tag: MediaCrooks: France

Privacy Policy

Showing posts with label France. Show all posts
Showing posts with label France. Show all posts

Sunday, November 8, 2020

Uncontrolled Jihadism

The US elections are once again in a tangle after the 2000 episode with Al Gore. However, unlike 2000, the 2020 election is sprinkled “liberally” with Jihadis, Islamists, Antifa goons, Commies and other such anti-democracy outfits stamping their assertion in these elections. Recent events in France involving the beheading of innocent people has also brought forth a new resolve from Emmanuel Macron to fight the Jihadis. The French President has started the fight in right earnest by deporting a good number of potential Islamic terrorists and suspects. No one has to die for a cartoon or for a vile speech. This terrorism has long haunted France and one hopes they combat it till the terrorists are thrown out from everywhere in France. Macron, otherwise considered a soft Liberal, made sure the entire world knows his stand on the murder of Samuel Paty with this tweet in no uncertain terms:

In sharp contrast, India is seeing consistent rise in uncontrolled Jihadism all across the country. Ever since Narendra Modi became the PM, his quest for improving his image from the taint of 2002 and hatred by Muslims is costing India a lot. Modi has gone out of his way to appease Muslims in India, appease Middle East leaders and has still not been able to shake the contempt that Muslims and Sickulars hold for him. Unlike AB Vajpayee, Modi is hated by almost every political party even if it has been an NDA allay at some point. The Shiv Sena now spares no effort to mock and insult Modi (UdhavT throws insults and asks BJP to eat Gobar and drink GauMutra and keep their mouths shut). 

All the hatred for Modi is making Hindus pay a price because Modi has been wrongly identified as a Hindutva leader which he himself never claims and nor has been so. Unlike Macron, Modi only sheds tears for Muslim victims of violence. He sheds tears for Akhlaq, Tabrez or Shabana Azim in an accident or Muslim BJP workers in JK. Modi doesn’t shed one tear for Kamlesh Tiwari, Palghar Sadhus or BJP workers killed in Bengal. His moronic Bhajan Mandli claims this is because “Federal Structure”. Seriously? The FAKE “Federal structure” prevents the PM from mourning or condoling extreme crimes against Hindus? This idiotic excuse is now starting to annoy Hindus. Modi lamented the deaths of victims at the church in Nice. He was late on Samuel Paty. But for some reason he seems to hate Hindus who are killed for the same reasons as Paty. The murder of Kamlesh Tiwari is more horrendous because he was a marked man and there was a known threat to him.

Systematically and consistently, Modi has tried to please the Muslims with his pronouncements on Islam, Quran, Mohammad or any aspect of Islamic or Muslim life. Imagine, a man who had never before 2014 ever put out a greeting on Eid-e-Milad or Mohammad’s birthday or “alleged” teachings does so regularly since 2014. It makes you wonder if this guy reads Kalma every day like his colleague Piyush Goyal:

A PM greeting Muslims on these days is not unfair or unusual but Modi has gone overboard to please Muslims despite consistently given the signal that he is scared to offend them or tell them the truth about their riots, bad behaviour, violence or murders. 

In the 2nd term alone, since Modi became PM again Eid riots happened in Delhi. A temple was vandalized. Hindu girls and boys have been slaughtered by Muslim men on the streets or their home for Love-Jihad or being rejected. Shaheen Bagh nonsense was allowed to continue because they are Muslims. Markaz nonsense was allowed because they are Muslims. Delhi riots was a consequence of Shaheen Bagh. Thookiyas with weapons in their homes were untouched by Delhi Police. Bangalore riots followed. In the latest incident a young college girl, Nikita Tomar, was murdered in broad daylight by one Tauseef for rejecting his Love-Jihad attempts. Modi’s incompetence and not even warning govts to act on such violence or commenting on them emboldens such Jihadism.

