For a long time, though NDTV's reporting was dubious no one could
say anything as Prannoy, Barkha and Rajdeep had become stars. Arnab then was
left to anchor smaller shows by StarNews/NDTV. As it went on I instinctively knew
there is something wrong with the channel and its reporters. They weren’t
merely critcising the ABV govt, they were running a campaign against it. Even
that seemed fine. On a different note to begin with - bear in mind, all the members of the Commie-media mafia routinely get awards of some kind by rotation. Arnab is the only one that doesn't get such awards despite having the highest popular viewership.
It was from Gujarat 2002 that I was convinced these guys were
indeed out with sinister motives. I have watched Rajdeep and Barkha reporting
from Ahmedabad and other cities of Gujarat and their reporting could be only be
described as more incitement. NDTV became a separate, new channel around 2003.
It has been downhill ever since then. Arnab left for Timesnow around 2005 and
Rajdeep for CNNIBN around 2007, I think. In 2004 the Congress came to power and Prannoy, Barkha, Rajdeep
assumed extraordinary powers. Their
BOSSES had come to power and there was no one to stop them. Since then, I
have observed all of them and their reporting and their shows. Let’s keep the
focus here on Barkha, since she’s the one who’s been ranting lately. Let’s do a
roll call:
I have always wondered why the most tainted Congis or Muslims
find a platform with her or with NDTV. Think of Suresh Kalmadi of CWG, Shashi
Tharoor of IPL scam, Hindu-hater like Zakir Naik. It made me write “Tainted? Have a chat with Barkha”
Then there was this constant hounding of Narendra Modi, with
no evidence, by hosting tainted characters like Teesta Setalvad, Shabnam
Hashmi, Sanjiv Bhatt. It’s a long list. They failed when the “SC exposed media’s clean shit”.
I could go on and on and on and this post would almost become
a book. One of the most foolish moments in Barkha’s career has to be her
reporting of the 26/11 attacks. She
reached Mumbai on the second day and from the start she was panting
breathlessly, dramatic, full of movie-like histrionics. She asked stupid
questions to friends and relatives of the hostages and even disclosing their
locations. Thus, that was the first incident of “Terror support service” even
if unwittingly.
Chaitanya Kunte, a blogger,
was so alarmed that he chronicled every act of Barkha with updates and
indicated the damage she could have caused and how she and NDTV would have
ended up helping the terrorists. Barkha sued him and forced him to remove the
blog and even apologise for narrating facts. For all her tall talk of freedoms and FoE. The SC comments on media over 26/11 while sentencing Ajmal Kasab vindicated what Kunte had written. Kunte disappeared but his blog
didn’t. You can read it here. This angered
many people around the world, including me and more people started realising
the dubious nature of NDTV’s reporting, political affiliation and influence.
Barkha had instantly become ordinary
people’s enemy in media. That was merely the start. Before long NDTV came
to be perceived as “Anti-India” and
it’s not people’s fault at all:
The Congress returned to power again in 2009. By now Barkha
had acquired Queen status in the media and anyone who criticised or questioned
her was termed an “abusive troll”.
The Congress successfully managed to build a coterie of reporters, activists
and assorted Babus and legal guys who worked to keep any other formation from
coming to power. Barkha could walk through any corridor of the govt anytime,
she could eat Golgappas at the PM’s party and through connections had also
become an international personality. No matter what her crime, nothing bothered
her. Then Radiagate happened.
In November 2010 her conversations with PR broker Niira Radia
were out in the open. She was constantly on phone with Radia on Cabinet
formation and ministries to be shared between Congress and DMK. For all the
dope she knew, Barkha reported none of it as any journo should have. And all
Barkha nonchalantly said was that she was “Stringing along” a source and had done nothing wrong. Brazen!
When outrage grew NDTV ran a Kangaroo court with a bunch of other journalists
and Barkha merely said it was “an error of judgement”. No regrets, no apologies
– Nothing! By now SM started growing and more and more people could see that
she was brazen, vicious, had no respect for any ethics and didn’t care two hoots about
any ordinary opinion. She had reached the pinnacle of political power. In other
words, she was “untouchable” with
close relations with politicians on every side. In any other democracy, she
would have been sacked and prosecuted for Radiagate. Not under Congress. This cartoon exposed
the deadly nexus of journos-brokers-politicians better than anything else:
Throughout her career a common thread was the way she
reported events in Kashmir. She constantly portrayed terrorists as victims,
security forces as aggressors and frequently featured separatists and Hurriyat
guys on her shows. She let them present their views without too many hard
questions. And by now she had become a close chummy of Congress guys and later
the AAP guys (when Congress started fading):
It is fair for a journalist to keep good relations with all
politicians and interact with them as needed. But to become as chummy as Barkha
is with many politicians is the typical Lutyens-Power-corridor-crawler.
