might have asked. One had to often struggle to find a connection between what Arnab asked and what RG answered.

The good news first. RahulG decided that this was an occasion of great significance so he must have felt the need to shave and come clean for Arnab. Any of those Gillette brand managers would be impressed. The make-up, the looks and the appearance was great. Unfortunately for viewers, RG also had to talk and that’s the tough part. For me, RG only confirmed what I had suspected and written many times on this site that the man is incapable of thinking on his feet or any kind of comprehension skills. Let’s just sample some of the Q&A (excerpts, some edited):

Arnab Goswami: Specifically speaking how is Narendra Modi, your party criticised him for the 2002 Gujarat riots, and how can you do that when he has been given a clean chit…. Do you believe that strategy of your party is fundamentally wrong?

Rahul Gandhi: The strategy of the party is very simple. Everything we have done over that last 5-10years, in fact if you look all the way back to the freedom movement, every single thing we have ever done is empower people. We empowered people in the freedom movement, we empowered farmers in the Green revolution, and we empowered the citizens of India when we did the telecom revolution. We have empowered millions and millions of people through frankly the most powerful legislation that has ever taken place in this country called the RTI- Right to information. Things that used to be closed, things that were in closed doors which nobody knew about.

That was the trend and pattern of the whole interview. Arnab asks something and RG goes into a banter about some unrelated issue. The few words most used by him were RTI, Women empowerment, system and fundamentals. This is apart from “my daddy, my grandmother” who are regular features of his answers to anything. Vote for me because my granny died and because my daddy died and that makes me who or what I am. So the reason, I suspect, Congress is so connected with corruption and scams is they were busy empowering everyone. You can ask any question you like but RG had only answers on RTI and empowerment. Mind you, even RTI is not an original Congress formulation. People are now better observers of what screw ups politicians do and they don’t use lipstick like a Vinod Mehta or Varadabhai tend to do. I think it is fair to say RG came for an essay on the cow but he was asked to write one on a dog instead. You see, this is the problem with people asking questions. Arnab should have first checked what RG had come prepared with, no? Some more where RG analyses RG and tells us how we should analyse RG:

Arnab Goswami: Are you avoiding a direct face-off with Narendra Modi? Is there a fear of loss Rahul because this election is not looking good for the Congress party from overall estimates? And the growing belief is that if Rahul Gandhi has not picked up the challenge officially that means that there is a fear of loss, he is avoiding a direct one on one battle with Narendra Modi, you must answer that?

Rahul Gandhi: To understand that question you have to understand a little bit about who Rahul Gandhi is and what Rahul Gandhi's circumstances have been and if you delve into that you will get an answer to the question of what Rahul Gandhi is scared off and what he is not scared off. The real question is what I am doing sitting here, you are a journalist, when you were small you must have said to yourself I want to do something, you decided to become a journalist at some point, why did you do that?

Arnab Goswami: You are asking me the question

Rahul Gandhi: Yes, I am asking you a question, it is a conversation

Arnab Goswami: Because I like and enjoy being a journalist, it is a professional challenge for me. My question is you avoiding a direct face-off with Mr. Narendra Modi?

Rahul Gandhi: You are not answering my question, but I will answer the question and that will give you some insight into how Rahul Gandhi thinks. For that I will have to expand a little bit about my growing up, how I grew up and the circumstances in which I grew up. What I saw when I was a child ,was my father, who was a pilot, and because of circumstances was thrown into the political system and all I saw when was small after my grandmother died was my father in constant-constant combat with the system in India and then I saw him die actually. In my life I have seen my grandmother die, I have seen my father die, I have seen my grandmother go to jail and I have actually been through a tremendous amount of pain as a child when these things happen to you, what I had to scared off I lost, there is absolutely nothing I am scared off…. The system everyday-everyday hurts people and I have felt the pain that the system can cause. I felt the pain with my father, I saw him every single day of his life, so the question of whether I am afraid of losing an election or whether I am afraid of Mr. Modi is not actually the point. I am here basically for one thing, I see tremendous energy in this country, I see more energy in this country than any other country, I see billions of youngsters and I see this energy is trapped...

On one point RG is off the mark though. I believe when Arnab was young he wasn’t thinking of being a journalist or even thinking of journalism. It is quite possible that Arnab just had a lot of questions for the nation or on behalf of the nation. So Dr. Rahul Freud Gandhi analyses Arnab’s diaper days and tells us how a man from Assam who wasn’t “empowered” decided and became a journalist. Whoa! When you don’t have answers you also fool yourself with lies. RG often cries about his granny and here mentions her being jailed. It doesn’t occur to him or his party that the criminal Emergency saw thousands of people being dumped in jail by IndiraG for no rhyme or reason except their opposition to her corrupt misrule. Thus, it is evident that this guy neither understands reality nor acknowledges truth and gives the impression that events in this life have caused a lot of mental damage. Some of this damage seems irreparable.

Arnab Goswami: Explain that. Government of Gujarat was aiding and abetting the riots is what you just said, explain that?

Rahul Gandhi: I mean it’s not me...it’s the large number of people who were there, large number of people who saw actively the Government of Gujarat being involved in the riots.

Arnab Goswami: You will keep that line despite the CM getting a clean chit form the courts?

Rahul Gandhi: I mean, people saw it. I am not the person who saw it, your colleague saw it. Your colleagues told me

Arnab Goswami: What are you saying? Can you explain?

Rahul Gandhi: What I feel is that this country needs to look at the fundamental issues at hand, the fundamental political issue at hand is that our Political system is controlled by too few people and we absolutely have to change the way our political system is structured, we have to change our Political parties, we have to make them more transparent, we have to change the processes that we use to elect candidates, we have to empower women in the political parties, that is where the meat of the issue but I don't hear that discussion, I don’t hear the discussion about how are we actually choosing that candidate, that is never the discussion.

