Elections & Dog-Tactics

There she was, all decked up and whining. Out of the blue Devyani Khobragade does an interview with a beat reporter of TimesNow. She is famous for being arrested, strip-searched over US laws on domestic staff payments. She was since moved to India’s UN office and the case has not been prosecuted. As UN staff she enjoys immunity too. So what was her whining all about considering she’s in the top rung of govt service and has channels and access to seek justice for any grievance she has? It’s election time. Her father does have political ambitions and both of them are neck deep in the Adarsh housing scam. Two days before Maharashtra goes to polls and on the day campaign ends, Timesnow brings you images of a “victim”:

People on SM now read the MSM like the back of their hands. Khobragade is Marathi Manoos so they hope the “victimhood” will cause some damage to the party they hate. So anything that can strengthen the votes for the anti-BJP forces is game for TimesNow. But people are also quick to point out why projecting a “Dalit” as victim can help the anti-BJP cause. All very clever doggy tricks and the stats someone put up bear the reason for it.

The history of journalism has seen interviews that have had severe consequences. Journalists have faced the most intimidating of personalities at great risk to their own lives. I mean seriously, who would want to interview a “Fatwa-loving-instant-beheading” Imam? This has nothing to do with our elections but a point about how serious journos do serious business and not lame interviews for mere political pimping. Watch (1 min):

That’s the late Mike Wallace (of CBS 60 Minutes) interviewing the Ayatollah Khomeini. One can’t be sure Anwar Sadat was killed because of his Fatwa but he was indeed assassinated in public view. Our MSM cowards like to use “Dog tactics” for their political pimping. I call it “Dog tactics” because one particular classless guy likes to call everyone a dog or person of “no class”. That’s right, Rajdeep Sardesai in an earlier interview of Raj Thackeray told him he “barks like a dog” and claimed that’s what people say. Which people? Must be the people of Rajdeep’s HATO alliance for whom everyone else is a barking dog. So what was RS doing when he recently asked Uddhav Thackeray if he was “asked to sit like a dog”? And treated like a dog by the BJP during their seat negotiations for Maharashtra? Watch (21 secs):

That this ugly character passes as a journo in our media is a disease that characterises our MSM. What’s with all the “dog tactics”? There was indeed an outrage on the SM over such cheap questions and statements. Rajdeep also posted a pic of him and UddhavT on Twitter to demonstrate his friendly nature. But watch the video closely, listen carefully and observe UddhavT’s behaviour when Rajdeep makes those dog comments. UT doesn’t bat an eyelid and is not perturbed or outraged one bit. Any other politician in his place would have taken serious objection to Rajdeep’s language and line of questioning. Not Uddhav Thackeray! Why? Because…

It would be clear if you observe closely that this dog tactic is a choreographed act. The BJP-Sena split happened at a time when the BJP is on the ascendancy and SS is not doing all that well, going by opinion polls. Suddenly, SS-haters like NDTV, Timesnow and Rajdeep are all lining up to interview UT and his son Aditya or some Marathi Manoos. The interview is in Hindi and Rajdeep wants Maharashtrians to hear how “poor UT” was treated like a “Dog” by the BJP. And the message: “Please sympathise with this (under?) dog and reject BJP”. Here are comments by TheJaggi in an article in Firstpost that should offer you further reasons why Rajdeep’s dog-question is actually “friendly fire” to help gain Marathi sympathy for UT:

I wonder how a party leader like UddhavT wants to win elections by being willingly characterised as a dog. What Marathi Manoos pride is he saving by such an act? A party that has the Tiger as its emblem is being called a dog and the head happily glosses it over. Charming stuff! Rajdeep, who has new-found sympathy for SS, has a history of contempt for the party. The contempt was so deep that he didn’t even spare Smita Thackeray from his hostile ridicule. He calls her a mere “hotel receptionist” just Moronshankar Aiyar refers to the “Chailwalla”. Take a look at history:

In his choreographed interview with UddhavT there weren’t any questions about Sena’s “Dadagiri” or “Poison” or UT’s lack of charisma as Rajdeep has consistently written about them. Nothing! It was all sympathy, love and affection. It was a grand attempt by Rajdeep to help UT and SS play the “underdog”. Now that the SS has split with BJP, Rajdeep and his HATO will go any length to garner sympathy for SS but time and tide don’t stop for these media morons. Their hatred for Modi can make them do anything but “dogs” usually remain dogs. 