She is not alone, there are many, but she exemplified it the most. No law, No
professional code, No editorial norms could touch her. And she continued her
merry ways – Reporting from conflict sites, easy and unlimited access to armed
forces installations and high officials, biased reporting in favour of Muslims,
turning Dadri like incidents into a political campaign, reckless leaking of
army movements and locations. She got more and more brazen with each passing
day. She was confident even the new ModiSarkar couldn’t do anything.
Come July 2016 another terrorist called Burhan Wani was shot and eliminated by our armed forces. He was
supposedly the “Commander” of the Hizbul Mujahideen (God knows how many
factions these terrorists have out there). This was Barkha’s response to it in
a tweet:
Wani was the son of a headmaster. He was a “Commander” of an
army maybe Barkha recognised as official. He was SM-savvy and used it as a
weapon of war. Mind you, he didn’t use guns or grenades – he used “SM as weapon
of war”. The shit had really hit the fan this time and there was no more any
doubt whose side this woman was on. Any lingering doubt was removed. Let me
introduce you to this honourable “Commander” Wani:
Those SM bullets of his are from a site called “Satyavijayi” since his account is as
dead as he is. Not once did Barkha describe this guy as a terrorist or a
militant. She received a sound thrashing from SM over this but when did public
opinion ever matter to her. She had her vast coterie of media friends,
political friends and connections and public opinions were best suited for the
garbage bin unless they were showering accolades on her. So she went on again
to Kashmir after Wani’s death to report on the unrest. She even tweeted mobile
and phone networks were down but only WIFI was working at her hotel. She leaks
such information at a sensitive time. She interviews boys hurt by pellets and
creates an emotional story of how educated boys, toppers of their stream had to
pick up guns and so on. All typically histrionic, dramatic and laden with
melodrama as has been throughout her career.
A few months prior, reporting from the Pathankot site of a terror attack she was still doing the same drama. Reporting on incidents she shouldn’t have and breaking all codes of reporting from a conflict site. The GOI issued a notice to NDTV for this breach. What could GOI do? NDTV and Barkha were powers way beyond anyone and above any law. She even tweeted additional forces were being rushed to Kashmir to quell the unrest and bring back law and order. I am quite certain that all the terrorists, trouble-makers do read tweets on the issue and they rely on the likes of Barkha to educate them on troop movements. It’s a gift.
And then the
pin dropped and the grenade exploded
Maybe JuD chief Hafiz
Saeed too reads her tweets and articles regularly. NDTV is also the only Indian channel allowed in Pakistan (at least it was). Later in July on a TV
show Hafiz showered praise on Barkha for her great work on the struggles
Kashmiris face from an aggressive BJP govt which has no respect for human
rights. All her awards, her Padma Shri and all paled into insignificance in 20
seconds flat. She had received the
highest accolade no journalist has ever received – recognition from a dreaded
terrorist. Journalists have interviewed Osama Bin Laden but received no such recognition from him.
Elsewhere Arnab
Goswami, who was earlier trolled serverely by the Commie-media mafia
because he got an interview with the PM in June was now armed and red-hot. He
would let fly his most aggressive tirade against the pro-Pak stooges in Indian
media, NGOs and politics. His 4.28 minutes tirade with the tag #ProPakDovesSilent over revelations by
Hafiz went viral and found applause from a vast majority of Indians who were
tired of the Pak stooges all around Delhi, the media and NGOS everyday trashing our Jawans and sometimes the country itself. This was one
serious and deadly blow to the entire filthy lot. And it wasn’t the govt or a
court that did it. It was the one the Pak stooges were indirectly feeding and supporting
through their statements, articles and tweets – A terrorist chief. In slamming the pro-Pak slaves Arnab did not
mention any names.