The nightmare in Bengal for the Hindu workers of BJP is never-ending. Almost everyday some Hindu is killed like sacrificial goat and the BJP or Modi or Amit Shah don’t have even one word to utter on these killings. It’s now a known fact that BJP enjoys these killings so that they can use them as “Electoral Flesh” during their election campaigns. This is a monstrous blood-bath that the party is tolerating and sacrificing innocents. And BJP Bengal puts out the image of the dead guy like a “Daily news bulletin” in their tweets. One can see a tweet almost every day of some Hindu being killed. Then, Amit Shah, recently went to Bengal and grandly did some campaign work and told media that BJP will get 200+ seats in the next Bengal elections. The moronery of this man beats his fat size. And he goes to a place where hundreds of his workers are killed and eats food with tribals as if in celebration of some festival. The image he wants to convey smacks of a reckless person who went for the 13th day feast of a dead man whose family was in mourning. There is a sinister disconnect:

From the killings in Bengal which is now commonly being referred to as an “Islamic State” or “Jihadi State” to young Love-Jihad men from the Muslim community, the killings, such as that of Nikita Tomar are so brazen and public that you would think these are streets of Somalia. At the other end, the same Muslims come out in large numbers whenever there is a problem in France or Denmark to protest and riot. This time too they protested over Macron (with large crowds during Covid) for no reason other than mindless nonsense but fortunately there wasn’t any violence as is normally the case. Cowards like Shivraj Chauhan or Amit Shah or BS Yeduriyappa are not willing or able to stop their violence, riots or illegal protests. They simply watch this uncontrolled Jihadism and the intimidation of other citizens of the State. Such is the brazen behaviour of their Mullahs that open threats of beheading for criticising Islam on TV is now commonplace as much as their Fatwas for beheading have become common. This one on TV is equally chilling but now routine in India (video 27 secs):


 

The way this “orchestrated” Jihadism operates is very surreptitious and often cloaked in niceties. Recently, two Muslims desecrated a temple in Mathura by doing namaz on its grounds. Some Mullahs came out in their support claiming they were only showing their “Bhakti” towards the Hindu Gods in the temple. Sure, moronic bhakti by namaz instead of praying to the Gods in the temple. Then there is unprovoked violence here and there and, in some cases, temples are vandalized or Hindu festivals (like Durga puja) stoned. When incidents like in France happen, many Jihadinis will come mouthing dialogues like “If one innocent is killed, the whole mankind is killed” because Mohammad said so. There will be the usual media-dancers like Arfa Khanum, Rana Ayyub, Saba Naqvi, Barkha Dutt, Shahid Siddiqui etc. who will then condemn the incidents but offer veiled defence of the terrorists and find wrong equivalence with some imaginary Hindutva nonsense.

 All this, while their lectures from Deoband and Madrassas will continue spewing hate-speeches and indoctrination of more radical Muslim kids. At the other end of the spectrum, govts (especially BJP govts are ministers) are more than eager to ban crackers on Diwali, trample on Hindu festivals as if some Middle East Mullah has ordered them to do so. Odisha govt has even banned the traditional earthen diyas. The assault on Hindu culture and practices is not an accident but an orchestrated action and Modi cannot shirk responsibility for it.

Amidst all of this, PM Modi grandly quotes his speech claiming “Building a New India free from the problematic old practices”. Wonder what New India he is building when outdated 1922 laws are invoked, wanton murder of Hindus on the streets, general lawlessness in Bengal/Maharashtra, Mass Muslim protests during Covid and uncontrolled Jihadism. The brunt of the failures of ModiSarkar are being borne by law-abiding Hindus. Every morning you wake up with a dream of “New India” but the dread of another assault somewhere on Hindus. 

 

Follow the blog on Twitter.


                                   Subscribe To                         Contribute

                                    Educating                             PayU (India)             

                                      Forward                             Paypal (Int’nl)

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Five-Star Criminals & Presstitutes

Every now and then some new information about JL Nehru turns up. The latest news is about his authorising snooping on relatives of Subhaschandra Bose. JLN grandly spoke about India’s tryst with destiny. What he did to guide her destiny can only be described as shambles. This is the man who many sycophants, liars and bogus historians in our country call “visionary”. In the era of new-found freedom when there was only one major political force, this man could get away with all his misdeeds. Democracy was only a screen while JLN went about implementing Commie policies since he was a deep admirer of Stalin. People need to be reminded repeatedly that this so-called visionary who failed on most fronts actually thought the USSR model was the future of the world. Do read an excerpt of his silly speech on socialism inspired by USSR and his vision for India. On the same page you will find a montage of all the Commies who destroyed their state or country. The life that guided rich guys like JLN has guided all Commie politicians, Five-star activists (FSAs) and Presstitutes (Ps).

