The Lynch Fraud

The Ministry of Home Affairs has issued yet another advisory to all States on the issue of mob violence and “lynching”. They have laid down a NEW “Maha mantra” – that law and order is a State issue and therefore States and Police must make all efforts to prevent such lynchings. This is following the recent observations by the Supreme Court which has directed the Centre and Parliament to enact a special law on lynchings. I have never seen such knee jerk reactions from the govt or the SC on such a matter. What exactly is lynching? And how the hell does SC assume the power to direct the Centre to enact a law? Making laws is beyond the authority of the SC and at best it can only make a recommendation. The lack of prudence in such a direction seems totally lost on our judges:

While it is desirable that crimes be prevented, how exactly can the police prevent a crime unless they have a tip off or intelligence report on an event? Police cannot prevent rapes, murders, abductions or mob violence unless they have been tracking some case or get an advance warning. This nonsense of crime prevention is biggest nonsensical rant of media, politicians and many Big Bindi frauds. No one can prevent a crime; the only solution available is swift justice. Our courts fail to provide justice in reasonable time and therefore criminals and potential criminals are free to commit more crimes. The latest case of “lynching” according to the chest-beating of media is a guy called Rakbar in Alwar. The guy reportedly died in police custody and had previous FIRs and charge-sheets against him. So he had a history but was out, probably on bail and free to commit more crimes.

No crime can ever be justified. Mob violence, regardless of the reasons, cannot be justified. In a group or a mob, people act in a frenzy of a different kind. Individually, a man may not burn vehicles or throw stones but when in a group, the rioter is pretty capable of all kinds of violence. Spectators and crowds are known to throw water bottles and other missiles at players when a match goes badly for their team. An individual by himself wouldn’t dare to do so.

But this entire campaign over “lynching” is nothing but a fraud. Who concocted this fraud? The Congress and the media inserted this term into mob violence that existed in India long before ModiSarkar came into power. In fact, the incidents of lynching under ModiSarkar are far lesser in number than under the criminal Congress during their term. A tweet by A.Ranganathan shows that there over a dozen lynchings under the Congress in 2013 alone. So, if one digs deeper into the ten years of Sonia and Congress, they would exceed the number of incidents in the four years of ModiSarkar. This is not to justify any killing but to indicate how the media and the Congress have labelled and created a terror-syndrome called “Lynching” which has managed to fool even the SC. This is nothing but mob violence and mob frenzy which has existed for a long time but has surely been declining with greater awareness among citizens.

What exactly is lynching? In technical or dictionary terms, a lynching is the execution of a person alleged to have committed a crime without any legal process or trial. This form of execution was usually by hanging. This form of execution was invented by none other than the Christians. They hanged people for blasphemy or even burned them at the stake. They have hanged people for merely being “Black” or for seeking equal rights. Lynchings were part of Christian rituals and this evil was most practiced in Europe and the US for a long time. The pic with Blacks being hanged comes from the South in the US where the White Supremacists were not willing to accept the erstwhile Black slaves as equal human beings.

As with the Commies, the Christians too have a heavy guilt hanging on their conscience. The Commies in India wiped out all the crimes of the murderous Mughals from our history books and our school books. Worldwide, the Christians are unwilling to accept responsibility or blame for the evil practice of lynching in their history books or school books. Even in the US, the lynchings in America are covered up and blacked out to hide the evil side of Christianity and its rituals. This is a scene from Texas, US from 1893 which is not so ancient:

What is different from mob violence and the Christian lynchings is that their lynching had the approval of society. Just look at the crowds collected to witness and enjoy the lynching above. In contrast, Indian society has not approved of lynching. It is simply another mob-violence crime. But given their guilt, the Christians under Congress and Christian-influenced media cleverly and mischievously planted the “Lynching” concept in the public domain only after ModiSarkar came into power. During the ten years of Congress also there were many killings by mobs but there was no such ranting and raving about “Lynching” as a terminology and label as it is now. The US has a history of over 4000 lynchings of blacks and that figure may not be accurate as there is no proper record of these crimes:

This clever trickery is missed by the SC and the idiots of the BJP. The Congress and their slave media rant about Lynching because the Christians have cleverly transferred most of their guilt on their crimes to other societies. The powers that dominate our media, Congress, Sickulars and NGOs are all driven by Christian funding and Christian narrative. And the other side of the coin has Islamic funding which ensures Muslims are portrayed as the victims and blown out of proportion as the only victims. Even a death over a seat fight on a train was blown up as lynching. The deaths by lynching under Congress is far more than the incidents under ModiSarkar but the “Lynch-song” is played out specifically to tar PM Modi as the “perpetrator” of the crime or empowering the perpetrators of the crime.