Rajdeep's Ugly Character - Part 2

If you haven’t already, please read the previous part: “Rajdeep reveals his ugly character at NY” and also “A question of Aroon Purie’s ethics & morals”.

Contrary to what a hack grandly claimed after Rajdeep Sardesai’s ugly Madison Square Garden incident, self-styled journalists do not have any Constitutional right to ask “obnoxious” questions. This dangerous assumption has been used to spew hatred on a certain segment of people by our MSM. This hatred had to inevitably result in the physical assault of a person that Rajdeep is guilty of. These sickos in our MSM have no business to talk about freedom or liberty. Wise men have long ago left this wisdom behind: “The liberty to swing your arm ends where another man’s nose begins”.

After the incident some Aaptards, led by you know who, put out part videos of RS being manhandled. Little did these idiots know that in this day and age anybody and everybody with a mobile phone is almost a citizen-journalist. But predictably, the “Box of parrots” that forms our MSM went on a rant about how RS was abused and assaulted. I have screenshots but to save space let’s summarise the initial morons:

These unworthies now have eggs on their faces. This is nothing short of a choreographed operation to make RS a “victim” of a “mob” as these scoundrels refer to the people who had come to hear PM Modi. All the evidences and videos have already been put up in the previous posts I referred to at the beginning. The question now is, what did Rajdeep do after the incident that drove this choreographed operation of #IStandWithRajdeep? Let’s read his “regret” which he published on October 10 (excerpts):

“However, I do believe it is important to put events of the day in context. I along with my camera person was outside Madison Square garden about three hours before the prime minister was to arrive. Our aim was to capture the mood, which was  joyous and excited. We were able to reflect much of this in our coverage… I was abused in terribly foul terms, my family was called names and I was kicked in the shins when my back was turned. The pushing and jostling continued even as I tried not to engage. I had gone to the event with hopes of goodwill instead the volley of name calling was unrelenting and shocking to me. My camera person and other witnesses would bear testimony to this… I do, however, believe that surrounding, heckling and hurling vicious personalized abuse while a journalist is doing a professional job is also unacceptable. We journalists have a challenging job at the best of times and only ask to be allowed to perform our duties unhindered without intimidation… The freedom of the press is an integral part of our democracy and should be respected  by all”.

Rajdeep uses all the balderdash in the world to defend his abuses and stupid behaviour. As a professional, if you’re heckled, you just walk away. You just find another spot to report from. The videos clearly show what this scoundrel was intent on doing: Inviting soundbites against Modi that will tar the PM and throw a sour note to the event. He was fishing for filth. RS claims he had his cameraman with him. What was that cameraman doing? Peeling onions? This is what RS tweeted:

A) If you got the “idiots on cam” where’s the video? B) It’s not that “mob” that released a “selective” video. It’s Rajdeep’s Aaptards who released a selective video. Fact: Rajdeep does have a video that his cameraman may have shot but unfortunately that video DOES NOT have any abuse or violence from people.  C) The full video which starts with Rajdeep turning back and assaulting Mr. Yellow Kurta was put up only after the “selective” video was put out by Aaptards.

RS represents a TV channel with a full crew but can’t put up a video to back his stupid claims? That’s the character that Rajdeep is and that is why his regret or apology is a mop-up operation that won’t pass. But the lies didn’t last long after the full video came up and that is why Rajdeep now tries to claim he was abused, his son was abused, all without the slightest shred of evidence. That calls for an estimate of what Rajdeep did after the incident, doesn’t it?