In other words, these Commies, FSAs and Ps lived and continue to live a life of luxury while they claim to represent the poor. The typical Lutyens life! Nehru did pretty little for the poor and they sunk deeper into their cesspool of poverty and debt. So when PM Modi called these pimps with an agenda “Five-Star activists” it naturally hurt them. But there is no doubt that a majority of these FSAs and NGOs are anti-India, block projects and perpetuate the same poverty that JLN left behind. If I said JLN is the fountainhead for these groups and their behaviour I wouldn’t be wrong at all. Less than 1% of our population is made of these scumbags who whine and protest everything while others rot in misery of their lives. Modi is trying to change the situation and that burns the hearts of these morons. Naturally! And since the nonsense of Nehru’s came out, here’s a response by one of India’s biggest Ps:

I don’t recall this pimp seeking release of Netaji papers earlier but now makes a big deal about its urgency. And he thinks it’s being “overdone”. If there was anything overdone and overcooked in recent history it has to be that Coup story against Gen VK Singh. These same media pimps made a big deal about the Amit Shah fake-snoopgate when there was not much to the story but want to cover up crimes of Nehru. Why is this the typical Presstitute life? Because of this:

You share information with a foreign govt on your own revered citizen? Why shouldn’t we believe Nehru was indeed an operator like Stalin whom he much admired? But hey, this is Sickular Nehru so his crimes must be washed. He was a British in Indian clothes; he loathed Hinduism and Hindu culture. That’s why I call JLN the fountainhead of FSAs, Ps and Commies. They all hate Hinduism and Hindu culture. We can talk about other FSAs but the biggest group of FSAs was none other than SoniaG’s NAC. All the anti-development and dole-culture crooks, some political crooks landed up a job in the NAC and these jokers were making policies for India. They superseded even the PM and the Cabinet at times. So what’s wrong in calling these people FSAs? The biggest nonsense has to be SoniaG allowing fraud-enriched Greenpigs to party at10JP while she was forming the govt after the 2009 elections. They paraded at her bungalow to showcase their influence on the Indian govt. Here you go:

The 10-years of Cong-UPA govt was a bonanza for anti-national NGOs, FSAs, Presstitutes and the rich and the corrupt. The poor stayed where they were. And because the corrupt groups, FSAs and Presstitutes lost their clout and influence in govt they are now all out to attack and tar ModiSarkar with the most flimsy nonsense. Modi is on tour in Europe visiting France and Germany and signing major deals that benefit India. But some motivated and some even extreme hate-filled nonsense is being peddled by the Ps. Here’s Forbes Asia:

Really? You have to wonder what morons at Forbes headline such crap. A govt grapples with multiple issues facing a country. Poverty, hunger are among the issues but so is security and defence. It doesn’t occur to morons at Forbes (and their Indian pimps too) that economic deliverance of the poor cannot happen without an environment of security and a desired level of defence. Maybe Forbes is behaving like the jealous spouse since we are buying French jets and not American ones. That seems the most plausible reason for this stupid headline.

Ask the same Ps if they ever wrote about JLN hanging around with white females in his swimming trunks while the poor were dying in India. The funny part is JLN even wears the Aaptard-like Topi to the pool. PMs swimming for recreation or health is absolutely fine. But why would a so-called PM hang around with White females at their pools? Was he thinking about the poor of India? The same media pimps who talk nonsense about Modi’s 10-lakh suit or Louis Vuitton shawl (all a load of rubbish and lies) wouldn’t ask the same question on why JLN was hanging out with foreign females in his trunks. It’s the FSA, Fiberal life-style, after all. They wouldn’t talk about Sonia’s unknown illness or her clothes or jackets or shawls. The Ps didn’t even dare ask which aircrafts she flew in on all her secret trips abroad. She’s the Fiberal from the Nehru fountainhead, Modi is the backward, unwanted desi from the 99% percent unwashed mass of India.

They whined about December 25 being declared “Good governance day” in honour of ABV because they claimed it is an attack on a Christian holiday. This is another of those stupid myths that Christian propagandists have successfully peddled. Nobody really knows what date Jesus was actually born on. Even the Pope and Vatican priests have now revealed that the date may not be accurate. But JLN’s birthday being celebrated as Children’s day is okay for these fools. Why? There is no record JLN had any great liking for children – that’s another of those Commie Presstitute myths that has been peddled for long. On the contrary, record only shows that sycophants made JLN pose with children with flowers on his birthday and they turned that nonsense into children’s day.

