Farcical LJ Laws

Throughout the world most pre-meditated murders are committed by those known to the victims. Spontaneous murders under “crimes of passion” are between people known to each other. Other cases of murder happen when there is a botched robbery or in a panic situation where a cop tries to stop a criminal; like a smuggler or mining mafia crook. Then there are blood-thirsty types who kill just for fun or because of a mental problem, like serial killers who hunt for their prey at random. All Love Jihad (LJ) crimes and murders are by those who know their victims.

One of the most brutal and gruesome murders in recent times was that of 15-year old Ankita Singh at Dumka in Jharkhand in August 2022. Her stalker, Shahruk, poured petrol on her through a window while she was sleeping and burned her alive with an accomplice called Naeem. At first, a Muslim officer of the PS tried to pass her off as a 19-year old to dilute the case against her killers. Shahruk was not a stranger to Ankita. She had known him but later spurned him after knowing a bit more about him. He kept stalking her and finally burned her to death when she refused to surrender to his attempts at entrapping her. In 2020, Nikita Tomar, a young college student, was brazenly shot dead outside her college in full public view by a Muslim guy called Tausif who demanded she marry him and convert to Islam. The brazen willingness to murder someone who doesn’t fall for your lust also constitutes Love Jihad:

A few days ago, a little movie starlet called Tunisha Sharma committed suicide according to media reports. She committed suicide on the sets where she was working in the room of her ex-boyfriend Sheezan Khan who had broken up with her some days earlier. Tunisha’s family claims foul play and that she didn’t commit suicide. It seems to me that Bollywood and the TV industry surrounding it actively encourages Hindu girls to engage in relationships with Muslim guys. This appears to be a passport to continued work and success in the filthy industry. Almost every top Bollywood Muslim actor either has a Hindu girlfriend or is married to a Hindu woman. They don’t seem to find Muslim women suitable or attractive to their lifestyle. And as soon as Tunisha’s death was reported, a BJP minister termed it LJ and promptly demanded that the Maharashtra govt pass a stringent anti-LJ law:

Girish Mahajan is not the first one to demand a law against LJ. Almost all BJP states have demanded and passed some kind of LJ law but they are largely deceptive and a white-wash without even defining LJ as a crime. Obviously, defining LJ as a crime would mean mentioning Hindu-Muslim as the focus which politicians wouldn’t dare. Among the first to recognise the LJ crime was none other than the Kerala HC way back in 2009. The court mentioned “Under pretext of love there cannot be any compulsive, deceptive conversion”. But that is the very purpose of Love Jihad:

Therefore, it is important to define what Love Jihad is. None of the laws made to combat this menace actually mentions the term LJ nor defines what LJ is. The laws that were made were essentially “anti-conversion” laws addressing conversion by entrapment, inducement or force. The laws do not address the fact that LJ is basically an assault on Hindu girls and women nor recognise the fact that it’s an organized menace by Muslim youths. In some cases, it is a minor modification of the earlier anti-conversion law or more mumbo-jumbo in legal nonsense without addressing the problem of Love Jihad. Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka (all BJP states) have passed such a law which is nothing but a FARCE which doesn’t really address the problem of LJ:

Because these laws are general in nature the Dalits in Karnataka opposed the Bill because it curbs their freedoms to convert to Buddhism or any other religion without following certain legal procedures. In a recent episode, there was mass-conversion of Dalits to Buddhists in Delhi because Delhi doesn’t have any religious conversion law that mandates certain legal procedures like the conversion having to be done with an affidavit or sworn statement in front of a Magistrate.

Last year, a report from Gujarat claimed the first arrest under the new modified anti-conversion law. The case has all the ingredients of Love-Jihad but the only omission the report makes is the utter foolishness of the woman involved in the aborted relationship. First, read this report and then we will try to understand how it unveils the ingredients:

The woman is obviously Hindu or non-Muslim. The man fakes his religious identity as a Christian. He took her to various religious places, promised her a good life and then blackmailed her with intimate photos to marry and convert to Islam. There is just one jarring note – why would a woman go along with a man after the first incident of rape as she claims? She claims she was raped FOUR times. Is the first rape not enough to dump a man or at least not meet him in private places? Is she that dumb to go along with the man even after meeting his family who would have given all signs of being Muslims? Is she that dumb that she waited to be raped FOUR times to realise she is being conned?