Fact seems to be that the truncated video was indeed passed on to “very senior Aaptards” by Rajdeep himself or his crew. The Aaptards put up the selective video and the boss sends a message to all his fellow Aaptards who then trend #IStandWithRajdeep. It’s based on this LIE that all the morons in the media started making him a “victim”. How do I know? Well, a very “Senior Bird” from Delhi called me up a few days ago to tell me the whole story. This Bird & Co. also had interactions with Rajdeep immediately after the incident. As soon as he went to his hotel, or wherever he went after the incident, Rajdeep probably realised that he had screwed up unforgivably. Once the heat of the moment was gone, his cold sweat probably caused him to realise his blunder. So what does he do? He calls up all members of the HATO (Hammam Associates Treaty Organisation). That’s a lot like the NATO you know. The job of this HATO is to protect their mafia member no matter what. That’s why Namita Bhandare foolishly rants “Assault of one journalist is assault on entire press”. Bravo! By the same logic, rape by Tejpal would also make the entire press a mafia of rapists. Wouldn’t it? That’s what someone reminded her:

And Namita Bhandare enters into long baseline rallies with another journo pointing to eyewitness accounts. Really? Eyewitness? In this age of candid camera? And she demands the “Union of snakes” which also passes by the name of Editors Guild must seek an apology from the organisers of the MSG event. Oh well, she quotes the eyewitness account’s narration. Here:

Well, well! As soon as the truth came out, the “eyewitness account” of Mistresses like Namita Bhandare disappeared. This moron who tends to blabber a lot about right-wing didn’t pause to think for herself. She was led like a babe in the woods to the stupidity she came to deliver on behalf of Rajdeep. After all, member of HATO, eh? As for eyewitnesses, Ashok Shrivastav of DD was also an eyewitness and he didn’t disappear or withdraw like Namita’s punk on FB. So, Rajdeep called up many of his HATO members to paint him a victim and they gladly obliged without a second thought or without any fact-checking. That’s what the criminal attempted – a black-wash of his crimes. You would have thought that Rajdeep who so bragged about “Citizen Journalism” while with CNN-IBN forgot that these same citizen journalists abound everywhere to screw his lies. If a legal authority were to scan the phone call records of Rajdeep from that day it would bear out what I have stated.

Next, Rajdeep runs into Gautam Adani in some restaurant and narrates his sob story. He tells him how he was abused and molested by the “mob” (Of the Gambino or Modino family?). Adani probably said he sympathises and any leader would condemn such incidents. Of course, you can safely assume Adani wouldn’t have seen or heard anything other than the sob story of Rajdeep. So Rajdeep gets a call from Sheela Bhatt (or maybe he called her to deliver another Salma story) and he tells her how Adani mentioned Modi was upset with the “mob’s” behaviour. Promptly, Sheela Bhatt runs a story on her Rediff pages with the headline “Modi upset over attack on Rajdeep Sardesai”. All this, when Modi would have probably have never even heard of the incidents in his busy schedule. And why would Modi even bother with the silly drama of Rajdeep? Even this lie could not run its course because Adani issued a clear denial of any such communication. So basically Rajdeep and Sheela Bhatt were doing their “Salma-Sabrina” act. Pathetic LIARS!

In summary, the fake stories of abuse, assault on him etc. were placed in the social media by none other than Rajdeep himself. He used his Hammam, senior Aaptards and gullible people like Sheela Bhatt to spread his victimhood. There isn’t a single piece of evidence that he was abused (except in retaliation) or physically assaulted. All the video-evidence points to Rajdeep being the criminal. And that is that! Rajdeep is also lucky Mr Yellow Kurta didn’t file a police complaint for assault, else he would have cooled his heels in a cold cell and still be in the US on bail. 

After Wimbledon this year Maria Sharapova blurted out she hadn’t heard of Sachin Tendulkar. That was enough to send thousands of his fans on a rampage. Sharapova was ridiculed, abused all over the social media and cartoons abounded on the MSM. Why would you go to a public event of PM Modi and deliberately abuse and provoke those who came to hear him? Why would you call them a “mob”? Would you call people assembled for an SRK show a mob? Would you call those attending Sonia’s rally a mob? All this is mindless hatred that Rajdeep and others in the MSM have nurtured. It culminated in his violent behaviour. The only mafia “mob” I see is lumpens from the MSM who spread lies and abuse people because they support Modi. You don’t shout “Fire” in a crowded theatre. Rajdeep and his entire Hammam now stand naked in front of you.

