The BJP govt at the Centre is
commonly referred to (sometimes in a derogatotry tone) as a Hindutva govt. I cannot recall a single
law or policy by this govt that would indicate it’s Hindutva in anyway. In
contrast, when Commies come to power they make their agenda quite clear. In
Kerala the Commie CM wants to kill or subdue Hindus and take over temple
properties. Commie Mamata has gone to the extent of changing “Ram” to “Rong” in Ramdhenu and feeds kids such garbage. A Samajwadi Party
goon declares UP is only for Muslims and Yadavs, thereby treating all other
Hindus as aliens. All this passes as Sickular crap in the media and among
Commie Pigs. ModiSarkar has not even dared to modify the horrendous anti-Hindu RTE law. The Congress, when it came to
power in 2004, first repealed the POTA to appease Muslims.
Subramaniam Swamy repeatedly points out that
development alone is not enough. And I agree with him. ModiSarkar has consistently
ignored social issues, especially protection of Hindu culture and traditions. AB
Vajpayee, despite good governance and development, lost in 2004 being perceived
as another Muslim-appeaser. Over the years a stream of PILs against Hindu
practices, traditions or even temple-practices have found their way into High
courts and the Supreme Court. There is, without a doubt, a very organised
attempt by the West and their Indian foot-soldiers to destroy Hinduism and
Hindu culture. One such participant in this criminal racket is none other than PETA. This so-called animal protection
NGO is probably the most outrageous of Dhimmi organisations operating in India
with an American-born as its Head. The Anti-Hindu folks have been consistently campaigning
against any Hindu festival:
Water-less
Holi, Cracker-less Diwali, against Kite-flying, Jallikattu or Dahi Handi on
Krishna Jayanti. In some of these the SC has been issuing rulings much to the
chagrin of the affected Hindu communities. And increasingly the SC is being
defied by many groups and that is hardly a good sign for our democracy. The SC could have heard multiple interests
and passed suitable protection measures rather than complete bans in some
cases. The Dahi-Handi ruling of 20-feet height by SC was defied by groups in Maharashtra. This month on Pongal, the
Jallikattu-ban was also defied by some groups in Tamil Nadu. The Jallikattu ban
is not new. It was banned by the Madras HC in 2006 and the lawyer who
petitioned the ban today claims he regrets doing so.
In the
past couple of years, the outrageous and virulent PETA has been particularly
more aggressive against Jallikattu and some other Hindu customs. PETA folks are
also well-known for their own cruelty to animals and have even carried campaigns against
ordinary milk and other causes. The sick PETA jerks have protested even the
innocuous Pokemon game as cruelty to
animals. Laughable! PETA has gone to the
extent of dumping a ton of manure against a restaurant they were protesting
against. Such sick campaigners should not find a place in India. PETA doesn’t
have the guts to protest the violent killing of animals for religious purposes
in India or even in the West. Take a look at this video of a Halal-killing in a
“Non-stun” procedure (Stun procedure would render a painless death to the
animal – video 3 mins – Caution:
Contains disturbing images):
In India,
when a PETA activist campaigned for a Vegan-Eid in Bhopal she was thrashed by
Muslim goons and had to be protected by Police. Since then, their campaign
against slaughter of animals by Muslims has remained dead. It is because Hindus
do not respond violently that more campaigns are being seen against them. And folks at PETA dare to ask why Hindus point out their cowardice and hypocrisy:
More PILs
are filed in courts against Hindu practices because this is an “organised racket” by forces funded by
the West and Sickulars. PETA has also filed a petition in a Kerala against elephants in temples which
is an age-old tradition merely to create ruckus. If there are violations, that
can be brought to notice but PETA has no business to make petitions to withdraw
existing orders of a govt. The Dahi-Handi petition claimed children participate
and get injured or men get killed. The same claim has been made for Jallikattu
too. What physical sports does not have a certain risk? Even in
non-physical-contact sport like Cricket there have been deaths. Figure this out:
Over 130 footballers have died on
the field.
At least 11 cricketers have died on the field. Should
football and cricket be banned?