These myths being destroyed is definitely hurting our media pimps. It is also hurting their earnings and influence on govt. Their castle is being destroyed bit by bit by the SM and with tags like #SupariJournalists #BazaruMedia and #Presstitutes. There is no escape anymore. And they made a big issue of some fake Louis Vuitton shawl Modi wore in France – scumbaginis like Sagarika and Rana Ayyub leading the nonsense. My question is very simple:

That “panties in a twist” is not my original coinage. It is a phrase that the same media pimps hurl at others. And it does indeed look their panties go into a twist every time Modi wears something. Every person in India who can afford it wears some foreign brand or the other (our Presstitutes mostly wear foreign brands) so why is this an issue for these morons? They don’t have any real work anymore because the ModiSarkar is not providing them with scandals or scams that they can gorge upon. These sick Presstitutes cannot find anything to tar him with; so there’s a bankruptcy of issues. There is more hilarious stuff from media morons:

Someone rightly remarked on Twitter that the only people dumber than bimbos like Sagarika, Rana, Mihir or Shankarsan have to be the morons who employ them. Their filth simply cannot be exceeded. And just when you think it cannot be exceeded there is always another moron lurking around the corner to prove you wrong:

It would take an extremely sick mind to write this nonsense. So because Smriti Irani is used to cameras she should get used to some CCTV spying on her in a changing room? This is the filth that Fiberals believe in. This is almost like saying everyone who faces cameras frequently, including sportspersons, politicians and TV anchors should be okay with CCTVs spying on them in change-rooms. Imagine, these same media pimps would tell you Indians are used to filth and open defecation so why do you need SwachhBharat? So why should you object if once in a blue moon someone urinates on your house or bungalow wall? That is their stupid argument. And what’s the bloodbath in the HRD ministry? Are they in danger of destroying themselves? Even if Smriti was doing badly or HRD ministry was in chaos or something; nothing warrants these opening lines which have no connection to the stupid article. That is why these pimps originate from the Nehru fountainhead. Anything non-Fiberal is fair game for irrational abuse and scorn. These are from the 1% of Indians who despise the 99% of India. They aren’t criticising the govt, they just hate the very existence of other Indians. One honest journalist did have the courage to say it as it is:

Yes, the cause of this extreme nonsense is nothing but hatred. I don’t believe there are FSAs. If the GOI diligently investigated them, most of them would turn out to be Five-star criminals breaking multiple laws. As for the media pimps and presstitutes this here is the reality:

The Presstitutes are getting angrier by the day 
because they are fast losing relevance.

They are not able to impact public opinions in the face of the SM increasing in power and truthfulness. They are not able to get free junkets, wine and food on AirIndia One and I estimate their earnings are going down too. The only thing going up is their volume of hatred. More damage is likely to follow in due course.
 

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 2



The spiritual roads to God or the “Power” that runs the universe are many. This is what Hindus believe and are taught. Hindus are also taught that all religions are the same. Many Hindus still chant this nonsense despite an abundance of evidence of it not being true. If all religions are the same, then followers of all religions must believe that. They don’t! The spirit of tolerance should be extended only when there is mutual respect between all religions. The time for mouthing such invalid, false philosophies like “all religions are the same” must be ended by Hindus.

There is a Mohammad Ali Road in Mumbai. It’s famous for its eateries and a delight for gluttony fans. There is one for him in Delhi too. During Eid this road in Mumbai also becomes an open Masjid where Muslims offer mass Namaz on the streets. It’s a phenomenon over the last two decades. Along with MK Gandhi he led the Khilafat movement in India. There are lots of things written about him but here is something he said about Gandhiji that you can ponder over: "However pure Gandhi's character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without character. He repeated it later, saying, 'Yes, according to my religion and creed, I hold an adulterous and a fallen Muslim to be better than a Mr. Gandhi." Just imagine if a Hindu leader had said this about a Muslim leader. I can imagine your imagination running riot. And this was said about Gandhi who was far more sympathetic to Muslims than to Hindus.

