Sometimes the awakening is rude.
Sometimes it’s quite violent. That’s the hard truth for hypocrites and liars
who have defended wrong principles all their life. In all the past years our Sickularists have defended Islamic terrorists, Muslim agitators and
rioters with a gallery of reasons. You had the “root cause” theory for terrorism. Then you had the “victimhood” theory for rioters. Even
when it came to freedom of speech or expression they defended the offences by
the Muslims and defended their right not to be offended. In India, their “Sickularism”
meant one should never offend Muslims or their religious beliefs or icons while
they can liberally offend everyone else. Among the greatest battles over free
speech was that between MF Hussain and others. Here’s the classic Sickularist’s
argument from none other than the “Happy-tongue hypocrite” Shashi Tharoor
and I quote from the post:
“It’s the third
issue that is striking. The discussion moves to the M.F. Hussain paintings.
Here’s where our happy-tongue minister reveals his true self. He argues
strongly that it was Hussain’s freedom of expression for which he should not
have faced a backlash. Well, obviously Hussain was so blissfully ignorant that
his controversial paintings would cause friction or offend a whole community.
It needed Mr.Happy-tongue to defend him. But that newspaper editor and the
Danish cartoonist shouldn’t have exercised their free expression rights as they
would have been aware of the consequences. And that’s not all. Tharoor goes on
to state that Hussain paints these Hindu Gods in various forms. That Hussain
had once painted Indira Gandhi as Durga Ma ! Tharoor equates painting Indira
Gandhi as Durga Ma to nude paintings of Hindu Gods. Even a moron can see that
the Indira Gandhi painting would be seen as a compliment rather than an
offence. This is how he misleads international audiences with his happy-tongue
glib talk”.
So you see, when Hussain paints nude
pics of Hindu Gods he is using his freedom of expression which we should admire
but when others use their freedom of expression they should be aware of the “consequences” and desist. Frankly, I don’t
give a damn what Hussain paints or what cartoonists draw and they can paint,
write or draw whatever they want. But it’s the hypocrisy of the Sickularists that
has now been severely shattered by none other than the Islamists themselves.
The ISIS warriors came along and our
Sickularists are finding it hard to defend or explain their actions. It has put them in a hole that they dug for
themselves because the ISIS carries out all its actions in the name of Islam.
So our poor Sickularists aren’t able to say “that’s not Islam or they are not Muslims”. What to do! So some
exemplary morons in our country started on a new venture. They started an
effort to somehow relate ISIS to Hindu practices, entities or icons. They had
to; otherwise the survival of their hypocrite-life was seriously threatened. First
off, let’s look at an Intellectual Moron
(IM) who is now a frequent panellist on NDTV. And that should tell you
everything, doesn’t it? An IM-panellist on NDTV has to qualify as a scumbag
hypocrite. So what’s he say? Here’s trash-can discourse specialist Sudheendra Kulkarni:
The IMs like Kulkarni are so dumb that
they have become incapable of seeing who is really a victim of a crime.
Kulkarni is so idiotic that he brands the beheading of James Foley, an American journalist, as “hate crime”. Such IMs don’t care to think much about events as they
happen. Foley wasn’t executed because he was white or American or Christian.
They may hate them but in Foley’s case the crime was a political act to send a
political message to those who want to stop the ISIS from spreading their
terror further. It doesn’t take Einstein to figure that. And then the IM goes
on to insult the death of Foley by grandly stating that the crime was against Islam. Oops! The
crime wasn’t against Foley, his family or his country but the victim here is the religion of the perpetrator. You have to
wonder how LK Advani, BJP and then
our media nurture such brainless idiots. Of course, Kulkarni is an
IIT-graduate.
