King Henry
II of England and Thomas Beckett
were good friends. They were even “drinking club” friends. When Beckett was
appointed Chancellor he did everything that the King desired, even taxed the
Church. The King even had Beckett playing foster-father to his sons. The King
was constantly in conflict with the Church and wanted the Royalty be supreme
over the Church. To settle the conflict and gain supremacy he appointed his
best friend Beckett as the Archbishop of
Canterbury. That’s when things went wrong. Once he became Archbishop,
Beckett turned pious and refused to oblige and sign any agreements that would
establish the supremacy of the King over the Church. Beckett is reported to
have started penance for his earlier sins. He refused to break with the Pope in
Rome. Beckett was murdered in 1170, presumably under orders of Henry II, and was
later bestowed Sainthood by the Pope. Beckett’s story became famous through
T.S. Elliot’s “Murder in the cathedral”
and partly referenced in Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Canterbury tales”.
When Ranjit Sinha (RS) was appointed CBI
Director last year there were protests from the leaders of the Opposition,
Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley. They had apprehensions that he was another
puppet who would do the bidding of Sonia
Gandhi & Co. Their suspicion was justified considering RS had a record
of being servantile and his record also had some minor blemishes. But when a
person assumes a certain office he brings his own story and burden to bear on
it. Not many newspapers or TV channels have narrated this story but OpenMagazine has found a genuine
explanation for the twin stories that culminated in the destruction of Pawan Kumar Bansal and Ashwani Kumar. We’ll get to that. In
the meantime, let’s hear some familiar nonsense about who’s to blame for the
last Parliament session washout.
It has been
a tradition now in our media to blame the Opposition, in particular the BJP,
for the Parliament blockades and washout of sessions. The media morons believe,
like they do on their TV channels, that everything can be sorted out with a debate. My answer is a clear NO. You cannot debate obvious crimes. When
the Parliament was blocked for the 2G issue the same media cried themselves
hoarse blaming the opposition. The end result was a farcical JPC whose chairman
was in a rush to distribute clean chits. The tweets of the Numero Uno and Numero Unee
are reflective of this culture on TV where they believe parliament sessions are
the only way to sort out crimes. This is an argument the Congress offers to
gain time and prevent action on crimes. Democracy exists far beyond the walls
of parliament and we have seen time and again that parliament is incompetent in
dealing with criminals. They can only make laws, nothing more. In this case too
CNN-IBN and it’s govt foot-soldiers
blamed the BJP only to turn turtle in the next few days.
What Ashwani
Kumar did was a serious crime which is being played down by the Congress and
the media. His role was one of obstruction
of justice and protecting people who may have the potential of being indicted
by a court in the massive Coalgate
scam. The Opposition is right in stalling the parliament where the Congress
sought to divert all the issues by bringing in some bogus Food Security Bill with elections in mind and then accused other
parties of being “anti-poor” because
they stalled parliament. This dubious conduct by the Congress is now familiar
to all. All, except our specialists in the media. The Congress, as usual,
claimed the SC had not pronounced any verdict and there was an inquiry against
Bansal. Nonsense! The SC observations on the doctored Coalgate affidavit is
enough for the PM to be sacked. And Bansal? He wasn’t sacked because Sonia
Gandhi had an attack of conscience as we came to learn. But in just over a
week, Pallavi Ghosh meekly tweets
that Congress was to blame for Parliament washout which ridicules the
propaganda of her own bosses.
SoniaG
reportedly rushed to PM’s residence on May 10 to seek the sacking of Bansal and
Kumar. She created all the drama for the media to show how strongly she acts
against corruption. Her phones were probably so dead that she had to rush to
7RCR. Nonsense again! It turns out that the tapes in which Bansal was pimping
for railway appointments and distributing the loot was out with some in the
media and so possibly also with the Congress boss. Kanchan Gupta indicates what exactly could have been the contents
of the bribery tapes. It’s like when you’re finally clean-bowled in Cricket and
even the third umpire can’t save you if it isn’t a no-ball. That’s when it
dawned upon Sonia Gandhi that the damage in retaining Bansal could be far more
severe than the Congress anticipated. So while at it, the Congress made both
ministers go since AshwaniK would have to go anyway at some point of time.
Better hurt now than later. That’s a good choice. But if knowing all this the
PM and SoniaG were against sacking Bansal earlier it speaks of monumental
dishonesty. All the editors in the media
who kept giving MMS a certificate of “honesty” must hang their heads in shame.
In all of
this can the lady who is now haunting Pakistan be left out of her own 2 cents
of special intelligence? Absolutely not! So there you go, there’s Barkha Dutt
telling us about the “Punjabi”
conspiracy of some sort. What Open Magazine, which is far more reliable than
Barkha, tells us is that an aspirant to the post of Law Minister leaked out
information of AshwaniK’s meddling with the CBI affidavit. I don’t think we
need the CIA to infer that OpenMag is referring to zero loss. The leak being a
done job, there was no way Ranjit Sinha could escape admitting the facts in the
SC of the affidavit. He had an added incentive. OpenMag reports AshwaniK was harsh on him and even
humiliated him with rude comments on Ranjit’s poor knowledge of English. You
see, in India, it is better to be an English Laloo like Salman Khurshid or
Shashi Tharoor than a desi CBI director. In
short, AshwaniK and the PM’s cohorts gangraped the CBI affidavit and left
it a poor survivor to be sent to a hospital.
In the case
of Bansal, RS had an old score to settle. It seems Mahesh Kumar, the 10Crore briber who was in the Rail business
earlier too, had shunted him out to unattractive posts in the past. So without
anyone asking him or any govt advising the CBI, RS started a special watch on
Mahesh Kumar and poor Pawan Bansal was caught with his monkey-hand grabbing
peanuts from the trap, just like that lady in Radiagate. Conversations were
taped over months and even the sacrificial Goat
that Bansal used in a puja in the end couldn’t save him. Unwittingly, Ranjit Sinha has become the saviour of CBI and may
finally be the man to save it from the evil clutches of the most corrupt govt
ever in the history of India. Ranjit
Sinha became Thomas Beckett. RS also finally managed to put some fear into
the hearts of politicians. He also proved there is no need for the Jokepal, a strong, independent CBI and
Judiciary is quite adequate to deal with corruption.
The Congress
and some of its allies in the UPA have spawned such a culture of corruption and
brazen loot that every joker has started believing he has a “Right To Loot”. Whether it’s Bansal,
Ashwani, Marans, Kripashankars or the whole gang of UPA. This doesn’t happen if
there is zero tolerance for corruption. This happens only when the whole gang
gets a clear signal that looting is okay as long as the Mafia is paid its due. This
is what the UPA has been reduced to. And this birthright to corruption doesn’t end
with politicians it also extends to the news media who keep lying through their
nose to protect their corrupt masters. SoniaG has given a clear signal through
Shashi Tharoor and Abhishek Singhvi that if you’re tainted just take a
chill-pill, spend some time taking a vacation. You will be back quite soon. If
banks are money-laundering as Cobrapost suggests it is surely not without
approval and a guarantee of protection.
The Congress
appointed Ranjit Sinha with the belief he will be another puppet and be loyal
to the Queen and her coterie. The story has gone terribly wrong. The Beckett story was made into a
movie. The same movie was adapted and remade in Bollywood – it was called “Namak Haraam” (featuring Rajesh Khanna
and Amitabh Bachchan). In both movies the “namak haraam” dies. I have no doubts
that Ranjit Sinha is going to be called a ‘namak haraam’ in Congress and media
circles. One just hopes he doesn’t meet the same fate.