Tailpiece: To the bimbo who claimed journalists have the right to ask “obnoxious” questions my only warning is to expect “obnoxious” answers. There’s a video floating on Facebook about a similar obnoxious behaviour by a reporter. She epitomises what Rajdeep did at MSG. The street guys responded with far more maturity.

Telling people “You have money but have no class… Did Modi teach you this?... You American-Indians have no values” is nothing short of racist behaviour by Rajdeep. And these are the bimbos to teach us freedom of press and democracy? 

Bengal's Terror Machine

Among his many profound pieces of advice that “Deep Throat” gave Bob Woodward, one principle in the pursuit of crimes remains immortal:  “Follow the money”. It started as another scam or a Ponzi scheme but the pursuit of the Saradha scam in Bengal has opened up a much bigger threat to the country and one of its neighbours. The web of deceit, financial crimes and the linkage to terrorism is shocking to say the least. And all of this comes with involvement of the ruling party members in the state. There is no escape for Mamata Banerjee (MB) or her TMC from this. She will indeed have to answer for a lot.

On the evening of October 6, Monday, the man in the pic, Derek O’Brien (DOB) was asked to respond to the incident of an accidental blast at the Burdwan centre of TMC which killed two men who were assembling IEDs. Instead of answering the questions DOB stated barking at the BJP and Social Media as “hate-mongering” with their Hindu agenda against the TMC. This scumbag also happens to be an MP from Bengal. We have to wonder what agenda the TMC really has. In June-July there was a spate of attacks on Hindus and BJP leaders by TMC goondas, some murders too. There were a few rapes earlier which MB described as a “conspiracy” against her. 34 years of CPM and now this absolute horror of a political party sinking Bengal has still not seen an outrage in our media. Not surprising because they all belong in the “Sickular” basket. Let’s summarise the story first.

On August 24 a story surfaced about the Saradha scam money fanning terrorism in Bangladesh: “The CBI and ED learnt that funds collected from the public through Saradha’s chit fund schemes were centrally deposited at the group’s offices in Salt Lake. After being accounted for, hundreds of crores were transported to various centres close to the Indo-Bangladesh border. The cash was put in huge bags and taken by ambulances belonging to the Saradha group. The Indian currency was then secretly converted to Bangladeshi Taka and European currencies at a “Foreign Currency Convertor Centre” belonging to a man from Kolkata. Armed couriers of radical Islamic outfits would then smuggle the converted currency across the border under the cover of darkness”. The report mentions the operations being managed by a Rajya Sabha MP. He is TMC MP Ahmed Hassan Imran and his story is quite interesting:

“TMC links with Bangladeshi radical groups The Anand Bazar Patrika report “Before 2011, the Jamaat helped Trinamool with huge funds secretly transferred across the border. Imran played a key role in it. “Later when the Jamaat faced government’s ire during its opposition to war crimes trials, it received funds from Trinamool which had come to power in 2011 and many of whose leaders were ministers in the Manmohan Singh government,” the Ananda Bazar Patrika report said, quoting extensively from a detailed report it claims was given to India by Bangladesh intelligence. Who is Ahmed Hassan Imran? Ahmed Hassan Imran is a Rajya Sabha MP from West Bengal at present. In 1975-76 he founded West Bengal Muslim Students Association. In 1977, Imran co-founded the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) in Aligarh Muslim University in Uttar Pradesh”.

It doesn’t stop there. This Ahmed Hassan Imran is suspected to be not an Indian but technically a citizen of Pakistan: “A Pakistani citizen is now a TMC member in the Rajya Sabha, courtesy West Bengal Chief Minister and TMC chief Mamata Banerjee. Ahmed Hassan, aka Imran, is in fact a Pakistani citizen, since he entered India from East Pakistan in 1970-71, before the birth of Bangladesh”. Let’s move forward with the story:

“An explosion in Burdwan town of West Bengal on Thursday (October 2) killed two people and led to a cache of arms and explosives being discovered, causing the police to suspect a terror link. The blast occurred around noon at a house in a residential locality of Burdwan town, about 100 km from Kolkata, in the middle of the festive season of Durga Puja. More than 50 improvised explosive devices (IED), other explosives and wires were recovered from the flat. Shakil Ahmed (32) was killed on the spot while Swapan Mondal (22) succumbed to injuries at the… Hospital.   A third, Hasan Saheb, is stable and undergoing medical treatment while a fourth male resident is absconding… fire brigade personnel were prevented from entering the house by two women, who refused to open the door. Upon breaking open the door, the police found them burning some papers. The women -- Ahmed’s wife Rumi Bibi and Hasan’s wife Aklima Bibi – have been detained. Security agencies are now trying to find out if the IEDs were meant to be used in Bengal or sent somewhere else. Bomb disposal squads have also recovered a number of explosives and SIM cards on the banks of the Damodar river near the town. The six people – four men and two women – rented the house three months ago and told house owner Hasan Chowdhury that they were setting up a workshop for making Burkhas. Chowdhury didn’t check the identities of the tenants”

The house the potential terrorists used belonged to Nurul Hasan Chowdhury. You don’t need another guess to know that he too is a member of the TMC. He leads the Burdwan unit of the TMC and his house also operates as its make-shift office. Don’t be surprised – in this day and age Hasan Chowdhury, a political leader, lets out his house to people without knowing who they are or without any background check as he claimed. The bomb-making guests of TMC had targets of Kolkata airport and a dozen other targets (AajTak). That just about summarises the sequence of events for us

If the bomb-makers had succeeded in their plans there could have been a major carnage around Durga Puja in Bengal and who knows how many people may have been killed. And we discovered all this only because a couple of bombs they were assembling went off accidentally. MamataB’s Muslim-appeasement is not limited merely to her govt policies or vote-bank politics. She has now reduced Bengal police to levels of unthinkable stupidity after a major terror-threat. Dressing up as a Muslim or praying as a Muslim is one thing but letting or asking the police to cover up crimes, as is being reported, is a totally different thing and this is what happened:

Over 50 explosives and other accessories collected by the Bengal police from the Burdwan house were detonated and destroyed. Why? What kind of criminal police destroys evidence? In addition, the women involved in the operation burnt a lot of papers which still left some corners legible. Forensic sciences can even investigate and find clues even in fully burnt papers and items. What does the Bengal police do? I watched with horror the TimesNow reporter picking up pieces from the debris to show it to the camera while the public was casually walking around inspecting the debris as if it were a tourist spot. Is this how a state deals with terrorists or potential-terrorists? And to all that, MamataB still wants the state CID to deal with these incidents and refuses NIA investigation. Nothing can be more comic. The Centre cannot be dictated by such comic stubbornness if they plan to tackle terrorism seriously. Here’s Vicky Nanjappa who has been reporting on these events consistently:

 

India is strongly against cross-border terrorism and faces the same problem with Pakistan. Why would we tolerate a state where the govt acknowledges cross-border terrorism but refuses an NIA investigation? There seems to be abundant evidence that this Ahmed Hassan of TMC has been promoting extremism in Bangladesh and their govt has asked for serious action on this:

“Indian Muslims will live for India and die for India” said Modi in an interview to a tainted, foreign news peddler. The Muslims involved in this entire episode not only appear to have had a plan to kill people at large but even Muslims across the border. Bengal govts, the present and the previous CPM, seem to have a special sympathy for terrorists. The CPM is known to have political-murders as a party policy. “Eminent terrorist” Yasin Bhatkal was in custody in Bengal but jumped bail mysteriously from Kolkata. And this is the same dumb Bengal police that is investigating the Burdwan incident and related cross-border terrorism?

“There is no good and bad terrorism” said Narendra Modi at the UN. There is no reason why one should tolerate a state govt which has members who not only support terror activities in India but also have links to cross-border terrorism. It doesn’t take Einstein to figure out that this cannot have been going on for so long without the knowledge of many in power in Bengal. There are problems at the LOC which Modi-Sarkar is now tackling firmly. Modi believes in the federalism and greater autonomy of states. But terrorism and cross-border promotion of it cannot be merely the state’s issue. It is a national security issue. Narendra Modi must intervene and ensure a massive operation to weed out terrorists from Bengal is undertaken. There is also the promise of sending back illegal Bangladeshis. These issues must see signals of actions. If these were mere election rhetoric there will be a very large price to pay.