These are
sports played in many countries throughout the year unlike some Hindu festivals
that are celebrated for a day or two. Why
are there no petitions against these sports where more people have died than in
Dahi-Handi or Jallikattu? Over the years, footballers wear protection –
like knee cap or shin-guards. Cricketers wear helmets, arm-guards, abdomen-guards
and so on. Instead of restricting Dahi-Handi or Jallikattu the courts could
have asked the Centre, in conjunction with concerned state govts, to make the
practices safer. Sports like Jallikattu can be monitored under strict
supervision to ensure no cruelty or harm to the animal and to ensure people
wear sufficient protective gear. People have died in stampedes at many major
festival gatherings, including multiple times at Mecca. Should we ban all such
gatherings? Should we ban Haj travel?
Nothing calls for a total ban on traditions
and practices. This always backfires.
For instance, the longer Ganesh festival (particularly in Maharashtra) is
supervised under strict laws and rules and is a lot more organised now. The
same can be done with other Hindu practices too. But much of the PILs and
anti-Hindu campaigns are actually cheered on bigger Hindu-haters in the media
and politics. Some of the vilest ridicule and contemptuous remarks are made by
these hate-mongers:
In Madhya
Pradesh two villages have an annual ritual of hurling stones at each other. It’s
a 300-year old practice. Obviously, this can be injurious or fatal. So, they
slapped a ban on it. When the police tried to enforce the ban both villages
united and stoned the police.
The police had to withdraw and the ritual went on as usual – ban or not. The
anti-police riot happened in 2009 but the ritual goes on (see video from 2016). What can be
done is to educate the villagers and make them understand the dangers. The
state did manage to convince the villagers to stop using slings but the ban had
to be lifted. Maybe they can
be given small rubber-balls (perhaps filled with light stones?) and to use that
instead of stones.
There can
be a way through it but banning
traditions and rituals only provokes defiance and riots. Either way,
foreign NGOs like PETA who are predominantly anti-Hindu and where foreign money
influences their agenda should have no business to campaign against our
traditions. Subramaniam Swamy is also seeking an investigation on the manner in which these organisations are
funded to protest Hindu traditions. India is the last bastion of Hinduism in
the world. Although we aren’t designated “Hindu Rashtra” our traditions and
culture cannot be subjected to diktats of foreign crooks and NGOs. There are
serious dangers to this that the ModiSarkar ignores.
In former
parts of India, like Pakistan or Bangladesh, Hindus have been more or less wiped out physically. Hindu temples
and shrines have been destroyed in those countries (and in India too). The
sheer size of Hindu population in India makes it difficult for rouge NGOs and
anti-Hindu racketeers to wipe it out physically. So many organisations, largely
with foreign funds, methodically, systematically and surely want to gnaw at
Hindu traditions and culture and destroy it bit by bit. Before you know it,
Hinduism will be in danger of looking like a merger of Chrislam and some
left-over form of Hinduism. Many stupid
Hindus already wear Santa clothes and chant “Jeez” (a slang word for surprise
or annoyance derived from Jesus) or teach their children the greatness of all
religions but their own. Writer Amish Tripathi asks a very valid question:
Who are
these foreigners and foreign NGOs to dictate Hindu culture and practices? As
with the protests against the Kudankulam
nuclear plant or the endless protests of Greenpeace
against various projects, the GOI needs to throw out PETA too. Alternatively,
GOI must bring appropriate laws that allow these NGOs to petition only govts
and not any legal rights to file PILs to ban any practice or organisation. PETA
is not even respected in the US or the UK. PETA was found by FBI to be supporting convicted arsonists and had
financed criminals. PETA has a record of killing a large number of animals
under its care as well.
In the West,
there are other animal-welfare activists and NGOs that are far more respected
than this unruly and violent PETA. The
Animal Liberation Front that PETA tacitly supports is considered a domestic
terrorist outfit by FBI. People considerate to animals advocate a more
humane way of killing even for religions purposes. Hollywood, which often uses
animals in movies, gets their animal-scenes supervised by the American Humane Association and
not by publicity-seekers like PETA. In the UK too the govt has been repeatedly
petitioned to stop non-stun Halal slaughter of animals for religious purposes. India
too does not need junk-activists and NGOs like PETA. They are predominantly
anti-Hindu and have no place in our society.