So, technically and legally, what case would the police take to a court? It would only be case of entrapment and rape and the accused would predictably argue that since they had an ongoing relationship, the sex was consensual and not rape. Consequently, the only possible case against the Muslim man would be that of an imposter pretending to be a Christian to lure the woman and/or blackmail with the photos. But since she didn’t complain till the fourth rape even the charges of entrapment or luring would fall flat. We don’t know what happened to that case yet. Time will tell.

Therefore, what exactly is Love Jihad? In the current circumstances in India, LJ is a deliberate plot and act by some Muslim men to target Hindu girls and women for lust, sex, marriage to birth babies and then convert to Islam. Non-compliance means either be dumped or killed. The term non-compliance also means the woman spurns the seduction which results in murder as with Ankita Singh and Nikita Tomar. So, the woman can be killed for non-compliance and also for complying with and falling for the seduction as in the case of Shraddha Walkar. The reason I specifically say “Muslim men” is because of the word Jihad which is associated only with Islam and not with Christianity or Buddhism. Love Jihad also involves the man faking himself to be a Hindu with a Hindu name to lure the woman and seduce her into a dream of good life.

None of the laws made so far use the term “Love Jihad” or address the “organized” plotting of the whole act of LJ targeting Hindu women. They are just plain illegal-conversion laws. These laws do not address cases like those of Ankita or Nikita where there was no marriage and no conversion involved. Such cases will remain regular murder cases and nothing more. Most importantly, none of these laws state a woman (usually Hindu woman) as the target of the LJ offence. Under current laws even a man can be targeted for forced conversion with threat to life. That is a serious flaw and that is why LJ continues to be a menace. Thus, a new law that specifies and uses the term LJ or “Love entrapment” for seduction by fake representation of religion, fake name, inducement, entrapment, blackmail followed by forced conversion, threat to life and/or murder has to be enacted. Since the Constitution will not allow Muslims to be specified as the usual suspects, the law has to mention a person of one religion faking identity to entrap a woman. And LJ has to be specifically recognized as a crime against a woman and not as a general forced conversion crime. The cartoon depicts stages of entrapment and stupidity of the Hindu woman quite appropriately.

Take the case of a woman named Uma Sharma from Mumbai. She was married to a Muslim and also converted to Islam and changed her name. She reportedly also had children with her husband Wasim. She was murdered for not agreeing to wear the hijab or burqa as demanded by Wasi Ahmed. She was buried in the bedroom of their house. This is not a case of LJ. Technically and legally, this is a plain case of murder and no other offence can be invoked under Indian laws:

While demanding more stringent laws is one thing, Hindu women should also learn and understand the risks they are running. By all the accounts we see in the media, most of the LJ victims are from a lower middle-class section. There are just a few cases from middle and upper class and hardly any case from rich families. It is hard to say what drives such women to fall for potential killers. But where the laws are concerned, all the laws made so far to combat this menace are a sham, a farce and do not address the problem at all.

Follow on Twitter.

Subscribe    Donate INR     Donate Intl Cards

Selective Pain

Prior to 2004 Hindus had zero outlets to vent their anger and frustration. Whether this was Constitutional discrimination or murders of Hindus, the criminal media and Sickulars ruled public discourse. They established one important principle “Only Muslims can be victims of any kind of violence, Hindus are chopped liver”. This was best demonstrated during and after the Gujarat 2002 riots. Sickulars and media reported 3000, 5000 – any number of Muslims and ONLY Muslims killed. At the final count, the total dead was around 1200 of which around 250 were Hindus. This is not counting the 59 Hindus barbecued at Godhra which provoked the riots. The biggest beneficiary of those riots was none other than Narendra Modi. As the entire Sickular gang vilified him, he got to play “victim”. He used the assertive Hindu majority in Gujarat (which has been electing BJP since 1995) to play “Hindu Hriday Samrat” as he came to be called.