The only one to take it as a personal attack was Barkha Dutt. Maybe guilt forced her too. She has been perceived
as Pro-Pak, Pro-Separatists and Arnab appears to have hit hard at her guilt
since she was the only one mentioned by Hafiz. Since that day, she has been
ranting on Facebook, on NDTV blog and in over 60 tweets and RTs on SM. This time
there is no going back. The damage is
beyond repair. She sought the support of all and sundry from her coterie to
help her make this a war against Arnab but not many were willing to come forward, not even
her old chum Rajdeep Sardesai.
It is obvious that she wants her stupid war with Arnab (who is not a participant at all) to be the news rather than the admiration of Hafiz for her. She spared no effort to paint Arnab as anti-journalists, anti-media and anti-freedom. Nobody was willing to buy her rubbish except a few of her handful cronies. Worse awaited Barkha. Turns out that the unrest she so passionately covered was orchestrated and paid for by none other than Hafiz Saeed. He revealed this in a speech that was aired on Timesnow. And local Khilafa-aspirant Assiyeh Andrabi coordinated it with Hafiz.
It is obvious that she wants her stupid war with Arnab (who is not a participant at all) to be the news rather than the admiration of Hafiz for her. She spared no effort to paint Arnab as anti-journalists, anti-media and anti-freedom. Nobody was willing to buy her rubbish except a few of her handful cronies. Worse awaited Barkha. Turns out that the unrest she so passionately covered was orchestrated and paid for by none other than Hafiz Saeed. He revealed this in a speech that was aired on Timesnow. And local Khilafa-aspirant Assiyeh Andrabi coordinated it with Hafiz.
On her Facebook post many slammed her severely and the
comments are harsh and too many for me to reproduce. Readers can check those on
her FB page. Not many Indians stand with her. The ones most on her side appear
to be Pakistanis. That should give her some solace. Perception
matters. People called her a Pak stooge for a long time because of the
perception she created. She could have altered course. She did not give a damn.
But Hafiz confirmed what everyone thought she was doing. Reckless reporting,
tweeting of information and whipping up of emotions that can even lead to more
unrest. She didn’t care two hoots. Did she have access and contacts with guys
like Hafiz? Maybe, maybe not. But a lot of journalists do have contacts with
terrorists, militants and state enemies and they are entitled to it and to
protect their sources for reporting. Look at this pic again of a moronic Track2
nonsense of which Barkha was a part:
The guy second from right, Ved Pratap, had even met Hafiz Saeed while in Pakistan. Arnab
savaged this guy too on his show then. Are
people duffers to imagine others in the group did not know about his visit? If
this not-so-known guy can have access to Hafiz why is it wrong to believe folks
like Barkha, Padgaonkar or Sudheen Kulkarni too could have contacts or access.
It is a reasonably fair assumption to make. She has made quite a few trips to
Pakistan. As far as I know most of the visits
were not journalistic expeditions. There are no reports from her on her
trips or at least I am not aware of those. In a panel discussion on a Pak channel she stated that then PM Yusuf Gilani had told her the agreement on Sir Creek was ready and that he was just waiting for a visit by MMS to sign it. Such is her audacity to comment on disputed issues.
Silence would have been a smarter move. But Barkha
desperately wants to make Arnab the “villain
of the whole Commie media mafia”. She even lies repeatedly that Arnab wanted to gag the media. She
wants to get rid of the guilt of Hafiz Saeed recognising her as indirectly
serving his cause and wants to make Arnab the villain. But Arnab, with his
honourable silence over her stupid rants, has now become an even bigger hero
for having exposed the slimy Pak stooges in India. The usual suspects to stand
by Barkha in her mindless rants are the same who blow trumpets for Pakistan all
the time and are featured in this cartoon by Kureel:
Now why does Barkha get appreciated by Pakistanis and even
Hafiz Saeed? Pollster Yashwant Deshmukh had the most simple answer that common
sense can understand easily:
What no law, no editors guild or govt could do, Hafiz Saeed
accomplished in 20 seconds. And in her mindless stupid rants, bordering on vicious abuse of Arnab, Barkha falls
deeper and deeper into her self-dug hole. Someone certified by
Hafiz Saeed cannot claim to be talking about journalism, ethics, nuances, freedom of speech,
freedom of media as a cover-up. Barkha cannot claim to speak for Indian media. It won’t sell. This time, there will no
saviour or redemption. And there is nothing to save her from. At least not
easily as in the past.