The Sickulars are still reeling under the aftermath of the CharlieHebdo killings. They are at pains to find excuses to justify the actions of terrorists. From NDTV to The Hindu to a whole lot of Commie media the latest one to join the ranks is Outlook. Here’s an excerpt:

While I am all for free speech and all for satire, it must be said that Charlie Hebdo had it coming. That sounds crude and cruel, but Muslims would treat the cartoons as crude and deliberately provocative. And it won’t cut much ice with them if you tell them that the cartoons on the Pope were equally bad. You can lampoon Islam and its followers, as you can lampoon any other religion. You can even make fun of the Caliphs (arguably) but don’t touch the Prophet. Muhammad is no go area. His name is prefaced with ‘Prophet’ or with the appellation “peace be upon him” by his billion followers. You can’t paint him, sculpt him, or build a musical around him a la ‘Jesus Christ—Superstar.’ All that these caricaturists and satirists have to do is to leave one man alone. Not too much of a price to pay for peace, is it?”

Fantastic, isn’t it? It is one thing to argue that the Prophet is a “no go area” but a totally different thing to reiterate “Charlie Hebdo had it coming”. There are many ways to protest strongly but killing isn’t one of them. Had it coming, he says! There are other “no go areas” too and we will get into it shortly. All these scumbags who argue that CharlieHebdo had it coming are at a loss to answer a simple question. 59 people were roasted alive in a coach on a train in Gujarat in 2002. Did these people draw any cartoons? Did they even shout any anti-Muslim or anti-Islam slogans? But when the Hindus retaliated violently these very people claimed genocide, pogrom, state-sponsored violence etc. Seriously, did they expect that Hindus should simply continue to tolerate such unprovoked and unwarranted attacks? Since 2002 Gujarat has seen relative peace where communal relations are concerned. There have been stray incidents here and there but no major communal riots.

The man who wrote the Outlook article (Keki Daruwalla – is not a regular journo, but another Arundhati Roy types that infest Outlook) argues that not drawing the cartoons is a small price to pay for peace. 2002 happened before all these cartoons. And is the writer suggesting that prior to these cartoons the Islamists were peaceful and there was no terrorism? Did 9/11 happen because of cartoons? Did 26/11 happen because of cartoons? Did Madrid or London underground happen due to cartoons? Saif Rahman is an ex-Muslim of Pakistani origin in the UK. Here’s what he tweeted January 26:

It is an unfortunate but inevitable truth – Tolerance of intolerance doesn’t buy peace. It never has. Increasingly, we have only seen that retaliation (and often disproportionate retaliation) stands a better chance of buying peace. Ask the Japanese. Rahman has also written a book “The Islamist Delusion”. Do read the summary on the page I have linked. Rahman has drawn no cartoons of the Prophet but merely written a book criticising the practices of Muslims. He claims to have received 139 death-threats so far. What he summarises in his tweet as the 10 Islamist commandments is for our Sickulars to think about. Playing victim will not help anymore. What should now be clear is that after the Paris incident there are many who are making this absolutely clear to the extremists.

Bobby Jindal, the governor in an American state, was a darling for our media for quite a while as they claimed he was an Indian-American. He disappointed them recently by stating that he is only “American” and that his forefathers came to America to be Americans and not Indian-Americans. More stunningly, Jindal became the first politician to boldly state what many politicians were unwilling to say. Excerpts:

"Let's be honest here. Islam has a problem… Muslim leaders need to condemn anyone who commits these acts of violence and clearly state that these people are evil and are enemies of Islam. It's not enough to simply condemn violence, they must stand up and loudly proclaim that these people are not martyrs who will receive a reward in the afterlife, and rather they are murderers who are going to hell. If they refuse to do that, then they're part of the problem. There is no middle ground here”.

Jindal went on to add in his speech in the UK that some countries have allowed Muslims to establish autonomous neighbourhoods in cities where they govern by a harsh version of Islamic law. Yes indeed, UK is facing this problem and so are many other non-Islamic countries in the world. There are over 700 no go zones created by Muslims in France and though it is not authorised in any form, the police and other services dread to go to these zones. Norway has expelled over 5000 foreigners, mostly Muslims, as action for reducing crime in the country. In a rare departure, British PM David Cameron has finally issued a warning to mosques in Britain to rein in extremists:

Belgians in the Congo. France invaded Algeria for no genuine reason except greed and now Algerians are in large number in France. The Dutch were in South Africa and some other places to subdue the original inhabitants. The Portuguese were in Bombay, Goa and Diu. And there is hardly a country left that Britain had not invaded and colonised. It is very tempting to say “they had it coming”. But it’s not revenge that the Islamists are seeking. If that was the case they could have declared formal wars. But it is intolerance of the culture and systems of the host country while enjoying all its privileges that is causing the problems. This is true in India too. “No go area” said that dumb Outlook writer and that avoiding cartoons will buy peace. I have written before that there are many towns in India that are completely Islamised and are somewhat of a no go zone for non-Muslims. This has happened even in places considered particularly holy pilgrimage locations by Hindus. It is hard to believe this has happened in Rameshwaram:

It is understandable if one makes the mistake of thinking these no go zones are stray cases across the world, although increasingly common. It would help to pause for a minute and think that an entire community was thrown out Kashmir which is now a no go zone for India’s non-Muslims. Can any no go zone be worse than that? Had the authorities acted then or even a few months later the KPs could have returned to Kashmir. They are never going to return – no go zones are forever. No politician is going to be courageous enough to alter the situation. The challenge is to avert creating some more and for that unlimited tolerance has to disappear.


To be concluded

Sunday, January 11, 2015

The War On Hindus - Part 3 #MultiprongedAttack



(This is a MaxiPost)

There are many ways a country can be invaded. An “invasion” is commonly associated with a Military invasion. There are other ways too – Politically, Commercially, Culturally, and Populationally. 

**********

The first time the Americans encountered Islamic terrorism was way back around 1784. The Arabs (the Ottoman states of Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers and also Morocco) had a practice of demanding a “tribute” (call it Jaziya or Hafta) for safe passage of ships through the Mediterranean sea around them. Refusal to pay resulted in capture and enslavement of the ship crews by Islamic pirates followed by demands for ransom (Somali pirates are only the modern version).

In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once

Maybe Ambassador Abdrahaman was explaining the “root cause” that terror-apologists at NDTV, HeadlinesToday, TOI and G-37 specialists like Kiran Bedi are looking for. Later in 1801, then as President, Thomas Jefferson, refused to pay the Hafta and thus the first ever war by the US Navy was prosecuted against Islamic terrorism. It was also the first time US Navy came into international combat. It came to be known as the Barbary wars. The pirate states were defeated. Remember, Israel did not exist then. Oil wasn’t discovered in the Middle East till early 20th century, around 1908.

**********

During the 1960s and till the mid-70s most of the romantic films and songs of Bollywood were usually made in Kashmir. There’s a movie from 1962 called “Hum Dono” which features the song “Allah tero naam, Ishwar tero naam” although I’m not sure the Muslims will agree with that. They believe Allah is only one and there is no other God or name for him. There are movies with no Muslim characters in it but would suddenly have a Qawali out of the blue. Mind you, Qawalis are very entertaining and enjoyable. There were many Muslims in Bollywood who had screen names, like Dilip Kumar and Johny Walker. We discovered they were Muslims only much later. But nothing wrong in screen names.

Then in the 70s and 80s guys like the late Feroze Khan, an average actor who became a better director, who would often play characters with names like Rajesh, Ramesh or Shankar (Check out his character’s names in most of his movies). But sometimes his movies would suddenly spring an Islamic song out of the blue. “Qurbani” directed by him suddenly springs up the song “Allah ko pyaari hai qurbani” in a very contrived context. So too “Jaanbaaz”, with the song “Allah ho Akbar”. These “Allah” songs are often inserted in movies as stand-alone numbers with no relevance to the story or context. That trend continues till today. But the different turn is that there are songs that demean Hindu icons as Sushma Swaraj once pointed and Gaurav Sawant reminds us:

Over the years Bollywood has consistently ridiculed and abused Hindu icons. Alright, if you want to make satires or ridicule icons you are welcome to it. But what is obvious is that the very same people refuse to expose the hilarious nonsense in other religions. It has almost become mandatory to have some item number or movies which portray Hindu icons in a vulgar fashion while the slightest negative portrayal of a Christian or Muslim icon invites extreme anger and violent reactions. The cowards at the Censor Board not only cave into such reactions but also pre-empt directors from ridiculing religions other than Hinduism. One such anti-Hindu Sicko is the current Chairperson of the CBFC, Leela Samson, a Jewish-Christian:

That thing about “… Malamaal” isn’t a stray case either. Jokes about Johny Lever’s name Abdullah made the Censor Board force the film-makers to change his name in the movie to Habibullah. They can’t even stand jokes about a name but they’re okay with ridiculing Shiva or Radha. I need not remind anyone about the violent agitations over “Vishwaroopam” by Kamal Haasan. And another movie that ridicules Christian priests has been blocked by the same Censor Board for over two years:

Wow! It’s been held back because it might hurt the Christian community. This might hurt Muslims that might hurt Christians but no problems with anything that offends Hindu sentiments. It is this hypocrisy that Hindus are now revolting against. Our media pimps like Barka, Sagarika, Rajdeep and Co. stand by these hypocritical morons of CBFC and claim they are all for freedom of expression. These pimps and the morons in various State and Central govts cannot tolerate any play or book about Nathuram Godse. Sure he killed Gandhi and he did so knowingly and willingly. He’s a murderer but what is so tolerant about all these morons that they cannot stand a play about him? And that is their idea of free speech? Sick slaves of Sickularism! So how does Bollywood abuse Hindus and Hinduism so daringly and get away with it? What’s their incentive?

The other phenomenon that can’t be missed – Since the late 1980s and early 90s there has been a great influx of Muslim actors in Bollywood and TV. There are Khans from Bollywood families and from outside too. If there’s a shortage, the producers import Muslims from Pakistan (like Nargis Fakri or Veena Malik). In principle, there is absolutely nothing wrong if a good number of talented Muslims get into movies and TV. But is that the only thing? Mahesh Bhatt converted to Muslim to marry a second woman and is now a prime-promoter of Islamic culture in Bollywood and a ubiquitous spokie for them. Is all this mere coincidence or incentivised? The cultural turn in Bollywood to abusing or ridiculing Hinduism alone (PK is only one of many such incidents) is an “invasion” that  shouldn’t go unnoticed. Many Muslim actors from here and there are included in a movie out of financing or coercion by the mafia; like that Monica of Abu Salem.

**********

Many years after oil was discovered in the Middle East, OPEC was formed in 1960 with their HQ in Vienna, Austria. This is a Trade-Bloc or like a Cartel of oil-producing and exporting countries. From being barren desert regions, many ME countries suddenly grew wealthier and economically more influential. This time they had Israel as common enemy. So during the 1973 Egypt-Israel war the OPEC choked oil supplies to US and other countries and the prices dramatically soared due to the “rationing”. This embargo lasted a year resulting in inflation, recession and unemployment in many parts of the world. The Islamists realised their power and muscle. This was eventually combatted by alternate energy, other production sources and by 1980 the OPEC was in to an oil glut in the market. Prices dropped dramatically as they pumped out more oil than ever before. There was a deep impact on India too.

From the mid-70s onward lakhs of Indian labour migrated to ME to find jobs and earned better money than they did at home. They were exploited, their passports were seized, they could not follow their own religion, they could not strike. In short, they were turned into bonded slaves. Sheiks from the ME came to Hyderabad and Mumbai to shop for young girls to take back as slaves for their harems. The stories are too many and you can look them up. People sent home a lot of money, labourers returned home with two-in-ones in their hands and large bags of goodies. Parts of Kerala, like Cochin, had turned almost Dubai-like with Islamic influence. They went as labour but came back as Islamists. The Saudi Wahabis and others in the ME started investing in “Islamism” in India and her neighbours. Even countries like Sudan funded a rash of Madrassas – to amounts like 3000 crores. There are many towns in India which were completely Islamised with funds from ME. Bollywood too was no exception.

Since the mid-70s Petro-dollars have been funding Bollywood and simultaneously a new underworld, supported by certain politicians and ME funding, blossomed not only to control Bollywood but Mumbai itself. And it then extended to terrorism, cultural codes like Muslims who earlier wore dresses like anyone else adopted more Pathani dresses, skull caps and burqas. There was phenomenal growth of Mosques and Madrassas. If all that was only for educational upliftment of Muslims that would be one thing but it became an “assertive” Islamic culture which resulted in more and more demands and our Central and State govts fuelled this culture with more appeasements. Kashmir Pandits were thrown out of Kashmir. Kerala saw a dramatic Islamisation of the State. Bengal and Telangana are following the same routes. UP and Bihar became terror-hubs.

**********

From the late 1970s and 80s onward the Islamic and Muslim influence in Bollywood and other forms of arts started seeping in. Prominent among the conflict with Hindus was the nude paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses by MF Hussain and artists at Commie hotbeds like JNU.