After the riots there was a terrorist attack on the Swaminarayan temple in Gandhinagar in September 2002 – 30 were killed and many injured. Immediately after, Modi called for mid-term elections which were held in December 2002. His vilification, his oratory, chest-thumping Hindutva, Hindu anger for Godhra and the temple attack were all heady ingredients for an electoral win. BJP did win handsomely. “Miyan Musharraf” or “Hum paanch, humare pachees” filled his speeches. Although I coined the phrase “Electoral Flesh” only this year, the 2002 election was the first time Modi used “Dead Hindus” as electoral flesh. Six were arrested for the Akshardham attack – all were acquitted by SC in May 2014. Talk about justice for the Hindu victims. There was not a whimper anywhere.

As the SM platforms grew from 2004-2010, more and more people heard about Modi, his vilification and all that earned him “sympathy” from Hindus across the world. Modi too played the victimhood very well in all campaigns along with the Hindutva card. Many may not be aware – the media and Sickulars called Gujarat the “Hindutva Laboratory” right from the mid-1990s. Modi made Hindutva his main plank to rise in Gujarat and later on to become PM.

Cut to the present. Hindus are still outraging on SM over targeted or wanton murders of Hindus, including lynching and there being no outrage by media or political parties. I have no doubts that Hindus killed by the “peaceful” barbarians far exceeds Muslim victims. But now that Modi is PM, he doesn’t think so. This was his latest comment in RS on the murder of a Muslim man – Tabrez.

Nothing wrong in what Modi said. He is right in accusing “selective outrage” by Sickulars and he is rightly “pained” over Tabrez. Modi is very careful about his “anti-Muslim” image and phobia. The Sickulars have painted him into that corner. He is very careful about his lipstick too. It is easy to be a “Hindutva Samrat” in Gujarat. Most Hindus in Gujarat have good money, don’t like govt intrusion in their life or business, mostly very religious, cow-loving vegetarians and will not tolerate any Muslim appeasement. It takes a man with guts to be what he was in Gujarat (which helped Modi eventually become PM) to be the same in Delhi. So, what is the problem here? Gutless Modi has repeatedly demonstrated that just as he accuses Sickulars of “selective outrage”, he too feels only “Selective Pain”. From Hindu Hriday Samrat he is now the “Sultan of Pain” for Muslims. When provoked by media and Sickulars, Modi feels PAIN for Tabrez. When provoked by them, he feels PAIN for Akhlaq. But Modi feels NO PAIN whatsoever for murdered or lynched Hindus because they are good “Electoral Flesh”. He never feels any pain for them because the Sickulars don’t provoke him.

When MMS made the statement Muslims (or Minorities) have the first Right on resources, everyone mocked him. At least MMS implied others have “second Right” on resources. In case of Modi, ONLY Muslims have the right to his “Selective Pain” – Hindus and others can go fly a kite. Feeling pain at wanton murders is a matter of conscience and justice and not wearing lipstick for your Sickular adversaries or Islamists in the ME. Here are some recent samples of wanton murders of Hindus:

A Lassi-seller is lynched in the first image on the left. In the middle image a Hindu is killed, his body parts removed like a “ritual killing”, in the pic on the right (Moronic TOI asks if it’s a crime of passion) Soumya, a Kerala cop, was stalked, then knocked over by her Muslim murderer, then chased into a building, then butchered into pieces, then the body parts were burned by him. This is an extreme “OVERKILL” that pains neither Modi nor any of his ministers. The Sultan of “Selective Pain” Modi is not pained at any of these horrible murders. He will use these “dead Hindus” in the next elections. Modi sent the NIA to arrest killers of Ramalingam only in the middle of LS elections. There’s Ankit Saxena, there’s Dr. Pankaj Narang who was killed by a Muslim gang for celebrating a cricket win in Delhi. There’s Dhruv Tyagi who was killed because he protected his daughter from eve-teasers. The funny part is, the criminal-tabela of Aroon Purie claims assailants “unidentified” but “arrested”. Such Sickular jerks don’t even know what crap they write. How can some people be arrested and their identity still remain “unknown”?

