This site was created to expose the criminalities of the MSM and over the years it has done so adequately. But since 2019, the focus is not so much on the defeated media but on the anti-Hindu forces. MediaCrooks has also never criticized online magazines whether RW, LW or Centrist because online magazines, even if their opinions are often jarring, struggle hard to survive in India. But when a magazine like “Swarajya” starts abusing Hindus merely for holding opinions not convenient to them, then it’s fair game to trash these bootlickers of BJP.
For a brief history, Swarajya is the product of the erstwhile failed CRI (Centre Right India) website that took over the defunct magazine. Whether as CRI or now as Swarajya, their impact on public discourse has been negligible. This is despite the fact that two of their senior operators, R. Jagannathan and Prasanna Vishwanathan, were bestowed with an interview by PM Modi. That kind of privilege is not extended to most MSM in India but Swarajya was gifted that interview by virtue of being BJP janitors. All that is background music. What is now bugging these bootlickers is that many Hindus didn’t react positively to the moronic DNA comment by RSS Chief Dr. Mohan Bhagwat.
Bhagwat’s statement that “Hindus and Muslims had the same DNA” was a moronic comment and most of the responses were a trashing and should have been left there. But NO! The morons of Swarajya, through a writer called Arvind Neelakandan (AN), decided they must defend Bhagwat and trash the rebels. And Swarajya does so by abusing them with “classy” adjectives mostly used by losers. So, they wrote a grand article full of gobar and nonsense called “Mohan Bhagwat’s common DNA is more Hindutva”:
How that stupid comment becomes “Hindutva” is a mystery to me but let’s keep that aside. First, let’s get past this DNA stuff and some technical aspects of it. I am not a scientist, so the simple definition of DNA I follow is that it’s a set of molecules that wraps around each other like a double-helix with instructions for the development, functioning, growth and reproduction of all known organisms. No two individuals have the same DNA. It is unique. Even identical twins rarely have the same DNA. The use of DNA gained fame through its use in a criminal case in 1986 by Sir Alec Jeffreys. In that case a man accused of double rape and murder was exonerated as his DNA did not match with the samples collected from the victims.
A person gets half his DNA from each parent. So, a DNA test can determine who the person’s parent(s) is or even his ancestors. India used DNA to prove a man was indeed ND Tiwari’s illegitimate son he had disowned. Since most Muslims in India are converts from Hinduism, thus Bhagwat’s claim that Hindu and Muslims figuratively have the same DNA. Technically, that is not true. There are thousands of Hindu women raped or married by Mughal invaders or were made part of their harems. The invaders were not original Hindus. Therefore, the DNA of their legal or illegal children may not be fully that of a Hindu. However, Bhagwat obviously used it figuratively or as a metaphor to suggest converted Muslims and existing Hindus came from the same origins. But there is trickery and fraud to the statement.
Since centuries, Muslims have claimed a separate culture different from Hindus and Hindus mostly continue to retain their traditions and customs. The two are often in conflict. There have been violent clashes throughout history with Muslims trying to assert their superiority over Hindu religion and culture. Bhagwat is foolish to ignore all this and suggest that Hindus and Muslims share a common culture because of their origins with his stupid DNA comment. This is what the Hindus trashing Bhagwat are arguing while Swarajya trashes them all and grandly claims it’s Hindutva to claim common DNA. No, Bhagwat would be scientifically wrong in claiming common DNA and figuratively wrong in claiming a common culture. Hindus have nothing in common with Muslims from dressing to eating and education. The only thing common is that Muslims still live in the same country.
The whole idea now of RSS, Bhagwat and PM Modi is to wipe out Hindu identity and merge it with a “Composite” idea of Indian which includes many communities of Hindus and the Muslims but excludes the upper caste Hindus (like Brahmins and Kshatriyas etc). This is the trickery and fraud that RSS and BJP are pulling on Hindus. And that is why Hindu festivals are being trashed and banned. Hindu Gods are being manipulated to unusual forms not Hindu at all. That is why conversion of Hindus to Islam or Christianity is gleefully allowed by Modi, BJP and the RSS with no attention to many crimes associated with it. RSS jerks like Ratan Sharda claim that this trashing of Bhagwat’s comment or other moronic statements is because people are not “Well read enough”. Such is the laughable arrogance of Sharda and also the jerks at Swarajya:
In reality, RSS guys, including their top management, are mostly low-intellect guys. They are extremely inarticulate in their speeches and in nearly 75 years post-Independence haven’t been to stand for any of their loudmouth agenda. They first shouted a lot about “Hindu Rashtra” with no clarity on how to define it. They are not clear whether to eat cows or ban cow slaughter. And blabbermouth Bhagwat doesn’t hesitate to call Ram “Imam-e-Hind” because some Muslim said so. In short, these jokers of RSS neither understand Hindus nor Muslims and their sentiment. In his article AN complains of the Dasana Mahant Narsinghanand:
If you are so confident what Bhagwat said stands for Hindutva why should you bother what Narsinghanand said from some corner of UP? You idiots have the right to trash the sentiments of millions of Hindus but you are rattled by Narsinghanand? Who is in fear and who hides behind the bravado of “Hindutva” for a moronic DNA comment? The bootlicker doesn’t stop there. He goes on to abuse those who opposed, trashed or mocked Bhagwat:
None of those opposing Bhagwat’s comment are doing so because of what Sitaram Goel or Koenrad Elst said now or in the past. There is no data but I can assure you half of the people that AN grandly calls “Keyboard warriors” or “Anglophone Hindus” would not be deeply into reading the works of Goel or Elst. It should be easy for educated idiots of Swarajya to understand that you don’t have to be educated even to be PM of India. The language that AN uses is the same as that of the brainless Bhajan Mandli of Modi: Keyboard warriors, Anglophone Hindus. He forgot to add “English speaking fake Hindus sitting in AC rooms with a laptop” as the morons often claim when someone trashes their hero or RSS. This comment under the Swarajya article itself is enough to educate both Aravind and the other gooches at Swarajya on how common sense is all it takes to explain the real Hindu-Muslim situation historically with relevance to the present:
The strengths of RSS are largely over-estimated. It is just an organisation of workers and their management is just like leaders of a trade union. The public generally doesn’t comment on RSS or their internal working unless someone like Bhagwat makes some stupid comment in public. Nobody cares. Their cadres have strength in disaster relief and ground work in elections but that alone hasn’t ensured electoral victories everywhere. The victories of Modi or BJP cannot be all attributed to RSS. It is partly also due to the total failure of Opposition and the corrupt Congress and contempt for the Chinese Gandhis. However, no political situation is ever permanent. The BJP and Modi are now at their lowest ebb. A few more blunders and they will taste more Bengals. So, it would be in their best interest to shed their arrogance and their janitors like Swarajya to stick to bootlicking instead of lecturing Hindus or lecturing about Hindutva.
Subscribe To EducatingForward / Buy The EF Handbook