What can you say about Kavita Krishnan? First, you have to
wonder how this brainless bimbo got planted in the media. The answer to that is
not very hard. In accordance with the Commie policies of the Congress and its
clones they created a practice through which they would “plant” panellists in the media. People like Krishnan and Kulkarni
were born from that practice. Need more such examples? You have people like Tehseen Poonawalla who was the secret
ace up the Congress sleeve. Tehseen
represents everything intelligent about the Congress. Anyway, so this
Kavita Krishnan was too dumbfounded to find any answers to the ISIS actions and
brutality. So she equates ISIS to RSS. You can picture it clearly. Those RSS
guys running around with knives, swords and guns killing Muslims, Christians,
Jews, Parsis, Sikhs, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Buddhists, Animists, Scientologists!
Any community left? What Hema Malini was to Bollywood movies, Kavita Krishnan
is to hate-mongering and hypocrisy. She’s
the Sickular “Dream Girl” who dreams all these sequences of RSS doing stuff
like ISIS in her dreams. You could say I hold KK in extreme contempt but
what happens when this bimbo can’t sell her stupidity to someone who “loves her and hates RSS”? Here’s what:
Stupidity born out of extreme hatred for
Hindus and Hindu culture is hard to hide beyond a point. Like I said at the
beginning, KK has fallen into the hole she dug herself. The best is yet to
come. The permanent Hindu-hater, sponsored by Congress and CPM, who made her
career out of lies, hate-mongering, fake affidavits, dining and wining with the
money meant for victims of communal violence topped all of the previous morons.
Teesta Setalvad should be in jail
for her crimes and I estimate she will end up in one sooner or later. What do
you know; she could well be the first Padma Shri in prison. And instead of
merely her prison number ID, the warden may have to address her as “Padma Shri 420”. Here’s what Teesta
came up with:
So Teesta, like the previous
hate-mongering hypocrites, simply didn’t know how to defend the actions of
ISIS. She comes up with a classic comparison to the Hindu deity Kaali who slays
evil demons. The guy in the bottom left pic is, according to Teesta, Lord
Krishna in the desert using his “Sudarshan chakra”. Naturally, the question
many people were asking her is why she couldn’t draw a comparison with the
Prophet himself? You see, that’s the problem. That it is okay to offend Hindus and their religion (even without
knowing what the deities symbolise) and equate them to the ISIS terrorists when
the mass crimes are by Islamists themselves. The best part was Teesta told the
world that the image “was still to be
worked upon” and was put up in haste:
Well scumbagini, maybe you should have
taken some more time and worked it to perfection. Maybe you could have shown
Lord Krishna landing in the Middle-east and slaughtering Jews, Yazidis and
Non-Muslims. That would have been a thrill for you. No? I am sure there will be
many FIRs against her although she deleted the tweet and the pic. That doesn’t matter.
What does matter is that all these folks have nurtured a deep-rooted hatred for
Hindus and Hindu culture. Our media
gives them prominent space to rant against Hindus and their practices. Whether
Teesta offends me or not is irrelevant but she
did break a law. And it’s this selective demand for punishment that makes
people like Rajdeep or Barkha criminal hypocrites.
Teesta apologised and withdrew her pic
and message and Rajdeep tweeted that was enough to close the matter. Had the
case been the reverse of a Hindu public figure or editor who offended Muslims with
an article or statement you can rest assured it would be debated in the media for a week. His or her office
would be destroyed by now and s/he would be attacked violently. From Azad Maidan
to Saharanpur and Meerut these media and activist hypocrites have been covering
up crimes of the Muslims. The ISIS dealt such a severe blow to them that they
left them no place to hide. Even the Indonesian president had to come out strongly against the ISIS. He stated that the
ISIS is an embarrassment to Muslims. One would think it’s much worse than mere
embarrassment. The chant of “religion of
peace” was shattered long back but the ISIS made it extremely difficult to
defend that position. I think Tarek
Fateh, regular writer and observer of Jihadi elements, described it all
with a fascinating term:
Although Tarek’s response was to another
person in a similar context of Islamic violence his term describes Sudheendra
Kulkarni, Kavita Krishnan, Teesta Setalvad and their promoters like Barkha
Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Arnab Goswami & Co. That “Jihadi Botox” cannot hide their hatred and prejudices any longer.
Their ugly faces have been shown up by the ISIS in the most devastating way.