Some cricketers
like Sreesanth and Chandilya were arrested in the IPL betting case and were in
jail for a few days before they got bail. They seem to have been recently
vindicated and may return to the game. In contrast, look at how our media and
courts deal with a fraud-accused like Teesta
Setalvad. I did not comment on the CBI court declining her anticipatory
bail because I suspected the Bombay HC will come to her rescue. But she’s a “victim”. Earlier when a
court cancelled her bail a battery of lawyers held a “Dial-a-bail” video
conference with the Supreme Court to get her bail in the late evening. But she’s a poor “victim”.
When the CBI
court rejected her bail she claimed she was a victim of hate and vendetta. Some
of her funders are convicted criminals like SantSingh Chatwal. Sant who? He’s the New York hotelier who was
awarded a Padma Bhushan in January
2010 by the Congress govt. And then there is Ford Foundation and many others.
All these guys were moved to tears by Teesta’s fight for justice. Let us leave
it at that. That she was fraudulently funded with help by the Congress is not a
big secret. The money trail also makes fantastic reading. I am not going to
waste time repeating what is already in the public domain. For Teesta when courts vindicate Modi it’s not
acceptable but when courts slam her she’s being penalised for a petty crime:
Now, in my
previous post (Teesta Rudalis)
I mentioned all the crooks in the media gathered to mourn her tragedy and
situation. Of course, the reason is simple – a conviction of Teesta is an
indirect conviction of these crooks who fed on her filth to target political
opponents. But it is one particular hypocritical moron who has been screaming
his lungs out as if a great disaster has befallen a poor woman who has been
working hard for justice. Here’s “Wheeler Dealer” Shekhar Gupta:
Not just SG but
all our media crooks danced at the fake cases against Amit Shah. I don’t think
people have forgotten the war-dance of Sreenivasan Jain. Never mind! I got
curious on why this SG is so agitated against legal prosecution of what are
evidently fraudulent financial transactions by Teesta. He calls it mere accounting issues:
So called
foolish editors who claim to be experts from finance to “Bahubali” appear to have learned nothing from history. All it took to start
off a serious investigation into the greatest political scandal of the 20th
century was this – A donation-cheque of $25000 issued to the Republican National Committee
to re-elect Nixon, instead of being deposited into the RNC bank account, was
endorsed to a Watergate burglar. That was followed by the famous Deep Throat quote: “Follow the money”! Did Shekhar Gupta
ever learn this? Does he remember that it was an ordinary endorsement of a
cheque to a burglar that finally led to the resignation of a US president? No, obviously
not. So why is this “wheeler-dealer” so vocally defending the financial crimes
of some political activist like Teesta? What’s his stake? And he even goes on
to say CBI is hounding Teesta for some crap like Tampons and stuff:
(By the way,
this is the same hypocrite SG who ranted about Kiran Bedi fudging some travel bills to benefit her NGO rather than
personal enrichment and considers Teesta’s frauds an accounting issue). And
here’s the beauty about Ford Foundation:
Okay SG! Did you
ever ask SoniaG how she allowed FF to operate in India then? CBI hounds people
for buying tampons and silly love stories with donation money? That’s the
intelligence of our so-called editors. Firstly, many disagree, but I am
absolutely clear that Teesta is an anti-national and is a threat to national
security. Here’s why:
Teesta took the
Gujarat riots issue to politicise it
internationally. She took it to the Geneva Human Rights Organisation when
the matter was already in our courts. What were her motives if not to tarnish
the image of India and our courts (other than her political motives for
Congress against Modi)? The Supreme Court rightly warned her "You seem to have
more faith in foreign organisations than this court. It seems that witnesses
would be protected by these organisations," the bench remarked adding that
if such letters are written then the court would pass the order without hearing
the contentions of the CJP… If you send such letters then we would hear the
amicus curie and pass the order (without hearing you)," the court said
adding, "All the cases are being monitored by us, we don't like any
correspondence of her with foreign agencies". Not an anti-national
act? Not for SG, I suppose.
Next, Teesta
testifies with the US Commission
on religious freedoms (some US based groups against Modi organised this
nonsense). You testify with a US commission for your political persuasions and
motives? Who else had she talked to and is still talking to? And she LIED even that to that Commission.
The fraud that she is, she claims riots happened in Gujarat only since 1998
when BJP came to power. Any idiot (even a fool like Shekhar Gupta would know)
that Gujarat has a history of riots – the worst being 1969 and 1985 under
Congress rule. This fraudulent liar is who our media Rudaalis claim is a poor
victim?
So I had to ask
myself the question – Why is SG so agitated about a petty thief like Teesta and
political foot-soldier? What is his obsession in whining for her? That reminded
me of an old article I had written on this blog – Commie media’s anti-Hindu poison. I recollected the name STRATFOR because I had quoted an
article by that organisation in that post. Then it struck me why SG’s tampons
are in a twist over this self-confessed petty offender like Teesta. So I posted
this tweet asking the question:
When I first
wrote about Stratfor and SG being the only contact they had in India, it was
written in a different context and a different topic. Now the question that
crosses my mind is in the tweet above – Does
SG too have tampons to hide in his closet? He has never denied his links
with Stratfor. All these agenda-morons who pass for editors often write a lot
of stuff in their short resume in Opeds and articles – “Editor for IE, formerly
with HT, Rhodes scholar, Eminent political observer” and so on. I have never
once seen SG or any media house ever mentioning his being a worker for Stratfor.
Obviously, I have to assume, SG is not a social “worker” (like Teesta?) who
would do things for free for groups like Stratfor. Would he? And now that I
recalled it – this Stratfor is far more sinister it appears. It has links to
CIA, it spied on the Bhopal Gas activists to provide information to Dow Chemicals
for protective measures. All this went on without the knowledge of SG?
Nobody in the
media or the then GOI asked any questions to SG about this sinister
organisation. But why would the Congress ask any questions to SG anyway? After
all, this “wheeler dealer” was “Doctoring & Nursing” the Congress when it was evidently dying. There is
something more alarming in the report that was based on the Wikileaks:
A mix of covert
and overt informants? Makes me assume SG had to be a covert operator since he has
never disclosed it anywhere (till Wikileaks blew the lid) as far as I know and
I am open to correction if someone can provide me such information on his disclosure. And the
operators were being paid via Swiss banks and prepaid credit cards?
Interesting! So let me understand this from some expert – If I get a payment
through a Swiss bank where would that be reflected? If it were me – it would be
reflected in my normal Indian bank account. But here’s another thing –
operators were also paid by “Prepaid
credit cards” – which means it will not be reflected anywhere in any
account of mine. Clever operation; eh? And SG was also ignorant of Hamid Gul of ISI being a member of Stratfor? Extraordinary! You can read the
full article at Hardnews.
Like I said in
my post “Teesta Rudalis”, all those whining for her appear to be worried
investigating her may reveal a lot more on our media pimps who dismiss her
frauds as “petty offences”. In December 2014 Caravan Magazine ran an article on the phenomenal wealth
acquired by SG. Let us assume all that is legitimate – after all SG is an
expert in “accounting” but there are other questions he must answer. What was
his role with Stratfor? Did they pay him? And why is he called a “Wheeler
Dealer” in the Capital? Maybe the GOI should look into all this with a fine
tooth-comb. Deep Throat left us with his wisdom for eternity – “Follow the money”.