This is the nonsense and crime by the lynchers of Congress and media. Neither the PM nor his ministers have the guts to do a straight-talk on this. Instead, they crawl before the SC and issue advisories over this fake narrative. The purpose of bringing out a brief history of lynching being a Christian ritual is not to hold Christians responsible for mob-violence in India but to point out that the narrative is set by none other than Christian-dominated forces that still drive certain political parties and much of our media. The record of their past gets more dismal if you read more about it:

The Christians have cleverly, more or less, wiped out their history of lynch-crimes but have now transferred the terminology and guilt to India, particularly to ModiSarkar. The SC has been influenced into directing the Centre to make stupid laws specially for lynching by the same lobby that is permanently in a PIL mode to throw as much mud on ModiSarkar as any other issue not worth the time of SC. Current laws in the country are adequate to deal with mob violence and there is no need for a special “Lynch law”. And there is technically no lynching in India because society does not approve it as it did in Christianity. Our society does not hold public hangings or beheadings or burning at the stake as a socially-approved practice in any state or in any society in this land. Therefore, this fraudulent narrative of lynching is yet another discourse that ModiSarkar has failed to combat effectively.

And pray, what exactly is all this cow-smuggling and cattle-rustling for? In many states in India, cow-slaughter is banned. This ban should legally be extended to all states. Even in states where cow slaughter is banned, there may be illegal cow-slaughter and beef consumption. Here is a table of beef consumption across the world from 2016:

The cow is a holy animal for Hindus. Still India figures at 52 in the world list of beef consumption. It is down in the charts only because of population numbers. If you look at the absolute quantity in the above chart, India would probably be in the top 5 or 6 countries. The fraudulent narratives on many issues continue because Modi wants to play Mahatma.

The source of the cow-vigilantes problem is cow-rustling and cow-smuggling. Instead of addressing that as a serious issue, ModiSarkar is busy putting Band-aid on visible wounds. The wound that is NOT VISIBLE is the suffering of the farmer or poor family that depends on cattle for livelihood and source of income. What if a man came out of his house and suddenly found his car is stolen? A family that loses cows or cattle feels much the same way. And as with cars, the stolen cattle is never found unless you happen to be the Home Minister like Azam Khan and can order the police around. PM Modi needs to find some guts to address this serious issue:

 

Either way, a law on total ban on cow-slaughter is required across India. That itself will stop a lot of crimes. But on priority, a law that punishes cow-theft and cow-smuggling severely will by itself deter criminals. It’s not a stupid anti-lynch-law that we need. That is based on a fraudulent narrative. What we do need is a law that severely punishes cow-thieves and smugglers.

Follow on Twitter @RealMediaCrooks.

www.EducatingForward.com

Beef Wars

“What’s your beef?” is a common American phrase. It’s a question a person asks someone who talks or acts without reason or goes off on a rant with no purpose other than creating a confrontational situation. This is the question to ask many media and political ranters who have been trying hard to link every incident to Modi.  "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian” said ex-Beatle Paul McCartney who turned vegan long ago. Since they don’t, people put up such pics on SM so others can see:

I have kept the pic small so it doesn’t offend too much. Five years ago, a café owner was ordered to remove an extractor fan because the resident next to the café was offended by the fumes of bacon. This was in England where bacon is a routine food item. For those who are not familiar, bacon is made from pork – from pigs. Do you want me to tell you the Faith of the complaining neighbour? I don’t think so; it doesn’t take Einstein to figure that out. Now, bacon is common food in almost all western countries and for a Muslim to complain about the smell of bacon from a café (where even Muslims were patrons) should be considered absurd. But such is the stupidity of councils and govts that they will pander to the nonsensical victimhood of minorities (read the full story here).