This is a fantastic answer to who saw the Gujarat govt abetting riots in 2002. RG foolishly fumbles and states he was told by others. He mentions Arnab’s colleagues saw govt employees aiding the riots and Arnab’s honourable colleagues at that time were Rajdeep and Barkha. So RG is not really off the mark here. It’s a fact that the most number of lies were peddled by Arnab’s colleagues who, if you go by RG, are superior to any court or SIT. But asked to expand on his silly answer, RG again takes us through his nonsense of “fundamental issues” and changing “processes”. Nobody tells this jerk that most of the ills in our system and polity were installed by his own party. And even so, there is hardly any sign shown by RG of improving or changing anything in the last 10 years that he has been in politics and part of the govt. Naturally, the Congress cronies at CNN-IBN and Firstpost were quick to use this as a headline “Rahul blames Modi for 2002”. It’s now a tradition. By this token, RG should still be held guilty of abducting Sukanya Devi.

Rahul Gandhi: My long term view is that we need to take the Indian political system to a different place. We need to bring in youngsters and we need to move away from this concentration of power. Unfortunately the political system today is at a particular place and I can’t simply ignore the fact that the political system is at that place, so certainly there are points at which you might have to take a decision that you are not a 100% happy with but the long term idea for me is to transform the system, to bring in youngsters and make sure they are empowered.

Arnab Goswami: Lalu Prasad has been convicted on the 30th of September 2013 ….

Rahul Gandhi: Our alliance in Bihar is with a political party with an idea not an individual, we are making alliance, and it is not certain that we are going to make an alliance, we are in process of talking to people and our alliance is with an idea, with a party, not an individual

Who can disagree with all this? I’m sure RG and Congress have a rare vision through which they see RJD as separate from the criminal Lalu Prasad and they also see an “idea” of the party which they are willing to marry. This is the moron who claims he is against corruption. This is the moron who talks non-stop empowerment and change in systems. But he proves only one thing: that he doesn’t have the slightest idea what BS he is talking about. RG is just an over-grown kid who uses big words without any idea what they mean.

Arnab Goswami: You're avoiding a debate. Will you have a debate with Narendra Modi if he agrees to a debate on any of these issues? My question is direct. If Narendra Modi says I'm willing to debate these issues...

Rahul Gandhi: I'm debating these issues by building structures in the Congress party that's going to transform it.

So even where a debate is concerned RG is debating by building structures in his party. By logic it means RG is debating all the time. So someday he might reach a conclusion and when he does it will probably require changing the whole structure again.

Rahul Gandhi: It all depends on what you're trying to do. I told you that I'm here because I want to help use the energy of this country. I want to make this country powerful. I want to project the ideas of this country. To do that, I think there are basically 3 things one needs to do. One, is changing the way we do politics here. Getting away from the superficialities, getting away from the small issues and moving deeper into the issues right. Questioning the system, changing the system. Things like RTI, things like Lokpal, things like how we choose our candidates. Things like bringing youngsters into politics. Second is empowering the women of this country. Really bringing them into the system. Really pushing them forward. And third is using the energy of the youth of this country. Bringing in the type of jobs that they need. This stuff is not done in 5 minutes. This stuff is frankly not done in this type of discussions. This stuff is done through concentrated thinking and long term work. It's frankly difficult work, it's painful work….. The real thing is that it's a heart thing. It's a soul thing. Why are you here? I asked you that question, why am I sitting here? I'm sitting here because I feel with all my heart that we need to change the system here and not enough people are actually asking that question.

It’s a heart thing! It’s a soul thing! This stuff is not done in 5 minutes. This stuff is done through concentrated thinking. I can keep laughing at this moron but he is a serious problem to himself. What exactly is concentrated thinking? Like you lock yourself up and think? One can pick what he or she likes or dislikes from an interview but I am convinced this man is a danger not only to the country but to himself as well. There is neither clarity in thought nor a demonstrated skill of comprehension. All the nonsensical nuggets by RG are pieces of his usual meaningless speeches which he could have delivered with anyone asking him questions. I am also convinced that he keeps referring to “systems” because he doesn’t know what it is that needs changing or fixing. Even Harsha Bhogle who analyses cross-bats and googlies for a living couldn’t find a connection between the questions and answers.

I may have mentioned this before that in the theory of change one answers three simple questions as a leader. This comes from the book “The Goal” by Eliyahu Goldratt about a factory manager struggling to save his plant in the 3 months given to him:

1) Change what? – This is simply identifying what or which parts of a system to change.

2) Change it to what? – This answers whether you change a donkey to a horse or a horse to an elephant. In other words, mere desire of change doesn’t mean anything unless one is clear on what to change it to. If one part of a system needs to be changed 100% or be made an online process. RG has not shown anything in his political life of what he would change things to.

3) How to – If one knows what to change and change it to what then the obvious question is how to do it. RG is not only a powerful person in his party but also holds power over the govt. I haven’t seen any knowledge or skill in this interview or any time before that he possesses the answer on how to change things.

Empty words and an empty mind; there is a reason why RG has been nicknamed “Pappu”. As the years pass he only keeps giving us more proof why he is such a big disaster. When there were only black cars and people demanded more colours, Henry Ford was famously reported as saying “we have all the colours you want, as long as it is black”. RG was no different, you can ask all the questions you want he has only four answers: RTI, Women-empowerment, system and fundamentals. I believe it is not just that his answers are incoherent but perhaps his mind itself is incoherent. 

PS: Vote on the poll for worst journalists 2014 (Right margin of page).