Those who are offering a veiled defence for the #CharlieHebdo (CH) killings by Muslim terrorists cannot stop defending the perverted portrayals of Hindu Goddesses by MFH. Goddess Saraswati is considered the icon of knowledge by Hindus. Vijaya Dashmi is celebrated by Hindus with a “Puja” of their weapons, implements, tools and books – whichever is the work-pursuit of the person. Why would a moron want to paint her nude? And those who find CH’s cartoons offensive continue to defend MFH’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses. The C5M even asks why a nude Saraswati can’t be done when Indian laws specifically prohibit such a religious offence. Our laws prohibit any form of nudity and obscenity for commercial purposes. Hindus treat Goddesses as mother. Let me be extremely harsh and blunt – Only the most perverted pimps like Sagarika, Barkha, Rajdeep and their Commie filth encourage such hypocritical nonsense. I believe the MFH defenders are either perverts who have seen or want to see their mothers having sex or bisexuals or lesbians who are aroused by such paintings. And these are the very scumbags who will scream about women being used as commodity and sex objects.

Their hypocrisy has no limits when it comes to offending Muslim sentiments. That’s Islamic money and fear talking and not a sense of fairness. Let’s see some more perverts and their cowardly hypocrisy:

It’s a common refrain. The movie PK which ridicules and abuses Lord Shiva in an attempt to portray fraudulent godmen is fine with them but CH cartoons are not. There are fraudulent godmen, fraudulent and violence-encouraging Mullahs and pedophile Christian priests but the only ones consistently being targeted by Bollywood and media are the Hindu ones. And that is what is arming the Islamic violence further. The fear of Muslims agitating and/or killing the “offenders” makes our Bollywood and media pimps wet their pants and skirts. In contrast, the worst perverts in the media, like street-thug Rajdeep, equate the protests against MFH to the CH killings. Another bimbo called Rana Ayyub of the dead Tehelka equates even protests against Praveen Swami to the killings of CH artists. And the best part is, both Rajdeep and Sagarika, India’s most moronic media-couple behave like they are the real victims of the CH killings.

What is the message these cowards are sending? That unless Hindus too arm themselves and kill those who offend their religious sentiments it is okay to offend Hinduism, Hindu Gods and Goddesses and Hindus in general? MFH wasn’t killed. The cowardly Hindu-abuser ran from the Courts of India to a desert and died there. Maybe it’s nature’s retribution that he didn’t deserve to die in the holy soil of India which many ordinary people are blessed with the fortune to.

**********

If all that wasn’t enough, here’s the High-Pimptress of Hypocrisy and cheerleader of Pakistan and the anti-Hindu brigade in media:

As Rana Ayyub points out? I can’t help rolling over in laughter. This is Salma quoting Sabrina to somehow slam France in a twisted defence of the CH killings. The bimbo further goes on to slam France for practicing dual-standards of free speech. I wonder if she ever looks in her bathroom mirror at the face of hypocrisy and dual standards. First, France wasn’t the first country to ban protests. In fact France was one of the earliest victims of Palestinian terrorism (remember the AirFrance plane hijacked to Entebbe in 1976?).  France was the first country to impose an arms embargo on Israel after the 1967 war with Egypt to appease Muslims and Palestinians. Secondly, France is the country that housed the known fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini for ages before he returned to Iran and pronounced a death-fatwa on Barkha’s permanent darling Salman Rushdie. For both these Moronginis, Barkha and bimbo Ayyub, someone has specially written an article on how Muslim appeasement is making France pay a price. May be they should read and educate themselves because India has been paying this price for over 60 years and the cost of appeasement will only go higher.

After the CH killings there were Sickos on NDTV like Kiran Bedi and their anchors and some on Headlines Today who were still discussing the “root cause” nonsense. Street-thug Rajdeep called Taslima Nasreen for a discussion on CH killings. She slammed Islamic terrorists and she slammed cowardly hypocrites so much that he suddenly cut off the show to move to a breaking-news that wasn’t really urgent. I think I have fairly explained the “root cause” of Islamic violence, earlier in this post, which caused the Barbary wars.

The Chrislamist invasion and attack on Hindus follows multiple paths – Weaponry (through terrorism), Culturally, Politically and Commercially. Who’s the target? Hindus! Anything I left out? Oh yes, Populationally! We will deal with that in the concluding part of this series.