Neither the Sultan of selective pain nor any his ministers felt any “pain”. Had Dhruv Tyagi been a Muslim, some BJP minister would have visited him and Congis would have protested on the streets and criminals in media outraged like their own father was killed. In another recent incident, a father of an abducted daughter was lynched because he filed a police complaint:

 

He’s a Hindu, so naturally Sickulars won’t give a damn. But the “Selective Pain-feeler” Modi or his UP CM or any of his ministers are also the “Selective Pain” gang. They won’t feel any pain because his name is “Gangaram” and his daughter has now been orphaned for he trying to protect her. The other issue related to Gangaram is that “peaceful goons” are trying to force Hindus out of that locality. Not just his area; “peaceful goons” on tw0-wheelers in Meerut were firing in the air threatening and forcing Hindu families to quit the area. 150 Hindu families have exited according to Republic TV. And Yogi and Modi want to “modernize” Madrassas. Try teaching donkeys to fly – you might still succeed.  The hypocrisy of PM Modi is becoming more alarming in the statements he now frequently makes. Comically, in the run up to LS2014, a Reuters journalist asked Modi if he feels any remorse for the deaths in the 2002 riots. Modi then gave his infamous analogy of feeling PAIN for even a puppy being crushed under a car:

Very sensitive Sultan, indeed. Naturally, the Sickulars quickly latched on to this statement accusing Modi of equating Muslims with puppies. While that accusation was foolish, we must now ask Modi. How come a man who would feel such deep pain for a puppy being run over has never expressed one bit of sorrow or pain for many Hindus wantonly murdered in the 5 years of his PMship? Now he feels “selective pain” only for Muslims. Stupid Hindus must be worse than puppies that their deaths at the hands of criminals have not caused the slightest bit of pain or sorrow to him. In five years, Modi has not made ONE STATEMENT condemning or feeling pain at Hindus killed, especially in many cases by Muslim mobs.

Not just hypocrisy, the sheer deception of the useless, chest-thumping statements Modi makes during campaigns and then plays “opportunistic victimhood” is unbecoming of a PM voted a second time with such a mandate. This tweet would have been missed by many as a demonstration of Modi’s hypocrisy and his idiotic “Bhajan Mandli” would have done “Wah Wah” but the unbelievable stupidity of this tweet is too glaring to miss:

Some “members” asked you? Laughable! Which members? Surely, Congis and Sickulars wouldn’t ask as they are the ones facing possible jail. If it’s BJP members that asked you, then they are bigger Chamelis than I estimated. This tweet is nothing but “camouflaged acceptance” of deception, playing “victim” over failure by Modi on the Emergency anniversary. Modi’s entire 2014 campaign was based on “punishing” the corrupt. Nothing happened. Fine! But in 2019, who claimed he will send people to jail? Monalisa from Mehsana? No! It is you PM Modi. You are the one who grandly claims repeatedly that you will put the corrupt in jail. Let me remind you the statement you have repeatedly made this campaign when you played bigger than Hanuman claiming you will put people in jail:

Forget putting corrupt politicians in jail. That won’t happen in the tenure of Modi as I have stated earlier. What Modi is UNWILLING to explain is… Why are ED, CBI, IT all playing “notice-summons” games with people like Vadra, PC, KC etc? Not a SINGLE case against these people is in any court. Which only means the drama of “notice-summons” will continue. A court can act only if a case is filed and trial commences. So, why deceptively transfer your failure to the courts? There is no case in any court against most of these scamsters. The only case brought to court is by Dr. Swamy against the Gandhis on NatHerald (it’s now SEVEN years old). That too is being handled shoddily by ModiSarkar, thanks to “Gandhi Chintaks” like Jaitley & co. Jaitley as FM didn’t approve prosecution of PC for many years. Is this also the courts’ doing? One can compel a court to daily hearings through SC.

Imagine, if the PM of a country is now feeling “helplessness” in bringing criminals to justice because he CANNOT reform judiciary then who should you appeal to? The World Wrestling CEO? Because his entire Cabinet is a bunch of bootlicking slaves, so are other BJP members and “Bhajan Mandlis”, nobody points out the silliness and hypocrisy in the statements Modi now makes.

In summary, other than the issue of terrorism, BJP is turning out as Sickular as Congress or any other Commie party. Going to temples or covering oneself in a saffron blanket and sitting in a cave means nothing. That is Modi’s personal pursuit not any symbol of policy. Feeling the pain of Hindus too and serious issues concerning them would mean something. If Sickulars are guilty of “selective outrage” then Modi and his entire Cabinet are equally guilty of “selective pain”. They feel pain ONLY for Muslim victims. Hindus are garbage to them. Accepting that reality will help Hindus in looking at new paradigms.

 

Subscribe    Indian Cards     International Cards