Cow-slaughter ban has existed in many states in India for ages. Some states have adopted that policy in the last few decades. For centuries the cow has been a sacred symbol in India, particularly for the Hindus. Recently, the Maharashtra govt extended the ban to bulls and buffaloes too. The Maharashtra ban on cow-slaughter has been in place since the 1970s but govts never enforced it strictly. There is nothing wrong in respecting the sentiments of Hindus. Consider this – Every hotel, airline and food stalls at airports now put up a sign saying they use only “Halal meat”. Surely, that is not to respect the sentiments of Christians or Jews, is it? It is highly unlikely you will find hotels and restaurants that routinely offer pigs (pork) as food. Will you? Why is it that only Muslim sentiments must be respected over what food is offered and how the animal is slaughtered?

Once the Maharashtra government slapped a ban on sale or possession of beef there were responses from all the Sickular scoundrels. Bollywood reacted (slide show). The usual Sickos in MSM reacted. Others from political parties reacted. That’s how this new beef war started. Earlier, to defy the cow-slaughter ban some morons held a “Beef eating festival” at Osmania University in 2012 which led to violence. Do note, there has been a cow slaughter ban (in then what was united Andhra) since 1977. So why would the authorities allow an activity that brazenly breaks the law? If it offends Hindus, no law is important, one can break it – that’s a social law in India in most states. If these people had eaten beef privately in stealth it wouldn’t have mattered but they wanted to make a public statement. Criminal media passes this and the bigger jokers will even celebrate it like the Monk and the Moron:

The StreetThug wants to eat steak immediately after the beef-festival debate and the Category5Moron wants to eat meat dripping with blood. I doubt anyone cares what morons like these eat – they can eat rats, dogs, insects, bats, snakes. And if they want to break the law and express their defiance even more strongly - they can even eat dead human-beings. These Anti-Hindu thugs just want to keep offending Hindu sentiments and that is all. Govt should usually not make laws over social issues and food habits. After all, I doubt there’s any law that says only “Halal meat” should be sold but everyone is offering that. Isn’t it?  The respect for Hindu sentiments on cows should have come naturally. But most of these people in media and politics who want to kill cows don’t want it to end there – they want Hindus to disappear so that a Chrislamic State can become a reality. You just have to give 15 minutes to Akbar Owaisi (family friend of the Monk and the Moron).

They want Hindu traditions and customs to disappear. They want Hindus to stop celebrating Holi. They ridicule and condemn even Raksha Bandhan. They want kite-flying to stop because the string sometimes slashes some birds. But they want to kill cows. Someone put it nicely when he showed that these same morons have extraordinary sympathy for stray dogs that are becoming a menace in many cities:

So, the latest round of outrage is over a 50-year old man, Akhlaq, who was lynched by a mob because there was a rumour he and his family consumed beef. The family denies it and claims it was mutton and that was what was stored in their fridge too. Given the consistent pattern of our media getting news wrong I would naturally be sceptical about the reason for the attack. However, let us assume he was lynched for the reason the reports say. Now, nobody… nobody has to die for eating something. Even if that offends anyone or breaks the law, nobody needs to die. But this culture of madness and killing in UP happens for many other reasons too. But the outrage and the attempt to link it to Modi and Hindus wanting to kill a Muslim is the kind of stupidity that is criminal by our MSM and many politicians. Fortunately, such media-scams aren’t passing anymore, thanks to SM.  

How brazen and stupid can it get? Well, there is Akhilesh Yadav – CM of UP who, instead of assuring strong action against the killers, asks the PM to ban the export of beef. And the entire media carried his ignorant crap like a box of parrots. All it took was for someone to educate this beef-challenged kid:

The beef-export ban is already in place for some time but our UP CM wants to pin the nonsense in UP on Modi. That is the whole game of politicians and media – as if Modi is policing every nook and corner of this country. It is true that there are a lot of social issues that Modi is failing to address but he certainly can’t be a cop monitoring every corner. What are CMs and local police meant for? To talk nonsense when crimes happen in their region? But the overall trick is to bring up some issue to outrage on before every election. Remember the “attack on Christians” fraudulent campaign before Maharashtra and Haryana elections? Well there is Bihar around the corner. So, the already prosecuted Beef-war in progress now becomes a Muslim killed over beef. Hope for the losers is eternal. I am not sure this will work either. What’s their beef?